Article published in:
The Soft Power of War: Legitimacy and community in Iraq war discourses
Edited by Lilie Chouliaraki
[Journal of Language and Politics 4:1] 2005
► pp. 93–117

The Iraq war as curricular knowledge

From the political to the pedagogic divide

| National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
| Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
The paper deals with educational discourse concerning the recent Iraq war in an attempt to explore how broader political issues, such as the Iraq war, are materialised in everyday classroom practices. It analyses lesson plans, aimed to be used by US educators of primary and secondary schools, from two Internet sites: one supporting the official position of US to go to war and the other taking a position against the war. The paper suggests that the lesson plans in the two sites constitute materialisations of two general approaches to education, the dominant and the critical, which do not simply adopt opposing views concerning the war but which, most importantly, contribute to the construction of different pedagogic subjects: in one case, there is an attempt towards ‘compulsory patriotism’, whereas in the other an attempt towards a ‘compulsory’ challenging of the war. The ideals which are in fact recontextualised here are that of nation and justice, the pedagogisation of which seems to raise much more questions than to provide answers.
Keywords: dominant and critical pedagogy, pedagogic subjects, on-line educational materials, lesson plans, pedagogisation of war, genre realisations, national standards, grand narratives
Published online: 08 June 2005
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.1.05mit
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Archakis, Argiris & Villy Tsakona
2009. Parliamentary discourse in newspaper articles. Journal of Language and Politics 8:3 ► pp. 359 ff. Crossref logo
Archakis, Argiris & Villy Tsakona
2010. ‘The wolf wakes up inside them, grows werewolf hair and reveals all their bullying’: The representation of parliamentary discourse in Greek newspapers. Journal of Pragmatics 42:4 ► pp. 912 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Apple, Michael W.
1993 The politics of official knowledge: Does a national curriculum make sense? Teachers College Records 95 (2) , 222–241. [ p. 114 ]Google Scholar
1996 Being popular about national standards: A review of National Standards in American Education: A Citizen’s Guide . Education Policy Analysis Archives, 4(10). http://​epaa​.asu​.edu​/epaa​/v4n10​.html(retrieved 6/11/2003). [ p. 115 ]Google Scholar
Apple, Micheal W..
2002 Pedagogy, patriotism, and democracy: On the educational meanings of 11 September 2001. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 23 (3) , 299–308. Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight
1997 A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 31 (1) , 71–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Basil
1996 Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity. Theory, Research, Critique. London: Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2002 Do something! Conceptualising responses to the attacks of 11 September 2001. Journal of Language and Politics 1 (1) , 181–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie and Fairclough, Norman
1999 Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar
Dendrinos, Bessie
2001 European discourses of homogenization in the discourse of language planning. In: Bessie Dendrinos (ed.) The Politics of ELT. Athens: The University of Athens Publications, 30–42. It also appears in Macedo Donaldo, Dendrinos Bessie and Gounari Panayota. 2003. The Hegemony of English. Colorado: Paradigm Publishers, 45–59.Google Scholar
Ellis, Dave
1997 Becoming a Master Student. Boston & New York: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar
Gee, James P.
1996 Social Linguistics and Literacies. London: Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold. Google Scholar
Halpern, Diane F.
1996 Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Harris, Theodore L. and Hodges, Richards E.
1981 A Dictionary of Reading and Related Terms. Newark, NJ: International Reading Association. Google Scholar
Holly, Mary L.
1984 Keeping a Personal-Professional Journal. Deakin: Deakin University Press. Google Scholar
Kirst, Michael W. andGuthrie, James W.
1994 Goals 2000 and a reauthorized ESEA: National standards and accompanying controversies. In: Nina Cobb (ed.) The Future of Education: Perspectives on National Standards in America. The National Center for Cross-Disciplinary Teaching and Learning: College Board, 157–173. Google Scholar
Koutsogiannis, Dimitris
2004 Critical techno-literacy and ‘weak’ languages. In: Ilana Snyder and Catherine Beavis (eds.) Doing Literacy Online: Teaching, Learning and Playing in an Electronic World. New Jersey: Hampton Press, 163–184. Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther
1996 Representational resources and the production of subjectivity: Questions for the theoretical development of Critical Discourse Analysis in a multicultural society. In: Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard andMalcolm Coulthard (eds.) Texts and Practices. London and New York: Routledge, 15–31. Google Scholar
Kurland, Daniel J.
1995 I Know What it Says…What does it Mean? Critical Skills for Critical Reading. CA: Wadsworth Publishing. Google Scholar
Lankshear, Colin
1997 Changing Literacies. Buckingham: Open University Press. Google Scholar
Luke, Allan
1996 Genres of power? Literacy education and the production of capital. In: Ruqaiya Hasan and Geoff Williams (eds). Literacy in Society. London and New York: Longman, 308–338. [ p. 116 ]Google Scholar
Martin, Jim R.
1992 Critical thinking for a humane world. In: Stephen P. Norris (ed.) The Generalizability of Critical Thinking. Multiple Perspectives on an Educational Ideal. New York: Teachers College Press, 163–180. Google Scholar
McDonough, Jo and McDonough, Steven
1997 Research Methods for English Language Teachers. London and New York: Edward Arnold. Google Scholar
Muspratt, Sandy H., Luke, Allan and Freebody, Peter
(eds.) 1997 Constructing Critical Literacies. New Jersey: Hampton Press. Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair
2001 Critical Applied Linguistics: A Critical Introduction. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
Richards, Jack C. and Lockhart, Charles
1994 Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rhoads, Melanie, Sieber, Ron and Slayton, Susan
1996 Examining national standards. http://​ horizon​.unc​.edu​/projects​/issues papers​/National​_Standards(retrieved 6/11/2003)Google Scholar
Street, Brian
1995 Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography and Education. London and New York: Longman. Google Scholar
Tyler, William
1999 Pedagogic identities and educational reform in the 1990s: The cultural dynamics of national curricula. In:. Frances Christie (ed.). Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness. London and New York: Cassell, 262–289. Google Scholar
Volosinov, V. N.
1986 Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Trans. L. Matejka and I. R Titunik. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Wallace, Michael J.
1998 Action Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Walters, Kerry
1994 Critical thinking, rationality and the vulcanization of students. In: Kerry Walters (ed.) Re-thinking Reason: New Perspectives on Critical Thinking. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1–22. Google Scholar