Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 21:3 (2022) ► pp.484–504

The rise of the new Polish far-right

An analysis of Grzegorz Braun’s discursive strategies

ORCID logo | University of Warsaw
While much research has been done regarding right-wing discourse in modern Europe, the literature of Polish far-right discourse is still insufficient. The present paper discusses the discursive strategies of Grzegorz Braun, one of the leaders of Confederation Liberty and Independence, which were implemented by the politician during the 2019 Gdańsk mayoral campaign. In order to provide a comprehensive analysis of Braun’s discourse, audiovisual materials were included in the study. The findings show that Braun employs positive presentation of the Catholic Church and himself, and negative presentation of his opponents (LGBT activists, immigrants, the European Union, the elites), whom Braun considers to be in an alliance against Poland and its core values under the name of the “Gdańsk Pact”.
Keywords: Confederation Liberty and Independence, Grzegorz Braun, legitimation, multimodal discourse analysis, right-wing discourse
Article outline
  • 1.Modern right-wing discourse in Europe and Poland
  • 2.Grzegorz Braun and his activity on the Polish political scene
  • 3.Discourse historical approach
  • 4.Multimodal discourse analysis
  • 5.Dataset
  • 6.Analysis of the materials
    • 6.1Grzegorz Braun’s ad
      • 6.1.1Multimodal resources
        • Modal hierarchy and affordances
        • Cultural contexts
        • Contextual demands and temporal features
      • 6.1.2Pragma-strategic level
        • General strategy
        • Macro-speech act
        • Topic selection
        • Supporting internal coherence
        • Foregrounding/backgrounding
        • Deixis
        • Rhetorical features
        • Emotional coercion
      • 6.1.3Justificatory schema
      • 6.1.4Legitimation as a quality
      • 6.1.5Legitimation as a process
      • 6.1.6Discourse-historical moral evaluation
    • 6.2The Gdańsk Pact bulletin and the interview with Grzegorz Braun
      • 6.2.1LGBT activists
      • 6.2.2Immigrants and refugees
      • 6.2.3The Gdańsk Pact and the elites
  • 7.Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 13 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20063.kos
References (49)
References
Adami, Elisabetta. 2016. “Multimodality”. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Society, ed. by Ofelia García, Nelson Flores, and Massimiliano Spotti, 451–472. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan., and Chris Bulcean. 2000. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology 291: 447–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caramani, Daniele, and Luca Manucci. 2019. “National Past and Populism: The Re-Elaboration of Fascism and Its Impact on Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe.” West European Politics 42 (6): 1159–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castelli Gattinara, Pietro, and Andrea L. P. Pirro. 2019. “The far right as social movement.” European Societies 21 (4): 447–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaidas, Dimitrios. 2018a. “The Benefits of Narratology in the Analysis of Multimodal Legitimation: The Case of New Democracy.” Discourse & Communication 12 (3): 258–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018b. “Legitimation strategies in the Greek paradigm: A comparative analysis of Syriza and New Democracy.” Language & Communication 601: 136–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheles, Luciano. 2010. “Back to the Future. The Visual Propaganda of Alleanza Nazionale (1994–2009).” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 15 (2): 232–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chołuj, Bożena. 2021. “Gender und LGTBQ: Unbekannte Begriffe als Machtinstrumente in Polen [Gender and LGTBQ: Unknown Terms as Instruments of Power in Poland]” In Anti-Genderismus in Europa Allianzen von Rechtspopulismus und religiösem Fundamentalismus. Mobilisierung – Vernetzung – Transformation, ed. by Sonja A. Strube, Rita Perintfalvi, Raphaela Hemet, Miriam Metze, and Cicek Sahbaz, 147–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danero Iglesias, Julien. 2015. “An Ad Hoc Nation.” East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures 29 (4): 850–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demata, Massimiliano. 2017. “‘A Great and Beautiful Wall.’” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5 (2): 274–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dijk, Teun A. van. 1993. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society 4 (2): 249–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. “Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Japanese Disourse 1 (1): 17–27.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Discourse and manipulation.” Discourse & Society 17 (3): 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse Textual analysis for social research. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 258–284. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
“Grzegorz Braun szczerze o ‘układzie gdańskim’ i... Arce Gdynia! [Grzegorz Braun honest about the Gdańsk Pact and… Arka Gdynia!].” Available online: [URL]
“Grzegorz Braun: Stworzyłem gdańszczanom możliwość wyboru [Grzegorz Braun: I created the residents of Gdańsk a possibility of choice].” 14 February 2019. Available online: [URL]
Hameleers, Michael, Linda Bos, and Claes H. de Vreese. 2017. “‘They Did It’: The Effects of Emotionalized Blame Attribution in Populist Communication.” Communication Research 44 (6): 870–900. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Kristof, and Niels Spierings. 2019. “A Populist Paradise? Examining Populists’ Twitter Adoption and Use.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (12): 1681–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid. 2015. Discourse, Identity and Legitimacy: Self and Other in representations of Iran’s nuclear programme. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreis, Ramona. 2017. “#refugeesnotwelcome: Anti-Refugee Discourse on Twitter.” Discourse & Communication 11 (5): 498–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 2009. “What is Mode?” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, ed. by Carey Jewitt, 54–67. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2010. The Discursive Construction of European Identities. A Multi-Level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2013. “From Anti-Immigration and Nationalist Revisionism to Islamophobia: continuities and shifts in recent discourses and patterns of political communication of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ).” In Right-Wing Populism in Europe. Politics and Discourse, ed. by Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik, and Brigitte Mral, 135–148. Bloomsbury: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Discursive Shifts in Ethno-Nationalist Politics: On Politicization and Mediatization of the “Refugee Crisis” in Poland.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16 (1–2): 76–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Discursive shifts and the normalisation of racism: imaginaries of immigration, moral panics and the discourse of contemporary right-wing populism.” Social Semiotics 30 (4): 503–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowska, Natalia, and Michał Krzyżanowski. 2018. “ Crisis and Migration in Poland: Discursive Shifts, Anti-Pluralism and the Politicisation of Exclusion.” Sociology 52 (3): 612–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeuwen, Theo van. 2007. “Legitimation in discourse and communication.” Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipiński, Artur, and Agnieszka Stępińska. 2019. “Polish Right-Wing Populism in the Era of Social Media: The Unexpected Careers of Paweł Kukiz and Janusz Korwin-Mikke.” Problems of Post-Communism 66 (1): 71–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackay, Rowan R. 2013. “Legitimation by Multimodal Means: A Theoretical and Analytical Enquiry with Specific Reference to American Political Spot Advertisements.” PhD diss., University of Edinburgh.
2015. “Multimodal legitimation: Selling Scottish independence.” Discourse & Society 26 (3): 323–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markowski, Radoslaw. 2020. “Plurality Support for Democratic Decay: The 2019 Polish Parliamentary Election.” West European Politics, February, 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Michael. 2001. “Between Theory, Method, and Politics: Positioning of the Approaches to CDA.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Michael Meyer, and Ruth Wodak, 14–31. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Mertes, Michael. 2018. “The Autumn of Our Discontent: Germany Facing Populism.” Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs 12 (1): 11–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, Sigrid. 2015. Multimodality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norocel, Ov Cristian, and Gabriella Szabó. 2019. “Special Issue: Mapping the Discursive Opportunities for Radical-Right Populist Politics across Eastern Europe.” Problems of Post-Communism 66(1): 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norocel, Ov Cristian, Gabriella Szabó, and Márton Bene. 2019. “Media Visibility and Inclusion of Radical Right Populism in Hungary and Romania: A Discursive Opportunity Approach.” Problems of Post-Communism 66(3), 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pędziwiatr, Konrad. 2016. “Islamophobia in Poland. National report 2016.” In European Islamophobia Report, ed. by Enes Bayraklı, and Farid Hafez, 411–443. Ankara: SETA.Google Scholar
Pond, Philip, and Jeff Lewis. 2019. “Riots and Twitter: Connective Politics, Social Media and Framing Discourses in the Digital Public Sphere.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (2): 213–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Ant-Semitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2009. “The discourse-historical approach (DHA).” In Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis. Second Edition, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Rensmann, Lars. 2017. “The Noisy Counter-Revolution: Understanding the Cultural Conditions and Dynamics of Populist Politics in Europe in the Digital Age.” Politics and Governance 51: 123–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, John, and Monica Colombo. 2013. “Continuity and Change in Anti-Immigrant Discourse in Italy.” Journal of Language and Politics 12 (2): 180–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
“Układ gdański [The Gdańsk Pact].” Available online: [URL]
Wodak, Ruth. 2002. “Aspects of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 361: 5–31.Google Scholar
. 2011. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 2015. The Politics of Fear. What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “ We have the character of an island nation. A discourse-historical analysis of David Cameron’s “Bloomberg speech” on the European Union”. In Doing Politics: Discursivity, performativity and mediation in political discourse, ed. Michael Kranert, and Geraldine Horan, 27–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zhao, Sumin, Emilia Djonov, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2014. “Semiotic technology and practice: a multimodal social semiotic approach to PowerPoint.” Text & Talk 34 (3): 349–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Kosman, Marcin
2024. Framing the Polish-Belarusian Border in 2021. The Case of Public Service Television (TVP). Problems of Post-Communism ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kosman, Marcin
2024. Sanitary segregation imposed by Big Brother – a Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis of Grzegorz Braun’s radical anti-vaccine rhetoric. Journal of Contemporary European Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kosman, Marcin
2024. Strategie (de)legitymizacyjne kandydatów w wyborach na prezydenta Rzeszowa w 2021 roku. Analiza korpusowa wpisów na Twitterze. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 20:1 ► pp. 124 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.