Cover not available
Article published In:
The Soft Power of War: Legitimacy and community in Iraq war discourses
Edited by Lilie Chouliaraki
[Journal of Language and Politics 4:1] 2005
► pp. 65–91

War rhetoric of a little ally

Political implicatures and Aznar’s legitimatization of the war in Iraq

| Universitat Pompeu Fabra

In this paper we examine some of the properties of the speeches by former Prime Minister José María Aznar held in Spanish parliament in 2003 legitimating his support of the USA and the threatening war against Iraq. The theoretical framework for the analysis is a multidisciplinary CDA approach relating discursive, cognitive and sociopolitical aspects of parliamentary debates. It is argued that speeches in parliament should not only be defined in terms of their textual properties, but also in terms of a contextual analysis. Besides an analysis of the usual properties of ideological and political discourse, such as positive self-presentation and negative other-presentation and other rhetoric devices, special attention is paid to political implicatures defined as inferences based on general and particular political knowledge as well as on the context models of Aznar’s speeches.

Keywords: political discourse, political cognition, political rhetoric, political implicatures, legitimation, Critical Discourse Analysis, Iraq, war
Published online: 8 June 2005
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.1.04dij
References
Atlas, J. D.
2000 Logic, Meaning, and Conversation: Semantical Underdeterminacy, Implicature, and the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, P
2004 Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borch, F. L. and Wilson, P. S.
2003 International Law and the War on Terror. Newport, R.I.: Naval War College.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. A.
2004 Political Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N
2003 Hegemony or Survival. America’s Quest for Global Dominance. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Christopher, P
2003 The Ethics of War and Peace. An Introduction to Legal and Moral Issues. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Daalder, I. H and Lindsay, J. M
2003 America Unbound. The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y
2001 War, Aggression, and Self-Defense. Cambridge [England] New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falk, R. A
2003 The Great Terror War. New York: Olive Branch Press.Google Scholar
Gareau, F. H
2004 State Terrorism and the United States. From Counterinsurgency to the War on Terrorism. Atlanta, GA: Clarity Press.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G
1979 Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Geis, M. L
1987 The Language of Politics. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. E and Klingemann, H. D
(eds). 1996 A New Handbook of Political Science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P
1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. andMcGuire, W. J
1993 Explorations in Political Psychology. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lau, R. R and Sears, D. O
(eds) 1986 Political Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C
2000 Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Rojo, L
1995 Division and rejection: From the personification of the Gulf conflict to the demonisation of Saddam Hussein. Discourse & Society6(1), 49–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Rojo, L. and Van Dijk, T. A
1997 “There was a problem, and it was solved!” Legitimating the expulsion of ‘illegal’ immigrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse. Discourse & Society8(4), 523–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newhouse, J
2003 Imperial America. The Bush Assault on the World Order. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Nye, J. S
2000 Understanding International Conflicts. An Introduction to Theory and History. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Rodin, D
2002 War and Self-Defense. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E
1984 Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 461, 365–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A
1993 Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society 4(2), 249–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998a Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London, England UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
1998b What is political discourse analysis?In: Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen (eds). Political Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 11-52.Google Scholar
2000 Parliamentary debates In: R. Wodak and T. A van Dijk (eds). Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava Verlag, 45-78.Google Scholar
2001 Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 95-120.Google Scholar
2002 Political discourse and political cognition. In: Paul A. Chilton and Christina Schäffner (eds). Politics as Text and Talk. Analytical approaches to political discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 204-236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Knowledge in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and Politics 2(1), 93-129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Text and context of parliamentary debates. In: P. Bayleyed.. Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 339–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J
1990 Politically Speaking. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wodak, R
ed. 1989 Language, Power, and Ideology. Studies in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. and Menz, F
(eds.) 1990 Sprache in der Politik — Politik in der Sprache. Analysen zum öffentlichen Sprachgebrauch. (Language in Politics — Politics in Language. Analyses of Public Language Use). Klagenfurt: Drava.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. and Van Dijk, T. A
eds. Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States Klagenfurt, Austria Drava Verlag