Using the methodology of conversation analysis and a modified analytical framework, this article attempts to
characterize and investigate Trump’s practices to resist the agendas of the interviewers’ questions during the press briefings
held by the Trump Administration in 2020. Statistical data show that Trump mainly used four types of overt resistant response
practices in order of decreasing frequency: (1) Justifying the resistance; (2) Providing a partial answer; (3) Flatly
refusing to answer without any explanation; and (4) Resorting to a personal attack, which is a new type of overt resistant
practices. However, only one type of covert resistant response practice is identified, i.e. Repeating words subversively. The
potential reasons for Trump’s use of such practices are discussed. In essence, Trump’s deliberate use of resistant response
practices is a typical reflection of the right-wing populist politicians’ claim of “authenticity” rather than “truth” in the
Post-Truth era.
Albert, Saul and Chase Raymand. 2019. Conversation
analysis at the ‘middle region’ of public life: Greetings and the interactional construction of Donald Trump’ political
persona. Language and
Communication 691: 67–83.
Bull, Peter. 1994. On
identifying questions, replies and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and
Social
Psychology 13(2): 115–153.
Chang, J.2020, February26. San
Francisco Chinatown Affected by Coronavirus Fears, Despite No Conffrmed Cases:
NPR. NPR. Retrieved from [URL]
Chovanec, Jan. 2020. “Those
are not my words”: Evasion and metalingual accountability in political scandal talkJournal of
Pragmatics 1581: 66–79.
Clayman, Steven. 2001. Answers
and evasionsLanguage in
Society 30 (3): 403–442.
Clayman, Steven. 2002. Disagreements
and third parties: dilemma of neutralism in panel news interviews. Journal of
Pragmatics 341:1385–1401.
Clayman, Steven. 2013. Conversation
analysis in the news interview In: The Handbook of Conversation
Analysis ed. by Sidnell Jack. and Stivers Tanya. 630–656. Wiley-Blackwell.
Clayman, Steven and John Heritage. 2002a. The
News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge University Press.
Clayman, Steven and John Heritage. 2002b. Questioning
presidents: journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of U.S presidents Eisenhower and
Reagan. Journal of
Communication 52(4): 749–775.
Clayman, Steven and John Heritage. 2021. Conversation
analysis and the study of sociohistorical change. Research on Language and Social
Interaction. 54(2): 225–240.
Clayman, Steven, John Heritage, Marc Elliot and McDonald Laurie. 2007. When
does the watchdog bark? Conditions of aggressive questions in presidential news
conferences. American Sociological
Review 72(1): 23–41.
Degani, Marta. 2016. “Endangered
intellect: A case study of Clinton vs. Trump campaign discourse.” Iperstoria – Testi
Letterature Linguaggi 81.
Dhanani, Y. Lindsay and Franz, Berkeley. 2020. Why
public health framing matters: An experimental study of the effects of Covid-19 framing on prejudice and xenophobia in the
United States. Social Science and
Medicine 2691: 1–8.
Ekström, Mats. 2009a. Announced
refusal to answer: a study of norms and accountability in broadcast political
interviews. Discourse
Studies 11(6): 681–702.
Ekström, Mats. and Goran Eriksson. 2018. Press
conferences In: The Routledge Handbook of Language and
Politics ed. by Wodak, Ruth and Bernhard Forchtner, 342–354. Taylor &Francis Group.
Gitlin, Todd. 2018. From
‘Liberal Media’ to ‘Fake News’. The American
Prospect 121.
Greatbatch, David. 1986a. Aspects
of topical organization in news interviews: the use of agenda-shifting procedures by
interviews. Media, Culture and
Society 8(4): 441–455.
Greatbatch, David. 1988. A
turn-taking system for British news interviewsLanguage in
Society 17(3), 401–430.
Harris, Sandra. 1991. Evasion
action: how politicians respond to questions in political
interviews In: Broadcast Talk ed.
by Paddy Scannell, 76–99. London: Sage.
Heritage, John. 1984b. Garfinkel
and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heritage, John. 1985. Amazing
news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing
audience. In: Handbook of Discourse
Analysis ed. by Teun A. Dijk, 95–119. New York: Academic Press.
Heritage, John. 2002b. The
limits of questioning: negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of
Pragmatics 34 (10–11): 1427–1446.
Heritage, John and Steven, Clayman. 2010. Talk
in Interaction Wiley-Blackwell.
Heritage, John and Greatbatch, David. 1986. Greeting
applause: a study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of
Sociology 92(1): 110–157.
Heritage, John and Greatbatch, David. 1991. On
the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news
interviews. In: Talk and social structure: Studies in
ethnomethodology and conversation analysis ed. by Boden Deirdre and Donald Zimmerman, 93–137. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jacobsen, Ronald Rosendal. 2019. Interruption and
co-construction in the First 2016 Trump-Clinton US presidential debate. Journal of
Pragmatics 1481: 71–87.
Jones, H. Rodney. 2021. The wounded leader: The
illness narratives of Boris Johnson and Donald Trump. Discourse, Context and
Media 411:1–11.
Kumar, Joynt Martha. 2020. Contemporary
presidency–Presidents meet reporters: Is Donard Trump an outlier among recent
presidents?Presidential Studies
Quarterly 501: 193–215.
Romaniuk, Tanya. 2013. Pursuing
answers to questions in broadcast journalism. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 46 (2): 144–164.
Ross, S. Andrew and Caldwell, David. 2020. ‘Going
negative’: An ALLRAISAL analysis of the rhetoric of Donald Trump on twitter. Language and
Communication 701: 13–27.
Schalash, D. (2020). The
disaffiliative use of ‘did you know’ questions in Arabic news interviews: the case of Aljazeera’s ‘The opposite
direction’. Discourse
Studies 22(5): 590–609.
Schubert, Christoph. 2019. ‘Ok,
well, first of all, let me say…’: Discursive uses of response initiators in US presidential primary
debates. Discourse
Studies 21(4): 438–457.
Sclafani, Jennifer. 2018. Talking
about Donald Trump: A Sociolinguistic Study of Style, Metadiscourse, and Political
Identity. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Stopfner, Maria. 2021. Just
thank God for Donald Trump – Dialogue practices of populists and their supporters before and after taking
office. Journal of
Pragmatics 1861: 308–320.
ten Have, Paul. 1999. Doing
conversation analysis: A practical
guide. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth, Jonathan Culpeper and Elena Semino. 2020. Shameless
normalization of impoliteness: Berlusconi’s and Trump’s press conferences. Discourse &
Society 32(3): 369–393.