Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 22:6 (2023) ► pp.869–893

A topic modeling-assisted diachronic study of “One Country, Two Systems” represented in Anglo-American newspapers

| Shanghai Normal University
ORCID logo | Shanghai Normal University

One Country, Two Systems (1C2S) is a framework proposed by China to achieve national unification of territories with different economic and socio-political systems. This study explores the discursive construction of 1C2S in two representative Anglo-American newspapers from January 1984 through March 2020 by taking a topic modeling-assisted critical discourse studies approach. The findings suggest that the foci of coverage change throughout the years, and the reports present an increasingly negative portrayal of 1C2S and growing distrust in its future through the use of a variety of discursive strategies such as predication, intensification, and normalization. In addition to practical concerns of the U.S. and the U.K., these findings are interpreted with regard to the underlying ideological conflicts between socialist China and the two capitalist Western countries. This study also shows the advantage of integrating the topic-modelling approach into discourse studies, especially in terms of diachronic analysis.

Keywords: One Country, Two Systems, topic modeling, news discourse, critical discourse studies, corpus linguistics, The Times , The New York Times
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The implementation of “One Country, Two Systems”
  • 3.Theoretical base
    • 3.1Media representations of political systems: A perspective of critical discourse studies
    • 3.2Topic modeling and its applicability to corpus-assisted discourse studies
  • 4.Data and methods
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Main topics
    • 5.2Tendencies of the topics
    • 5.3Analysis of selected topic words
      • 5.3.1Analysis of democracy
      • 5.3.2Analysis of Beijing
      • 5.3.3Analysis of identity
      • 5.3.4Analysis of future
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 May 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21038.che
References
Alvaro, Joseph
2013 “Discursive representations of a dissident: The case of Liu Xiaobo in China’s English press.” Discourse & Society 24(3): 289–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery and Ruth Wodak
2008 “A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press.” Discourse & Society 19(3): 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, Aditi
2016 “Discursive construction of the ‘key’ moment in the Umbrella Movement.” Journal of Language and Politics 15(5): 549–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brookes, Gavin, and Tony McEnery
2019 “The utility of topic modelling for discourse studies: A critical evaluation.” Discourse Studies 21(1): 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav, Matt Timperley, and Tony McEnery
2018 #LancsBox v. 4.x. [software package]. Available at: [URL]
Cheng, Winnie, and Phoenix Lam
2013 “Western perceptions of Hong Kong ten years on: A corpus-driven critical discourse study.” Applied Linguistics 34(2): 173–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cao, Xiuling, Danqi Zhang, and Qianjun Luo
2022 “Attitudinal stance towards the anti-extradition bill movement in China Daily and South China Morning Post: A corpus-assisted comparative analysis.” Journal of Language and Politics 21(1): 60–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Chor-yung
2017 “ ‘One country, two systems’ after the Umbrella movement: problems and prospects.” Asian Education and Development Studies, 6(4): 385–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chavance, Bernard
2003 “The historical conflict of socialism and capitalism, and the post-socialist transformation.” In Trade and Development: Directions for the 21st Century, ed. by John Toye, 16–34. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Christian
2013 “@Sweden: Curating a nation on Twitter.” Popular Communication 11(1): 30–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Timothy
1997 Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. Chicago: University of Chicago University.Google Scholar
de Goede, Marieke
1996 “Ideology in the US welfare debate: neo-liberal representations of poverty.” Discourse & Society 7(3): 317–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, Léonie, and Elizaveta Gaufman
2022 “The normalisation of the far right in the Dutch media in the run-up to the 2021 general elections.” Discourse & Society 33(6): 773–787. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Mattias, and Michał Krzyżanowski
2021 “A populist turn? News editorials and the recent discursive shift on immigration in Sweden.” Nordicom Review 42(S1): 67–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1995 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2009 “Language and globalization.” Semiotica 1731: 317–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, John, and Rodney H. Jones
2016 “Occupy Hong Kong Historicizing Protest.” Journal of Language and Politics 15(5): 519–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, John, and Solomon Leong
2007 “Metaphors in the discursive construction of patriotism: The case of Hong Kong’s constitutional reform debate.” Discourse and Society 18(3): 273–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fong, Brian
2017 “One Country, Two Nationalisms: Center-periphery relations between mainland China and Hong Kong, 1997–2016.” Modern China 43(5): 523–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregoriou, Christiana, and Laura L. Paterson
2017 “ ‘Reservoir of rage swamps Wall St’ The linguistic construction and evaluation of Occupy in international print media.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5(1): 57–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grün, Bettina, and Kurt Hornik
2011 “topicmodels: An R Package for Fitting Topic Models.” Journal of Statistical Software 40(13): 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ho, Janet
2019 “ ‘Sensible protesters began leaving the protests’: A comparative study of opposing voices in the Hong Kong political movement.” Language & Communication 641: 12–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huan, Changpeng
2016 “Journalistic engagement patterns and power relations: Corpus evidence from Chinese and Australian hard news reporting.” Discourse & Communication 10(2): 137–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ieţcu, Isabela
2006 “Argumentation, dialogue and conflicting moral economies in post-1989 Romania: an argument against the trade union movement.” Discourse & Society 17(5): 627–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaworska, Sylvia, and Anupam Nanda
2018 “Doing well by talking good: A Topic modelling-assisted discourse study of corporate social responsibility.” Applied Linguistics 39(3): 373–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2020a “Normalization and the discursive construction of ‘new’ norms and ‘new’ normality: discourse in the paradoxes of populism and neoliberalism.” Social Semiotics 30(4): 431–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020b “Discursive shifts and the normalisation of racism: imaginaries of immigration, moral panics and the discourse of contemporary right-wing populism.” Social Semiotics 30(4): 503–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Mats Ekström
2022 “The normalization of far-right populism and nativist authoritarianism: discursive practices in media, journalism and the wider public sphere/s.” Discourse & Society 33(6): 719–729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Junghi, and Robert L. Craig
1992 “News as an ideological framework: Comparing US newspapers’ coverage of labor strikes in South Korea and Poland.” Discourse & Society 3(3): 341–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Ming, and Cong Jiang
2019 “Constant fear, but lingering nostalgia: British press representations of post-colonial Hong Kong 20 years on.” Discourse & Communication 13(6): 630–636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Ming, and Jiali Zhong
2020 “Between national and local: Identity representations of post-colonial Hong Kong in a local English newspaper.” Discourse, Context & Media 361: 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Ming, and Ling Lin
2021 “ ‘One Country, Two Systems’: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of the politics of recontextualization in British, American and Chinese newspapers.” Critical Arts 35(3): 17–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Ming, and Jingxue Ma
2022 “The politics of fear in Hong Kong protest representations: A corpus-assisted discourse study.” Journal of Language and Politics 21(1): 37–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lui, Tai-lok
2015 “A missing page in the grand plan of ‘One Country, Two Systems’: Regional integration and its challenges to post-1997 Hong Kong.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 16(3): 396–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ng, Toby Wing-Chun
2020 “Recontextualisation of Beijing’s voice: A critical discourse analysis of hegemony and resistance in Hong Kong political discourse.” Discourse & Society 31(5): 540–561. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan
2004 “Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast.” In Corpora and Discourse, ed. by Alan Partington, John Morley, and Louann Haarman, 11–20. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Peng, Zengjun
2004 “Representation of China: An across time analysis of coverage in the New York Times and Los Angeles Times .” Asian Journal of Communication 14(1): 53–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin., and Ruth Wodak
2016 “The Discourse-historical approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.), ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 23–61. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Seib, Philip
1997 Headline Diplomacy: How News Coverage Affects Foreign Policy. Westport: Praegar.Google Scholar
Silge, Julia, and David Robinson
2016 Tidytext: Text mining and analysis using tidy data principles in R. Journal of Open Source Software 1(3): 37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
So, Alvin
2011 “ ‘One country, two systems’ and Hong Kong-China national integration: A crisis-transformation perspective.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 41(1): 99–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Summers, Tim
2022 “Britain and Hong Kong: the 2019 protests and their aftermath.” Asian Education and Development Studies 11(2): 276–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
2009 “News, discourse, and ideology.” In The Handbook of Journalism Studies, ed. by Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin and Thomas Hanitzsch, 191–204. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wang, Guofeng
2017 “Discursive Construction of Territorial Disputes: Foreign Newspaper Reporting on the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands Dispute.” Social Semiotics 27(5), 567–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022 “Britain as a protector, a mediator or an onlooker? Examining the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests in British newspapers.” Journal of Language and Politics 21(1): 17–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Guofeng, and Ming Liu
2022 “An introduction to the special issue on ‘Language, politics and media: The Hong Kong protests’”. Journal of Language and Politics 21(1): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Guofeng, Ming Liu, and Yihang Xin
2022 “Categorisations of developed and developing countries in UN news on climate change.” Social Semiotics: 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Guofeng, and Xueqin Ma
2021 “Were they illegal rioters or pro-democracy protestors? Examining the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests in China Daily and The New York Times .” Critical Arts 35(2): 85–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2015 The Politics of Fear. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2019 “Schamlose Normalisierung.” MO – Magazin für Menschenrechte 21: 20–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, Wilson, and Hanyu Xiao
2018 “Twenty years of Hong Kong and Macao under Chinese rule: being absorbed under ‘one country, two systems’.” Public Money & Management 38(6): 411–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, Ian
2014 “Recent advances and applications of probabilistic topic models.” AIP Conference Proceedings 1636(1): 124–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ye, Meng, and Peter Thomas
2019 “Paternalism in China Daily’s coverage of Chinese Muslims (2001–2015).” Discourse & Communication 14(3): 314–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yin, Liangen, and Haiyan Wang
2010 “People-centred myth: Representation of the Wenchuan earthquake in China Daily .” Discourse & Communication 4(4): 383–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuen, Samson
2015 “Hong Kong after the Umbrella Movement. An uncertain future for ‘One Country Two Systems’.” China Perspectives 11: 49–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar