Article in:
Journal of Language and Politics: Online-First Articles

When in parliamentary debate there is no debate

Argumentation strategies during Catalonia’s 2017 referendum

| Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona , Spain
| Aberystwyth University , United Kingdom
On the 1st October 2017 an independence referendum was organised in Catalonia. The aim of this paper is to analyse the nature of the political debate going on in the Catalan Parliament during the whole process by focusing on the kind of argumentation strategies that were used by each of the leanings to legitimise their political decisions. We do that relying on a methodological distinction that differentiates between sound argumentation and fallacious argumentation. By using a Critical Discourse Analysis approach, this study offers a wide picture of the kind of argumentation used by the main political actors involved in the process of decision making in Catalonia. The results show that there is more emphasis in antagonising with the others, than engaging in sound argument exchange that could facilitate minimal points of consensus. Such results may help explain why the Catalan conflict is still unsolved at the political level.
Keywords: argumentation strategies, fallacies, Topoi , Catalonia’s referendum, parliamentary debates
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Argumentation strategies by pro-secession parties: Constructing the Spanish state as an aggressor to Catalan society
    • 4.2Argumentation strategies by Pro-Union parties: Constructing secessionism as a threat that needs to be confronted
    • 4.3Argumentation strategies by sovereignty align: Discrediting pro and against leanings
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 18 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21007.rub
References
Aja, Eliseo, and César Colino
2014 “Multilevel Structures, Coordination and Partisan Politics in Spanish Intergovernmental Relations.” Comparative European Politics 12 (4): 444–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bächtiger, André, and John Parkinson
2019 Mapping and Measuring Deliberation: Towards a New Deliberative Quality. Oxford University. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Basta, Karlo
2020 “Time’s Up! : Framing Collective Impatience for Radical Political Change.” Political Psychology 41 (4): 755–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bischof, Karin, and Cornelia Ilie
2018 “Democracy and Discriminatory Strategies in Parliamentary Discourse.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (5): 585–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2005 “Persuasion, legitimacy and leadership.” Politicians and rhetoric. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dardanelli, Paolo
2019 “Conceptualizing, Measuring and Mapping State Structures---with an Application to Western Europe 1950--2015.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 49 (2): 271–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella and Francis O’Connor
2017 Social Movements and Referendums from below: Direct Democracy in the Neoliberal Crisis. London: Policy Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella and Martín Portos
2020 “A Bourgeois Story? The Class Basis of Catalan Independentism.” Territory, Politics, Governance, 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S., and Simon Niemeyer
2010 Pluralism and Meta-Consensus. In Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elias, Anwen, Edina Szöcsik, and Christina Isabel Zuber
2015 “Position, Selective Emphasis and Framing: How Parties Deal with a Second Dimension in Competition.” Party Politics 21 (6): 839–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-García, Belén and Óscar G. Luengo
2018 “Populist parties in Western Europe. An analysis of the three core elements of populism”. Communication & Society 31(3): 57–76.Google Scholar
Franco-Guillén, Núria, and Ricard Zapata-Barrero
2014 “Catalunya Terra d’acollida: Stateless Nationalist Parties Discourses on Immigration.” In The Politics of Immigration in Multi-Level States: Governance and Political Parties, edited by E. Hepburn and R. Zapata-Barrero, 261–84. Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franco-Guillén, Núria, and Gema Rubio-Carbonero
Forthcoming. “Narratives of the Process: Parliamentary debates on Catalonia’s referendum of 2017”. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism.
Gamper Sachse, Daniel
2018 “Ambivalences of Populism: The Case of Catalan Independentism.” Social Science Information 57 (4): 573–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heras-Pedrosa, Carlos de las, Carmen Jambrino-Maldonado, Patricia P. Iglesias-Sánchez, and Elena Millán-Celis
2020 “Populism and Independence Movements in Europe: The Catalan-Spanish Case.” Social Sciences 9 (4): 1–20. https://​ideas​.repec​.org​/a​/gam​/jscscx​/v9y2020i4p35​-d338406​.html
Innerarity, Daniel, and Ander Errasti
2019 “Decide on What? Addressing Secessionist Claims in an Interdependent Europe.” In Between Democracy and Law, edited by Margiotta, C. & Martinico, G., Closa, C., 61–83. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Issel-Dombert, Sandra
2020 “Sprachen Im Kontakt--Sprachen Im Konflikt: Agonale Zentren Im Spanischen Und Katalanischen Unabhängigkeitsdiskurs (2017–2019).” PhiN-Beiheft 221: 73.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred, and Walther Kindt
1997 “On the Problem of Bias in Political Argumentation: An Investigation into Discussions about Political Asylum in Germany and Austria.” Journal of Pragmatics 27 (5): 555–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, Peter A., and Joan Vergés-Gifra
ed. 2017 The Catalan Process: Sovereignty, Self-Determination and Democracy in the 21st Century. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Autonomics.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas
2004 “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oswald, Steve, and Thierre Herman
2020 “Give the Standard Treatment of Fallacies a Chance! Cognitive and Rhetorical Insights into Fallacy Processing.” In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild, edited by F H Van Eemeren and B. Garssen, 41–62. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, John, Sebastian De Laile, and Núria Franco-Guillén
2020 “Mapping Deliberative Systems with Big Data: The Case of the Scottish Independence Referendum.” Political Studies, December. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin
2014 “Argumentation Analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach A Methodological Framework.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Chris Hart and Piotr Cap, 67–96. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. Routledge.Google Scholar
Requejo, Ferran, and Miquel Caminal
2012 Federalism, Plurinationality and Democratic Constitutionalism: Theory and Cases. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Antonio
2020 “Spain vs. Catalonia: normalizing democracy through police intervention.” Social Semiotics 30(4): 485–502. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rokkan, Stein, and Derek W. Urwin
1983 Economy, Territory, Identity: Politics of West European Peripheries. Sage.Google Scholar
Rubio-Carbonero, Gema
2020 “Subtle discriminatory political discourse on immigration”. Journal of Language and Politics, 19(6): 893–914. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz Casado, Juan Alberto
2019 “Articulations of Populism and Nationalism: The Case of the Catalan Independence Movement.” European Politics and Society, 1–16.Google Scholar
Serrano, Ivan
2013 “Just a Matter of Identity? Support for Independence in Catalonia” Regional & Federal Studies 23 (5): 523–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibata, Masaki
2020 “Why do politicians cite others in political debates?: A functional analysis of reported speech in a Japanese political debate.” Journal of Language and Politics 19(4): 604–623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swan, Coree B., and Daniel Cetrà
2020 “Why Stay Together? State Nationalism and Justifications for State Unity in Spain and the UK.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 26 (1): 46–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tronconi, Filippo
2006 “Ethnic Identity and Party Competition. An Analysis of the Electoral Performance of Ethnoregionalist Parties in Western Europe.” World Political Science 21: 2. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teunis A.
1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018 Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas
2007 Media argumentation: Dialectic, persuasion and rhetoric. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
2009 The Discursive Construction of National Identity, 2nd Edn. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar