Atlas, J. D.
2000Logic, Meaning, and Conversation: Semantical Underdeterminacy, Implicature, and the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, P.
Borch, F. L. and Wilson, P. S.
2003International Law and the War on Terror. Newport, R.I.: Naval War College.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. A.
2004Political Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
2003Hegemony or Survival. America’s Quest for Global Dominance. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Christopher, P.
2003The Ethics of War and Peace. An Introduction to Legal and Moral Issues. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Daalder, I. H and Lindsay, J. M.
2003America Unbound. The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y.
2001War, Aggression, and Self-Defense. Cambridge [England] New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falk, R. A.
2003The Great Terror War. New York: Olive Branch Press.Google Scholar
Gareau, F. H.
2004State Terrorism and the United States. From Counterinsurgency to the War on Terrorism. Atlanta, GA: Clarity Press.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G.
1979Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Geis, M. L.
1987The Language of Politics. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. E and Klingemann, H. D.
(eds). 1996A New Handbook of Political Science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P.
1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. andMcGuire, W. J.
1993Explorations in Political Psychology. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lau, R. R and Sears, D. O.
(eds) 1986Political Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
2000Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Rojo, L.
1995Division and rejection: From the personification of the Gulf conflict to the demonisation of Saddam Hussein. Discourse & Society6(1), 49–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Rojo, L. and Van Dijk, T. A.
1997“There was a problem, and it was solved!” Legitimating the expulsion of ‘illegal’ immigrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse. Discourse & Society8(4), 523–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newhouse, J.
2003Imperial America. The Bush Assault on the World Order. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Nye, J. S.
2000Understanding International Conflicts. An Introduction to Theory and History. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Rodin, D.
2002War and Self-Defense. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E.
1984Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 461, 365–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A.
1993Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society 4(2), 249–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998aIdeology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London, England UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
1998bWhat is political discourse analysis?In: Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen (eds). Political Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 11-52.Google Scholar
2000 Parliamentary debates In: R. Wodak and T. A van Dijk (eds). Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava Verlag, 45-78.Google Scholar
2001Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 95-120.Google Scholar
2002Political discourse and political cognition. In: Paul A. Chilton and Christina Schäffner (eds). Politics as Text and Talk. Analytical approaches to political discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 204-236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Knowledge in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and Politics 2(1), 93-129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Text and context of parliamentary debates. In: P. Bayleyed.. Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 339–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J.
1990Politically Speaking. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wodak, R.
Wodak, R. and Menz, F.
(eds.) 1990Sprache in der Politik — Politik in der Sprache. Analysen zum öffentlichen Sprachgebrauch. (Language in Politics — Politics in Language. Analyses of Public Language Use). Klagenfurt: Drava.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. and Van Dijk, T. A.
eds. Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States Klagenfurt, Austria Drava Verlag
Cited by

Cited by 80 other publications

Abuelwafa, Marwa Adel
2021. Legitimation and Manipulation in Political Speeches: A Corpus-based Study. Procedia Computer Science 189  pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Akanda, Muhammad Anisur Rahman
2021. Textual meaning: Media messages of Bangladesh–China relation and its Themes. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies 10:1  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Almaged, Sadiq
Arroyo, José Luis Blas
2015. Pragmatics of Political Discourse. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Aru, Silvia
2023. ‘Battleship at the port of Europe’: Italy's closed-port policy and its legitimizing narratives. Political Geography 104  pp. 102902 ff. DOI logo
Atkinson, David & Cinta Ramblado
Aydın-Düzgit, Senem
2018. Foreign policy and identity change: Analysing perceptions of Europe among the Turkish public. Politics 38:1  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Baldi, Benedetta, Ludovico Franco & Leonardo M. Savoia
2019. Alternative truths and delegitimization pragmatic strategies around the 2018 Italian elections. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:2  pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Bartolucci, Valentina
2012. Terrorism rhetoric under the Bush Administration. Journal of Language and Politics 11:4  pp. 562 ff. DOI logo
Bartolucci, Valentina
2014. L'invasione dei migranti: la costruzione simbolica di un'emergenza umanitaria nel discorso politico italiano durante i rivolgimenti nel mondo arabo. SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE :45  pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Björkvall, Anders & Catharina Nyström Höög
2019. Legitimation of value practices, value texts, and core values at public authorities. Discourse & Communication 13:4  pp. 398 ff. DOI logo
Boukala, Salomi
2019. Greek Media Discourse About the ‘Islamist Threat’: From ‘Islamist Terrorism’ to ‘ISIS Terror’. In European Identity and the Representation of Islam in the Mainstream Press,  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Brusenbauch Meislová, Monika
2023. In Quest for Discursive Legitimation of Ongoing Policy Processes: Constructing Brexit as a Success Story. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 61:3  pp. 815 ff. DOI logo
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana B & Mercedes Díez-Prados
2014. Positive self-evaluation versus negative other-evaluation in the political genre of pre-election debates. Discourse & Society 25:2  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana B.
2015. Manipulation in Spanish and American pre-election political debates: The Rajoy–Rubalcaba vs. Obama–McCain debates. Intercultural Pragmatics 12:4 DOI logo
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana Belén
2022. Manipulation as an ideological tool in the political genre of Parliamentary discourses. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana Belén
2023. Transitivity and evaluation in American and Spanish parliamentary discourse: the 2015 State of the Union Address in the US vs. the 2015 State of the Nation Address in Spain. Critical Discourse Studies 20:2  pp. 128 ff. DOI logo
Del Saz-Rubio, Mª Milagros
2019. The pragmatic-semiotic construction of male identities in contemporary advertising of male grooming products. Discourse & Communication 13:2  pp. 192 ff. DOI logo
Diez, Mercedes
2016. The use of metaphor and evaluation as discourse strategies in pre-electoral debates. In Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 262],  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Douifi, Mohamed
2018. Introduction. In Language and the Complex of Ideology,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Efeoğlu Özcan, Esranur
2022. Pull the weeds out or perish: Using pandemic metaphors to strengthen in-group solidarity in Turkish political discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 37:2  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
El Shazly, Reham Farouk
2021. The synergy of topoi and socio-cognition in ideology construction and identity reformation: war on terror discourse. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 13:1  pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina
2016. Chapter 2. Intensification, identity and gender in the Andalusian Parliament. In A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 68],  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Fuentes-Rodríguez, Catalina
2023. Adversarial Attacks in Spanish Politics: Direct and Indirect Forms. In Political Debasement,  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Galnoor, Netta
2020. From Jewish Sentiments to Rational Exhortations. Israel Studies Review 35:2  pp. 130 ff. DOI logo
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
2010. The idiosyncratic language of Israeli ‘peace’: A Cultural Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis (CCDA). Discourse & Society 21:5  pp. 565 ff. DOI logo
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
2010. If both opponents “extend hands in peace” — Why don’t they meet?. Journal of Language and Politics 9:3  pp. 449 ff. DOI logo
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
2014. Collective memory as a metaphor: The case of speeches by Israeli prime ministers 2001–2009. Memory Studies 7:1  pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
2014. ‘TALKING PEACE – GOING TO WAR’. Critical Discourse Studies 11:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gelabert-Desnoyer, Jaime J.
2022. Not so impersonal. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Gibson, Stephen
2012. ‘I'm not a war monger but…’: Discourse Analysis and Social Psychological Peace Research. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 22:2  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Golubeva, Tatyana
2019. Hyperbole as a Persuasion Tool in Political Discourse (The Case of British Politicians’ Speech). Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 2. Jazykoznanije :3  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Guillem, Susana Martínez
2013. Constructing contexts, (re)defining immigrants: Mental models and social representations in immigration policy defense. Discourse & Society 24:2  pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
Martínez Guillem, Susana
2009. Argumentation, metadiscourse and social cognition: organizing knowledge in political communication. Discourse & Society 20:6  pp. 727 ff. DOI logo
Martínez Guillem, Susana
2019. Performing (in) places, moralizing (through) spaces. Journal of Language and Politics 18:6  pp. 803 ff. DOI logo
Kaltseis, Magdalena
2023. War Discourse on TV: A Glimpse into Russian Political Talk Shows (2014 and 2022). Zeitschrift für Slawistik 68:3  pp. 375 ff. DOI logo
Karpenko-Seccombe, Tatyana
2021. Separatism: a cross-linguistic corpus-assisted study of word-meaning development in a time of conflict. Corpora 16:3  pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
Klymenko, Lina
2016. Nation-building and presidential rhetoric in Belarus. Journal of Language and Politics 15:6  pp. 727 ff. DOI logo
Lastres-López, Cristina
Li, Ke & Xiaonan Gong
2022. Proximization: a critical cognitive analysis of health security discourse. Text & Talk 42:5  pp. 713 ff. DOI logo
Li, Tao & Yifan Zhu
2020. How does China appraise self and others? A corpus-based analysis of Chinese political discourse. Discourse & Society 31:2  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Lin, Yuting
2023. Correcting the scientific record. Pragmatics and Society DOI logo
Lin, Yuting & Meilin Chen
2022. “The more important findings are sustained”: A diachronic perspective on the genre of the retraction notice. English for Specific Purposes 67  pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Ming
2022. Stancetaking in Hong Kong political discourse. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 13:1  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Lorda, Clara Ubaldina & Elisabeth Miche
2006. Two institutional interviews: José María Aznar and Jacques Chirac on the Iraq conflict. Discourse & Society 17:4  pp. 447 ff. DOI logo
Mestre-Mestre, Eva M.
2021. Emotion and Sentiment Polarity in Parliamentary Debate: A Pragmatic Comparative Study. Corpus Pragmatics 5:3  pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Mestre-Mestre, Eva M.
