The “conversation on Austria”
A televised representation of Austria’s internal condition after the national-conservative “Wende”
In February 2000, the Austrian Christian conservative People’s Party ÖVP and the right wing nationalist Freedom Party (under its notorious leader Jörg Haider) formed a new government in Austria. This political change resulted not only in heavy political protests in Austria, but also caused bilateral sanctions of the other 14 EU member states against the new government. In March 2000, Austria’s public broadcasting company organised a media discussion between representatives of the then government, opposition politicians, representatives of the Austrian civil society and ‘ordinary people’ to establish a ‘national consent’ towards the sanctions. Drawing upon insights from appraisal theory, social semiotics and critical discourse analysis, this paper demonstrates how non-verbal situational aspects as well as discursive features of this program are used by the programme makers to create an overall impression of ‘Austria as a victim’ and how dissenting voices are silenced.
Keywords: media analysis, appraisal analysis, social semiotics, political discourse analysis
Published online: 24 August 2004
Cited by 5 other publications
Carpentier, Nico & Benjamin De Cleen
Carpentier, Nico & Wim Hannot
Carpentier, Nico & Nick Resmann
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
de Cillia, Rudolf
de Cillia, Rudolf and Gruber, Helmut
Eggins, Suzanne and Martin, James R.
Fairclough, Norman and Mauranen, Anna
Halper, Alexander and Hummler, Michaela
Holly, Werner, Kühn, Peter and Püschel, Ulrich
Kress, Gunter and van Leeuwen, Theo
Kress, Gunther and van Leeuwen, Theo