Editorial published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 4:3 (2005) ► pp. 367370
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Gould, Robert
2011.  In Transnational Europe,  pp. 170 ff. Crossref logo
Hopewell, Kristen
2017. Invisible Barricades: Civil Society and the Discourse of the WTO. Globalizations 14:1  pp. 51 ff. Crossref logo
Hopewell, Kristen
2017. Invisible Barricades: Civil Society and the Discourse of the WTO. SSRN Electronic Journal Crossref logo
Saarinen, Taina
2008. Persuasive presuppositions in OECD and EU higher education policy documents. Discourse Studies 10:3  pp. 341 ff. Crossref logo
Saarinen, Taina
2008. Position of text and discourse analysis in higher education policy research. Studies in Higher Education 33:6  pp. 719 ff. Crossref logo
Saarinen, Taina
2008. Whose quality? Social actors in the interface of transnational and national higher education policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 29:2  pp. 179 ff. Crossref logo
Shi-xu
2012. Why do cultural discourse studies? Towards a culturally conscious and critical approach to human discourses. Critical Arts 26:4  pp. 484 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Blommaert, J.
2005Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ p. 370 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dedaic, M.
2004The Sociolinguistic Analysis of State of the Union Addresses: Clinton, Tudjman and Mandela. Unpubl. PhD Dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C..
Fairclough, N.
2005Critical discourse analysis in transdisciplinary research. In: R. Wodak and P. A. Chilton (eds.) 2005 A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 53–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, B.
2004Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy. Critical Discourse Studies 1 (2) , 159–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krzyzanowski, Michal
2005‘European identity wanted!’ On discursive dimensions of the European Convention. In: R. Wodak and P. A Chilton (Eds.). A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam/Phil.: Benjamins, 137–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R and Wodak, R.
(eds.) 2003Re/reading the past. Critical and functional perspectives on time and value. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, P., Weiss, G. and Wodak, R.
2000European Discourses on Un/employment. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Employment Policy-Making and Organizational Change. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panagl, O. and Wodak, R.
(eds.) 2004Text und Kontext: Theoriemodelle und methodische Verfahren im transdiziplinären Vergleich. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann. Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S.
2004Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Tricento, T.
2005An Introduction to Language Policy. London: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar
Wodak, R.
1996Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman. Google Scholar
2001The discourse-historical approach. In: R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds.) 2001 Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 63–94. Google Scholar
2005aGender mainstreaming and the European Union: Interdisciplinarity, gender studies and CDA. In: M. Lazar (ed.). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. London: Palgrave, 90–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005bSprache und Politik — Sprache in der Politik — Sprache/Sprechen über (Sprache in/und) Politik: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen diskursanalytischer Vorgangsweisen. Aptum 1 (2) , 135–153. Google Scholar
Wodak, R. Novak, P., Pelikan, J., Gruber, H., De Cillia, R., and Mitten, R.
1990“Wir sind alle unschuldige Täter”. Diskurshistorische Studie zum Nachkriegsantisemitismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar
Wodak, R., and Weiss, G.
2005 Analyzing European Union discourses: Theories and applications. In: R. Wodak and P. A. Chilton (eds). A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam/Phil.: Benjamins, 121–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar