Cover not available
Article published In:
(De)legitimising EUrope in times of crisis
Edited by Franco Zappettini and Samuel Bennett
[Journal of Language and Politics 21:2] 2022
► pp. 320–343

Taking the left way out of Europe

Labour party’s strategic, ideological and ambivalent de/legitimation of Brexit

ORCID logo | University of Liverpool

This paper investigates how Brexit was de/legitimised by different Labour actors in a corpus of texts published after the referendum (2016–2020). It thus contributes an intra-party perspective to understanding discursive dynamics of European (dis)integration by building on the notorious ‘European question’ historically debated inside Labour and on the polysemy of Brexit constructed by/reflected in such discourses. The analysis, conducted at lexical-semantic and discursive-pragmatic levels, points to distinct strategic, ideological and ambivalent forms of de/legitimation of Brexit in the discourses of Labour. While strategic and ambivalent de/legitimation point to the Brexit debate being mainly driven by political communication logics, ideological de/legitimation highlights a deeper struggle inside Labour over EU-rope, especially in relation to international vs. national conceptualisations of socialism. While EU-rope was de/legitimised (and Brexit legitimised) by advocates of ‘socialism in one country’, reverse stances tended to be adopted by supporters of ‘international socialism’.

Keywords: Brexit, Labour, socialism, strategy, ideology, ambivalence, language, CDA
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: The ideological polysemy of Brexit and its implementation
  • 2.Corbyn’s constructive ambiguity during the Brexit institutionalisation phase
  • 3.Methodological approach and toolbox
  • 4.Analysis and discussion
    • 4.1Strategic de/legitimation
    • 4.2Ideological de/legitimation
    • 4.3Ambivalent de/legitimation
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21069.zap
References
Bennett, Samuel
2019a “ ‘Crisis’ as a discursive strategy in Brexit referendum campaigns”. Critical Discourse Studies 16(4): 449–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019b “Standing up for ‘real people’ UKIP, the Brexit, and discursive strategies on Twitter”. In Imagining the Peoples of Europe: Populist discourses across the political spectrum, edited by Jan Zienkowski, and Ruth Breeze, 230–257. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Matt, and Frederick H. Pitts
2018 Corbynism: A Critical Approach. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brusenbauch Meislova, Monika
2019 “Brexit Means Brexit – or Does It? The Legacy of Theresa May’s Discursive Treatment of Brexit.” The Political Quarterly, 901: 681–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caiani, Manuela, and Simona Guerra
2017 Euroscepticism, democracy and the media: Communicating Europe, contesting Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2019 Metaphors of Brexit: No Cherries on the Cake? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demata, Massimiliano
2019 “ ‘The referendum result delivered a clear message’: Jeremy Corbyn’s populist discourse”. In: Discourses of Brexit. Edited by Veronika Koller, Susanne Kopf and Marlene Miglbauer, 123–139. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Patrick
2019 “Brexit and The Labour Party. Euro-caution vs. Euro-fanaticism? The Labour party’s ‘constructive ambiguity’ on Brexit and the European Union.” In The Routledge handbook of the politics of Brexit, edited by Diamond, P., Nedergaard, P., & Rosamond, B., 167–178. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dieckmann, Walther
1975 Language in Politics. Introduction to the pragmatics and semantics of political language. 2nd edition Heidelberg: WinterGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela and Norman Fairclough
2012 Political Discourse Analysis, A method for advanced students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise
2017 “The early semantics of the neologism BREXIT: a lexico-grammatical approach.” Functional Linguistics 4 (6). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freeden, Michael
2003 Ideology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 Discourse, concepts, ideologies. Pausing for thought. Journal of Language and Politics, 20 (1): 47–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanretty, Chris
2017 “Areal interpolation and the UK’s referendum on EU membership.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 27 (4): 466–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirsh, David
2017 Contemporary Left Antisemitism. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katsambekis, Giorgios, and Alexandros Kioupkiolis
2019 The Populist Radical Left in Europe. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgariff, Adam
2009 “Simple maths for keywords.” In Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics Conference CL2009, edited by Mahlberg, M., González-Díaz, V. & Smith, C. University of Liverpool, UK.Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika, Susanne Kopf and Marlene Miglbauer
(eds.) 2019 Discourses of Brexit. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2010 The Discursive Construction of European Identities.Google Scholar
2014 “Values, imaginaries and templates of journalistic practice: a Critical Discourse Analysis, Social Semiotics 24 (3): 345–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maiguashca, Bice, and Jonathan Dean
2019 Corbynism, Populism and the Re-shaping of Left Politics in Contemporary Britain. In G. Katsambekis and A. Kioupkiolis (Eds.), The Populist Radical Left in Europe. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marquand, David
1991 The Progressive Dilemma. London, HeinemannGoogle Scholar
Martin, James Robert and Peter Robert Rupert White
2005 The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menon, Anand, and Alan Wager
2019 “Labour’s Brexit Dilemma.” In Brexit and Public Opinion 2019, edited by Anand Menon, 31–33). [URL]. Accessed 21/02/2021
Musolff, Andreas
2017 “Truths, lies and figurative scenarios – Metaphors at the heart of Brexit.” Journal of Language and Politics 16(5): 641–657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 “Brexit as “having your cake and eating it”: The discourse career of a proverb.” In:.) Discourses of Brexit, edited by Veronika Koller, Susanne Kopf and Marlene Miglbauer, 208–221. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nairn, Tom
1972 “The European Question”. New Left Review 751Google Scholar
Philo, Greg, Mike Berry, Justin Schlosberg, Antony Lerman, and David W. Miller
2019 Bad News for Labour: Antisemitism, the Party and Public Belief. London: Pluto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rich, Dave
2018 The Left’s Jewish Problem: Jeremy Corbyn, Israel and Antisemitism. Biteback publishingGoogle Scholar
Serafis, Dimitris, E. Dimitris, and Stavros Assimakopoulos
2022 “Sailing to Ithaka: The transmutation of Greek left-populism in discourses about the European Union”, Journal of Language and Politics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Eric
2021 “The UK and the Labour Party”. In Europe and the Left: Resisting the Populist Tide, edited by James Newell, 189–210. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayson, Steve
2020 The Fall of the Red Wall: ‘The Labour Party no longer represents people like us’. Independently publishedGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
1995 “Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis” in Language & Peace, edited by Schäffner, C. and Wenden, L., 17–33. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Watts, Jake, and Tim Bale
2019 “Populism as an intra-party phenomenon: The British Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 21(1): 99–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2011 “Politics as Usual: Investigating political discourse in action.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by J. Gee & M. Handford, 525–540. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Worth, Owen
2017 “Whither Lexit?”, Capital & Class 41(2):351–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappettini, Franco
2019a “The Brexit referendum: how trade and immigration in the discourses of the official campaigns have legitimised a toxic (inter)national logic.” Critical Discourse Studies 16 (4): 403–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019b “The official vision for ‘global Britain’: Brexit as rupture and continuity between free trade, liberal internationalism and ‘values’.” Discourses of Brexit, edited by V. Koller, S. Kopf, & M. Milgbauer, 140–154. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019c European identities in discourse: a transnational citizens’ perspective. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
forthcoming). Brexit: a Critical Discursive Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
2021a “The tabloidization of the Brexit campaign: Power to the (British) people?” Journal of Language and Politics 20(2): 277–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021b “The UK as victim and hero in the Sun’s coverage of the Brexit ‘humiliation’ in Media emotionalization” Special issue of the Russian Journal of Linguistics, edited by Zappettini, F., Larina, T. and Ponton, D.) 25 (3): 645–662. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappettini, Franco and Michał Krzyżanowski
2021 Brexit in media and political discourses: From national populist imaginary to cross-national social and political crisis. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappettini, Franco and Marzia Maccaferri
2021 “Euroscepticism between populism and technocracy: The case of Italian Lega and Movimento 5 Stelle.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 17(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar