Legitimation in revolutionary discourse
A critical examination of the discourse of Jerry John Rawlings
This paper analyzes the legitimation strategies used by Jerry John Rawlings, a Ghanaian revolutionary leader, to
license his revolutionary actions, including political enemy executions and a crackdown on corrupt practices. It adapts and
extends van Leeuwen’s legitimation framework by demonstrating how Rawlings exploited historical memory and the notion of sacrifice
in conjunction with the strategies of authorization, rationalization and moralization to formulate his revolutionary rhetoric. The
analysis reveals that the legitimation strategies enabled Rawlings to project a patriot-cum-nationalist identity as well as
construct himself as a noble revolutionary mandated by the people of Ghana to represent their interests, protect them from
evildoers and lead the process of social transformation. The study illustrates the persuasive power of revolutionary discourses in
terms of how they function ideologically in the message they communicate (or exaggerate) and conceal.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Context: Jerry John Rawlings and the 1979 and 1981 revolutions in Ghana
- 3.Analytic framework
- 3.1Legitimation through authorization, moralization and rationalization
- 3.2Legitimation through historicization and the claim of sacrifice
- 4.Data and analytical procedure
- 5.Legitimizing revolutionary discourse
- 5.1Authorization
- 5.2Rationalization
- 5.3Moralization
- 5.4Historicization
- 5.5Claim of sacrifice
- 6.Conclusion
-
References
References (41)
Ali, Marwah, Anne Christopher, and Munif Nordin
2016 “
Language
Use and De-legitimation Strategy in Newspaper Discourse: A Critical Discourse
Analysis”.
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied
Sciences 10(12): 318–327.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alinejad, Mahmoud
1999 Imagination,
Meaning and Revolution: The Sources of the Revolutionary Power of Islam in Iran. Unpublished
PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Braun, Virginia and Victoria Clarke
2006 “
Using
Thematic Analysis in Psychology”.
Qualitative Research in
Psychology 3(2): 77–101.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2014 Analyzing
Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke and New York.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chiluwa, Innocent
2015 “
Radicalist
Discourse: A Study of the Stances of Nigeria’s Boko Haram and Somalia’s Al Shabaab on
Twitter”.
Journal of Multicultural
Discourses 10(2): 214–235.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ciaglia, Antonio
2013 “
Politics
in the Media and the Media in Politics: A Comparative Study of the Relationship between the Media and Political Systems in
three European Countries”.
European Journal of
Communication 28(5): 541–555.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Edwards, John
2004 “
After
the Fall”.
Discourse &
Society 15(2–3): 155–184.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, Norman
2010 Critical
Discourse Analysis. 2nd
ed. London: Pearson Education.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Folson, Kweku
1993 “
Ideology,
Revolution and Development – The Years of Jerry John
Rawlings”. In
Ghana under PNDC Rule edited
by
Emmanuel Gyimah-Boadi, 74–99. Great Britain: CODESRIA.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friedman, Elie
2017 “
Evasion
Strategies in International Documents: When ‘Constructive Ambiguity’ Leads to Oppositional
Interpretation”.
Critical Discourse
Studies 14(4): 385–401.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geis, Michael
1987 The
Language of Politics. New York: Springer-Verlag.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graham, Phil, Thomas Keenan, and Anne-Maree Dowd
2004 “
A
Call to Arms at the End of History: A Discourse-historical Analysis of George W. Bush’s Declaration of War on
Terror”.
Discourse &
Society 15(2–3): 199–221.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hodges, Adam
(ed.) 2013 Discourses
of War and Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Igwebuike, Ebuka and Lily Chimuanya
2021 “
Legitimating
Falsehood in Social Media: A Discourse Analysis of Political Fake News”.
Discourse &
Communication 15(1): 42–58.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Igwebuike, Ebuka and Ameh Akoh
2021 “
Self-legitimation
and Other-delegitimation in the Internet Radio Speeches of the Supreme Leader of the Indigenous People of
Biafra”.
Critical Discourse
Studies 1–19.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, Nam
2018 “
Revolutionary
Leaders and Mass Killing”.
Journal of Conflict
Resolution, 62(2): 289–317.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lazar, Annita and Michelle Lazar
2004 “
The
Discourse of the New World Order: ‘Out-casting’ the Double Face of Threat”.
