Article published In:
Journal of Language and PoliticsVol. 7:1 (2008) ► pp.119–136
Ballistic missile defense and articulation theory
An analysis of technology using a cultural studies approach
In this paper, I use articulation theory to examine the political discourse which surrounds the Bush Administrations proposed ballistic missile defense shield. I argue that there are three central articulations used by the Bush Administration to garner public support for the ballistic missile defense shield. They are: 1) the articulation of missile defense with national security; 2) the unity formed out of terrorism and the threat of a missile attack by rogue states; and 3) the articulation of missile defense with technological inevitability and progress. I illustrate how these dominant articulations discursively serve to garner support for the proposed shield by setting the parameters around which discussions of missile defense can take place. My primary argument is that the discursive unities made by the Bush Administration out of such elements as terrorism, technology, progress, and capitalism functions to perpetuate and justify a larger American project of exceptionalism, unilateralism, and military hegemony.
References
Angus, Ian
2000 Primal Scenes of Communication: Communication, Consumerism, and Social Movements. New York: State University of New York Press.
Ball, Nichole
1998 Third world arms control: A third world responsibility. In: Thomas Ohlson (Ed.). Arms Transfer Limitations and Third World Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 34—57.
Benjamin, Paul
2000 Green wars: Making environmental degradation a national security issue puts peace and security at risk. Cato Institute 3691, 1—21.
Berland, Jody
2001 Cultural technologies and the ‘evolution’ of technological cultures. In: Andrew Herman & Thomas Swiss (eds). Contemporary Cultural Theory and the World Wide Web. New York: Routledge.
Brand-Jacobsen, Kai Frithjof
2000 Peace: The goal and the way. In: John Galtung, Carl Jacobsen, & Kai Frithjof Brand-Jacobsen (eds). Searching for Peace: The Road to Transcend. London: Pluto Press, 16—24.
De Rooji, Paul
2003, March 31. Arrogant propaganda: The first 10 days of the US-Iraq war. Counterpunch. Available at: [http://www.counterpunch.org/rooij04012003.html].
Der Derian, James
2003 Decoding the national security strategy of the United States of America. Boundary 21, 19—27. 
Gerson, Joseph
2001 The politics and geopolitics of ‘missile defenses.’ Peace and Economy Security Program (Disarmament Series). American Friends Services Committee 21, 1—12.
Giroux, Henry A
2004 War on terror: The militarising of public space and culture in the United States. Third Text 181, 211—221.
Gompert, David C. & Isaacson, Jeffrey A
1999 Planning a ballistic missile defense system of systems: An adaptive strategy. Rand Institute. Document: IP-1811, 1—14.
Grossberg, Lawrence
1987 Critical theory and the politics of empirical research. In: Michael Gurevitch & Mark R. Levy (eds). Mass Communication Review Yearbook Vol. 6. London: Sage Publications, 86—106.
Hall, Stuart
1989 Ideology and communication theory. In: Brenda Dervin et al.. (eds). Rethinking Communication, Vol. 1, Paradigm Issues. Newbury Newbury: Sage Publications, 40—52.
1995 Fantasy, identity, politics. In: Erica Carter, James Donald and Judith Squires (eds). Cultural Remix. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 63—69.
1996 On postmodernism and articulation: An interview with Stuart Hall. In: David Morely and Kuan-Hsing Chen (eds). Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge, 131—151.
Harnett, Stephan J. and Stengrim, Laura A
2004 The whole operation of deception: Reconstructing President Bush’s rhetoric of weapons of mass destruction. Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies 4(2), 152—197.
Hutcheson, John
et al. 2004 U.S national identity, political elites, and a patriotic press following September 11. Political Communication 211, 27—50.
Lee, Richard E
2003 Life and Times of Cultural Studies: The Politics of Transformation of the Structures of Knowledge. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
Leuder, Ivan
, et al. 2004 On membership categorization: ‘us’, ‘them’ and ‘doing violence’ in political discourse. Discourse and Society 15(2—3), 243—266.
Lifton, Robert
2003, December 22. American apocalypse. The Nation.
Lindsay, James M. & O’Hanlon, Michael, E
2001 Defending America: The Case for Limited National Missile Defense. New York: Brookings Institution Press.
Mésáros, István
2001 Socialism or Barbarism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
McLaren, Peter
2002 George Bush, apocalypse sometime soon, and the American Imperium. Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies 2(3), 327—333.
Mitchell, Gordoin
2000 Strategic Deception: Rhetoric, Science and Politics in Missile Defense Advocacy. East East: Michigan State University Press.
Mutimer, David
1997 Reimaging security: The metaphors of proliferation. In: Keith Kraus and Michael Williams (eds). Critical Security Studies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 187—216.
Neack, Laura
2003 The New Foreign Policy: U.S. and Comparative Foreign Policy in the 21st Century. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Parenti, Michael
2002 The Terrorism Trap: September 11 and Beyond. New York: City Light Books.
Rojek, Chris
2003 Stuart Hall. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Inc.
Slack, Jennifer D
1989 Contextualizing technology. In: Brenda Dervin et al.. (eds). Rethinking Communication: Paradigm Exemplars, Vol. 2. Newbury Newbury: Sage Publications, 329—345.
1996 The theory and method of articulation in cultural studies. In: Brenda Dervin et al.. (eds). Rethinking Communication, Vol. 1, Paradigm Issues. New York: Routledge, 112—127.
Sterne, Jonathan
1999 Thinking the Internet: Cultural studies versus the millennium. In: Steven Jones (Ed.). Doing Internet Research. Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net. London: Sage, 257—288.
Weldes, Jutta
1999 Constructing National Interests: The US and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
et al. 1999 Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities and the Production of Danger. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Weldes, Jutta & Saco, Diana
1996 Making state action possible: The United States and the discursive construction of ‘the Cuban problem’, 1960—1994. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 25(2), 361—98.
Wilkening, Dean A
2000 Ballistic Missile Defense and Strategic Stability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wood, David C
2002, December 10. War against political addiction. Vanderbilt University. Available at: [http://www.witherspoonsociety.org/02—12/hooked_on_fear.htm].
Cited by
Cited by 7 other publications
Funk, Marcus
2013. Imagined commodities? Analyzing local identity and place in American community newspaper website banners. New Media & Society 15:4 ► pp. 574 ff. 
Kinsella, William J.
2015. Rearticulating Nuclear Power: Energy Activism and Contested Common Sense. Environmental Communication 9:3 ► pp. 346 ff.
Kumar, Sangeet
2014. Articulation as a Site of Discursive Struggle: Globalization and Nationalism in an Indian Media Debate. Journal of Communication Inquiry 38:2 ► pp. 113 ff.
Lawson, Sean
2011. Articulation, antagonism, and intercalation in Western military imaginaries. Security Dialogue 42:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Lawson, Sean
2014. The US military's social media civil war: technology as antagonism in discourses of information-age conflict. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 27:2 ► pp. 226 ff.
Loke, Jaime, Dustin Harp & Ingrid Bachmann
2011. MOTHERING AND GOVERNING. Journalism Studies 12:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
Quichocho, Danielle & Burton St. John
2022. Locating a narrative paradigm Nexus in the circuit of culture: articulating the anti-proposition 112 public relations campaign in Colorado. Journal of Public Relations Research 34:3-4 ► pp. 135 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.