Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 9:3 (2010) ► pp.364–392

Gender-specific constructions of the ‘other religion’ in French and Austrian discourse on Turkey’s accession to the European Union

| Institute of Conflict Research, Vienna
This article presents results from a qualitative analysis of religious and gender-specific ‘othering’ in Austrian and French media discourse on Turkey’s accession to the EU (2004–2006). A typology of arguments justifying inclusion and exclusion of Turkey from Europe or the EU is presented, and gender-specific othering is placed in the context of differing national discourses about Europe and diverging visions of secularisation and citizenship. Secondly, various topoi of orientalism are reconstructed which play a crucial role in both national corpora, and it is shown how various historically shaped discourses of alterity intersect and produce gendered images of cultural and religious otherness.
Keywords: European Union, Turkey, enlargement, print media, discourse analysis, identity, orientalism, Austria, France
Published online: 1 November 2010
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.3.02bis
References (55)
References
Altheide, David L. 1996. Qualitative Media Analysis (= Qualitative Research Methods Series, vol. 38), London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Martin and Aarts, Bas. 2000. Corpus construction: a principle for qualitative data collection. In: Martin Bauer and George Gaskell (eds.). Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. London: Sage, 19–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bottici, Chiara. 2008. Disentangling the myths of Europe. Paper presented at the workshop Myths and Maps of Europe. Florence.Google Scholar
Braun, Christina von and Mathes, Bettina. 2007. Verschleierte Wirklichkeit. Die Frau, der Islam und der Westen, Berlin: Aufbau.Google Scholar
Braun, Christina von. 2001. Versuch über den Schwindel. Religion, Schrift, Bild, Geschlecht, Zürich/München: Pendo.Google Scholar
Dietz, Thomas. 2005. Constructing the self and changing others: reconsidering ‘Normative Power Europe’. Millennium 33 (3): 613–636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman and Wodak, Ruth. 1997. Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Teun van Dijk (ed.). Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 258–284.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Joel S. and Soper, J. Christopher. 2005. Muslims and the State in Britain, France, and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert. 2002. The meanings of Europe in French national discourse: a French Europe or an Europeanized France? In: Mikael af Malmborg and Bo Strath (eds.). The Meaning of Europe. Variety and Contention With and Among Nations. Oxford: Berg, 311–326.Google Scholar
Giannakopoulos, Angelos and Maras, Konstadinos. 2005. Der europäische Türkei-Diskurs: Eine Vergleichsanalyse. In: Angelos Giannakopoulos and Konstadinos Maras (eds.): Die Türkei-Debatte in Europa. Ein Vergleich. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag, 213–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilman, Sander L. 1994. Freud, Identität und Geschlecht, Frankfurt/M: Fischer.Google Scholar
Göckede, Regina and Karentzos, Alexandra. 2006. Einleitung. In: Regine Göckede and Alexandra Karentzos (eds.): Der Orient, die Fremde — Positionen zeitgenössischer Kunst und Literatur. Bielefeld: transcript. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Göle, Nilüfer. 2002. Islam in public: New visibilities and new imaginaries. Public Culture 14(1), 173–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guénif-Souilamas, Naicra. 2006. The other French exception. Virtuous racism and the war of sexes in postcolonial France. French Politics, Culture and Society 24(3), 23–41.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. Glauben und Wissen. Frankfurt / Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1992. The West and the rest: discourse and power. In: Stuart Hall and Bram Gieben (eds.). Formations of Modernity. Cambridge: Open University/Polity Press, 275–320Google Scholar
Hörner, Karin. 2001. Verborgene Körper — verbotene Schätze. Haremsfrauen im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert, in: Gernig, Kerstin (Hg.): Fremde Körper. Zur Konstruktion des Anderen in europäischen Diskursen, Berlin: Achims Verlag Achim Freudenstein, S. 177–207.Google Scholar
Huth-Hildebrandt, Christine. 2002. Das Bild von der Migrantin. Auf den Spuren eines Konstrukts, Frankfurt/M: Brandes&Apsel.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2009. Veil: Mirror of Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kalmar, Ivan Davidson and Penslar, Derek. 2005. Orientalism and the Jews: an introduction. In: Ivan Davidson Kalmar and Derek J. Penslar (eds.). Orientalism and the Jews. Waltham/Mass: Brandeis University Press, XIII–XL.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred. 1992. Alltagslogik: Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Koenig, Matthias. 2004. Öffentliche Konflikte um die Inkorporation muslimischer Minderheiten in Westeuropa — analytische und komparative Perspektiven. Journal für Konflikt- und Gewaltforschung 21, 85–100.Google Scholar
