Cover not available
Article published In:
Discourse Theory: Ways forward for theory development and research practice
Edited by Benjamin De Cleen, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, Yannis Stavrakakis and Ilija Tomanić Trivundža
[Journal of Language and Politics 20:1] 2021
► pp. 22–46

Moving discourse theory forward

A five-track proposal for future research

ORCID logo | Vrije Universiteit Brussel
| Vrije Universiteit Brussel
| Charles University
| University of Essex
| Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
This article assesses the current state of play of the poststructuralist and post-Marxist discourse theory associated with Laclau and Mouffe and the ‘Essex school’, and identifies ways forward at the level of theory development, research practice and critique. The article starts by disentangling the different meanings of the notion of ‘discourse’ in ‘discourse theory’, clarifying the specificities of discourse theory as a theoretical and analytical framework and situating discourse theory in, but also beyond, critical discourse studies. It then moves to an assessment of the current state of discourse theory, its main contributions, and the identification of shortcomings and ways forward. This discussion is organized around five topics: methodology and the theory-analysis dialectic; the logics approach; the discursive-material relation; the role of fantasy and other psychoanalytic categories; and populism.
Keywords: discourse theory, discourse analysis, discourse, Ernesto Laclau, Chantal Mouffe, poststructuralism, populism, psychoanalysis, discursive-material
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.On the meanings of discourse in discourse theory
    • 2.1A discursive perspective: Discourse as an ontological category (level 1)
    • 2.2Discourses as relational structures of meaning (level 2)
    • 2.3Texts and the embodiment of discourses (level 3)
  • 3.From theory to method and back again
  • 4.Social, political and fantasmatic logics
  • 5.The discursive and the material
  • 6.Fantasy, identification, psychoanalysis
  • 7.Populism and beyond
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20076.dec
References (114)
References
Arditi, Benjamin. 2007. Politics on the Edges of Liberalism: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Anastasiou, Michaelangelo. 2019. “Of Nation and People: The Discursive Logic of Nationalist Populism.” Javnost – The Public 26 (3): 330–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Niels A. 2003. Discursive analytical strategies. Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Bristol: The Policy Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bal, P. Matthijs, and Edina Dóci. 2018. “Neoliberal ideology in work and organizational psychology.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 27 (5): 536–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Tom, and Nicolina Montesano Montessori. 2021. “Towards Webs of Equivalence and the Political Nomad in Agonistic Debate: Contributions from CDA and Scales theory.” Journal of Language and Politics 20 (1).Google Scholar
Beasley-Murray, Jon. 2006. “Book Review: Ernesto Laclau’s On Populist Reason and Franciso Panizza’s Populism and the Mirror of Democracy.” Contemporary Political Theory 5 (3): 362–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behagel, Jelle, and Ayşem Mert. 2021. “The Political Nature of Fantasy and Political Fantasies of Nature.” Journal of Language and Politics 20 (1).Google Scholar
Borriello, Arthur, and Anton Jäger. 2020. “Left-Populism on Trial: Laclauian Politics in Theory and Practice.” Theory & Event 23 (3): 740–764. [URL]
Breeze, Ruth. 2018. “Positioning “the people” and its Enemies: Populism and Nationalism in AfD and UKIP.” Javnost – The Public 26 (1): 89–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carpentier, Nico. 2010. “Deploying discourse theory. An introduction to discourse theory and discourse theoretical analysis.” Media and Communication Studies Interventions, edited by Nico Carpentier et al., 251–266. Tartu: Tartu University Press.Google Scholar
. 2017. The Discursive-Material Knot. Cyprus in Conflict and Community Media Participation. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2019. “Enriching Discourse Theory. The Discursive-Material Knot as a Non-Hierarchical Ontology.” Global Discourse, 9 (2): 369–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “Doing justice to the agential material: A reflection on a non-hierarchical repositioning of the discursive and the material.” Journal of Language and Politics 20 (1).Google Scholar
Carpentier, Nico, and Benjamin De Cleen. 2007. “Bringing discourse theory into media studies: the applicability of discourse theoretical analysis (DTA) for the study of media practices and discourses.” Journal of language and politics 6 (2): 265–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carpentier, Nico, Benjamin De Cleen, and Leen Van Brussel. 2019. “Introduction: Discourse Theory, Media and Communication, and the Work of the Brussels Discourse Theory Group.” In Communication and Discourse Theory, edited by Leen Van Brussel, Nico Carpentier, and Benjamin De Cleen, 1–31. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
Chen, Yiming. 2020. The Construction of the Professional Identity of the TV News Presenter in Two Chinese News Programmes: A Discourse-Theoretical Study. PhD Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Uppsala University, [URL]
Cossarini, Paolo and Fernando Vellaspin, eds. 2019. Populism and Passions: Democratic Legitimacy after Austerity. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csigó, Péter. 2016. The Neo-popular Bubble. Speculating on the People in Late Modernity. Budapest: CEU Press.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Lincoln, and Sean Phelan, eds. 2011. Discourse Theory and Critical Media Politics. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cleen, Benjamin. 2012. The Rhetoric of the Flemish Populist Radical Right Party Vlaams Blok / Belang in a Context of Discursive Struggle: a Discourse-theoretical Analysis. Unpublished PhD thesis. Brussel: Vrije Universiteit Brussel.Google Scholar
. 2019. “The populist political logic and the analysis of the discursive construction of ‘the people’ and ‘the elite’.” In Imagining the Peoples of Europe. Populist discourses across the political spectrum, edited by Jan Zienkowski & Ruth Breeze, 19–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cleen, Benjamin, and Jason Glynos. 2021. “Beyond Populism Studies.” Journal of Language and Politics 20 (1).Google Scholar
De Cleen, Benjamin, Jason Glynos, and Aurelien Mondon. 2021. “Populist Politics and the Politics of “Populism”: The Radical Right in Western Europe.” in Populism in Global Perspective. A Performatived and Discursive Approach, edited by Pierre Ostiguy, Francisco Panizza, and Benjamin Moffitt. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dean, Jonathan, and Bice Maiguashca. 2020. “Did Somebody Say Populism? Towards a Renewal and Reorientation of populism studies.” Journal of Political Ideologies 25 (1): 11–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demata, Massimiliano, Michelangelo Conoscenti, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2020. “Riding the Populist Wave: Metaphors of Populism and Anti-Populism in the Daily Mail and The Guardian .” Iperstoria 151: 8–35.Google Scholar
Eberle, Jakub. 2019. Discourse and Affect in Foreign Policy. Germany and the Iraq War. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eklundh, Emmy. 2019. Emotions, Protest, Democracy. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escobar, Arturo. 1999. “After Nature: Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology.” Current Anthropology 40 (1): 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, Alan. 2007. “From Beliefs to Arguments: Interpretive Methodology and Rhetorical Political Analysis.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9 (4): 545–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flintoff, Adam, Ewen Speed, and Susan J. McPherson. 2019. “Risk assessment practice within primary mental health care: A logics perspective.” Health 23 (6): 656–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 2021. “Discourse, Concepts, Ideologies: Pausing for Thought.” Journal of Language and Politics 20 (1).Google Scholar
Galanopoulos, Antonis, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2019. “Populism, Anti-populism and Post-truth in Crisis-ridden Greece.” POPULISMUS working papers 101. [URL]
Gibson-Graham, Julie Katherine. 2006. A Postcapitalist Politics. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Glasze, Georg. (2007). Vorschläge zur Operationalisierung der Diskurstheorie von Laclau und Mouffe in einer Triangulation von lexikometrischen und interpretativen Methoden. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung 8 (2).Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason. 2011. “Fantasy and identity in critical political theory.” Filozofski vestnik 32 (2): 65–88.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Body, Discourse, and the Turn to Matter.” In Language, Ideology, and the Human: New Interventions, edited by Sanja Bahun, and Dusan Radunovic, 173–192. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Hating Government and Voting Against One’s Interests: Self-Transgression, Enjoyment, Critique.” Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 19 (2): 179–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “Critical Fantasy Studies.” Journal of Language and Politics 20 (1).Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth. 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political theory. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynos, Jason, David Howarth, Aletta Norval, and Ewen Speed. 2009. Discourse analysis: Varieties and methods. NCRM.Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason, David Howarth, Ryan Flitcroft, Craig Love, Kostis Roussos, and Jimena Vazquez. 2021. “Logics, Discourse Theory and Methods: Advances, Challenges and Ways Forward.” Journal of Language and Politics 20 (1).Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason, and Aurelien Mondon. 2019. “The political logic of populist hype: The case of right wing’s populism’s ‘meteoric rise’ and its relation to the status quo.” In Populism and Passions: Democratic Legitimacy after Austerity, edited by Paolo Cossarini, and Fernando Vellaspin, 82–101. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goyvaerts, Jana, and Benjamin De Cleen. 2020. “Media, Anti-Populist Discourse and the Dynamics of the Populism Debate.” In Perspectives on Populism and the Media, edited by Benjamin Krämer, and Christina Holtz-Bacha, 83–108. Baden-Baden: Nomos. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardy, Cynthia, and Robyn Thomas. 2015. “Discourse in a Material World.” Journal of Management Studies 52 (5): 680–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinshelwood, Robert, and Wilhelm Skogstad. 2000. Observing Organizations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoedemaekers, Casper. 2018. “Creative Work and Affect: Social, Political and Fantasmatic Dynamics in the Labour of Musicians.” Human Relations 71 (10): 1348–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hollway, Wendy, and Tony Jefferson. 2000. Doing Qualitative Research Differently. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hook, Derek. 2007. Foucault, Psychology and the Analytics of Power. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howarth, David. 1998. “Discourse theory and political analysis.” In Research strategies in the social sciences, edited by Elinor Scarbrough, and Eric Tanenbaum, 268–293. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Discourse. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Applying discourse theory: The method of articulation.” In Discourse Theory in European Politics, edited by David Howarth, and Jakob Torfing, 316–350. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howarth, David, and Jakob Torfing, eds. 2005. Discourse Theory in European Politics. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howarth, David, Aletta Norval, and Yannis Stavrakakis, eds. 2000. Discourse theory and political analysis. Identities, hegemonies and social change. Manchester & New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Thomas, and Robin Tschötschel. 2019. “Topic models meet discourse analysis: a quantitative tool for a qualitative approach.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 22 (5): 469–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Anton. 2017. “The semantic drift: Images of populism in post-war American historiography and their relevance for (European) political science.” Constellations 24 (3): 310–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, Marianne W., and Louise J. Phillips. 2002. Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karakatsanis, Leonidas. 2014. Turkish-Greek relations: Rapprochement, civil society and the politics of friendship. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karavasilis, Lazaros. 2017. “Perceptions of ‘Populism’ and ‘Anti-populism’ in Greek Public Discourse during the Crisis: The case of the website ‘Anti-news’.” Politik 20 (4): 58–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katsambekis, Giorgos. 2017. “The Populist Surge in Post-Democratic Times: Theoretical and Political Challenges.” The Political Quarterly 88 (2): 202–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1999 [1989]. “Politics and the limits of modernity.” In: Postmodernism: a reader, edited by Thomas Docherty, 329–343. Harvester: Wheathsheaf.Google Scholar
. 1990. New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.Google Scholar
. 1991. “Intellectual Strategies; Memorandum to PhD Students in the IDA Programme.” Essex University Downloaded from [URL]
. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
. n.d. “The Philosophical Roots of Discourse Theory.” the University of Essex Centre for Theoretical Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Online Paper. Downloaded from [URL]
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
. 1987. “Post-Marxism Without Apologies”. New Left Review 1661: 79–106.Google Scholar
Lapping, Claudia. 2011. Psychoanalysis in Social Research. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, Moran. 2020. “Making Our Country Great Again: The Politics of Subjectivity in an Age of National-Populism”. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 331: 451–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchart, Oliver. 2018. Thinking Antagonism: Political Ontology After Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, James. 2016. “Capturing Desire: Rhetorical Strategies and the Affectivity of Discourse.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18 (1): 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marttila, Tomas. 2015. Post-Foundational Discourse Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mazzolini, Samuele. 2020. “Populism Is not Hegemony: Towards a Re-Gramscianization of Ernesto Laclau.” Theory & Event 23 (3): 765–786. [URL]
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2015. “How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism.” Government and Opposition 50 (2): 189–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. London: Verso.Google Scholar
. 2000. The democratic paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
. 2005. On the Political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nabers, Dirk. 2015. A Poststructuralist Discourse Theory of Global Politics. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikisianis, Nikos, Thomas Siomos, Yannis Stavrakakis, Titika Dimitroulia, and Grigoris Markou. 2019. “Populism Versus Anti-populism in the Greek Press: Post-Structuralist Discourse Theory Meets Corpus Linguistics.” In Discourse, Culture and Organization: Inquiries into Relational Structures of Power, edited by Tomas Marttila, 267–295. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nonhoff, Martin. 2007. “Hegemonic Analysis: on The Recent Development of Political Discourse Analysis in the Political Sciences.” Langage et société 120 (2): 77–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norval, Aletta. 2000. “Trajectories of future research in discourse theory.” In Discourse Theory and Political Analysis. Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change, edited by David Howarth, Aletta Norval, and Yannis Stavrakakis, 219–236. Manchester & New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Nymalm, Nicola. 2013. “The End of the ‘Liberal Theory of History’? Dissecting the US Congress’ Discourse on China’s Currency Policy.” International Political Sociology 7 (4): 388–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ostiguy, Pierre. 2009. “The High-Low Political Divide. Rethinking Populism and Anti-Populism.” Kellogg Institute Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series 360. Downloaded from [URL]
Ronderos, Sebastian. 2020. “Hysteria in the Squares: Approaching Populism from a Perspective of Desire”. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roussos, Konstantinos. 2019. “Grassroots collective action within and beyond institutional and state solutions: the (re-)politicization of everyday life in crisis-ridden Greece.” Social Movements Studies 18 (3): 265–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salter, Leon. 2016. “Populism as a fantasmatic rupture in the post-political order” Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online 11 (2): 116–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shepard, Paul. 1996. The Others: How Animals Made Us Human. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
Sjolander, Annika Egan and Jenny Gunnarsson Payne (eds.) 2011. Tracking Discourses: Politics, Identity and Social Change. Chicago: Nordic Academic Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Anna Marie. 1998. Laclau and Mouffe. The Radical Democratic Imaginary. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis. 1999. Lacan and the Political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Antinomies of formalism: Laclau’s theory of populism and the lessons from religious populism in Greece.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 253–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The Lacanian Left. Albany: SUNY Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, ed. 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Psychoanalytic Political Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2021. “The (discursive) limits of (left) populism.” Journal of Language and Politics 20 (1).Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis, Ioannis Andreadis, and Giorgos Katsambekis. 2017a. “A new populism index at work: identifying populist candidates and parties in the contemporary Greek context.” European Politics and Society 18 (4): 446–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis, Giorgos Katsambekis, Nikos Nikisianis, Alexandros Kioupkiolis, and Thomas Siomos. 2017b. “Extreme right-wing populism in Europe: revisiting a reified association.” Critical Discourse Studies 14 (4): 420–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomassen, Lasse. 2008. “Methods and philosophy of social science for discourse theory.” Journal of Power 1 (2): 217–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Mark, and Hugh Willmott. 2016. “The social potency of affect: Identification and power in the immanent structuring of practice.” Human Relations 69 (2): 483–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomanić Trivundža, Ilija, and Andreja Vezovnik. 2021. ““Symbolic Photographs” as Floating and Empty Signifiers: Iconic Transformation of News Photography.” Journal of Language and Politics 20 (1).Google Scholar
