This article examines the impact of national borders on public discourses, based on a case study of the struggle surrounding Turkey’s application to join the European Union (EU). Comparing opinions, reasons and interpretation patterns in quality press commentaries about enlarging the EU beyond the Bosphorus, the article confirms the importance and robustness of national cleavages between the German and the French public spheres on the one hand and the British public sphere on the other. Whereas Turkish membership was predominantly rejected on the continent, the British commentators strongly and almost unanimously supported Ankara’s request. These similarities and divergences, I argue, are first and foremost the result of competing visions of Europe’s finality, especially regarding various constitutional ideas and cultural principles. Against this background, the Turkey question was partly exploited as an instrument to advance or to suppress different concepts on the future of European integration.
1999Norms, Institutions and National Identity in Contemporary Europe. International Studies Quarterly 43 (1), 83—114.
Diez, Thomas
1999Speaking Europe: The Politics of Integration Discourse. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (4), 598—613.
Diez, Thomas
2001Europe as a Discursive Battleground: European Integration Studies and Discourse Analysis. Cooperation and Conflict 36 (1), 5—38.
Entman, Robert M
1993Framing. Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4), 51—58.
Fairclough, Norman
2003Analysing Discourse. Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Finnemore, Martha and Kathrin Sikkink
1998International Norm Dynamics and Political Chance. International Organization 52 (4), 887—917.
Forster, Anthony
2002Euroscepticism in Contemporary British Politics: Opposition to Europe in the British Conservative and Labour Parties since 1945. London: Routledge.
Frank, Robert
2002The Meanings of Europe in French National Discourses: A French Europe or an Europeanized France? In: Mikael af Malmborg and Bo Stråth (eds.). The Meaning of Europe. Variety and Contention within and among Nations. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 311—326.
Gates, Andrea
2005Negotiating Turkey’s Accession. The Limitations of the Current EU Strategy. European Foreign Affairs Review 10 (3), 381—398.
Goldstein, Judith and Robert O. Keohane
(eds1993Ideas and Foreign Policy. Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Holden, Gerard
2002Who contextualizes the Contextualizers? Disciplinary History and the Discourse about IR Discourse. Review of International Studies 28 (3), 253—270.
Howarth, David and Jacob Torfing
(eds2005Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jabko, Nicolas
2004The Importance of Being Nice: An Institutionalist Analysis of French PReferences on the Future of Europe. Comparative European Politics 3 (2), 282—301.
Jachtenfuchs, Markus, Thomas Diez, and Sabine Jung
1998Which Europe? Conflicting Models of a Legitimate European Political Order. European Journal of International Relations 4 (4), 409—445.
Johnstone, Barbara
2007Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Kassim, Hussein
2004The United Kingdom and the Future of Europe: Winning the Battle, Losing the War. Comparative European Politics 3 (2), 261—281.
Kevin, Deirdre
2003Europe in the Media. A Comparison of Reporting, Representation, and Rhetoric in National Media Systems in Europe. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kratochwil, Friedrich
1989Rules, Norms, and Decisions. On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krzyzanowski, Michal and Florian Oberhuber
2007(Un)doing Europe. Discourses and Practices of Negotiating the EU Constitution. Bruxelles: Lang.
Larsen, Henrik
1999British and Danish European Politics in the 1990s: A Discourse Approach. European Journal of International Relations 5 (4), 451—83.
Ludlow, Piers
2002Us or Them? The Meaning of Europe in British Political Discourse. In: Mikael af Malmborg and Bo Stråth (eds.). The Meaning of Europe. Variety and Contention within and among Nations. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 101—124.
Marcussen, Martin, Thomas Risse, Daniela Engelmann-Martin, Hans Joachim Knopf, and Klaus Roscher
1999Constructing Europe? The Evolution of French, British and German Nation State Identities. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (4), 614—633.
Milliken, Jennifer
1999The Study of Discourse in International Relations. A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations 5 (2), 225—254.
Müller, Harald
2004Arguing, Bargaining and All That: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 10 (3), 395—435.
Oberhuber, Florian, Christoph Bärenreuter, Michal Krzyzanowski, Heinz SchÖnhuber, and Ruth Wodak
2006Analysing Newspapers. An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Risse, Thomas
2000“Let’s Argue!” Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1), 1—39.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas
1996Exploring the Nature of the Beast: International Relations Theory and Comparative Policy Analysis Meet the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 34 (1), 53—80.
Schimmelfennig, Frank
2001The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1), 47—80.
Spohn, Wilfried
2002Continuities and Changes of Europe in German National Identity. In: Mikael af Malmborg and Bo Stråth (eds.). The Meaning of Europe. Variety and Contention within and among Nations. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 285—309.
Thielemann, Eiko R
2004Dividing Competences: Germany’s Vision(s) for Europe’s Federal Future. Comparative European Politics 3 (2), 358—374.
Wæver, Ole
1998Explaining Europe by Decoding Discourses. In: Anders Wivel (ed.). Explaining European Integration. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Political Studies Press, 100—146.
Wæver, Ole
2002Identity, Communities and Foreign Policy. Discourse Analysis as Foreign Policy Theory. In: Lena Hansen and Ole Wæver (eds.). European Integration and National Identity. The Challenge of the Nordic States. London/ New York: Routledge, 20—49.
Wæver, Ole
2004Discursive Approaches. In: Antje Wiener and Thomas Diez (eds.). European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 197—215.
Wodak, Ruth
2001What CDA is about � A Summary of History, Important Concepts and its Developments. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage Publications, 1—13.
Yee, Albert
1996The Causal Effects of Ideas on Politics. International Organization 50 (1), 69—108.
Cited by
Cited by 6 other publications
ERİŞEN, Hanife & Nilüfer TÜRKSOY
2021. Turkey’s Representation in the News Covering the Cyprus Problem: An Analysis of the British Press (2000). Kritik İletişim Çalışmaları Dergisi 3:2 ► pp. 70 ff.
Gulmez, Seckin Baris, Alp Eren Topal & Bahar Rumelili
2023. Europe and Turkey: identities in evolution. An analytical literature review. Open Research Europe 3 ► pp. 120 ff.
Hamid-Turksoy, Nilyufer, Giselinde Kuipers & Liesbet Van Zoonen
2014. “Try A Taste of Turkey”. Journalism Studies 15:6 ► pp. 743 ff.
Minkenberg, Michael, Hajo G Boomgaarden, Claes H de Vreese & André Freire
2012. Turkish membership in the European Union – The role of religion. Comparative European Politics 10:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.