References
Abdullah, N. A. 2004. Relational Communication in Organizational E-Mail: A Malaysian Case Study. PhD Dissertation. University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Anis, J. (ed.). 1999. Internet, Communication et Langue Fran�aise. Paris: Hermes Science Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Axelsson, A., Abelin, A. and Schroeder, R. 2003. Anyone speak Spanish?: Language encounters in multi-user virtual environments and the influence of technology. New Media & Society 5(4,) 475—498. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Climent, S., Mor�, J., Oliver, A., Salvatierra, M., S�nchez, M., Taul�, M. and Vallmanya, L. 2003. Bilingual newsgroups in Catalonia: A challenge for machine translation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 9(1,) http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clyne, M. 2003. Towards inter-cultural communication in Europe without linguistic homogenization. In: R. de Cillia, H. J. Krumm and R. R (eds). Die Kosten der Mehrsprachigkeit/ The Cost of Multilingualism. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences, 39—48.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
CEC. 2001. European Governance: A White Paper. Brussels: European Commission.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Danet, B. 2001. Cyberpl@y: Communicating Online. Oxford: Berg.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Cillia, R. 2003. Grundlagen und Tendenzen der europ�ischen Sprachenpolitik. In: M. Mokre, G. Weiss and R. Baub�ck (eds). Europas Identit�ten. Mythen, Konflikte, Konstruktionen. Frankfurt/New York: Campus, 231—256.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Durham, M. 2003. Language choice on a Swiss mailing list. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9(1,) http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analyzing Discourse: Text Analysis for Social Research. London: Rout-ledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graddol, D. 1997. The Future of English. London: English Company![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M.A.K. 1978. Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iedema, R. 1999. Formalizing organizational meaning. Discourse & Society 10(1,) 49—66. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jewitt, C. and van Leeuwen, T. (eds). 2001. The Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kienpointner, M. 1992. Alltagslogik. Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: frommann-holzboog.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. 1996. Reading Images. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lemke, J. L. 1999. Discourse and organizational dynamics: Website communication and institutional change. Discourse & Society 10(1,) 21—48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lemke, J. L. 2000. Multiplying Modalities: Presentational, Orientational and Organizational Meaning. Unpubl. Paper.
Lemke, J. L. 2001. Discursive technologies and the social organization of meaning. In: R. Wodak (ed.) Special Issue Folia Linguistica. Critical Discourse Analysis in Post-Modern Societies. Vol. XXXV/1—2, 79—97.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lemke, J. L. 2003. Texts and discourses in the technologies of social organization. In: G. Weiss and R. R (eds). Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity. London: Palgrave/Macmillan, 130—149.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maas, U. 1985. Lesen - Schreiben - Schrift. Die Demotisierung eines professionellen Arcanums im Sp�tmittelalter und in der fr�hen Neuzeit. Literatur und Linguistik (LiLi) 591, 55—81.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neuage, T. 2003. Conversation Analysis of Chatroom Talk. PhD Dissertation, University of South Australia.
Phillipson, R. 2003. English-Only Europe? Challenging Language Policy. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pollak and Slobinski. 2002. Democratizing the European Union: Representation is nothing; Responsiveness is everything. IWF (EIF) Working Paper 27/2002. Vienna: Institute for European Integration Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reisigl, M. 2004. Wie man eine Nation herbeiredet. Eine diskursanalytische Untersuchung zur sprachlichen Konstruktion der �sterreichischen Nation und �sterreichischen Identit�t in politischen Fest- und Gedenkreden. Vienna: PhD Dissertation.
Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rusch, D. 2004. Von den M�glichkeiten der Web-Inszenierung zum audio-visuellen Gesamtereignis am Beispiel online-journalistischer Kulturberichterstattung in �sterreich und den USA. Vienna: PhD Dissertation.
Schlesinger, P. 2003. The Babel of Europe? An essay on networks and communicative spaces. ARENA Working Paper 22/03.
Schlesinger, P. and Kevin, D. 2000. Can the European Union become a sphere of publics? In: E. O. Eriksen and J. E. Fossum (eds). Democracy in the European Union: Integration through Deliberation?. London: Routledge, 206—229.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. 2004. Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seidlhofer, B. 2003. Brave new English? Zum bildungs/sprachenpolitischen Desiderat einer Konzeptualisierung von Englisch als Lingua franca. In: R. de Cillia, H. J. Krumm and R. R (eds). Die Kosten der Mehrsprachigkeit/ The Cost of Multilingualism. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences., 125—134.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1986. Relevance, Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stein, D. 2006. E-mail, internet, chatroom talk: Pragmatics. In: K. Brown (ed.). Elsevier Encylcopaedia of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 41, Second Edition. Oxford: Elsevier (in Press). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swales, J. 2001. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Urry, J. 2003. Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Widdowson, H. G. 1994. The ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly 28(2,) 377—389. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilhelm, A. G. 2000. Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R. 2000. Recontextualisation and the transformation of meaning: A critical discourse analysis of decision making in EU-meetings about employment policies. In: S. Sarangi and M. M (eds). Discourse and Social Life. Harlow: Pearson Education, 185—206.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R. 2004. Critical discourse analysis. In: J. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium and D. D (eds). Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage, 197—213. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R. and Wright, S. forthcoming. The European Union in cyberspace: Democratic participation via online multilingual discussion boards? In: B. Danet and S. C. Herring (eds). The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture and Communication in Instant Messaging, Email and Chat. Oxford: OUP (in press).
Wright, Scott. 2004. A Comparative Analysis of Government-run Discussion Boards at the Local, National and European Union levels. PhD Dissertation, University of East Anglia.
Wright, S. 2005. Design matters: The political efficacy of government-run discussion boards. In: R. Gibson, S. Oates and D. D (eds). The Internet and Politics: citizens, voters and activists. London: Routledge, 80—99.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wright, S. and Street, J. 2005. Democracy, Deliberation and Design: the case of online discussion forums. Paper presented to Political Studies Association Annual Conference, Leeds 2005.
Wright, S. 2006. Government-run Online Discussion Forums: moderation, censorship and the shadow of control. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations.
Wright, S. 2007. A Virtual European Public Sphere? The Futurum Discussion Forum. Journal of European Public Policy 14(3) (Special Issue: The European Constitution).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)