Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 8:3 (2009) ► pp.333–358

The humanitarian imperative under fire

| Qatar University
This paper explores how speakers manage the dilemmatic tension between competing demands for accountability in mundane explanations of humanitarian assistance in settings of armed conflict. Taking as analytic data talk recorded in interviews with the personnel of aid agencies and various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) who work in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), we examine how demands for both non-partisan impartiality, on the one hand, and sympathetic alignment with the victims (or losing parties) of armed conflict, on the other, feature in the explanations that humanitarian aid workers formulate to account for their professional activities. While non-partisanship features as a source of legitimacy given that humanitarian assistance is regarded as a response to universal human suffering, the source of that suffering in armed conflict necessitates recognition of the antagonist-protagonist and victim relationship in order for aid recipients to be identified. Everyday accounts of aid work function to mitigate the otherwise mutually exclusive relationship between competing assumptions that inform the logic of humanitarian assistance.
Keywords: accountability, armed conflict, non-governmental organization (NGO), Palestine/Israel, discourse analysis, ideological dilemma
Published online: 15 December 2009
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.3.01mck
References (39)
References
Baker, Carolyn. 1997. Membership categorization and interview accounts. In: David Silverman (ed). Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage, 130—143.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1984. Problems of Dostoyevsky’s Poetics, ed and trans C. Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1987/96. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael, Condor, Susan, Edwards, Derek, Gane, Mike, Middleton, David and Radley, A. R. 1988. Ideological Dilemmas. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 1992. Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news interview discourse. In: Paul Drew and John Heritage (eds). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 163—198.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1991. Transcription design principles for spoken discourse research. Pragmatics 11, 71—106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., and Paolino, D. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. In: J. A. Edwards and M. D. Lampert (eds). Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 45—89.Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek. 1997. Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
. 2006. Seeing Sociologically: The Routine Grounds of Social Action. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Glenn, Phillip. 2003. Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 1985. Analysing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an “overhearing” audience. In: Teun A. van Dijk (ed). Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. III1: Discourse and Dialogue. London: Academic Press, 59—119.Google Scholar
Heritage, John and Greatbatch, David. 1991. On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interview interaction. In: Diedre Boden and Don Zimmerman (eds). Talk and Social Structure. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hester, S. and Eglin, P. 1997. Membership categorization analysis: An introduction. In: S. Hester and P. Eglin (eds). Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian and Wooffitt, Robin 2008. Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications, 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1985. An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In: Teun A. van Dijk (ed). Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. III1: Discourse and Dialogue. London: Academic Press, 25—34.Google Scholar
Jha, P. S. 2006. The Twilight of the Nation State: Globalization, Chaos and War. London and Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Joppke, C. and Morawska, E. (eds) 2003. Toward Assimilation and Citizenship: Immigrants in Liberal Nation-States. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Mary. 1999. New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
(ed). 2000. Global Insecurity: Restructuring the Global Military Sector, Volume III1. London and New York: Pinter.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantel. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lash, Scott and Featherstone, Mike (eds). 2002. Recognition and Difference: Politics, Identity and Multiculture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Kevin. 2000. The psychology of time-travel: Ambivalent identity in stories of cross-cultural contact. Narrative Inquiry 91, 1—35.Google Scholar
. 2003. Discursive psychology and the “new racism”. Human Studies 261, 461—491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. forthcoming. Backhanded compliment and self-deprecation as inference rich devices for the management of entitlement.
Mehan, H. and Wood, H. 1975. The Reality of Ethnomethodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan. 1996. Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rattansi, A. 2004. Dialogues on difference: Cosmopolitans, locals and ‘others’ in a post-national age. Sociology 381, 613—621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rieff, David. 2002. A Bed for the Night: Humanitarianism in Crisis. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 501, 696—735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1998. Reply to Wetherell [1998]. Discourse & Society 91, 413—416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharrock, Wes W. 1974. On owning knowledge. In: R. Turner (ed). Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin Education, 45—53.Google Scholar
Shotter, John. 1993. Bakhtin and Vygotsky: Internalization as a boundry phenomenon. New Ideas in Psychology 111, 379—390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shotter, John and Billig, Michael. 1998. A Bakhtinian psychology: From out of the heads of individuals and into the dialogues between them. In: M. M. Bell and M. Gardiner (eds). Bakhtin and the Human Sciences: No Last Words. London: Sage, 13—29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shweder, R., Minow, M. and Markus, H. (eds). 2002. Engaging Cultural Differences: The Multicultural Challenge in Liberal Democracies. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Steiner, H. J. and Alston, P. 2000. International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals. Text and Materials, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vortovec, S. and Cohen, R. (eds). 2002. Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wetherell, Margaret. 1998. Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society 91, 387—412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. 2006. Interrogating the Real, ed and trans Rex Butler and Scott Stephens. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

O’Leary, Patrick, Aisha Hutchinson & Jason Squire
2015. Community-based child protection with Palestinian refugees in South Lebanon: Engendering hope and safety. International Social Work 58:5 ► pp. 717 ff. DOI logo
McKenzie, Kevin
2011. Structure and Agency in Scholarly Formulations of Racism. Human Studies 34:1 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
McKenzie, Kevin
2016. Invoking the Specter of Racism: Category Membership as Speaker Topic and Resource. Qualitative Sociology Review 12:3 ► pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
McKenzie, Kevin
2018. Structure and Agency in Peace Psychology: Temporality as Mediating Gesture Between Abstract and Concrete Intervention. In Discourse, Peace, and Conflict [Peace Psychology Book Series, ], ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
McKenzie, Kevin
2022. Vicissitudes of laughter. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.