Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 3:1 (2004) ► pp.325
References (51)
References
Abélès, Marc. 1992. La vie quotidienne au parlement européen. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Ammon, Ulrich. 2001. The Dominance of English as a Language of Science. Effects on Other Languages and Language Communities. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter. 1992. Introduction: John Gumperz’ approach to contextualization. In: P. Auer and A. Di Luzio (eds). The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins, 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhael. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. [ed. by C. Emerson and M. Holmquist, transl. by V.W. McGee]. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1955. A Theory of play and fantasy. Psychiatric Research Reports: Approaches to the Study of Human Personality. Vol. II1. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 39–51.Google Scholar
Bellier, Irène. 2002. European identity: Institutions and languages in the context of the enlargement. Journal of Language and Politics, Vol. I (1). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 85–114.Google Scholar
Beneke, Jürgen and Eggers, Annemarie. 1995. Lernziele. In: G. Von der Hand and H. Stricker (eds). Das Zertifikat Deutsch für den Beruf. Frankfurt, München: Deutscher Volkshochschul-Verband and Goethe-Institut, 21–50.Google Scholar
Boden, Deirdre. 1994. The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Born, Joachim and Schütte, Wilfried. 1995. Eurotexte: Textarbeit in einer Institution der EG. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. and Brennan, Susan E. 1993. Grounding in communication. In: L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, and S.D. Teasley (eds). Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington, D.C. (American Psychological Association), 129–149.Google Scholar
De Cillia, Rudolf. 2003. Grundlagen und Tendenzen der europäischen Sprachenpolitik. In: M. Mokre, G. Weiss and R. Bauböck (eds). Europas Identitäten. Mythen, Konflikte, Konstruktionen. Frankfurt, New York: Campus, 231–256.Google Scholar
Erickson, Frederick. 1976. Gatekeeper encounters: A social selection process. In: P.R. Sanday (ed.). Anthropology and the Public Interest. London, New York: Academic Press, 111–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 1998. Terminologie & Traduction. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
European Communities. 1999. A Multilingual Community at Work. Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
European Cultural Foundation. 1999. Which Languages for Europe? Report of the Conference held in Oegstgeest, The Netherlands. Oegstgeest: European Cultural Foundation.Google Scholar
European Parliament’s Directorate-General for Information and Communication. 1999. The European Parliament. Office for official publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Firth, Alan. 1991. Discourse at Work: Negotiating by Telex, Fax and ‘Phone. [doctoral dissertation] Aalborg: University of Aalborg.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua. 1994. On the limits of ethnolinguistic democracy. In: T. Skutnabb-Kangas and R. Phillipson (eds). Linguistic Human Rights. Overcoming Linguistic Discriminations. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 49–61.Google Scholar
Frake, Charles O. 1977. Plying frames can be dangerous: Some reflections on methodology in cognitive anthropology. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Development. Vol. I1. Rockefeller University, 1–7.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1987. Social Theory and Modern Social Thought. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1978. The conversational analysis of interethnic communication. In: E.L. Ross (ed.). Interethnic Communication. Athens: Georgia Press, 14–31.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1974. Ways of speaking. In: R. Bauman and J. Sherzer (eds). Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 433–451.Google Scholar
Koole, Tom and Thije, Jan ten. 1994. The Construction of Intercultural Discourse. Team Discussions of Educational Advisers. [Utrecht Studies in Language and Communication], [doctoral dissertation Utrecht University]. Amsterdam — Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Labrie, Norman. 1993. La construction linguistique de la Communauté européenne. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Loos, Eugène F. 1997. Internationale Bedrijfscommunicatie. Reconstructief onderzoek naar het intertekstuele netwerk van Nederlandse en Duitse actoren in een bungalowpark. [doctoral dissertation] Utrecht: Utrecht University.
1998. Language choice at work. Implications of language policy for management of meaning at a Dutch holiday centre in Germany. In: M. Gastelaars and A. de Ruijter (eds). A United Europe: The Quest for a Multifaceted Identity. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing, 101–125.Google Scholar
1999. Intertextual networks in organizations: the use of written and oral business discourse in relation to context. In: F. Bargiela-Chiappini and C. Nickerson (eds). Genres, Media and Discourses. London: Longman, 315–332.Google Scholar
2000. Language choice, linguistic capital and symbolic domination in the European Union. Language Problems & Language Planning. Vol.XXIV (1). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 37–53.Google Scholar
Lopes Sabino, Amadeu. 1999. Les langues dans l’Union Européenne — Enjeux, pratiques et perspectives. In: European Cultural Foundation. Which languages for Europe? Report of the conference held in Oegstgeest, The Netherlands. Oegstgeest: European Cultural Foundation, 99–109.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge & Kegan.Google Scholar
Mamadouh, Virginie. 1995. De talen in het Europees Parlement. Amsterdam: Instituut voor Sociale Wetenschappen, Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
. 1999. Institutional multilingualism: An exploration of possible reforms. In: European Cultural Foundation. Which languages for Europe? Report of the Conference Held in Oegstgeest, The Netherlands. Oegstgeest: European Cultural Foundation, 119–125.Google Scholar
Minsky, Marvin Lee. 1975. A framework for representing knowledge. In: P.H. Winston (ed.). The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York: McGraw Hill, 211–277.Google Scholar
Muntigl, Peter. 2000. The European Union: Policy-making through organizational discursive practices. In: P. Muntigl, G. Weiss and R. Wodak (eds). European Union Discourses on Un/employment. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Employment Policy-Making and Organizational Change. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, Robert. 2001. Principles for a supranational EU language policy. Presentation at the conference L’Europe parlera-t-elle l’anglais demain? 03.03.2001. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Publications and Public Events Service of the European Parliament. 1998. United in Democracy.
Ross, R.N. 1975. Ellipsis and structure of expectation. San Jose State Occasional Papers in Linguistics. Vol. I1. 183–191.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel. 1989. The Ethnography of Communication. Oxford, New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2001. Closing a conceptual gap: the case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (11), 133–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spradley, James P. 1980. Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rineholt & Winston.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen. 1985. Kulturelle Kodes und ethnische Grenzen: Drei Theorien über Fehlschläge in der interethnischen Kommunikation. In: J. Rehbein (ed.). Interkulturelle Kommunikation. Tübingen: Narr, 103–120.Google Scholar
Swaan, Abram de. 1999. The European language constellation. In: European Cultural Foundation. Which languages for Europe? Report of the Conference Held in Oegstgeest, The Netherlands. Oegstgeest: European Cultural Foundation, 13–23.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1979. What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In: R.O. Freedle (ed.). New Directions in Discourse Processing. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, 137–181.Google Scholar
Weick, Karl E. 1969. The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert. 2000. Researching the European Union. Data and ethnography. In: P. Muntigl, G. Weiss and R. Wodak (eds). European Union Discourses on Un/employment. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Employment Policy-Making and Organizational Change. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins, 51–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2000. From Conflict to consensus? The co-construction of a policy paper. In: P. Muntigl, G. Weiss and R. Wodak (eds). European Union Discourses on Un/employment. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Employment Policy-Making and Organizational Change. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins, 73–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Lindholm, Maria
2008. A community text pattern in the European commission press release? A generic and genetic view. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 18:1  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Loos, Eugène
2007. Language policy in an enacted world. Language Problems and Language Planning 31:1  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Pelinka, Anton
2007. Language as a political category. Journal of Language and Politics 6:1  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.