Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics: Online-First Articles

Discourse and transformation

A discourse-historical approach to understanding energy in China’s diplomatic discourse

ORCID logo | Shanghai International Studies University
ORCID logo | Shanghai University of International Business and Economics

This paper sets out to investigate the representation of energy in China’s diplomatic discourse in a context where power structures within and among nation-states are shifting and energy is becoming more politicized. To do this, this research adopts corpus-assisted discourse-historical analysis to examine discursive strategies and investigates the way energy is constructed in China’s diplomacy. Results show a dichotomy of an active ingroup and an indifferent outgroup, revealing a reversal of power in the fierce competition of discourse in the international energy sector, which serves as a catalyst for the creation of demand for new energy sources and the development of new energy industries. The analysis of grounded linguistic evidences also signifies that discourse is the site where power is not only enacted and performed, but also negotiated and contested.

Keywords: Discourse-Historical Approach, energy, corpus-assisted, diplomatic discourse, China
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Energy diplomacy and discourse
  • 3.Unmasking discourse through the corpus-assisted DHA
  • 4.Data and methods
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Discourse topics
    • 5.2Discursive strategies
      • 5.2.1Nomination and predication strategies
      • 5.2.2Argumentation strategies
        • 5.2.2.1Topos of responsibility and topos of definition
        • 5.2.2.2Topos of reality
        • 5.2.2.3Topos of numbers and topos of contributions
      • 5.2.3Intensification and mitigation strategy
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 2 July 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.24025.jia
References (38)
Asdal, Kristin, and Noortje Marres
2014 “Performing Environmental Change: The Politics of Social Science Methods.” Environment and Planning A 46 (9): 2055–2064. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boukala, Salomi, and Dimitra Dimitrakopoulou
2017 “The Politics of Fear vs. the Politics of Hope: Analysing the 2015 Greek Election and Referendum Campaigns.” Critical Discourse Studies 14 (1): 39–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Amanda D.
2017 “Examining Community Perceptions of Energy Systems Development: The Role of Communication and Sense of Place.” Environmental Communication 11 (2): 184–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyer, Dominic
2014 “Energopower: An Introduction.” Anthropological Quarterly 87 (2): 309–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Can, Küçükali
2014 “Discursive Strategies of Instrumentalizing History in Mainstream Turkish Political Discourse.” Journal of Language and Politics 13 (1): 98–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casier, Tom
2011 “The Rise of Energy to the Top of the EU-Russia Agenda: From Interdependence to Dependence?.” Geopolitics 16 (3): 536–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaiyapa, Warathida, Miguel Esteban, and Yasuko Kameyama
2018 “Why Go Green? Discourse Analysis of Motivations for Thailand’s Oil and Gas Companies to Invest in Renewable Energy.” Energy Policy 1201: 448–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cox, J. Robert
2010 “Beyond Frames: Recovering the Strategic in Climate Communication.” Environmental Communication 4 (1): 122–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cozen, Brian, Danielle Endres, Tarla Rai Peterson, Cristi Horton, and Joshua Trey Barnett
2018 “Energy Communication: Theory and Praxis towards a Sustainable Energy Future.” Environmental Communication 12 (3): 289–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djerf-Pierre, Monika, John Cokley, and Louise J. Kuchel
2016 “Framing Renewable Energy: A Comparative Study of Newspapers in Australia and Sweden.” Environmental Communication 10 (5): 634–655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1989 Language and Power. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
2005 “Critical Discourse Analysis in Transdisciplinary Research.” In A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton, 53–70. Amsterdam: Benjamin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldthau, Andreas
2010 “Energy Diplomacy in Trade and Investment of Oil and Gas.” In Global Energy Governance: The New Rules of the Game, edited by Andreas Goldthau and Jan Martin Witte, 25–47. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Steven
2019 “Energy Diplomacy in a Time of Energy Transition.” Energy Strategy Reviews 261: 100386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gwet, Kilem
2001 Handbook of Inter-rater Reliability: How to Estimate the Level of Agreement between Two or Multiple Raters. Gaithersburg MD: STATAXIS Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Herranz-Surrallés, Anna
2016 “An Emerging EU Energy Diplomacy? Discursive Shifts, Enduring Practices.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (9): 1386–1405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huan, Changpeng, and Menghan Deng
2021 “Partners or Predators? A Corpus-based Study of China’s Image in South African Media.” African Journalism Studies 42 (3): 34–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Siegfried, and Florentine Maier
2009 “Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of Foucauldian Critical Discourse Analysis and Dispositive Analysis.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 34–61. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kuteleva, Anna
2020 “Discursive Politics of Energy in EU-Russia Relations: Russia as an “Energy Superpower” and a “Raw-material Appendage”.” Problems of Post-Communism 67 (1): 78–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladislaw, Sarah, and Nikos Tsafos
2019 Energy Spheres of Influence. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N.
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Leschzyk, Dinah K.
2021 “Infodemic in Germany and Brazil: How the AfD and Jair Bolsonaro are Sowing Distrust during the Corona Pandemic.” Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 51 (3): 477–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Tao, and Yifan Zhu
2020 “How does China Appraise Self and Others? A Corpus-based Analysis of Chinese Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 31 (2): 153–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liao, Janet Xuanli
2021 “China’s Energy Diplomacy towards Central Asia and the Implications on its “Belt and Road Initiative”.” The Pacific Review 34 (3): 490–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahmood, Arfan, Mehran Idris Khan, Shahid Ali, Zaheer Abbas, and Nouman Khan
2022 “The Role of Chinese Regimes of Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the Belt and Road Initiative in the Transformation of Its Energy Diplomacy: Quest for Economic Sustainability.” Sustainability 14 (24): 16997. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchi, Anna, and Charlotte Taylor
2009 “If on a Winter’s Night Two Researchers…: A Challenge to Assumptions of Soundness of Interpretation.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 3 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Pelling, Mark, Karen O’Brien, and David Matyas
2015 “Adaptation and Transformation.” Climatic Change 1331: 113–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Janet
2017 “What does Energy Mean? An Interdisciplinary Conversation.” Energy Research & Social Science 261: 103–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tarasova, Ekaterina
2018 “(Non-) Alternative Energy Transitions: Examining Neoliberal Rationality in Official Nuclear Energy Discourses of Russia and Poland.” Energy research & social science 411: 128–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tichý, Lukáš
2020 “EU Political Discourse on the Energy Security Relations with Russia.” European Political Science 19 (4): 603–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, Thomas
2021 “Energy, History, and the Humanities: Against a New Determinism.” History and Technology 37 (2): 247–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2011 “Discourse and Ideology.” In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, edited by Teun A. Van Dijk, 379–407. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Michael
2017 “Imperial Oil: The Anatomy of a Nigerian Oil Insurgency.” In Energy Humanities: An Anthology, edited by Imre Szeman and Dominic Boyer, 219–235. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
1996 “The Genesis of Racist Discourse in Austria since 1989. In Texts and Practices, edited by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, Malcom Coulthard, 107–128. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
2009 Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Zhou, Zhongbing, and Quande Qin
2020 “Decoding China’s Natural Gas Development: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Five-year Plans.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 1511: 119798. DOI logoGoogle Scholar