When in parliamentary debate there is no debate
Argumentation strategies during Catalonia’s 2017 referendum
Gema Rubio-Carbonero | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona , Spain
Núria Franco-Guillén | Aberystwyth University , United Kingdom
On the 1st October 2017 an independence referendum was organised in Catalonia. The aim of this paper is to analyse the
nature of the political debate going on in the Catalan Parliament during the whole process by focusing on the kind of argumentation
strategies that were used by each of the leanings to legitimise their political decisions. We do that relying on a methodological
distinction that differentiates between sound argumentation and fallacious argumentation. By using a Critical Discourse Analysis approach,
this study offers a wide picture of the kind of argumentation used by the main political actors involved in the process of decision making
in Catalonia. The results show that there is more emphasis in antagonising with the others, than engaging in sound argument exchange that
could facilitate minimal points of consensus. Such results may help explain why the Catalan conflict is still unsolved at the political
level.
Keywords: argumentation strategies, fallacies,
Topoi
, Catalonia’s referendum, parliamentary debates
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Argumentation strategies by pro-secession parties: Constructing the Spanish state as an aggressor to Catalan society
- 4.2Argumentation strategies by Pro-Union parties: Constructing secessionism as a threat that needs to be confronted
- 4.3Argumentation strategies by sovereignty align: Discrediting pro and against leanings
- 5.Conclusions
- Note
-
References
Published online: 18 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21007.rub
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21007.rub
References
Aja, Eliseo, and César Colino
Bächtiger, André, and John Parkinson
Basta, Karlo
Bischof, Karin, and Cornelia Ilie
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
Dardanelli, Paolo
Dearden, Lizzie
2017 “893 People Now Injured in Catalan Referendum Violence, The Independent, 2 October.” Retrieved 201: 2020. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/catalan-referendum-police-clashes-violence-900-injured-government-independence-vote-banned-latest-a7978166.html
Della Porta, Donatella and Francis O’Connor
Della Porta, Donatella and Martín Portos
Dryzek, John S., and Simon Niemeyer
Elias, Anwen, Edina Szöcsik, and Christina Isabel Zuber
Fernández-García, Belén and Óscar G. Luengo
Franco-Guillén, Núria, and Ricard Zapata-Barrero
Franco-Guillén, Núria, and Gema Rubio-Carbonero
Forthcoming. “Narratives of the Process: Parliamentary debates on Catalonia’s referendum of 2017”. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism.
Gamper Sachse, Daniel
Heras-Pedrosa, Carlos de las, Carmen Jambrino-Maldonado, Patricia P. Iglesias-Sánchez, and Elena Millán-Celis
2020 “Populism and Independence Movements in Europe: The Catalan-Spanish Case.” Social Sciences 9 (4): 1–20. https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v9y2020i4p35-d338406.html
Innerarity, Daniel, and Ander Errasti
Issel-Dombert, Sandra
Kienpointner, Manfred, and Walther Kindt
Kraus, Peter A., and Joan Vergés-Gifra
Oswald, Steve, and Thierre Herman
Parkinson, John, Sebastian De Laile, and Núria Franco-Guillén
Reisigl, Martin
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
Requejo, Ferran, and Miquel Caminal
Reyes, Antonio
Rokkan, Stein, and Derek W. Urwin
Rubio-Carbonero, Gema
Ruiz Casado, Juan Alberto
Serrano, Ivan
Shibata, Masaki
Swan, Coree B., and Daniel Cetrà
Tronconi, Filippo
Walton, Douglas