Topper, Keith. 2010. “Book in Review: Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory.” Political Theory 38 (5): 731–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torfing, Jacob. 1999. New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Discourse theory: Achievements, arguments, and challenges.” In Discourse Theory in European Politics, edited by David Howarth, and Jacob Torfing, 1–32. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Brussel, Leen. 2018. “The right to die: a Belgian case study combining reception studies and discourse theory.” Media, Culture and Society 40 (3): 381–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Brussel, Leen, Nico Carpentier, and Benjamin De Cleen, eds. 2019. Communication and Discourse Theory. Collected Works of the Brussels Discourse Theory Group. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
West, Karen. 2011. “Articulating discursive and materialist conceptions of practice in the logics approach to critical policy analysis.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (4): 414–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear. Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michał Krzyżanowski. 2017. “Right-wing populism in Europe & USA: Contesting politics & discourse beyond ‘Orbanism’ and ‘Trumpism’.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 471–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zicman de Barros, Thomas. 2019. “Identity, Enjoyment and the Democratic Potentialities of Populism”. In Une Nouvelle Lecture du Populisme: Psychanalyse et Politique, edited by Christian Hoffmann, and Joel Birman, 79–115. Paris: Langage.Google Scholar
. 2020. “Desire and collective Identities: Decomposing Ernesto Laclau’s notion of demand” Constellations 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zienkowksi, Jan and Ruth Breeze. 2019. Imagining the Peoples of Europe: Populist Discourses Across the Political Spectrum. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (18)

Cited by 18 other publications

Brown, Katy
2024. New opportunities for discourse studies. Journal of Language and Politics 23:4 ► pp. 473 ff. DOI logo
Brown, Katy & George Newth
2024. ‘Post-fascism’, or how the far right talks about itself: the 2022 Italian election campaign as a case study. Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
McMillan, Chris
2024. Inclusivity, diversity, and the absent presence of class: a logics approach to England and Wales cricket Board (ECB) policy discourse. Sport in Society ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Trif, Dana S.
2024. Negotiating ‘access’ to the international ‘rules-based order’: Taiwan’s South China Sea policy. The Pacific Review 37:3 ► pp. 634 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Yishu, Yuexing Tang & Luchen Zhang
2024. Exploring the connotation of “Local Community” in ICOMOS discourse: a textual analysis based on authoritative documents. Heritage Science 12:1 DOI logo
Bal, Matthijs, Andy Brookes, Dieu Hack-Polay, Maria Kordowicz & John Mendy
2023. Theoretical Foundation: A Multidisciplinary Review of Absurdity and Hypernormalization. In The Absurd Workplace, ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
de Groot Heupner, Susan & Halim Rane
2023. Co-constructing ‘the’ Ummah: the mutual relations of (populist) far right and islamist politics. The Journal of International Communication 29:1 ► pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
Ronderos, Sebastián & Jason Glynos
2023.  Anti-populist fantasies: interrogating Veja 's discursive constructions, from Lula to Bolsonaro . Critical Discourse Studies 20:6 ► pp. 618 ff. DOI logo
Sulehry, Rizwan Sarwar & Derek Wallace
2023. Identifying the discursive trajectory of social change – a systematic discourse theoretical framework. Journal of Language and Politics 22:2 ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
de Groot Heupner, Susan
2022. “Je suis … Charlie, Samuel, Muhammed”: Practicing Muhammed Cartoons in Far Right and Islamist Politics. Politics and Religion 15:4 ► pp. 807 ff. DOI logo
Malherbe, Nick
2022. Resisting Capitalist Rationality. In For an Anti-capitalist Psychology of Community [Community Psychology, ], ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Malherbe, Nick & Josephine Cornell
2022. Considering poststructuralist discursive community psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 16:4 DOI logo
Ostiguy, Pierre
2022. The Voice and Message of Hugo Chávez: A Rhetorical Analysis. In Populist Rhetorics [Rhetoric, Politics and Society, ], ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Stavrakakis, Yannis & Antonis Galanopoulos
2022. Populism. In The Palgrave Handbook of Psychosocial Studies, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Stavrakakis, Yannis & Antonis Galanopoulos
2022. Populism. In The Palgrave Handbook of Psychosocial Studies, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Stavrakakis, Yannis & Antonis Galanopoulos
2024. Populism. In The Palgrave Handbook of Psychosocial Studies, ► pp. 473 ff. DOI logo
Sunnercrantz, Liv
2021. ‘Which side are you on – Mr. Westerberg?’ Reason, affect, and division in public debate. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 22:3 ► pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Hegemony, Discourse, and Political Strategy [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 97], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.