Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 22:1 (2023) ► pp.22–45

Critical junctures beyond the black box

Crisis and the political contestation of time

ORCID logo | Hertford College, University of Oxford
ORCID logo | Centre for East European and International Studies (ZOiS)
Studies of institutional change identify critical junctures from the position of hindsight. But this perspective prioritises antecedent factors that downplay the role of agency around moments of potential change. This article looks at changes in the ways in which agents use temporal language to identify events or periods as moments of (possible) juncture. It combines quantitative and qualitative methods of text analysis, drawing on a corpus of British parliamentary speeches from 1811–2019. The article first analyses changes in the strategic use of the term crisis over time, paying particular attention to significant shifts in its politicisation and temporalisation. It then identifies three distinct components to the contestation of crises: over their identification, evaluation and proposed prescriptions. We suggest that studies of critical juncture ought to focus more on the use of temporal language around possible junctures to better understand the political dynamics at moments of heightened uncertainty.
Keywords: Crisis, time, temporality, language, historical analysis, critical juncture, path dependence, text analysis, British politics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and analytic strategy: Text analysis as a structured interpretive task
  • 3.On the changing political dynamics of crisis debates
  • 4.The changing temporalisation of crisis
  • 5.The anatomy of crisis juncture politicking
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22011.kra
References (55)
References
’t Hart, Paul, and Karen Tindall. 2009. Framing the Global Economic Downturn, Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Time Matters: On Theory and Method, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and James Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty, New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Basta, Karlo. 2017. “The Social Construction of Transformative Political Events.” Comparative Political Studies, 51(10): 1243–1278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Samuel. 2019. ‘Crisis’ as a Discursive Strategy in Brexit Referendum Campaigns. Critical Discourse Studies, 16 (4): 449–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, Michael. 2015. “Chronic Instability and the Limits of Path Dependence.” Perspectives on Politics, 13(4): 976–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2003. “Structures Do Not Come with an Instruction Sheet: Interests, Ideas, and Progress in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics, 1(4): 695–706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni. 2015. Critical Junctures and Institutional Change. In Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis, edited by James Mahoney and Kathleen Thelen: 147–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni, and Daniel Kelemen. 2007. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism.” World Politics, 59 (3): 341–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth. 1993. “Organizational Repertoires and Institutional Change: Women’s Groups and the Transformation of US Politics, 1890–1920.” American Journal of Sociology, 98(4): 755–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Organizing Powers in Eventful Times.” Social Science History, 39(1): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth, and David Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
De Giorgi, Elisabetta, and Gabriella Ilonszki (eds.). 2018. Opposition Parties in European Legislatures: Conflict Or Consensus?, London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Rycker, Antoon, and Zuraidah Mohd Don. 2013. Discourse and Crisis: Critical Perspectives: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella; Gattinara, Pietro Castelli; Eleftheriadis, Konstantinos and Andrea Felicetti. 2020. Discursive Turns and Critical Junctures: Debating Citizenship after the Charlie Hebdo Attacks, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewan, Torun, and Arthur Spirling. 2011. “Strategic Opposition and Government Cohesion in Westminster Democracies.” American Political Science Review, 105(2): 337–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ewing, Blake. 2021. “Conceptual History, Contingency and the Ideological Politics of Time.” Journal of Political Ideologies, 26(3): 262–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach, Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. Liberal Languages: Ideological Imaginations and Twentieth-Century Progressive Thought, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goet, Niels. 2019. “Measuring Polarization with Text Analysis: Evidence from the UK House of Commons, 1811–2015.” Political Analysis, 27(4): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Colin. 1996. “Narrating Crisis: The Discursive Construction of the ‘Winter of Discontent’.” Sociology, 30(2): 253–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “Crisis and the Structural Transformation of the State: Interrogating the Process of Change.” British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 1(3): 317–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hix, Simon, and Abdul Noury. 2016. “Government-Opposition or Left-Right? the Institutional Determinants of Voting in Legislatures.” Political Science Research and Methods, 4(2): 249–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogan, John. 2019. “The Critical Juncture Concept’s Evolving Capacity to Explain Policy Change.” European Policy Analysis, 5(2): 170–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Lynn. 1984. Politics, Culture, and Class in the French Revolution, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis. 1996. The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 2003. Periodization and Preferences: Reflections on Purposive Action in Comparative Historical Social Science. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, D1: 270–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keeler, John. 1993. “Opening the Window for Reform – Mandates, Crises, and Extraordinary Policy-Making.” Comparative Political Studies, 25(4): 433–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1988. Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2004 [1985]. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart, and Richter, Michaela. 2006. Crisis. Journal of the History of Ideas, 67(2): 357–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krawatzek, Félix. 2018. Youth in Regime Crisis: Comparative Perspectives from Russia to Weimar Germany, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowska, Natalia, and Michał Krzyżanowski. 2018. “‘Crisis’ and Migration in Poland: Discursive Shifts, Anti-Pluralism and the Politicisation of Exclusion.” Sociology, 52(3): 612–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2019. “Brexit and the Imaginary of ‘crisis’: A Ciscourse-Conceptual Analysis of European News Media.” Critical Discourse Studies, 16(4): 465–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society, 29(4): 507–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. The Legacies of Liberalism: Path Dependence and Political Regimes in Central America, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 1986. The Sources of Social Power. Vol. I A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthijs, Matthias. 2012. Ideas and Economic Crises in Britain from Attlee to Blair (1945–2005), Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, and William Sewell. 2001. It’s about Time: Temporality in the Study of Social Movements and Revolutions. Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics, 891, p. 125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2015. “How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism.” Government and Opposition, 50(2): 189–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parnell, Tamsin. 2021. “Humiliating and Dividing the Nation in the British Pro-brexit Press: A Corpus-Assisted Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies: 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riker, William. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Roitman, Janet. 2014. Anti-Crisis, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ruzza, Carlo, and Milica Pejovic. 2019. “Populism at Work: The Language of the Brexiteers and the European Union.” Critical Discourse Studies 16(4): 432–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2017. “Agency, Design and ‘Slow Democracy’.” Time & Society, 26(3): 362–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1): 303–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Daniel; Traber, Denise, and Benoit, Kenneth. 2015. “Estimating Intra-Party Preferences: Comparing Speeches to Votes.” Political Science Research and Methods, 5(2): 379–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sewell, William. 1996. Three Temporalities: Toward en Eventful Sociology. In : McDonald, T. (ed.) The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press: 245–80.Google Scholar
Slater, Dan, and Erica Simmons. 2010. “Informative Regress: Critical Antecedents in Comparative Politics.” Comparative Political Studies, 43(7): 886–917. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, John D. 2014. Banking in Crisis: The Rise and Fall of British Banking Stability, 1800 to the Present, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry. 2005. Persuasion, Preference Change, and Critical Junctures: The Microfoundations of a Macroscopic Concept. In : Katznelson, I. & Weingast, B. (eds.) Preferences and situations: 161–84. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Yashar, Deborah. 1994. Demanding Democracy: Reform and Reaction in Costa Rica and Guatemala, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Zahariadis, Nikolaos. 2003. Ambiguity and Choice in Public Policy: Political Decision Making in Modern Democracies, Washington, DC: Georgetown university press.Google Scholar
Zappettini, Franco, and Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2019. The Critical Juncture of Brexit in Media & Political Discourses: From National-Populist Imaginary to Cross-National Social and Political Crisis. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Krawatzek, Félix & Friedemann Pestel
2024. The Political Force of Memory: The Making and Unmaking of Brexit as an Event. Comparative Studies in Society and History 66:1 ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.