Cover not available
Article published In:
Discourses of Fake News
Edited by Scott Wright
[Journal of Language and Politics 20:5] 2021
► pp. 653–675

Delegitimizing the media?

Analyzing politicians’ media criticism on social media

ORCID logo | University of Vienna
| Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
| University of Vienna

A growing literature on the impact of “fake news“ accusations on legacy news outlets suggests that the use of this term is part of a much larger trend of increased and delegitimizing media criticism by political actors. However, so far, there is very little empirical evidence on how prevailing politicians’ delegitimizing media criticism really is and under which conditions it occurs. To fill these gaps, we present results of a content analysis of media-related Facebook postings by Austrian and German politicians in 2017 (N = 2,921). The results suggest that media criticism, in general, is actually rare and that about half of it can be described as delegitimizing (i.e., characterized by incivility or absence of argumentation). Most often, media criticism is used by populist politicians, who accuse “the media” in general of bias and falsehoods.

Keywords: media criticism, delegitimization, social media, content analysis, populist communication, fake news
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Media criticism in a digital age: From “good” to “bad”?
  • 3.Characteristics of delegitimizing media criticism
    • 3.1Absence of reasoning
    • 3.2Presence of incivility
  • 4.The importance of the “fake news” label
  • 5.Determinants of delegitimizing media criticism
    • 5.1Political actors: Populist politicians and parties
    • 5.2Journalistic actors: Generalization of addressee
    • 5.3Time period: Election campaigns
  • 6.Methods
    • 6.1Case selection
    • 6.2Sample
    • 6.3Coding procedure
    • 6.4Measures
    • 6.5Intercoder reliability
  • 7.Results
    • 7.1Descriptive results
    • 7.2Delegitimizing media criticism
    • 7.3Determinants of delegitimizing media criticism
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 June 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20081.ege
References (66)
Aalberg, Toril, Frank Esser, Carsten Reinemann, Jesper Strömbäck, and Claes De Vreese
(eds) 2016 Populist political communication in Europe. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aaldering, Loes, and Rens Vliegenthart
2016 “Political leaders and the media. Can we measure political leadership images in newspapers using computer-assisted content analysis?”. Quality & Quantity 50, no. 5: 1871–1905. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Althaus, Scott L.
2012 “What’s good and bad in political communication research? Normative standards for evaluating media and citizen performance.” In The SAGE handbook of political communication, ed. by Holli A. Semetko, and Margaret Scammell, 97–112, London: SAGE Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Ryan, Liesbet Hooghe, Seth Jolly, Gary Marks, Jonathan Polk, Jan Rovny, Marco Steenbergen, and Milada Vachudova
2020 “2019 Chapel Hill Expert Survey”. Available on chesdata.eu. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Bickford, Susan
2011 “Emotion talk and political judgment.” The Journal of Politics 73, no. 4: 1025–1037. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carey, James W.
1974 “Journalism and criticism: The case of an undeveloped profession.” The Review of Politics 36, no. 2: 227–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Matt
2009 “Media criticism as competitive discourse: Defining reportage of the Abu Ghraib scandal.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 33, 3: 258–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Embedded Links, Embedded Meanings: Social media commentary and news sharing as mundane media criticism.” Journalism Studies 17, no. 7: 915–924. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Journalistic authority: Legitimating news in the digital era. Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheruiyot, David
2018 “Popular Criticism That Matters: Journalists’ perspectives of ‘quality’ media critique.” Journalism Practice 12, no. 8: 1008–1018. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheruiyot, D.
