Disalignment in the EU: Disagreement and face threats in international European Committee debates

Franceschi, Valeria

doi:10.1075/jlp.22031.fra

Article published In:

Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 23:2 (2024) ► pp.219–238

Disalignment in the EU

Disagreement and face threats in international European Committee debates

Valeria Franceschi | University of Verona

European Union (EU) institutions are highly multilingual environments where international communication is very goal-oriented, as they produce and define policies and regulations applied to all member states. This paper aims at exploring how disagreements and conflicting opinions are conveyed in such contexts through the qualitative analysis of debates in recorded meetings of the European Parliament Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. Two meetings from two different parliamentary terms (2014–2019 and 2019–2024) will be analyzed. The study will adopt a pragma-rhetorical approach, drawing on studies on politeness and conversation analysis techniques and focusing especially on the management of Face Threatening Acts in English turns. Attention will also be paid to language choice, codeswitching, and to the international use of English. Results show that conflict and overt disagreements in the data are very rare, with speakers displaying instead careful mitigation of the language used, especially when English is employed.

Keywords: parliamentary discourse, disagreement, face-threatening acts, multilingualism, English as a lingua Franca

Article outline

1.Introduction: (un)parliamentary discourse
2.Disagreement in deliberative genres
3.Multilingualism and codeswitching in the EU
4.Data selection and analytical approach
5.Results
- 5.1Disagreements and mitigated face-threats
- 5.2Language choice and codeswitching
6.Conclusion
Acknowledgements
Transcription conventions
Notes
References

Published online: 27 November 2023

https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22031.fra

References (34)

References

Amason, Allen C. 1996. “Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams.” Academy of Management Journal 39 (1): 123–48.

Amason, Allen. C., and Harry. J. Sapienza. 1997. “The Effects of Top Management Team Size and Interaction Norms on Cognitive And Affective Conflict.” Journal of Management, 23 (4): 495–516.

Allan, Keith. 2007. “The Pragmatics of Connotation.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (6): 1047–57.

Angouri, Jo. 2012. “Managing Disagreement in Problem Solving Meeting Talk.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1565–79.

Angouri, Jo, and Miriam A. Locher. 2012. “Theorising Disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1549–53.

Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena. 2020. “Parliamentary Impoliteness and the Interpreter’s Gender.” Pragmatics 30 (4): 459–84.

Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cheung, Ching Ching, and Kong Bieng Chuah. 2000. “Intergroup Conflict Management Framework for Hong Kong’s Manufacturing Industry.” Engineering Management Journal 12 (3): 26–33.

EEC Council. “Regulation No 1 Determining the Languages to be Used by the European Economic Community.” OJ 171, 6.10.1958: 385–86.

Doerr, Nicole. 2018. Political Translation: How Social Movement Democracies Survive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2012. “‘A Simple Disagreement? A Row? Or a Massive Fall Out?’: On the Challenges of an Analytical Task.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1623–25.

Georgakopoulou, Alexandra, and Marianna Patrona. 2000. “Disagreements in Television Discussions: How Small Can Small Screen Arguments Be?” Pragmatics 10 (3): 323–38.

Hadjichristidis, Constantinos, Janet Geipel, and Lucia Savadori. 2015. “The Effect of Foreign Language in Judgments of Risk and Benefit: The Role of Affect.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 21 (2): 117–29.

Harris, Sandra. 2011. “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 12 (4): 451–72.

Ilie, Cornelia. 2001. “Unparliamentary Language: Insults as Cognitive Forms of Ideological Confrontation.” In Language and Ideology. Vol. II: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches, edited by René Dirven, Roslyn M. Frank and Cornelia Ilie, 235–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

. 2003. “Histrionic and Agonistic Features of Parliamentary Discourse.” Studies in Communication Sciences 3 (1): 25–53.

. 2006. “Parliamentary Discourses.” In Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics 2nd ed. Vol 91, edited by Keith Brown, 188–96. Oxford: Elsevier.

. 2010a. “Identity Co-construction in Parliamentary Discourse Practices.” In European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices, edited by Cornelia Ilie, 57–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

. 2010b. “Managing Dissent and Interpersonal Relations in the Romanian Parliamentary Discourse”. In European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices, edited by Cornelia Ilie, 193–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kecskés, Istvan. 2015. “Intercultural Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 861: 43–47.

Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Ruth Wodak. 2010. “Hegemonic Multilingualism in/of the EU Institutions: An Inside-Outside Perspective on the European Language Policies and Practices.” In Mehrsprachigkeit Aus Der Perspektive Zweier Eu-projekte: DYLAN Meets LINEE, edited by Cornelia Hülmbauer, Eva Vetter and Heike Böhringer, 115–33. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Marra, Meredith. 2012. “Disagreeing without being Disagreeable: Negotiating Workplace Communities as an Outsider.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1580–90.

Leal, Alice. 2021. English and Translation in the European Union. Unity and Multiplicity in the Wake of Brexit. London: Routledge.

Mehregan, Masoumeh, Eslamirasekh Abbass, Dabaghi Azizollah, and Jafari Seresht Davood. 2013. “Disagreement Expressions in the Discourse of Young Persian Speakers.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 701: 598–604.

McCrae, Susan. 2009. “‘It’s a Blokes’ Thing’: Gender, Occupational Roles and Talk in the Workplace.” In Gender and Spoken Interaction, edited by Pia Pichler and Eva Eppler, 163–85. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Papacharissi, Zizi. 2004. “Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups.” New Media & Society 6 (2): 259–83.

Pavlenko, Aneta. 2012. “Affective Processing in Bilingual Speakers: Disembodied Cognition?” International Journal of Psychology 47 (6): 405–28.

Plug, H. José. 2010. “Ad-Hominen Arguments in the Dutch and the European Parliaments: Strategic Manoeuvring in an Institutional Context.” In European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse Strategies and Interaction ractices, edited by Cornelia Ilie, 305–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ringe, Nils. 2022. The Language(s) of Politics Multilingual Policy-Making in the European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Sifianou, Maria. 2012. “Disagreements, Face and Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1580–90.

Stojanović, Nenad and Matteo Bonotti. 2020. “Political Parties in Deeply Multilingual Polities: Institutional Conditions and Lessons for the EU.” JCMS 58 (3): 599–615.

Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wodak, Ruth, Michal. Krzyżanowski, and Bernhard Forchtner. 2012. “The Interplay of Language Ideologies and Contextual Cues in Multilingual Interactions: Language Choice and Code-switching in European Union Institutions.” Language in Society 411: 157–86.

Zima, Elisabeth, Geert Brône, and Kurt Feyaerts. 2010. “Patterns of Interaction in Austrian Parliamentary Debates: On the Pragmasemantics of Unauthorized Interruptive Comments.” In European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse strategies and interaction practices, edited by Cornelia Ilie, 135–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.