Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 9:1 (2010) ► pp.115–139

Debating the EU Constitution in France

Promises and pitfalls of a European future

 | University of Haute Alsace
This paper focuses on the argumentative approaches and the rhetorical strategies employed by political actors in France in favour of or against the EU Constitutional Treaty (TCE), as they appeared in four French daily newspapers, Le Monde, Le Figaro, Libération and Aujourd’hui en France (national edition of Le Parisien), before the 29th of May 2005 referendum. In a qualitative discourse analysis and with the aid of argumentation theories and political communication approaches, the study investigates how the European Union’s Constitution, identity and future were represented and discussed by French political actors through the media in their effort to obtain public adherence before the referendum. Inevitably, the role of the media and the mediation process in the construction and transcription of the political discourse is also discussed.
Keywords: political discourse and argumentation in the media, representations of Europe/EU in France, EU Constitution, European Union, European construction, constitutional debates
Published online: 9 April 2010
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.1.06kou
References (57)
References
Angermüller, Johannes. L’analyse qualitative et quasi qualitative des textes. In: Paillé, Pierre (dir.) 2006. La méthodologie qualitative. Postures de recherche et travail de terrain. Paris: Armand Colin, 225–236.Google Scholar
Bärenreuter, Christophe, Bruell, Cornelia, Gaisbauer, Helmut, Gröner Ülrike, Kimmel Michael, Mokre Monika and Pausch, Markus. 2006. The Referenda on the European Constitution: A Crucial Moment for the Development of a European Public Sphere? Institute for European Integration Research (EIF) Working Paper Series 24, URL: [URL] Google Scholar
Berjoan, Thomas. 2004. Ethnographie de la sujétion : Le journaliste politique et ses sources. Questions de Communication 51, 213–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouillaud, Christophe, Dompnier, Nathalie and Greffet, Fabienne. 2006. Election européenne, mobilisation nationale (juin 2004): Une analyse des sites des partis socialistes et sociodémocrates de 20 pays. Questions de Communication 91, 267–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdon, Jérôme. 2007. Unhappy engineers of the European Soul. The EBU and the Woes of Pan-European Television. The International Communication Gazette 69(3), 263–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breton, Philippe. 2006 (1996). L’argumentation dans la communication. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Brouard, Sylvain and Sauger, Nicolas. 2005. Comprendre la victoire du “non”: proximité partisane, conjoncture et attitude à l’égard de l’Europe. Les Cahiers du Cevipof 421, 127.Google Scholar
Capdevila, Arantxa, Gomez, Lorena and Aubia, Laia. 2005. Partisan Strategies in Light of the European Constitution in Spain. Polis 2005 Plenary Conference on “European Identity and Political Systems”. Paris: School of Political Science [Science Po], URL: [URL] Google Scholar
Charaudeau, Patrick. 2005a. Le discours politique. Les masques du pouvoir. Paris: Vuibert.Google Scholar
Charaudeau, Patrick. 2005b. Les médias et l’information. L’impossible transparence du discours. Bruxelles: Editions De Boeck Université/INA.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dacheux, Eric. 2004. L’impossible défi. La politique de communication de l’Union européenne. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
De Vreese, Claes. 2003. Framing Europe. Television News and European Integration. Amsterdam: Aksant.Google Scholar
Delforce, Bernard. 2004. Le constructivisme : une approche pertinente du journalisme. Questions de Communication 61, 111–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James. 2005. Media Matter: How newspapers and Television News Cover Campaigns and Influence Voters. Political Communication 221, 463–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1991 (1987). La société des individus. Paris: Fayard (Die Gesellschaft der Individuen, edited by Michael Schröter, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1987, original 1939, published in English as The Society of Individuals, Oxford: Blackwell, 1991).Google Scholar
Eriksen, Erik Oddvar. 2005. An emergent European Public Sphere. European Journal of Social Theory 8(3), 341–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esquenazi, Jean-Pierre, Dessinges, Catherine and Fontar, Barbara. 2004. Trois événements de la campagne télévisuelle. In: Maarek Philippe (ed.). La communication politique française après le tournant de 2002. Paris: L’Harmattan, 79–108.Google Scholar
Eveland, William P. Jr., Hayes, Andrew F., Shah, Dhavan V. and Kwak, Nojin. 2005a. Understanding the Relationship between Communication and Political Knowledge: A model Comparison Approach Using Panel Data. Political Communication 221, 423–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005b. Observations on Estimation of Communication Effects on Political Knowledge and a Test of Intercommunication Mediation. Political Communication 221, 505–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcia, Guillaume and Le Torrec, Virginie (eds). 2003. L’Union européenne et les médias. Regards croisés sur l’information européenne. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Gauthier, Gilles. 2004. L’argumentation autour de l’élection présidentielle française de 2002 dans la presse québécoise: l’application d’une approche analytique d’argumentation. In: Maarek Philippe (ed.). La communication politique française après le tournant de 2002. Paris: L’Harmattan, 187–201.Google Scholar
Gerstlé, Jacques. 2004. La communication politique. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
. 2006. L’impact des médias sur la campagne référendaire française de 2005. Comparaison avec les élections européennes de 2004. Etudes et recherches 53, URL: [URL] Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. 1995. Does Europe need a constitution? European Law Journal 1(3), 282–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Théorie de l’agir communicationnel, Paris: Fayard (French translation by J.M. Ferry, and J.L. Schlegel of Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Francfort: Suhrkamp, 1983).Google Scholar
. 2006. Sur l’Europe. Paris: Bayard.Google Scholar
Hudson, Ray. 2000. One Europe or Many? Reflections on becoming European. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series 25(4), 409–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaitatzi-Whitlock, Sophia. 2005. Europe’s Political Communication Deficit. Bury St Edmunts: Arima-Abramis Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud and Statham, Paul. 1999. Political Claims Analysis: integrating protest event and political discourse approaches. Mobilization: The International Journal of Research and Theory about Social Movements, Protest and Collective Behavior 4(2), 203–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud and Erbe, Jessica. 2004. Towards a European Public Sphere? Vertical and horizontal dimensions of Europeanized political communication. Innovation. European Journal of Social Sciences 17(2), 97–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koukoutsaki-Monnier, Angeliki. 2006. The European Constitutional Treaty in the French Tabloid Press, Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Association for Media and Communication Research (IAMCR), Cairo, 23–28 July, 632–638.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał and Oberhuber, Florian. 2007. (Un)Doing Europe. Discourses and Practices of Negotiating the EU Constitution. Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lamizet, Bernard. 2002. Politique et identité. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.Google Scholar
Lehingue, Patrick. 2007. Le Non français au traité constitutionnel européen (mai 2005). Sur deux lectures polaires du scrutin. Actes de la recherche en Sciences Sociales 166/1671, 123–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maigret, Eric. 2003. Sociologie de la communication et des médias. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Mange, Jessica and Marchand, Pascal. 2007. Oui ou non à la Constitution Européenne. L’éloquence du forum. Mots. Les langages du politique 831, 121–137.Google Scholar
Meffert, Michael F., Chung, Sungeun, Joiner, Amber J., Waks, Leah and Garst, Jennifer. 2006. The Effects of Negativity and Motivated Information Processing During a Political Campaign. Journal of Communication 561, 27–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Christoph. 2007. The Constitutional Treaty Debates as Revelatory Mechanisms. Insights for Public Sphere Research and Re-Launch Attempts. RECON Online Working Paper Series 2007/06, URL: [URL] Google Scholar
Moore, Simon. 2007. Toward a “Total Communication” environment: integrating emotion with identity in European Union Strategy. ECREA Symposium “Equal Opportunities and Communication Rights: Representation, Participation and the European Democratic Deficit”. Brussels: Residence Palace, 11–12 October, URL: [URL] Google Scholar
Oberhuber, Florian, Bärenreuter, Christopher, Krzyżanowski, Michał, Schönbauer, Heinz and Wodak, Ruth. 2005. Debating the European Constitution. On representations of Europe/the UE in the press. Journal of Language and Politics 4(2), 227–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pailliart, Isabelle (ed.) 1995. L’espace public et l’emprise de la communication. Grenoble: ELLUG/Université Stendal.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. 1970 (1958). Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Perrineau, Pascal. 2005. De quelques idées fausses ou vérités partielles sur les résultats du référendum du 29 mai 2005. Les Cahiers du Cevipof 421, 2.Google Scholar
Pirat, Bertrand. 2007. Oui ou non. Le piège rhétorique du référendum. Mots. Les langages du politique 831, 139–153.Google Scholar
Rainer, Hülsse. 2006. Imagine the EU: the metaphorical construction of a supra-nationalist identity. Journal of International Relations and Developmenet 9(4), 396–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rey, Violette and Saint-Julien, Thérèse (eds) 2005. Territoires d’Europe. La difference en partage. Paris: ENS Editions. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quermonne, Jean-Louis. 2001. L’Europe en quête de légitimité. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Philip. 1999. Changing spaces of political communication. The case of the European Union. Political Communication 16(3), 263–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stråth, Bo. 2006. Future of Europe. Journal of Language and Politics 5(3), 427–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Steeg, Marianne. 2002. Rethinking the Conditions for a Public Sphere in the European Union. European Journal of Social Theory 5(4): 499–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 2007. Politique, Idéologie et Discours. Semen 21, URL: [URL] (French translation by E. Bouvard and A. Petitclerc of “Politics, Ideology and Discourse” in: Wodak, Ruth (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics).Google Scholar
Wilson, John. 1990. Politically speaking. The pragmatic analysis of political language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth (ed.). 1989. Language, power and ideology. Studies in political discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. The discourse-historical approach. In: Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael (eds.). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage, 63–95.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Weiss, Gilbert. 2004. Visions, Ideologies and Utopias in the Discursive Construction of European Identities: Organising, Representing and Legitimising Europe. In: Pütz, Martin, Neff-van Aertselaer, JoAnne and Van Dijk, Teun (eds.). Communicating ideologies: multidisciplinary perspectives on language, discourse and social practice, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 225–52.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2007. “Doing Europe”: the Discursive Construction of European Identities. In: Mole, Richard C.M. (ed.). Discursive Constructions of Identity in European Politics. Basing-stoke: Palgrave, 70–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.