Article published In:
Journal of Language and PoliticsVol. 23:2 (2024) ► pp.283–305
BIOMETRIC CITIZENS in smart cities
Re-evaluating citizens’ conceptualizations in smart cities policies as extended metaphorical arguments
This article addresses the socio-cognitive conceptualizations of the notion of ‘citizenship’ within the space of smart cities. It discusses how smart cities expos are endowed with ideological bearings that mark a shift in these conceptualizations. This ideological shift is explored in the policy releases of Barcelona expo media centre 2019/2020 as retrieved from the Smart City Expo World Congress website. The framework accounts for the socio-cognitive aspects that are brought to the smart expos’ discussions, reframing it within the paradigms of Posthumanism and neoliberal urbanism. It is found that citizenship within smart city discourse is characterized by series of subjugating conflations between biovalues and biometrics, the body, technology, and the city and the citizen. These subjugations are discovered by contesting the metaphors of CITIZEN-FOCUSED URBANISM, VULNERABLE CITIZENS, and TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONISM with their reframed counterparts of BIOMETRIC CITIZEN, INFRASTRUCTURE CITIZENSHIP, and TECHNOLOGICAL PATERNALISM.
Keywords: argumentation, citizenship, extended metaphors, neoliberal urbanism Posthumanism, smart cities
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Smart city ideals: Colluding neoliberal urbanism with Posthuman citizenship
- 3.Practical reasoning arguments
- 4.Data selection and analytical procedures
- 4.1Analytical procedures
- 5.Analysis
- 5.1Citizen-focused urbanism
- 5.2Technological solutionism
- 5.3
Reframing values as Posthuman practices in a neoliberal urbanism
- 5.3.1Citizen-focused urbanism biometric citizen
- 5.3.2Vulnerable citizens’ utopia infrastructure citizenship
- 5.3.3Technological solutionism technological paternalism
- 6.Conclusion
-
References
References
Primary sources
“
“
Technology To Improve Citizens’ Lives: The Case of The Montevideo
Beaches” 2021b Tomorrow City. [URL]
Alonso, Tania
2020 “Paul
Duan, Co-Founder and President of Bayes Impact: ‘We Should Trust in The Power Of The
Multitude.’” Tomorrow City. [URL]
Bravo, David
Euklidiadas, Martínez
Fuldauer, Esther
Herranz, Arantxa
2019b “Citizens
Policing Our Streets: Is It Lawful to Report the Inappropriate Use of Cities?” Tomorrow
City. [URL]
2020 Pontus
Westerberg, UN-Habitat: “People Need to Be Allowed To Offer Their Own Solutions To The Problems In The Places In Which
They Live.” Tomorrow City. [URL]
Liceras, Patricia
Martínez, Marcos
2019a Pablo
Soto, regional representative of Transparency and Participation in Madrid: “Technology Should Be Used to Enhance
Institutions.” Tomorrow City [URL]
2021 “Cities
Are Aging with Their Population: Challenges And Solutions For An Inverted Pyramid” Tomorrow
City. [URL]
Ramos, Jaime
Secondary sources
Ajana, Btihaj
2012 “Biometric
Citizenship.” Citizenship
Studies 16 (7): 851–870, 
Aligica, Paul D.
2018 Citizenship. In Public
Entrepreneurship, Citizenship, and
Self-Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alonso, R. Garcia, and Sebastian Castro
2016 “Technology
Helps, People Make: A Smart City Governance Framework Grounded in Deliberative
Democracy”. In Smarter as the New Urban
Agenda, edited by Ramon, J. Gil-Garcia, 333–347. Springer Cham.
Barnden, John
2016 “Communicating
Flexibly with Metaphor: A Complex of Strengthening, Elaboration, Replacement, Compounding and
Unrealism.” Review of Cognitive
Linguistics 14 (2): 442–473.
Barad, Karen
2003 “Posthumanist
Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to
Matter.” Signs 28 (2): 801–831.
Berntzen, Lasse, and Marius Johannessen
2016 “The
Role of Citizen Participation in Municipal Smart City Projects: Lessons Learned from
Norway.” In Smarter as the New Urban
Agenda, edited by Ramon, J. Gil-Garcia, 299–314. Springer, Cham.
