Article published in:
The Soft Power of War: Legitimacy and community in Iraq war discourses
Edited by Lilie Chouliaraki
[Journal of Language and Politics 4:1] 2005
► pp. 6591
References
Atlas, J. D.
2000Logic, Meaning, and Conversation: Semantical Underdeterminacy, Implicature, and the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, P
2004Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borch, F. L. and Wilson, P. S.
2003International Law and the War on Terror. Newport, R.I.: Naval War College.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. A.
2004Political Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N
2003Hegemony or Survival. America’s Quest for Global Dominance. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Christopher, P
2003The Ethics of War and Peace. An Introduction to Legal and Moral Issues. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Daalder, I. H and Lindsay, J. M
2003America Unbound. The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y
2001War, Aggression, and Self-Defense. Cambridge [England] New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Falk, R. A
2003The Great Terror War. New York: Olive Branch Press.Google Scholar
Gareau, F. H
2004State Terrorism and the United States. From Counterinsurgency to the War on Terrorism. Atlanta, GA: Clarity Press.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G
1979Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Geis, M. L
1987The Language of Politics. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. E and Klingemann, H. D
(eds). 1996A New Handbook of Political Science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P
1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. andMcGuire, W. J
1993Explorations in Political Psychology. Durham: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lau, R. R and Sears, D. O
(eds) 1986Political Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C
2000Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martín Rojo, L
1995Division and rejection: From the personification of the Gulf conflict to the demonisation of Saddam Hussein. Discourse & Society6(1), 49–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martín Rojo, L. and Van Dijk, T. A
1997“There was a problem, and it was solved!” Legitimating the expulsion of ‘illegal’ immigrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse. Discourse & Society8(4), 523–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newhouse, J
2003Imperial America. The Bush Assault on the World Order. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Nye, J. S
2000Understanding International Conflicts. An Introduction to Theory and History. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Rodin, D
2002War and Self-Defense. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E
1984Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 461, 365–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A
1993Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society 4(2), 249–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998aIdeology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London, England UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
1998bWhat is political discourse analysis?In: Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen (eds). Political Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 11-52.Google Scholar
2000 Parliamentary debates In: R. Wodak and T. A van Dijk (eds). Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava Verlag, 45-78.Google Scholar
2001Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 95-120.Google Scholar
2002Political discourse and political cognition. In: Paul A. Chilton and Christina Schäffner (eds). Politics as Text and Talk. Analytical approaches to political discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 204-236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Knowledge in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and Politics 2(1), 93-129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Text and context of parliamentary debates. In: P. Bayleyed.. Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 339–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J
1990Politically Speaking. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wodak, R
ed. 1989Language, Power, and Ideology. Studies in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. and Menz, F
(eds.) 1990Sprache in der Politik — Politik in der Sprache. Analysen zum öffentlichen Sprachgebrauch. (Language in Politics — Politics in Language. Analyses of Public Language Use). Klagenfurt: Drava.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. and Van Dijk, T. A
eds. Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States Klagenfurt, Austria Drava Verlag
Cited by

Cited by 64 other publications

No author info given
2020.  In The Quest for Argumentative Equivalence [Argumentation in Context, 18], Crossref logo
Abuelwafa, Marwa Adel
2021. Legitimation and Manipulation in Political Speeches: A Corpus-based Study. Procedia Computer Science 189  pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo
Akanda, Muhammad Anisur Rahman
2021. Textual meaning: Media messages of Bangladesh–China relation and its Themes. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies 10:1  pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo
Almaged, Sadiq
2021. THE DISCURSIVE FORMULATION OF BREXIT: DECISION, OPPORTUNITY AND NEEDFUL AGREEMENT. Discourse and Interaction 14:1  pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo
Arroyo, José Luis Blas
2015.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Atkinson, David & Cinta Ramblado
2018. Democratic credentials and the ‘other(s)’ in the discourse of the Spanish Partido Popular, 1977–2015. Journal of Language and Politics 17:1  pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo
Aydın-Düzgit, Senem
2018. Foreign policy and identity change: Analysing perceptions of Europe among the Turkish public. Politics 38:1  pp. 19 ff. Crossref logo
Baldi, Benedetta, Ludovico Franco & Leonardo M. Savoia
2019. Alternative truths and delegitimization pragmatic strategies around the 2018 Italian elections. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:2  pp. 293 ff. Crossref logo
Bartolucci, Valentina
2012. Terrorism rhetoric under the Bush Administration. Journal of Language and Politics 11:4  pp. 562 ff. Crossref logo
Bartolucci, Valentina
2014. L'invasione dei migranti: la costruzione simbolica di un'emergenza umanitaria nel discorso politico italiano durante i rivolgimenti nel mondo arabo. SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE :45  pp. 60 ff. Crossref logo
Björkvall, Anders & Catharina Nyström Höög
2019. Legitimation of value practices, value texts, and core values at public authorities. Discourse & Communication 13:4  pp. 398 ff. Crossref logo
Boukala, Salomi
2019.  In European Identity and the Representation of Islam in the Mainstream Press,  pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana B & Mercedes Díez-Prados
2014. Positive self-evaluation versus negative other-evaluation in the political genre of pre-election debates. Discourse & Society 25:2  pp. 159 ff. Crossref logo
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana B.
