Article published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 9:2 (2010) ► pp. 175–194

Dissonant political discourse

| Ariel University Center of Samaria
This study develops and illustrates the notion of dissonant political discourse. The discourse of dissonance is to be found wherever there is public debate on controversial topics or on topics requiring a decision, notably in the political arena. Discourse of this kind is characterized by arguments demonstrating both how hard and how necessary it is to face up to any decision that will put the decision maker in an inconsistent position. Findings confirm that voices heard in the arena of political discourse make use of dissonant argument when experiencing difficulties in justifying decisions. Ironically, it is precisely the evidence of difficulties encountered by the speakers that shows how continuation of the joint debate is ensured
Keywords: dissonant discourse, dissonance, pirate radio, political discourse
Published online: 15 July 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.2.01mos
References
Abraham, Rebecca.
1999 Negative Affectivity: Moderator Or Confound In Emotional Dissonance-outcome Relationships? The Journal of Psychology 133(1), 61–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, Elliot.
1972 The Social Animal. San Francisco: Freeman And Company.Google Scholar
Bass, L. R., and Thomas, D. B.
(1980) Dissonance and Perception during a Presidential Campaign: Pre- and Postelection Findings from the Carter-Ford Contest. Journal of Social Psychology, 1121, 305–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Be’er, Yizhar
1998 Pirate Radio In Israel: Alternative Media Or Danger To Democracy? Jerusalem: Keshev — Israelcenter For Defence Of Democracy.Google Scholar
Beasley, Ryan. K. and Joslyn, Mark R.
2001 Cognitive Dissonance And Post-Election Attitude Change In Six Presidential Elections. Political Psycholog 22 (3), 521–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard.
1952 Democratic Theory And Public Opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly 16 (3), 313–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy.
2006 Principled Agents? The Political Economy Of Good Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickford, Susan.
1996 The Dissonance Of Democracy: Listening, Conflict, And Citizenship. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, Jack W.
1956 Post-Decision Changes In The Desirability Of Alternatives. Journal Of Abnormal And Social Psychology 52 (3), 384–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Elinor, L.
2005 Transforming Social-Cultural Hierarchy: To Develop An Equitable Civil Society. In: Antonio F. Perez and Fenggang Yang (Eds). Civil Society As Democratic Practice. Washington, DC, USA: The Council For Research In Values And Philosophy, 157–172.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger and Gilman, Albert
1972 The Pronouns Of Power And Solidarity. In: Pier Paolo Giglioli (Ed). Language and Social Context. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin, 252–282.Google Scholar
Brumberg, Daniel.
2002 The Trap Of Liberalized Autocracy. Journal of Democracy 13 (4), 56–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buysse, Ann., De Clercq, Armand., Verhofstadt, Lesley., Heene, Els., Roeyers, Herbert and Van Oost, Paulette.
2000 Dealing With Relational Conflict: A Picture in Milliseconds. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 17 (4–5), 574–597. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cann, Damon and Jeff Yates
2008 Homegrown Institutional Legitimacy Assessing Citizens’ Diffuse Support For State Courts. American Politics Research 36 (2), 297–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cha, Jaeho.
2005 Media, Interpersonal Discussion, And Electoral Choice. Communication Research 32 (3), 295–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Chien-Jen
1998 The Chinese Democratic Tradition. Harvard International Review 20 (3), 83–84.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul.
2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London And New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Missing Links In Mainstream CDA: Modules, Blends And The Critical Instinct. In: Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton (Eds). A New Agenda in Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 19–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul and Schaffner, Christina.
1997 Discourse and Politics. In: Teun A. Van Dijk (Ed). Discourse As Social Interaction. London: Sage Publication, 206–230.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A.
1961 Who Governs? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, Sergio.
2007 Compound Democracies: Why the United States and Europe are Becoming Similar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman.
2003 Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis For Social Research, London And New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman and Wodak, Ruth.