Discourse &
Society 15(2–3): 223–242.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lizardo, Omar
2012 “
The
Conceptual Bases of Metaphors of Dirt and Cleanliness in Moral and Non-moral
Reasoning”.
Cognitive
Linguistics 23(2): 367–393.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maurantonio, Nichole
2014 “
The
Politics of Memory. In
The Oxford Handbook of Political
Communication, edited by
Kate Kenski and
Kathleen Jamieson, 1–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moffitt, Benjamin
2020 Populism. Cambridge: Polity.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nartey, Mark
2019 “
‘I
shall prosecute a ruthless war on these monsters … A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Discourse of Resistance in the Rhetoric of
Kwame Nkrumah’”.
Critical Discourse
Studies 16(2): 113–130.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nartey, Mark
2020 “
Voice,
Agency and Identity: A Positive Discourse Analysis of ‘Resistance’ in the Rhetoric of Kwame
Nkrumah”.
Language & Intercultural
Communication 20(2): 193–205.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nartey, Mark. & Ernanda
2020 “
Formulating
Emancipatory Discourses and Reconstructing Resistance: A Positive Discourse Analysis of Sukarno’s Speech at the First
Afro-Asian Conference”.
Critical Discourse
Studies 17(1): 22–38.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oddo, John
2011 “
War
Legitimation Discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Four US Presidential
Addresses”.
Discourse &
Communication 22(3): 287–314.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reyes, Antonio
2011 “
Strategies
of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions”.
Discourse &
Society 22(6): 781–807.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rojo, Luisa and Teun van Dijk, T.
1997 “
There
was a problem, and it was solved!”’: Legitimating the Expulsion of Illegal Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary
Discourse.
Discourse &
Society 8(4): 523–566.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Semelin, Jacques
2013 Purify
and Destroy: The Political Uses of Massacre and Genocide. New York, NY: Columbia University Press
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shillington, Kevin
1992 Ghana
and the Rawlings Factor. London: Macmillan Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stedman, Stephen
1991 Peacemaking
in civil war: International mediation in Zimbabwe, 1974–1980. Boulder, CO: L. Rienner Publishers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tajfel, Henri and John Turner
1979 “
An
Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In
The Social Psychology
of Intergroup Relations, edited by
William Austin and
Stephen Worchel, 33–37. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valentino, Benjamin
2004 Final
Solutions: Mass Killing and Genocide in the 20th Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, Teun
1993 “
Principles
of Critical Discourse Analysis”.
Discourse &
Society 4(2): 249–83.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, Teun
1998 Ideology:
A Multidisciplinary
Approach. London: Sage.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2007 Legitimation
in discourse and communication.
Discourse &
Communication 1(1): 91–112.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2008 Discourse
and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse
Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Leeuwen, Theo and Ruth Wodak
1999 “
Legitimizing
Immigration Control: A Discourse- historical Analysis”.
Discourse
Studies 1(1): 83–118.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walt, Stephen
1992 “
Revolution
and War”.
World
Politics 44(3): 321–68.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weitz, Eric
2003 A
Century of Genocide: Utopias of Race and Nation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, Ruth
2001 “
The
Discourse-historical Approach”. In
Methods of Critical Discourse
Studies, edited by
Ruth Wodak and
Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: Sage.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, Ruth
2011 The
Discourse of Politics in Action. Politics as
Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yankah, Kojo
2018 The
Trial of J.J. Rawlings: Echoes of the 31st December
Revolution. Odenton: Habari Afrika Limited.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Aboh, Sopuruchi Christian
2024.
‘It will never be well with SARS’: A discourse analytic study of the #EndSARS protests on social media.
Discourse & Society 35:2
► pp. 153 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Aboh, Sopuruchi Christian, John Ganaah & Godswill Uchechukwu Chigbu
2024.
Ethnic othering in Nigeria’s electoral discourse: the need for intercultural competence.
Language and Intercultural Communication ► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Isiaka, Adeiza
2024.
‘Only a tree stands still to be cut down’: discoursing legitimation in narratives of the Nigeria-Biafra war and the IPOB movement (1967 to present).
Small Wars & Insurgencies 35:3
► pp. 453 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.