2015. Manipulation in Spanish and American pre-election political debates: The Rajoy–Rubalcaba vs. Obama–McCain debates. Intercultural Pragmatics 12:4 Crossref logo
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana Belén
2017. Manipulation as an ideological tool in the political genre of Parliamentary discourses. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 27:2  pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana Belén
2022. Transitivity and evaluation in American and Spanish parliamentary discourse: the 2015 State of the Union Address in the US vs. the 2015 State of the Nation Address in Spain. Critical Discourse Studies  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Del Saz-Rubio, Mª Milagros
2019. The pragmatic-semiotic construction of male identities in contemporary advertising of male grooming products. Discourse & Communication 13:2  pp. 192 ff. Crossref logo
Diez, Mercedes
2016.  In Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 262],  pp. 215 ff. Crossref logo
Douifi, Mohamed
2018.  In Language and the Complex of Ideology,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Efeoğlu Özcan, Esranur
2022. Pull the weeds out or perish: Using pandemic metaphors to strengthen in-group solidarity in Turkish political discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 37:2  pp. 171 ff. Crossref logo
El Shazly, Reham Farouk
2021. The synergy of topoi and socio-cognition in ideology construction and identity reformation: war on terror discourse. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 13:1  pp. 62 ff. Crossref logo
Fuentes-Rodríguez, Catalina
2016.  In A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 68],  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
Galnoor, Netta
2020. From Jewish Sentiments to Rational Exhortations. Israel Studies Review 35:2  pp. 130 ff. Crossref logo
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
2010. If both opponents “extend hands in peace” — Why don’t they meet?. Journal of Language and Politics 9:3  pp. 449 ff. Crossref logo
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
2010. The idiosyncratic language of Israeli ‘peace’: A Cultural Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis (CCDA). Discourse & Society 21:5  pp. 565 ff. Crossref logo
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
2014. Collective memory as a metaphor: The case of speeches by Israeli prime ministers 2001–2009. Memory Studies 7:1  pp. 46 ff. Crossref logo
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
2014. ‘TALKING PEACE – GOING TO WAR’. Critical Discourse Studies 11:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Gelabert-Desnoyer, Jaime J.
2008. Not so impersonal. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 18:3  pp. 407 ff. Crossref logo
Gibson, Stephen
2012. ‘I'm not a war monger but…’: Discourse Analysis and Social Psychological Peace Research. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 22:2  pp. 159 ff. Crossref logo
Golubeva, Tatyana
2019. Hyperbole as a Persuasion Tool in Political Discourse (The Case of British Politicians’ Speech). Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 2. Jazykoznanije :3  pp. 195 ff. Crossref logo
Guillem, Susana Martínez
2013. Constructing contexts, (re)defining immigrants: Mental models and social representations in immigration policy defense. Discourse & Society 24:2  pp. 208 ff. Crossref logo
Karpenko-Seccombe, Tatyana
2021. Separatism: a cross-linguistic corpus-assisted study of word-meaning development in a time of conflict. Corpora 16:3  pp. 379 ff. Crossref logo
Klymenko, Lina
2016. Nation-building and presidential rhetoric in Belarus. Journal of Language and Politics 15:6  pp. 727 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Ke & Xiaonan Gong
2022. Proximization: a critical cognitive analysis of health security discourse. Text & Talk 0:0 Crossref logo
Li, Tao & Yifan Zhu
2020. How does China appraise self and others? A corpus-based analysis of Chinese political discourse. Discourse & Society 31:2  pp. 153 ff. Crossref logo
Lin, Yuting & Meilin Chen
2022. “The more important findings are sustained”: A diachronic perspective on the genre of the retraction notice. English for Specific Purposes 67  pp. 18 ff. Crossref logo
Liu, Ming
2022. Stancetaking in Hong Kong political discourse. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 13:1  pp. 79 ff. Crossref logo
Lorda, Clara Ubaldina & Elisabeth Miche
2006. Two institutional interviews: José María Aznar and Jacques Chirac on the Iraq conflict. Discourse & Society 17:4  pp. 447 ff. Crossref logo
Martínez Guillem, Susana
2009. Argumentation, metadiscourse and social cognition: organizing knowledge in political communication. Discourse & Society 20:6  pp. 727 ff. Crossref logo
Martínez Guillem, Susana
2019. Performing (in) places, moralizing (through) spaces. Journal of Language and Politics 18:6  pp. 803 ff. Crossref logo
Mestre-Mestre, Eva M.
2021. Emotion and Sentiment Polarity in Parliamentary Debate: A Pragmatic Comparative Study. Corpus Pragmatics 5:3  pp. 359 ff. Crossref logo
Mirhosseini, Seyyed-Abdolhamid
2017. Discursive double-legitimation of (avoiding) another war in Obama’s 2013 address on Syria. Journal of Language and Politics 16:5  pp. 706 ff. Crossref logo
Mishra, Smeeta
2008. Islam and Democracy. Journal of Communication Inquiry 32:2  pp. 155 ff. Crossref logo
O’Regan, Mary
2010. Political Language as a Flexible Friend: Irish Parliamentary Debate on the Iraq War. Irish Political Studies 25:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Pinero-Pinero, Gracia
2017. A matrix of cognitive domains at the service of the metaphoric delegitimisation of politicians. Discourse, Context & Media 18  pp. 20 ff. Crossref logo
Pinero-Pinero, Gracia & John Moore
2015. Metaphorical Conceptualization of Migration Control Laws. Journal of Language and Politics 14:4  pp. 577 ff. Crossref logo
Richard A. Posthuma & Mitrani, Mor
2013. (Re‐)telling societal beliefs. International Journal of Conflict Management 24:3  pp. 245 ff. Crossref logo
Rasiah, Parameswary
2010. A framework for the systematic analysis of evasion in parliamentary discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42:3  pp. 664 ff. Crossref logo
Reyes, Antonio
2011. Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & Society 22:6  pp. 781 ff. Crossref logo
Reyes, Antonio
2020. Spain vs. Catalonia: normalizing democracy through police intervention. Social Semiotics 30:4  pp. 485 ff. Crossref logo
Reyes-Rodríguez, Antonio
2008. Discursive strategies in Chavez's political discourse: voicing, distancing, and shifting. Critical Discourse Studies 5:2  pp. 133 ff. Crossref logo
Reyes-Rodríguez, Antonio
2008. POLITICAL DISCOURSE AND ITS SOCIOLINGUISTIC VARIABLES. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 5:4  pp. 225 ff. Crossref logo
Sandby-Thomas, Peter
2014.  In Discourse, Politics and Media in Contemporary China [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 54],  pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo
Santibáñez, Cristián
2017. Strategically wrong: On the relationship between generalized deception and persuasive behaviour. Journal of Pragmatics 114  pp. 16 ff. Crossref logo
Santibáñez Yáñez, Cristián
2018. Engaño generalizado, pragmática y argumentación. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 73  pp. 279 ff. Crossref logo
Tang, Liping
2021. The putative addressee in the persuasion of diplomatic discourse: China’s communication efforts through South African English-language newspapers. Discourse & Communication 15:4  pp. 458 ff. Crossref logo
Van der Linden, Nicolas, Boris Bizumic, Rune Stubager & Scott Mellon
2011. Social representational correlates of attitudes toward peace and war: A cross-cultural analysis in the United States and Denmark.. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 17:3  pp. 217 ff. Crossref logo
Vuković, Milica
2012. Positioning in pre-prepared and spontaneous parliamentary discourse: Choice of person in the Parliament of Montenegro. Discourse & Society 23:2  pp. 184 ff. Crossref logo
Ward, Sean & John Budarick
2021. Adapting to the postmodern medical paradigm: how The Daily Telegraph used emotion and anecdote to legitimise vaccination. Media International Australia 181:1  pp. 103 ff. Crossref logo
Wieczorek, Anna
2010. "And I Quote": Direct and Indirect Point-of-View Switches in Clusivity-Oriented Discourse. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6:2 Crossref logo
Wilson, John & Karyn Stapleton
2012. Discourse in the shadows: Discursive construction and the Northern Ireland Assembly. Discourse & Society 23:1  pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo
Yılmaz, Ferruh
2015. Analyzing Variations and Stability in Discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 14:6  pp. 830 ff. Crossref logo
Zurloni, Valentino & Luigi Anolli
2013.  In Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7688],  pp. 245 ff. Crossref logo
Álvarez-Benito, Gloria & Catalina Fuentes-Rodríguez
2016.  In A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 68],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.