Article published In:
Journal of Language and PoliticsVol. 9:1 (2010) ► pp.96–114
Ahmadinejad’s letter to Bush opens dialogue in Middle Eastern rhetorical style
Understanding how Middle Eastern rhetoric differs from Western communication can aid in deciphering diplomatic correspondence like the 2006 letter from President Ahmadinejad of Iran. Failure to understand such communications and respond appropriately may result in missed opportunities to avert hostilities or establish effective rapport with other nations. Success in grasping the intent of Iran’s diplomatic overture can provide a basis for creating a response that expresses American sentiments in a way that can be seen as intelligent and appropriate by Middle Eastern recipients. Such correspondence could entail establishing a respectable ethos, arranging content as expected, and emphasizing common values. Knowledge of the Middle Eastern rhetorical tradition can inform a viable understanding for diplomatic correspondence.
Keywords: Middle-East, political communication, rhetoric
References (21)
Ahmadinejad, M. (8 May 2006) Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s letter to George W. Bush. translation by the Islamic Republic News Agency. Wikisource. [URL]
.
Aljazeera.net. (2006) US dismisses Iranian president’s letter. May 10, 2006. [URL] accessed 1 Aug 06.
Associated Press. (9 May 2006) Iran Letter to Bush Criticizes U.S. [URL] accessed 28 July 06.
Binkley, R. (2004) The rhetoric of origins and the other: Reading the ancient figure of Enheduanna. Rhetoric Before and Beyond the Greeks. Carol S. Lipson and Roberta A. Binkley, Eds. Albany: State University of New York. 47–63.
Bizzell, Patricia and Bruce Herzberg, Eds. (2001) The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present. Boston: Bedford/St.Martin’s Press.
Chubin, S. (2002) Whither Iran? Reform, Domestic Politics and National Security. New York: Oxford University Press.
CNN. (9 May 2006) Ahmadinejad’s letter to Bush. [URL]. accessed 22 November 2007.
First as tragedy, then as Farsi: Ahmadinejad’s letter. (11 May 2006) ‘Aqoul. Eerie, Editor-in-Chief and Site Administrator. [URL]. accessed 22 November 2007.
Frandroid Atreides (web name). Posted to “Foreign Policy & MENA.” on ‘Aqoul
. Eerie, Editor-in-Chief and Site Administrator. 11 May 2006. [URL]. accessed 22 November 2007.
Hauser, C. (11 May 2006) Bush says Iran leader’s letter fails to address nuclear issue. The New York Times. Section A; Column 5; Foreign Desk; 24. [URL] accessed Oct 2006.
Herrick, J. A. (2005) The History and Theory of Rhetoric: An Introduction. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Hitchens, Christopher. (2 May 2006) Fighting words: A wartime lexicon. The Cole Report. Washington Post. Newsweek Interactive Co. LLC. [URL]. accessed 30 Oct 07.
Keddie, N. R. (2003) Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Krauthammer, Charles. (5 May 2006) Never again? Washington Post. A19. [URL]. accessed 30 Oct 07.
Luther, K. Allin. (1990) Islamic rhetoric and the Persian historians: 1100–1300 A.D. Studies in Near Eastern Culture and History. James A. Bellamy, Ed. Center for North African Studies, University of Michigan. 90–98.
Matin-asgari, A. (Spring 2004) Iranian postmodernity: The rhetoric of irrationality? Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies 13(1): 113–123. 
Presidency of The Islamic Republic of Iran. (2007) President: Letter to Bush carries message from Iranian nation. [URL]. accessed 22 November 2007.
Reuters. (9 May 2006) Ahmadinejad’s letter to Bush. The Washington Post.
[URL]. accessed 22 November 2007.
Stannard, Matthew B. (21 May 2006) Parsing message of Iran leader’s letter to Bush; Mideast experts say it’s savvy PR — and starting point for talks. The San Francisco Chronicle. The Chronicle Publishing Co. accessed via LexisNexis 18 Oct 2006.
Waldman, M. R. (1980) Toward a Theory of Historical Narrative: A Case study in Perso-Islamicate Historiography. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Watts, J. W. (2004) Story-List-Sanction: A cross-cultural strategy of ancient persuasion. Rhetoric Before and Beyond the Greeks. Carol S. Lipson and Roberta A. Binkley, Eds. Albany: State University of New York. 197–212.