Brenner, Neil and Nik Theodore
2005 “Neoliberalism
and the Urban
Condition.” City 9(1): 101–107.
Braun, Bruce
2014 “A
New Urban Dispositif? Governing Life in an Age of Climate Change.” Environment and Planning
D: Society and
Space 321: 49–64.
Brunn, Alison
2017 “Subaltern
Bodies in the Digital Urban Imaginary.” In Architecture and
Feminisms: Ecologies, Economies, Technologies, edited by Hélène Frichot, Catharina Gabrielsson, Helen Runting, 106–111. London: Routledge.
Cardullo, Paolo
2020 Citizens
in the ’Smart City: Participation, Co – Production,
Governance. Routledge.
Cardullo, Paolo and Rob Kitchin
2019 “Smart
Urbanism and Smart Citizenship: The Neoliberal Logic of ‘Citizen-Focused’ Smart Cities in
Europe.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and
Space
37
(5): 813–830.
Craig, Robert T.
2019 “Models of Communication in
and as Metadiscourse.” In Models of Communication: Theoretical
and Philosophical Approaches, edited by Mats Bergman, Kęstas Kirtiklis, and Johan Siebers. New York: Routledge.
Deleuze, Gilles
1992 “Post-Script
on Societies of
Control.” October 591: 3–7.
Dobbins, Michel
2009 “Urban
Design and People.” Journal of the American Planning
Association 77(4): 386–387.
Estlund, David
2021 “Epistocratic
Paternalism.” In Political
Epistemology, edited by Elizabeth Edenberg and Michael Hannon, 97–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fairclough, Isabela and Norman Fairclough
2012 Political
Discourse Analysis: A Method of Advanced
Students. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman
Working
paper. “Critical Discourse Analysis and Change in Management Discourse and Ideology: A
Transdisciplinary Approach to Strategic Critique.” Available online
at: [URL]
Fors, Anna
2012 “The
Ontology of the Subject in Digitalization.” In Handbook of
Research on Technoself: Identity in a Technological Society, edited by Rocci Luppicini. 45–63.
Foucault, Michel
2007 Security,
Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France
1977–1978. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Grossi, Giuseppe and Daniela Pianezzi
2017 “Smart
Cities: Utopia or Neoliberal
Ideology?” Cities 691: 79–85.
Guillem, Susana M.
2009 “Argumentation,
Metadiscourse and Social Cognition: Organizing Knowledge in Political
Communication.” Discourse &
Society 20 (6): 727–746.
Haggerty, Kevin and Richard Ericson
2000 “The
Surveillant Assemblage.” The British Journal of
Sociology 511, 605–622.
Haraway, Donna
1991 Simians,
Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
2017 “Symbiogenesis,
Sympoiesis, and Art Science Activisms for Staying with the
Trouble.” In Arts of Living on a Damaged
Planet, edited by Anna Tsing, Elaine Gan, Nils Bubandt, and Heather Swanson, M25–M50. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Harrison, Colin, Barbara Eckman, Rick Hamilton, Perry Hartswick, Jayant Kalagnanam, Jurij Paraszczak, and Peter Williams
2010 “Foundations
for Smarter Cities.” IBM Journal of Research and
Development 54 (4): 1–16.
Hudson, Richard
1975 “The
Meaning of
Questions.” Languages 511: 17–18.
Hughes, James J.
2004 Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic
Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books
Kitchin, Rob, Claudio Coletta and Cavin McArdle
2017 Urban
Informatics, Governmentality and the Logics of Urban Control. Programmable City Working
Paper 251. [URL].
Komninos, Nicos
2009 “Intelligent
Cities: Towards Interactive and Global Innovation Environments.” International Journal of
Innovation and Regional
Development 1 (4): 337–355.
Krzyzanowski, Michal
2010 The
Discursive Construction of European identities: A Multilevel Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming
European Union. Switzerland: Peter Lang Pub.
Landau, Mark J., Lucas A. Keefer and Trevor, J. Swanson
2017 “ ‘Undoing’ a
Rhetorical Metaphor: Testing the Metaphor Extension Strategy,” Metaphor and
Symbol 32 (2): 63–83.
