‘Veto the war but let no French head fall’
Linguistic avoidance strategies in Jacques Chirac’s pre-Iraq war interview transcripts
The eve of the ongoing Iraq war was a decisive moment for world leaders since they, given American pressure, had to choose between being with US or with the enemies. It meant treading on potentially threatening issues that could harm inter-national alliances and friendships. This paper illustrates using transcripts of Jacques Chiracs (then French president) interviews the linguistic avoidance strategies used to avoid, redefine, recontextualise, reframe, and reassess concepts and topics considered threatening to the position held. The answers Chirac gives to the rather direct questions show his desire to avoid projecting the false idea that France is hindering American foreign policy. It is therefore not only his face that is at stake, but also that of his people, his political party, and the nation. Placing the analysis within the broader concept of multimodal communication, the paper adopts some of the findings made by Caffi & Janney (1994) and Janney (1999) to emphasise that strategies of avoiding implicative and threatening concepts in speech follow similar patterns of escaping from or avoiding harmful objects in the physical world.
References (18)
References
Anchimbe E.A. (forthcoming) Linguistic avoidance as a political face-saving strategy in broadcast political interviews. In: F. Bargliela-Chiappini & M. Haugh (eds). Face, Communication and Social Interaction. London: Equinox Publishing.
Arndt H. & Janney R.W. 1987. InterGrammar: Toward an Integrative Model of Verbal, Prosodic and Kinesic Choices in Speech. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown P. & Levinson S.C. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bühler K. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Jena: Fischer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caffi, C. & Janney, R.W. 1994. Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication. In: C. Caffi & R.W. Janney (eds). Involvement in Language. Special Issue Journal of Pragmatics 221, 325—373.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, W.L. 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In: D. Tannen (Ed.). Spoken and Written Languages: Exploring Orality and Literacy. Norwood: Ablex, 35—53.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Channell, J. 1993. Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Humphrys, J. 2004. Lost for Words. London: BBC.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Janney, R.W. 1999a. Words as gestures. In: F. Anderson et al.. (eds). Pragmatics: The Loaded Discipline. special issue, Journal of Pragmatics on the occasion of the seventieth birthday of Jacob L. Mey. Oxford: Pergamon, 953—972.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Janney, R.W. 1999b. Linguistic Avoidance in the O.J. Simpson Transcripts. In: W. Falkner. & H.J. Schmid (eds). Words, Lexemes, Concepts — Approaches to the Lexicon. Studies in Honour of Leonhard Lipka. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 259—272.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kelland, K. 2004. Bush and Blair accused of mangling English. Sky News, online (Nov. 15th 2004).
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, S.C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalised Implicature. Boston: MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lutz, C. 1990. Engendered emotion, gender, power and the rhetoric of emotional control in American discourse. In: C. Lutz & L. Abu-Lughod (eds). Language and the Politics of Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 69—91.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maingueneau, D. & Charaudeau, P. (eds). 2002 Dictionnaire d’analyse du discourse. Paris: Seuil.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ochs, E. 1986. From feelings to grammar: A Samoan case study. In: S. Bambi & E. Ochs (eds). Language Socialization across Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 251—272.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schriffin, D. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, D. 1989. Talking Voices, Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Randour, François, Julien Perrez & Min Reuchamps
2020.
Twenty years of research on political discourse: A systematic review and directions for future research.
Discourse & Society 31:4
► pp. 428 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Thompson, Chrissy
2020.
Skirting Around the Issue: Misdirection and Linguistic Avoidance in Parliamentary Discourses on Upskirting.
Violence Against Women 26:11
► pp. 1403 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.