2019 Criticising Journalism: Popular Media Criticism in the Digital Age (Doctoral dissertation, Karlstads universitet).Google Scholar
Coe, Kevin, Kate Kenski, and Stephen A. Rains
2014 “Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments.” Journal of Communication 64, no. 4: 658–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahlgren, Peter
2005 “The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation.” Political Communication 22, no. 2: 147–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denner, Nora, and Christina Peter
2017 „Der Begriff Lügenpresse in deutschen Tageszeitungen.“ [The term lying press in German newspapers]. Publizistik 62, no. 3: 273–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Die Presse
(2017, July 3). “Pröll-Privatstiftung: Zivilprozess um ‘Fake News’-Vorwurf” [Pröll Private Foundation: Civil Suit Over ‘fake News’ Accusation]. [URL]
Farkas, Johan, and Jannick Schou
2018 “Fake news as a floating signifier: Hegemony, antagonism and the politics of falsehood. “Javnost-The Public 25, no. 3: 298–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eberl, Jakob-Moritz, Hajo Boomgaarden, and Markus Wagner
2017 “One bias fits all? Three types of media bias and their effects on party preferences.” Communication Research 44, no. 8: 1125–1148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egelhofer, Jana Laura, Loes Aaldering, Jakob-Moritz Eberl, Sebastian Galyga, and Sophie Lecheler
2020 “From novelty to normalization? How journalists use the term ‘fake news’ in their reporting.” Journalism Studies 21, no. 10, 1323–1343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egelhofer, Jana Laura and Sophie Lecheler
2019 “Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: a framework and research agenda.” Annals of the International Communication Association 43, no. 2: 97–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engesser, Sven, Nicole Ernst, Frank Esser and Florin Büchel
2016 “Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology.” Information, Communication & Society 20, no. 8: 1109–1126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernst, Nicole, Sven Engesser, Florin Büchel, Sina Blassnig, and Frank Esser
2017 “Extreme parties and populism: an analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries.” Information, Communication & Society 20, no. 9: 1347–1364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farhall, Kate, Andrea Carson, Scott Wright, Andrew Gibbons, and William Lukamto
2019 “Political Elites’ Use of Fake News Discourse Across Communications Platforms.” International Journal of Communication 131 (2019): 4353–4375.Google Scholar
Fawzi, Nayla
2019 “Untrustworthy news and the media as ‘enemy of the people?’ How a populist worldview shapes recipients’ attitudes toward the media.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 24, no. 2: 146–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “Right-Wing Populist Media Criticism.” In Perspectives on Populism and the Media, ed. by Benjamin Krämer and Christina Holtz-Bacha, 39–56. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Figenschou, Tine Ustad and Karoline Andrea Ihlebæk
2019 “Challenging Journalistic Authority: Media criticism in far-right alternative media.” Journalism Studies 20, no. 9: 1221–1237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friess, Dennis, and Christiane Eilders
2015 “A systematic review of online deliberation research.” Policy & Internet 7, no. 3: 319–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guess, Andrew, Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler
2017 “’You’re fake news!’ The 2017 Poynter media trust survey.” Retrieved from [URL]
Gründl, Johann
2020 “Populist ideas on social media: A dictionary-based measurement of populist communication.” New Media & Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hameleers, Michael
2020a “My Reality Is More Truthful Than Yours: Radical Right-Wing Politicians’ and Citizens’ Construction of ‘Fake’ and ‘Truthfulness’ on Social Media – Evidence From the United States and The Netherlands.” International Journal of Communication 141 (2020): 1135–1152.Google Scholar
2020b “Populist disinformation: Exploring intersections between online populism and disinformation in the US and the Netherlands.” Politics and Governance 8, no. 1: 146–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haller, André and Kristoffer Holt
2019 “Paradoxical populism: How PEGIDA relates to mainstream and alternative media.” Information, Communication & Society 22, no. 12: 1665–1680. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holt, Kristoffer, and André Haller
2017 “What Does ‘Lügenpresse’ Mean? Expressions of Media Distrust on PEGIDA’s Facebook Pages.” Politik 20, no. 4: 42–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humprecht, Edda, Frank Esser, and Peter Van Aelst
2020 “Resilience to online disinformation: A framework for cross-national comparative research.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 25, no. 3: 493–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humprecht, Edda, Lea Hellmueller, and Juliane A. Lischka
2020 “Hostile Emotions in News Comments: A Cross-National Analysis of Facebook Discussions.” Social Media+ Society 6, no.1: 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jagers, Jan and Stefaan Walgrave
2007 “Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research” 46, no. 3: 319–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, Allyson Volinsky, Ilana Weitz, and Kate Kenski
2017 “The political uses and abuses of civility and incivility.” The Oxford handbook of political communication, ed. by Kate Kenski and Kathleen Hall Jamieson, 205–218, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary and Langche Zeng
2001 “Logistic regression in rare events data.” Political analysis 9, no. 2: 137–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kritzinger, Sylvia, Julian Aichholzer, Nico Büttner, Jakob-Moritz Eberl, Thomas Meyer, Carolina Plescia, Markus Wagner, Davide Morisi, Hajo Boomgaarden and Wolfgang C. Müller
2018 “AUTNES Multi-Mode Panel Study 2017” – Documentation. Vienna: AUSSDA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladd, Jonathan M.