Latawiec, Beata, Richard Anderson, Shufeng Ma, and Kim Nguyen-Jahiel
2016 “Influence
of Collaborative Reasoning Discussions on Metadiscourse in Children’s Essays.” Text &
Talk 36(10): 2016, 23–46.
Lorimer, Jamie
2009 “Posthumanism/Posthumanistic
Geographies.” International Encyclopaedia of Human
Geography 81, 344–354.
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Walton, Douglas
2018 “Practical
Reasoning Arguments: A Modular
Approach.” Argumentation 32 (4): 519–547.
Macgilchrist, Felicitas
2021 “Theories
of Postdigital Heterogeneity: Implications for Research on Education and
Datafication.” Postdigital Science and
Education, 31, 660–667.
Mayes, Christopher
2015 The
Biopolitics of Lifestyle: Foucault, Ethics and Healthy
Choices. Routledge: New York.
Morozov, Evgeny
2014 To
Save Everything, Click Here. New York City, NY, USA: Public Affairs.
Mousley, Andy
2016 “The
Posthuman.” In The Cambridge Companion to
Frankenstein, edited by Andrew Smith, 158–72. Cambridge Companions to Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nayar, Pramod
2014 Posthumanism. London and New York: Polity Press.
2022 Posthuman
Urban Spaces in Dave Eggers’ the Circle. In Technology, Urban
Space and the Networked Community, edited by Saswat Samay Das, Ananya Roy Pratihar, 197–216. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Patton, Paul
1994 “Metamorpho-Logic:
Bodies and Powers in A Thousand Plateaus.” Journal of the British Society for
Phenomenology 251: 157–169.
Peck, Jamie, and Nik Theodore
2012 “Reanimating
Neoliberalism: Process Geographies of Neoliberalism.
Soc
.” Anthropol 20 (2): 177–185.
Pietra, John D. and Simon Wang
2021 “Enough
is Enough: This Cycle of Violence Has to Come to an End: Practical Reasoning in The Editorials During the Extraction Bill
Crisis of Hong Kong.” Discourse &
Communication 15 (4). 415–432.
Pinson, Gilles and Christelle Morel Journel
2016 “The
Neoliberal City – Theory, Evidence, Debates.” Territory, Politics,
Governance 4(2): 137–153,
Reigner, Hélène
2016 “Neoliberal
Rationality and Neohygienist Morality. A Foucauldian Analysis of Safe and Sustainable Urban Transport Policies in
France.” Territory, Politics,
Governance 4(2): 1–20.
Rose, Gillian
2017 “Posthuman
Agency in the Digitally Mediated City: Exteriorization, Individuation, Reinvention.” Annals
of the American Association of
Geographers 107 (4): 779–793,
Shaw, Debra Benita
2017 Posthuman Urbanism: Mapping
Bodies in Contemporary City Space. London and New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Sunstein, Cass
2015 Choosing
not to Choose: Understanding the Value of Choice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Toulmin, Stephen
2003 The
Uses of Argument. 2nd
edn. Cambridge: University Press.
Turner, Rachel
2008 Neoliberal
Ideology: History, Concepts and Policies. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh.
Walton, Douglas
2001 “Abductive,
Presumptive and Plausible Arguments.” Informal
Logic, 211: 141–169.
van Eemeren, Frans
2012 “The
Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation in
Discussion.” Argumentation 26 (4): 439–457.
van Eemeren, Frans, Bart Garssen, Erik Krabbe, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij and Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014 “The
Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation.” In Handbook of
Argumentation
Theory. Springer, Dordrecht.
van Eemeren, Frans, Rob Grootendorst, and Ralph, H. Johnson
2013 Fundamentals of
Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary
Developments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Vanolo, Alberto
2014 “Smartmentality:
The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy.” Urban
Studies
51
(5): 883–898.
Virilio, Paul
1995 The
Art of the Motor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Visser, Robin
2018 “Posthuman
Policies for Creative, Smart, Eco-cities? Case Studies from China.” Environment and
Planning A: Economy and
Space 51 (1): 206–225.