1997 Critical Discourse Analysis: An Overview. In: Teun A. Van Dijk (Ed). Discourse And Interaction. London: Sage Publication, 258–284.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph
1990 Sociolinguistic of Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon.
1957 A Theory Of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, Ill: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon and Carlsmithi, James M.
1959 Cognitive Consequences Of Forced Compliance. Journal Of Abnormal And Social Psychology 581, 203–211.Google Scholar
Fowler, Robert and Kress, Gunther.
1979 Critical Linguistics. In: Fowler Roger, Robert Hodge, Gunther Kress and Tony Trew (Eds). Language and Control . London And New York: Routledge, 185–213.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy.
1992 The Uses And Abuses Of French Discourse Theories For Feminist Politics. In: Mike Featherstone (Ed). Cultural Theory and Cultural Change. London: Sage Publication, 51–72.Google Scholar
Frijda, Nico F.
1986 The Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Furman, Gail. C.
1998 Postmodernism And Community In Schools: Unraveling The Paradox. Educational Administration Quarterly 34 (3), 298–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Girandola, Fabien.
1997 Double Forced Compliance and Cognitive Dissonance Theory. The Journal of Social Psychology 137 (5), 594–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
González-Márquez, Monica., Mittelberg, Irene., Coulson, Seana and Spivey, Michael J.
2006 Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hammersley, Martyn
1997 On the Foundations of Critical Discourse Analysis. Language and Communication 17 (3), 237–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Robert.
2003 Political Corruption: In and Beyond the Nation State. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holbert, R. Lance., LaMarre Heather L., and Landreville Kristen D.
2009 Fanning The Flames Of A Partisan Divide Debate Viewing, Vote Choice, And Perceptions Of Vote Count Accuracy. Communication Research 36 (2), 155–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jansz, Jeroen and Timmers, Monique.
2002 Emotional Dissonance: When the Experience of an Emotion Jeopardizes an Individual’s Identity. Theory & Psychology 12 (1), 79–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert.
1976 Perception and Misperception un International Politics. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Peter.
1998 Politics, Innocence, and the Limits of Goodness . London And New York : Routledge .Google Scholar
Knox, Robert E. and Inksten, James A.
1968 Post-Decision Dissonance at Post Time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8 (4), 319–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, Richard S.
1991 Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lecky, Prescott.
1945 Self-Consistency: A Theory of Personality. New York: Island Press.Google Scholar
Liebes, Tamar and Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1994 Managing A Moral Dilemma: Israeli Soldiers in the Intifada. Armed Forces & Society 21 (1), 45–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Limor, Yehiel.
1996 The Stormy Waves of Pirate Radio in Israel. Kesher 191, 42–57.Google Scholar
Locke, Terry.
2004 Critical Discourse Analysis. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Ian G. and Sharifian, Farzad
2002 Aspects of Aboriginal English Oral Discourse: An Application of Cultural Schema Theory. Discourse Studies 4 (2), 169–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matu, Peter M. and Lubbe, Hendrik Johannes
2007 Investigating Language and Ideology: A Presentation of the Ideological Square and Transitivity in the Editorials of Three Kenyan Newspapers. Journal of Language and Politics 6 (3), 401–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazid, Bahaa-eddin M.
2007 Presuppositions And Strategic Functions In Bush’s 20/9/2001 Speech: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Journal Of Language And Politics 6 (3), 351–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Davis S.
1996 Framing National Security: Elite Public Discourse on Nuclear Weapons During the Cold War. Political Communication 12 (2), 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Menz, Florian.
1989 Manipulation Strategies In Newspapers: A Program For Critical Linguistics. In: Rute Wodak (Ed). Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 227–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rajend, Mesthrie.
2000 Critical Sociolinguistics: Approaches To Language And Power. In: Mesthrie Rajend, Joan Swann, Ana Deumert and William L. Leap (Eds). Introducing Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 316–353.Google Scholar
Nash, Kate and Scott, Alan.