Kittner, Alma Elisa. 2006. „Nahe Ferne“ — „ferne Nähe” Anmerkungen zu einem orientalischen Topos in der zeitgenössischen Kunst, in: Regina Göckede/Alexandra Karentzos (Hg.): Der Orient, die Fremde. Positionen zeitgenössischer Kunst und Literatur, Bielefeld, 139–158.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud and Erbe, Jessica. 2004. Towards a European public sphere? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 17 (2), 97–118.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud and Stratham, Paul. 1999. Political claims analysis: integrating protest events and political discourse approaches. Mobilization 4 (2), 203–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1985 [1979]. Futures past, translated by K. Tribe. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał and Oberhuber, Florian. 2007. (Un)Doing Europe: Discourses and Practices of Negotiating the EU Constitution. Brussels et al.: P.I.E.-Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2008. Analyzing focus group discussions. In: Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski (eds.). Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 162–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loster-Schneider, Gudrun (Hg.) (2003): Geschlecht — Literatur — Geschichte II. Nation und Geschlecht, St. Ingbert: Röhrig.Google Scholar
Madeker, Ellen. 2006. Turkey — a part of Europe? The Construction of European Identity in the German Enlargement Debate. ECPR-Paper, 3rd Pan-European Conference on EU-Politics, Bilgi University Istanbul.Google Scholar
Mautner, Gerlinde. 2008. Analyzing newspapers, magazines and other print media. In: Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski (eds.). Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 30–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mejri, Mouna. 2004. La candidature turque à l’Union Euruopéenne à travers la presse française. Paris : L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Moisi, Dominique. 1999. Dreaming of Europe. Foreign Policy 1151, 44–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Münkler, Herfried. 1991. Europa als politische Idee. Ideengeschichtliche Facetten des Europabegriffs und deren aktuelle Bedeutung. Leviathan 191, 521–541.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2006. Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 21(1), 22–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin. 2008. Analyzing political rhetoric. In: Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski (eds.). Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 96–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rommelspacher, Birgit. 1995. Dominanzkultur. Texte zu Fremdheit und Macht, Berlin: Orlanda.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Markus. 2006. Orientalismus, Gender und die binäre Matrix kultureller Repräsentationen. In: Regina Göckede and Alexandra Karentzos (eds.). Der Orient, die Fremde — Positionen zeitgenössischer Kunst und Literatur. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 39–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa. 1995. Am Busen der Natur. Erkenntnis und Geschlecht in den Anfängen der Wissenschaft, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. 2007. The Politics of the Veil, Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steeg, Marianne van de. 2006. Does a public sphere exist in the EU? An analysis of the contentof the debate on the Haider case? European Journal for Political Research 45(4), 609–634 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Anselm and Corbin, Juliet M. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Trenz, Hans-Jörg. 2006. Europäische Öffentlichkeit und die verspätete Politisierung der EU. Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft 1/2006, 117–133.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1984. Prejudice in Discourse. Amsterdam/Phil.: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 1996. The representation of social actors. In: Carmen-Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard (eds). Texts and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 32–70.Google Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert. 2002a. Searching for Europe: The problem of legitimisation and representation in recent political speeches on Europe. Journal of Language and Politics 1(1): 59–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002b. AEIOU — Austria Europe Imago, Onus, Unio? In: Mikael af Malmborg and Bo Strath (eds). The Meaning of Europe. Variety and Contention With and Among Nations. Oxford: Berg, 263–284.Google Scholar
Wimmel, Andreas. 2005. Transnationale Diskurse in der europäischen Medienöffentlichkeit: Die Debatte zum EU-Beitritt der Türkei. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 46(3), 459–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wimmel, Andreas. 2006. Transnationale Diskurse in Europa. Der Streit um den Türkei-Beitritt in Deutschland, Frankreich und Großbritannien, Frankfurt / Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Weiss, Gilbert. 2005. Analyzing European Union discourses: theories and applications. In: Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton (eds). A New Research Agenda in Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam/Phil.: Benjamins, 121–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2000. Recontextualisation and transformation of meanings: a critical discourse analysis of decision-making in EU meetings about employment policies. In: Srikant Sarangi and Malcolm Coulthard (eds.). Discourse and Social Life, London: Longman, 185–207.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. The discourse-historical approach. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 63–94.Google Scholar
Yegenoglu, Meyda. 1998. Colonial Fantasies. Towards a Feminist Reading of Orientalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira. 1997. Gender and Nation, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ajanovic, Edma, Stefanie Mayer & Birgit Sauer
2018. Constructing ‘the people’. Journal of Language and Politics 17:5 ► pp. 636 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.