Editorial published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 4:2 (2005) ► pp. 169171
References
Sum, Ngai-Ling and Jessop, Robert
2003Pre- and post-disciplinarity perspective in (cultural) political economy. Économies et Societés 391, 993–1016.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2005Three models of interdisciplinarity. In: Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton (eds.) 2005 A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 3–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert and Wodak, Ruth
(eds) 2003Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Inter-disciplinarity. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2005Gender mainstreaming and the European Union: Interdisciplinarity, gender studies and CDA. In: Michelle Lazar (ed.) Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. London: Palgrave, 90–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Chilton, Paul
(eds.) 2005A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Dr Tanweer Ali, Kotwal, Ashok & Kate Power
2015. Eating words: a discourse historical analysis of the public debate over India’s 2013 National Food Security Act. On the Horizon 23:3  pp. 174 ff. Crossref logo
Wodak, Ruth
2006.  In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Qing
2010. The discursive construction of the social stratification order in reforming China. Journal of Language and Politics 9:4  pp. 508 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.