References (34)
References
Albertson, Bethany L. 2015. “Dog-whistle politics: Multivocal communication and religious appeals.” Political Behavior, 37 (1): 3–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1986. “Issue Voting Under Uncertainty: An Empirical Test.” American Journal of Political Science, 30 (4): 709–728. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhat, Prashanth, and Ofra Klein. 2020. “Covert hate speech: White nationalists and dog whistle communication on twitter.” In Twitter, the public sphere, and the chaos of online deliberation, Edited by Gwen Bouvier and Judith E. Rosenbaum, 151–172. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boholm, Max, and Asad Sayeed. 2023. Political dogwhistles and community divergence in semantic change. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Historical Language Change: 53–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breitholtz, Ellen. 2020. Enthymemes and Topoi in Dialogue: the use of common sense reasoning in conversation. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Breitholtz, Ellen, and Robin Cooper. 2021. ”Dogwhistles as Inferences in Interaction.” Proceedings of the Reasoning and Interaction Conference (ReInAct2021): 40–46.Google Scholar
Cooper, Robin. 2019. “Representing Types as Neural Events”. Journal of Language, Logic and Information. 28 (2), 131–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drakulich, Kevin, Kevin H. Wozniak, John Hagan, and Devon Johnson. 2020. “Race and policing in the 2016 presidential election: Black lives matter, the police, and dog whistle politics.” Criminology, 58 (2): 370–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1988. “Topoi and formes topiques.” Bulletin d’études de la linguistique français, 221: 11–14.Google Scholar
Garrett, R. Kelly, Dustin Carnahan, and Emily K. Lynch. 2013. “A turn toward avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information.” Political Behavior, 35 (1): 113–134.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E., and Michael Saward. 2005. “Dog whistles and democratic mandates.” The Political Quarterly, 76 (4): 471–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Noah and Michael C. Frank. 2016. “Pragmatic language interpretation as probabilistic inference”. Trends in cognitive sciences, 20 (11): 818–829. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haney-López, Ian. 2014. Dog whistle politics: How coded racial appeals have reinvented racism and wrecked the middle class: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, Robert, and Elin McCready. 2019. “Dog-whistles and the at-issue/not-at-issue distinction”. In Secondary Content, Edited by Daniel Gutzmann and Katherine Turgay, 222–245. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, George A. 2007. Aristotle On Rhetoric, a theory of civic discourse. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Khoo, Justin. 2017. “Code words in political discourse”. Philosophical Topics, 45 (2): 33–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Olivier, Russell Spears, and Stephen Reicher. 2007. “Social identity performance: Extending the strategic side of SIDE.” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11 (1): 28–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lamis, Alexander P. 1984. The Two-Party South. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, Stephan., Ullrich, U. K., Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, and John Cook. 2012. “Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing.” Psychological science in the public interest, 13 (3): 106–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, Elina, Björn Rönnerstrand, Ellen Breitholtz, Robin Cooper, Gregor Rettenegger, and Asad Sayeed. 2023. “Can Politicians Broaden Their Support by Using Dog Whistle Communication?119th APSA Annual Meeting & Exhibition, August 31 – September 3, 2023. Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
Mendelberg, Tali. 2001. The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myrendal, Jenny. 2019. Negotiating meanings online: Disagreements about word meaning in discussion forum communication. Discourse Studies, 21 (3): 317–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perry, Samuel L. 2023. “Mating Call, Dog Whistle, Trigger: Asymmetric Alignments, Race, and the Use of Reactionary Religious Rhetoric in American Politics.” Sociological Theory, 41 (1): 56–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2007. “The expressive dimension.” Theoretical Linguistics, 33 (2): 165–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rovny, Jan. 2012. “Who emphasizes and who blurs? Party strategies in multidimensional competition.” European Union Politics, 13 (2): 269–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1972. “The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition.” American Political Science Review, 66 (2): 555–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Somer-Topcu, Zeynep. 2015. “Everything to everyone: The electoral consequences of the broad-appeal strategy in Europe.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 841–854. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Jason. 2015. How propaganda works. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Svensson, A. 2019. “Veckans nyord: Hundvissla.” Språktidningen, May 20, 2019. [URL]
Tomz, Michael, and Robert P. van Houweling. 2009. “The Electoral Implications of Candidate Ambiguity.” American Political Science Review, 103 (1): 83–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., and Vincent L. Hutchings, and Ismail K. White. 2002. “Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns.” American Political Science Review 96 (1): 75–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wetts, Rachel, and Robb Willer. 2019. “Who is called by the dog whistle? Experimental evidence that racial resentment and political ideology condition responses to racially encoded messages.” Socius, 51: 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Ismail K. 2007. “When race matters and when it doesn’t: Racial group differences in response to racial cues.” American Political Science Review, 101 (2): 339–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Åkerlund, Mathilda. 2021. “Dog whistling far-right code words: the case of ‘culture enricher’ on the Swedish web.” Information, Communication & Society, 25 (12): 1–18.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lindgren, Elina, Björn Rönnerstrand, Gregor Rettenegger, Ellen Breitholtz, Robin Cooper & Asad Sayeed
2024. Coded Appeals and Political Gains: Exploring the Impact of Racial Dogwhistles on Political Support. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.