2012 Why Americans hate the media and how it matters. Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. Interviewed by Kurtzleben, Danielle
2017 (February 17). “With ‘Fake News,’ Trump Moves from Alternative Facts to Alternative Language.” [URL]
Lischka, Juliane
2019 “A badge of honor? How The New York Times discredits President Trump’s fake news accusations.” Journalism Studies 20, no. 2: 287–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Löfgren Nilsson, Monica, and Henrik Örnebring
2016 “Journalism under threat: Intimidation and harassment of Swedish journalists.” Journalism Practice 10, no. 7: 880–890. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lombard, Mathew, Jennifer Snyder-Duch, and Cheryl Bracken
2002 “Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability.” Human communication research 28, no. 4: 587–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masullo Chen, Gina, and Shuning Lu
2017 “Online political discourse: Exploring differences in effects of civil and uncivil disagreement in news website comments.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 61, 1: 108–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masullo Chen, Gina, Paromita Pain, Victoria Y. Chen, Madlin Mekelburg, Nina Springer, and Franziska Troger
2020 “ ‘You really have to have a thick skin’: A cross-cultural perspective on how online harassment influences female journalists.” Journalism 21, no. 7, 877–895. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Marcus, Pablo Jost, Jörg Haßler, and Simon Kruschinski
2019 „Auf den Spuren der Lügenpresse.“ [On the trail of the liar press]. Publizistik 64, no. 1: 15–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meeks, Lindsey
2020 “Defining the Enemy: How Donald Trump Frames the News Media.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97, no. 1: 211–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mudde, Cas
2004 “The populist zeitgeist.” Government and opposition 39, no. 4: 541–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naab, Teresa K., Dominique Heinbach, Marc Ziegele, and Marie-Theres Grasberger
2020 “Comments and credibility: how critical user comments decrease perceived news article credibility.” Journalism Studies 21, no. 6: 783–801. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, Nic, Richard Fletcher, Antonis Kalogeropoulos, David Levy, and Rasmus K. Nielsen
2018 “Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018.”Google Scholar
Newman, Nic, Richard Fletcher, Antonis Kalogeropoulos, and Rasmus K. Nielsen
2019 “Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019.”Google Scholar
Otto, Lukas P., Sophie Lecheler, and Andreas RT Schuck
2020 “Is context the key? The (non-) differential effects of mediated incivility in three European countries.” Political Communication 37, 1: 88–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prochazka, Fabian, Patrick Weber, and Wolfgang Schweiger
2018 “Effects of civility and reasoning in user comments on perceived journalistic quality.” Journalism Studies 19, no. 1: 62–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quarfoot, David, and Richard A. Levine
2016 “How robust are multirater interrater reliability indices to changes in frequency distribution?” The American Statistician 70, no. 4: 373–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reporters without Borders
(2018) RSF Index 2018: “Hatred of journalism threatens democracies.” Retrieved from [URL]
(2019) “2019 World Press Freedom Index.”Google Scholar
Rooduijn, Matthijs, Stijn Van Kessel, Caterina Froio, Andrea Pirro, Sarah De Lange, Daphne Halikiopoulou, Paul Lewis, Cas Mudde, and Paul Taggart
2019 “The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe.” [URL]
Schulz, Anne, Werner Wirth, and Philipp Müller
2018 “We are the people and you are fake news: A social identity approach to populist citizens’ false consensus and hostile media perceptions.” Communication Research 47, no. 2: 201–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sobieraj, Sarah, and Jeffrey B. Berry
2011 “From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news.” Political Communication 28, no. 1: 19–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solis, Jonathan A., and Iñaki Sagarzazu
2020 “The Media Smells like Sulfur!!! Leaders and Verbal Attacks against the Fourth Estate in Unconsolidated Democracies.” Political Communication 37, no. 1: 20–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsfati, Yariv and Jonathan Cohen
2005 “Democratic Consequences of Hostile Media Perceptions: The Case of Gaza Settlers.” The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 10, no. 4: 28–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Aelst, Peter, Jesper Strömbäck, Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Claes De Vreese, Jörg Matthes, David Hopmann et al.
2017 “Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy?” Annals of the International Communication Association 41, no. 1: 3–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dalen, Arjen
2019 “Rethinking journalist–politician relations in the age of populism: How outsider politicians delegitimize mainstream journalists.” Journalism. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waisbord, Silvio
2018 “The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics.” Communication Research and Practice 4, no. 1: 17–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, Wendy. N.