2004 The Blackwell Companion To Political Sociology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Oatley, Keith.
1992 Best Laid Schemes: The Psychology of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, Michelle
2007 The English Wits: Literature And Sociability In Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Louise Jane
1996 Rhetoric and Spread of the Discourse of Thatcherism. Discourse & Society 7 (2), 209–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Planas, J. Richard
1994 Way Does Castro Survives? In: Donald E. Schulz (Ed). Cuba and the Future. London: Greenwood Press, 41–52.Google Scholar
Pozhidaev, Dmitry D.
2007 What Statements Do Not State: Sine Ira Et Studi. Journal Of Language And Politics 6 (3), 327–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth.
2001 Discourse And Discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. Peter
1996 Deceit, Delusion, and Detection: Language and Language Behavior Series (Vol. 6). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Salmon, Charles T. and Oshagan, Hayg
1990 Community Size, Perceptions Of Majority. Public Relations Research Annual 21, 157–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzwald, Josef.
1978 Man is Not Alone: An Introduction to Social Psychology. Ramat Aviv: Open University. (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Semino, Elena and Masci, Michela.
1996 Politics in Football: Metaphor in the Discourse of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy. Discourse & Society 7 (2), 243–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shultz, Thomas R., Leveille Eléne and Lepper Mark R.
1999 Free Choice Cognitive Dissonance Revisited: Choosing “Lesser Evils” Versus “Greater Goods”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25 (1), 40–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slowe, Peter M.
1990 Geography and Political Power. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steinzor, Rena I.
2007 Mother Earth and Uncle Sam how Pollution and Hollow Government Hurt our Kids. . Austin, TX: University Of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Stricker, George.
1964 The Operation of Cognitive Dissonance on Pre- and Post- election Attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology 61, 111–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1984 Prejudice in Discourse. Philadelphia And Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991 Racism And The Press . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1993 Principles Of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse and Society 4 (2), 249–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000, October 25. Cognitive Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. Retrieved August 10, 2009, From Http://​Www​.Hum​.Uva​.Nl​/Teun​/Cogn​-Dis​-Anal​.Htm Google Scholar
2001 Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea For Diversity. In: Teun A. Van Dijk, Ruth Wodak and and Michael Meyer (Eds). Methods Of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 121–138.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. David
2000 From Self Psychology To Moral Philosophy. Philosophical Perspectives 14 (1), 349–378.Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G.
2004 Text, Context, Pretext. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth.
1990 The Waldheim Affair And Anti-Semitic Prejudice In Austrian Public Discourse. Patterns Of Prejudice 24 (2–4), 18–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994 The Development And Forms Of Racist Discourse In Austria Since 1989. In: David Graddol and Sebeok Thomas (Eds). Language In Changing Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1–15.Google Scholar
1996 The Genesis of Racist Discourse in Austria Since 1989. In: Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard (Eds). Texts And Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 107–128.Google Scholar
1997 Others In Discourse, Racism And Anti-Semitism In Present Day Austria. Research on Democracy and Society 31, 275–296.Google Scholar
2001 What CDA Is About — A Summary of uts History, Important Concepts and its Developments. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (Eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 1–13.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael.
2009 Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, And Methodology. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (Eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd Edn. London: Sage, 1–33.Google Scholar
www​.Inn​.Co​.Il.
(N.D.). Retrieved August 10, 2009, From Channel 7: Http://​Www​.Inn​.Co​.Il/
Wyatt, Robert. O., Katz, Elihu., Levinsohn, Hanna., and Al-Haj, Majid
1996 The Dimensions of Expression Inhibition: Perceptions of Obstacles to Free Speech in Three Cultures. International Journal Of Public Opinion Research 8 (3), 229–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Collins, Timothy P.
2018.  In Hypocrisy in American Political Attitudes, ► pp. 247 ff. Crossref logo
Sarfo-Kantankah, Kwabena Sarfo
2018. It's about people: identifying the focus of parliamentary debates through a corpus-driven approach. Corpora 13:3 ► pp. 393 ff. Crossref logo
Zompetti, Joseph P.
2019.  In Political Authority, Social Control and Public Policy [Public Policy and Governance, 31], ► pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.