2023. Emotion in Politics in Times of War: A Corpus Pragmatics Study. Corpus Pragmatics 7:4  pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Mirhosseini, Seyyed-Abdolhamid
2017. Discursive double-legitimation of (avoiding) another war in Obama’s 2013 address on Syria. Journal of Language and Politics 16:5  pp. 706 ff. DOI logo
Mishra, Smeeta
2008. Islam and Democracy. Journal of Communication Inquiry 32:2  pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Mohammadi, Ariana N
2023. Political framing of Covid-19. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics DOI logo
Momani, Kawakib, Muhammad A. Badarneh & Fathi Migdadi
2010. Intertextual borrowings in ideologically competing discourses:The case of the Middle East. Journal of Intercultural Communication 10:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Navarro, Francisco de Borja & Aiden Yeh
2022. The Dangerous Discourse of “Us” vs. “Them:” Spain's VOX Discursive Practices. Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics 16:2  pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Norberg, Anna-Maija
2021. "Man kan inte bara gympa sig igenom ämnet". Educare :3  pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
O’Regan, Mary
2010. Political Language as a Flexible Friend: Irish Parliamentary Debate on the Iraq War. Irish Political Studies 25:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Panpothong, Natthaporn & Siriporn Phakdeephasook
2022. “I Am Well-Loved by the Voters”: Self-Praise in Thai Political Discourse and Two Emic Concepts of Thai (Im)politeness. In Self-Praise Across Cultures and Contexts [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ],  pp. 351 ff. DOI logo
Pinero-Pinero, Gracia
2017. A matrix of cognitive domains at the service of the metaphoric delegitimisation of politicians. Discourse, Context & Media 18  pp. 20 ff. DOI logo
Pinero-Pinero, Gracia & John Moore
2015. Metaphorical Conceptualization of Migration Control Laws. Journal of Language and Politics 14:4  pp. 577 ff. DOI logo
Richard A. Posthuma & Mitrani, Mor
2013. (Re‐)telling societal beliefs. International Journal of Conflict Management 24:3  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Rasiah, Parameswary
2010. A framework for the systematic analysis of evasion in parliamentary discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42:3  pp. 664 ff. DOI logo
Reyes, Antonio
2011. Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & Society 22:6  pp. 781 ff. DOI logo
Reyes, Antonio
2020. Spain vs. Catalonia: normalizing democracy through police intervention. Social Semiotics 30:4  pp. 485 ff. DOI logo
Reyes-Rodríguez, Antonio
2008. POLITICAL DISCOURSE AND ITS SOCIOLINGUISTIC VARIABLES. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 5:4  pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Reyes-Rodríguez, Antonio
2008. Discursive strategies in Chavez's political discourse: voicing, distancing, and shifting. Critical Discourse Studies 5:2  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Sandby-Thomas, Peter
2014. Chapter 2. ‘Stability overwhelms everything’. In Discourse, Politics and Media in Contemporary China [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 54],  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Santibáñez, Cristián
2017. Strategically wrong: On the relationship between generalized deception and persuasive behaviour. Journal of Pragmatics 114  pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Santibáñez Yáñez, Cristián
2018. Engaño generalizado, pragmática y argumentación. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 73  pp. 279 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Liping
2021. The putative addressee in the persuasion of diplomatic discourse: China’s communication efforts through South African English-language newspapers. Discourse & Communication 15:4  pp. 458 ff. DOI logo
TEKİN, Beyza Çağatay
2022. THE DISCURSIVE LEGITIMATION OF THE EU-TURKEY REFUGEE DEAL IN EUROPEAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 44:1  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Telford, Andrew
2023. Where to draw the line? Climate change-conflict-migration-terrorism causal relations and a contested politics of implication. Environmental Science & Policy 141  pp. 138 ff. DOI logo
Türkeş-Kılıç, Selin & Gizem Cakmak
2022. Turkey and Greece as frenemies: discourse-historical approach to foreign policy repertoires of the leaders. Revista de Estudios Internacionales Mediterráneos :33  pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Van der Linden, Nicolas, Boris Bizumic, Rune Stubager & Scott Mellon
2011. Social representational correlates of attitudes toward peace and war: A cross-cultural analysis in the United States and Denmark.. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 17:3  pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Vuković, Milica
2012. Positioning in pre-prepared and spontaneous parliamentary discourse: Choice of person in the Parliament of Montenegro. Discourse & Society 23:2  pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
Ward, Sean & John Budarick
2021. Adapting to the postmodern medical paradigm: how The Daily Telegraph used emotion and anecdote to legitimise vaccination. Media International Australia 181:1  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Wieczorek, Anna
2010. "And I Quote": Direct and Indirect Point-of-View Switches in Clusivity-Oriented Discourse. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6:2 DOI logo
Wilson, John & Karyn Stapleton
2012. Discourse in the shadows: Discursive construction and the Northern Ireland Assembly. Discourse & Society 23:1  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Yılmaz, Ferruh
2015. Analyzing Variations and Stability in Discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 14:6  pp. 830 ff. DOI logo
Zurloni, Valentino & Luigi Anolli
2013. Fallacies as Argumentative Devices in Political Debates. In Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7688],  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Álvarez-Benito, Gloria & Catalina Fuentes Rodríguez
2016. Introduction. In A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 68],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Özşahin, M. Cüneyt & Cenap Çakmak
2022. Between defeating “the warlord” and defending “the blue homeland”: a discourse of legitimacy and security in Turkey’s Libya policy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 january 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.