Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 22:1 (2023) ► pp.46–65

The representation of migrant identities in UK Government documents about Brexit

A corpus-assisted analysis

ORCID logo | University of Nottingham | University of Warwick

In the English worldview, “not all immigrants are created equal” (Henderson and Wyn Jones 2021: 91). This paper provides support for the above statement by employing key semantic domain analysis (Rayson 2008) and CDA to answer the research question: How are EU and extra-EU migrants constructed in Brexit-related UK Government documents published between 2016 and 2019? The analysis demonstrates that extra-EU migrants are constructed as a threat that requires UK-EU unity. At the same time, the government’s grammatical and linguistic strategies discursively exclude EU migrants from the British public. The study argues that a neoliberal construction of the acceptable EU migrant erases the identities of migrant workers in so-called “unskilled” roles and foreshadows the social exclusion of these groups brought about by the UK’s post-Brexit immigration system. The paper concludes that the documents problematise Britain’s “tolerant nation” rhetoric and threaten to weaken feelings of belonging to the UK among migrants.

Keywords: Brexit, immigration, national identity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Representing immigrants in public discourse
    • 2.2Constructing immigrants in British politics
    • 2.3Immigration discourses in the Brexit debate
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Data collection
    • 3.2Analytical framework
    • 3.3Data analysis
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Representing non-EU migrants
    • 4.2Representing EU migrants
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 10 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22091.par
References
Baker, Paul
2006 Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Gabrielatos, Costas, KhosraviNik, Majid, et al.
2008 A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3): 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Samuel
2018 Constructions of migrant integration in British public discourse: Becoming British. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2019 “Crisis” as a discursive strategy in Brexit referendum campaigns. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(4): 449–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bocskor, Ákos
2018 Anti-Immigration Discourses in Hungary during the ‘Crisis’ Year: The Orbán Government’s ‘National Consultation’ Campaign of 2015. Sociology, 52(3): 551–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brexit Legal Guide
2019 Family migration. Available at: [URL]. Accessed: 24/10/2022.
Buckledee, Steve
2018 The Language of Brexit: How Britain Talked Its Way Out of the European Union. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Buonfino, Alessandra
2004 Between unity and plurality: the politicization and securitization of the discourse of immigration in Europe. New Political Science, 26(1): 23–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabinet Office
2021 Global Britain in a competitive age. The Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy. Available at: [URL] (Accessed: 15 December 2021).
Cap, Piotr
2019 “Britain is full to bursting point!”: Immigration themes in the Brexit discourse of the UK Independence Party. In: Koller, Veronika, Kopf, Susanne. and Miglbauer, Marlene. eds. Discourses of Brexit. London: Routledge, pp. 69–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capdevila, Rose and Callaghan, Jane E. M.
2008 “It’s not racist. It’s common sense”. A critical analysis of political discourse around asylum and immigration in the UK. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 18(1): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2006 Britain as a container: immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17(5): 563–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Metaphors of Brexit – No Cherries on the Cake? London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, John. and Newman, Janet
2017 ‘People in this country have had enough of experts’: Brexit and the paradoxes of populism. Critical Policy Studies, 11(1): 101–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curtice, John, and Montagu, Ian
eds. 2020 British Social Attitudes: The 37th Report. The National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
Demmen, Jane, Semino, Elena, Demjén, Zsofia, et al.
2015 A computer-assisted study of the use of Violence metaphors for cancer and end of life by patients, family carers and health professionals. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2): 205–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
EUNAVFOR, MED
2018 About Us. Available at: [URL] (Accessed: 15 October 2020).
Fairclough, Norman
2013 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falkenheimer, Jesper and Heide, Mats
2010 Crisis communicators in change: From plans to improvisations. In Coombs, W. Timothy & Holladay, Sherry. J. eds. The handbook of crisis communication. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 512–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiřtová, Magdalena
2019 Framing Canadian Immigration Discourse Under the Conservative Government (2006–2015): Breaking Path Dependence? Journal of International Migration and Integration, 221: 265–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas
2018 Keyness analysis: Nature, metrics and techniques. In: Taylor, Charlotte and Marchi, Anna. eds. Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review. London: Routledge, pp. 225–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas and Baker, Paul
2008 Fleeing, Sneaking, Flooding: A Corpus Analysis of Discursive Constructions of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press, 1996–2005. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(1): 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Andrew
2017 The referendum and Britain’s broken immigration politics. In Jackson, Daniel, Thorsen, Einar and Wring, Dominic. eds. EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. Available at: [URL] (Accessed: 22 April 2020).
George, Stephen
1990 An Awkward Partner: Britain in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, Stephen, & Booth, Rachael
2018 “An Australian-style points system”: Individualizing immigration in radical right discourse in the 2015 U.K. General election campaign. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24(4): 389–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1985 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Henderson, Ailsa and Wyn Jones, Richard
