Article published In:
Journal of Language and PoliticsVol. 3:2 (2004) ► pp.267–292
The “conversation on Austria”
A televised representation of Austria’s internal condition after the national-conservative “Wende”
In February 2000, the Austrian Christian conservative People’s Party ÖVP and the right wing nationalist Freedom Party (under its notorious leader Jörg Haider) formed a new government in Austria. This political change resulted not only in heavy political protests in Austria, but also caused bilateral sanctions of the other 14 EU member states against the new government. In March 2000, Austria’s public broadcasting company organised a media discussion between representatives of the then government, opposition politicians, representatives of the Austrian civil society and ‘ordinary people’ to establish a ‘national consent’ towards the sanctions. Drawing upon insights from appraisal theory, social semiotics and critical discourse analysis, this paper demonstrates how non-verbal situational aspects as well as discursive features of this program are used by the programme makers to create an overall impression of ‘Austria as a victim’ and how dissenting voices are silenced.
References (23)
de Cillia, Rudolf. 2003. “Wie kommen wir eigentlich dazu, von der EU so schlecht behandelt zu werden?” — Österreich “gespräch” und Opferthese. In: H. Gruber, F. Menz and O. Panagl (eds). Sprache und politischer Wandel. Frankfurt/Main et al..: Peter Lang Verlag, 233–253.
de Cillia, Rudolf and Gruber, Helmut. 2003. “Die Emotionen herunterholen”. Anspruch und Wirklichkeit im “Österreichgespräch” des ORF vom 15.3.2000. In: A. Betten, R. Schrodt and A. Weiss (eds). Neue Sprachmoral? Medien — Politik — Schule. o.O.: Edition Praesens, 129–144.
Eggins, Suzanne and Martin, James R. 1997. Genres and registers of discourse. In: T. van Dijk (ed.). Discourse Studies. Discourse as Structure and Process (Vol. 11). London et al.: Sage, 230–257.
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
. 1995a. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
. 1995b. Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
Fairclough, Norman and Mauranen, Anna. 1997. The conversationalisation of political discourse: A comparative view. In: J. Blommaert and Ch. Bulcaen (eds). Political Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 89–121.
Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News. Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2 ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Halper, Alexander and Hummler, Michaela. 2001. Konzeptuelle Metaphern in Fernsehgesprächen mit Politikern. Unpublished manuscript, Vienna: Deptartment of Linguistics.
Holly, Werner. 1992. Zur Inszenierung von Konfrontation in politischen Fernsehinterviews. In A. Grewenig (ed.). Inszenierte Information. Politik und strategische Kommunikation in den Medien. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 164–197.
. 1993. Fernsehen und Streitkultur. In >J. Janota (ed.). Germanistik und Deutschunterricht im historischen Wandel. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 57–66.
Holly, Werner, Kühn, Peter and Püschel, Ulrich. 1986. Politische Fernsehdiskussionen. Zur medienspezifischen Inszenierung von Propaganda als Diskussion. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 
Kress, Gunter and van Leeuwen, Theo. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
Kress, Gunther and van Leeuwen, Theo. 1998. Front pages: (The critical) analysis of newspaper layout. In: A. Bell and P.E. Garrett (eds). Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell, 186–220.
Martin, James R. 1992. English Text. System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1997. Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In: F. Christie and J.R. Martin (eds). Genre and Institutions. Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Cassell, 3–19.
1999. Modelling context: A crooked path of progress in contextual linguistics. In: M. Ghadessy (ed.). Text and Context in Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 25–63.
2000. Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In: S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds). Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 142–176.
Sperl, Gerfried. 2000. Der Machtwechsel. Österreichs politische Krise zu Beginn des 3. Jahrtausends. Wien: Molden Verlag.
Strauss, Günther. 1986. Der politische Wortschatz. Tübingen: Narr.
Thompson, John B. 1995. The Media and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
White, Peter. 1999. An Introductory Tour through Appraisal. Unpublished manuscript, Birmingham: English Language Research, Dept. of English, University of Birmingham.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Carpentier, Nico
2018. Media and Participation. In Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change, ► pp. 1 ff. 
Carpentier, Nico
2020. Media and Participation. In Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change, ► pp. 195 ff.
Carpentier, Nico & Nick Resmann
2011. The “Ordinary” on Commercial Radio and TV: A Reception Analysis of the Subject Position of Ordinary People in the Participatory ProgramsRecht van AntwoordandZwart of Wit. The Communication Review 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Carpentier, Nico & Wim Hannot
2009. To be a common hero. International Journal of Cultural Studies 12:6 ► pp. 597 ff.
Carpentier, Nico & Benjamin De Cleen
2007. Bringing Discourse Theory into Media Studies. Journal of Language and Politics 6:2 ► pp. 265 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.