2007 Critical conversations: A theory of press criticism. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.Google Scholar
2019 “Press criticism” The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies, ed. by Tim P. Vos and Folker Hanusch, 1–9, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

Buyens, Willem, Peter Van Aelst & Steve Paulussen
2024. Curating the news. Analyzing politicians’ news sharing behavior on social media in three countries. Information, Communication & Society ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Heidenreich, Tobias, Jakob-Moritz Eberl, Petro Tolochko, Fabienne Lind & Hajo G. Boomgaarden
2024. My Voters Should See This! What News Items Are Shared by Politicians on Facebook?. The International Journal of Press/Politics 29:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Kluknavská, Alena, Olga Eisele, Monika Bartkowska & Nina Kriegler
2024. A question of truth: accusations of untruthfulness by populist and non-populist politicians on Facebook during the COVID-19 crisis. Information, Communication & Society ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Novais, Rui Alexandre
2024. Divide et Impera? Populist Digital Anti-media Criticisms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication and Applied Technologies 2023 (ICOMTA 2023) [Atlantis Highlights in Social Sciences, Education and Humanities, 11], ► pp. 322 ff. DOI logo
Archer, Allison M N
2023. The Effects of Elite Attacks on Copartisan Media: Evidence from Trump and Fox News. Public Opinion Quarterly 87:4 ► pp. 887 ff. DOI logo
Ceron, Andrea, Giovanni Pagano & Margherita Bordignon
2023. Facebook as a media digest: user engagement and party references to hostile and friendly media during an election campaign. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 20:4 ► pp. 454 ff. DOI logo
Egelhofer, Jana Laura
2023. How Politicians’ Attacks on Science Communication Influence Public Perceptions of Journalists and Scientists. Media and Communication 11:1 ► pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Ekman, Mattias & Andreas Widholm
2023. Media criticism as a propaganda strategy in political communication. Nordic Journal of Media Studies 5:1 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Farkas, Johan
2023. Fake News in Metajournalistic Discourse. Journalism Studies 24:4 ► pp. 423 ff. DOI logo
Firdaus, Satria, Neysa Naila, Azzahra Dinar Pramesti, Cindy Kartika Sari, Dhara Fatimah Azzahra & Deni Angela
2023. Tiktok Sebagai Media Sosial dalam Melakukan Kritik terhadap Pembangunan di Lampung. Indonesian Journal of Social Development 1:2 DOI logo
Kluknavská, Alena & Olga Eisele
2023. Trump and circumstance: introducing the post-truth claim as an instrument for investigating truth contestation in public discourse. Information, Communication & Society 26:8 ► pp. 1583 ff. DOI logo
Liminga, Agnes & Jesper Strömbäck
2023. Undermining the legitimacy of the news media: How Swedish members of parliament use Twitter to criticise the news media. Nordicom Review 44:2 ► pp. 279 ff. DOI logo
Carson, Andrea & Scott Wright
2022. Fake news and democracy: definitions, impact and response. Australian Journal of Political Science 57:3 ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Egelhofer, Jana Laura, Ming Boyer, Sophie Lecheler & Loes Aaldering
2022. Populist attitudes and politicians’ disinformation accusations: effects on perceptions of media and politicians. Journal of Communication 72:6 ► pp. 619 ff. DOI logo
Gibbons, Andrew & Andrea Carson
2022. What is misinformation and disinformation? Understanding multi-stakeholders’ perspectives in the Asia Pacific. Australian Journal of Political Science 57:3 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Macaraig, Ayee & Michael Hameleers
2022. #DefendPressFreedom: Paradigm Repair, Role Perceptions and Filipino Journalists’ Counterstrategies to Anti-Media Populism and Delegitimizing Threats. Journalism Studies 23:16 ► pp. 2078 ff. DOI logo
Thiele, Daniel & Tjaša Turnšek
2022. How Right-Wing Populist Comments Affect Online Deliberation on News Media Facebook Pages. Media and Communication 10:4 ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Wright, Scott
2021. Beyond ‘fake news’?. Journal of Language and Politics 20:5 ► pp. 719 ff. DOI logo
Wright, Scott
2021. Discourses of fake news. Journal of Language and Politics 20:5 ► pp. 641 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.