2021 Englishness: the political force transforming Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huysmans, Jef and Buonfino, Alessandra
2008 Politics of Exception and Unease: Immigration, Asylum and Terrorism in Parliamentary Debates in the UK. Political Studies, 561: 766–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Islentyeva, Anna
2020 Corpus-based analysis of ideological bias. Migration in the British press. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jessop, Bob
2016 The Organic Crisis of the British State: Putting Brexit in its Place. Globalizations, 14(1): 133–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kapoor, Nisha
2011 The advancement of racial neoliberalism in Britain. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 26(6): 1028–1046. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid
2009 The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election (2005). Discourse & Society, 20(4): 477–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Immigration Discourses and Critical Discourse Analysis: Dynamics of World Events and Immigration Representations in the British Press. In: Hart, C. and Cap, P. eds. Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 501–519.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michal
2019 Brexit and the imaginary of ‘crisis’: a discourse-conceptual analysis of European news media. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(4): 465–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michal, Triandafyllidou, Anna, and Wodak, Ruth
2018 The Mediatization and the Politicization of the “Refugee Crisis” in Europe. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16(1–2): 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchi, Anna
2018 Dividing up the data: Epistemological, methodological and practical impact of diachronic segmentation. In: Marchi, Anna and Taylor, Charlotte eds. Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony and Hardie, Andrew
2011 Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miglbauer, Marlene and Koller, Veronika
2019 ‘The British people have spoken’: voter motivations and identities in vox pops on the British EU referendum. In: Koller, Veronika, Kopf, Susanne, and Miglbauer, Marlene eds. Discourses of Brexit. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulderrig, Jane
2011 Manufacturing Consent: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of New Labour’s educational governance. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(6): 562–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulvey, Gareth
2010 When Policy Creates Politics: the Problematizing of Immigration and the Consequences for Refugee Integration in the UK. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23(4): 437–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Office for National Statistics
2015 Migration Statistics Quarterly Report: November 2015. ONS. Available at: [URL] (Accessed: 23 May 2022).
Outhwaite, William
2018 Migration Crisis and “Brexit”. In Menjivar, Cecilia, Ruiz, Marie and Ness, Immanuel eds. The Oxford Handbook of Migration Crises. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual, Aguado Jiménez, Pilar and Sánchez Hernández, Purificación
2017 Constructing immigrants in UK legislation and Administration informative texts: A corpus-driven study (2007–2011). Discourse & Society, 28(1): 81–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parnell, Tamsin
2021 Humiliating and dividing the nation in the British pro-Brexit press: a corpus-assisted analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 0(0): 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perkowski, Nina
2016 Deaths, Interventions, Humanitarianism and Human Rights in the Mediterranean ‘Migration Crisis’. Mediterranean Politics, 21(2): 331–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pojanapunya, Punjaporn and Watson Todd, Richard
2018 Log-likelihood and odds ratio: Keyness statistics for different purposes of keyword analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14(1): 133–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potts, Amanda
2015 Filtering the Flood: Semantic Tagging as a Method of Identifying Salient Discourse Topics in a Large Corpus of Hurricane Katrina Reportage. In: Baker, Paul and McEnery, Tony eds. Corpora and Discourse Studies – Integrating Discourse and Corpora. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 285–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prentice, Sheryl
2010 Using automated semantic tagging in Critical Discourse Analysis: A case study on Scottish independence from a Scottish nationalist perspective. Discourse & Society, 21(4): 405–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayson, Paul
2008 From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4): 519–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto
1999 ‘Like an Animal I was Treated’: Anti-Immigrant Metaphor in US Public Discourse. Discourse & Society, 10(2): 191–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skills for Care
2020 Workforce nationality figures. Available at: [URL] (Accessed: 24 October 2020).
Sobolewska, Maria and Ford, Robert
2020 Brexitland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
UCREL
1998 The British National Corpus Sampler Corpus: Explanatory documentation. Available at: [URL] (Accessed: 28 April 2021).
van Leeuwen, Theo
1995 The representation of social actors. In: Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen Rosa and Coulthard, Malcolm eds. Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2008 Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waever, Ole., Buzan, Barry., Kelstrup, Morten, and LeMaitre, Pierre
1993 Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe. Pinter.Google Scholar
Walters, William
2010 Imagined Migration World: The European Union’s Anti-Illegal Immigration Discourse. In: Geiger, Martin and Pécoud, Antoine. (eds.) The Politics of International Migration Management. London Palgrave, pp. 73–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wincott, Daniel
2019 Brexit and the state of the United Kingdom. In: Diamond, Patrick, Nedergaard, Peter and Rosamond, Ben. eds. The Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit. London: Routledge, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2001 What CDA is about – a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In: Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael eds. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar