Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 6:1 (2007) ► pp.29–50

Welfare or workfare?

Partisan re/constructions of Finnish unemployment security in the era of retrenchment

The aim of the article is to analyse changing partisan constructions of unemployment security in Finland during the 1990s. In the article, a corpus of 143 texts comprising partisan statements on un/employment policies is analysed by using Perelman’s (1971/1958) rhetorical design. The focus lies on how the leading parties interpreted state responsibility for labour market failures, the nature of social rights for unemployed persons, and the generosity of unemployment benefits. Were there major reformulations of unemployment security as a reaction to high unemployment, fiscal problems and globalisation? And if so, what kinds of rhetorical argumentation were used in order to legitimate these reformulations? The results show that partisan constructions of unemployment benefits changed in a contractual and reciprocal direction, indicating that elements of so-called workfare rhetoric became rooted in the Finnish political discourse during the Mid-90s. The political elites also moved closer to a narrower interpretation of the concept of social right for unemployed.

Keywords: unemployment, unemployment security, social rights, discourse, rhetoric, argumentation
Published online: 13 June 2007
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.1.04nyg
References
Allen, James P. and Scruggs, Lyle
2004 Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science 48 (3), 496–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Torben M
2004 Challenges to the Scandinavian welfare model. European Journal of Political Economy 20 (3), 743–754. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergström, Göran and Boréus, Kristina
2000 Textens mening och makt. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Bonoli, Giuliano
2001 Political institutions, veto points and the process of welfare state adaptation. In: P. Pierson (ed) 2001 The New Politics of the Welfare State. New York: Oxford University Press, 238–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Budge, Ian, Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith and Tanenbaum, Eric
2001 Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments 945—1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth
1953 A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Crosswhite, James
1989 Universality in rhetoric: Perelman’s universal audience. Philosophy and Rhetoric 22 (3), 157–173.Google Scholar
Cousins, Mel
2005 European Welfare States. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun van
1997 Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Grootendorst, Rob
1995 Perelman and the fallacies. Philosophy and Rhetoric 28 (2), 122–133.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
2003 Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
1985 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Graham, Phil
1999 Critical systems theory. A political economy of language, thought, and technology. Communication Research 26 (4), 482–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Julkunen, Raija
2001 Suunnanmuutos. Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar
Kangas, Olli
1986 Luokkaintressit ja hyvinvointivaltio. Helsinki: Helsingin kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja D-84.Google Scholar
Kildal, Nanna
2000 En ny väg för välfärdsstaten? In: Nanna Kildal (ed). Den nya sociala frågan om arbete, inkomst och rättvisa. Göteborg: Daidalos, 7–30.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter and Palme, Joakim
2003 New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: welfare state regress in 18 countries 1975—1995. American Political Science Review 97 (3), 425–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Jay L
1995 Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
NOSOCO
2003 Social protection in the Nordic countries 2001. Scope, expenditure and financing. The Nordic social-statistical committee. Copenhagen: NOSOSCO.Google Scholar
Nygård, Mikael
2003 Välfärdsstaten, partierna och marknaden. Åbo: Åbo Akademis förlag.Google Scholar
Nygård, Mikael and Paajaste, Kai
2001 Retorik som det möjligas konst. Rhetorica Scandinavica 19/20011, 21–37.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm
1996 Retoriikan valtakunta. (orig. L’Empire rhétorique. Rhétorique et argumentation [1977]). Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm and Olrechts-Tyteca, Lucie
1971 The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. (orig. Traité de l’argumentation — la nouvelle rhétorique [1958]). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul
2001 Post-industrial pressures on the mature welfare states. In: Paul Pierson (ed). The New Politics of the Welfare State. New York: Oxford University Press, 80–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosengren, Mats
1998 Doxa och den nya retorikens kunskapssyn. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 8/19981: 10–17Google Scholar
Ross, Fiona
2000 Beyond left and right: The new partisan politics of welfare. Governance 13 (2), 155–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien
2002 Does discourse matter in the politics of welfare state adjustment? Comparative Political Studies 35 (2), 168–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W
2000 Economic changes, vulnerabilities, and institutional capabilities. In: Fritz W. Scharpf and Vivien Schmidt (eds) 2000 Welfare and Work in the Open Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 21–124.Google Scholar
Summa, Hilkka
1996 Kolme näkökulmaa uuteen retoriikkaan Burke, Perelman, Toulmin ja retoriikan kunnianpalautus. In: Kari Palonen and Hilkka Summa (eds) 1996 Pelkää retoriikkaa. Tampere: Vastapaino, 51–83.Google Scholar
Swank, Duane
2005 Globalisation, domestic politics, and welfare state retrenchment in capitalist democracies. Social Policy & Society 4 (2), 183–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, Peter
2004 Open markets and welfare values. European Societies 6 (1), 29–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 The politics of welfare in Europe. In: Peter Taylor-Taylor (ed). Welfare States under Pressure. London: Sage, 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, John B
1990 Ideology and Modern Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Timonen, Virpi
2003 Restructuring the Welfare State. Globalisation and Social Policy Reform in Finland and Sweden. Cheltenham: Edvard Elgar.Google Scholar
Torfing, Jacob
1999 Workfare with welfare: Recent reforms of the Danish welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy 9 (1), 5–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen
1958 The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert and Wodak, Ruth
2003 (eds). Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. New York: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Panagl, Oscar
2004 Theoriemodelle und methodische Verfahren in transdisziplinären Vergleich. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Wood, Stewart
2001 Labour Market Regimes under Threat? In: Paul Pierson (ed) 2001 The New Politics of the Welfare State. New York: Oxford University Press, 368–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Tarkiainen, Laura
2020. ‘Effortful’, ‘needy’ and ‘freeloader’. Journal of Language and Politics 19:2 ► pp. 290 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.