Article published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 9:3 (2010) ► pp. 364–392

Gender-specific constructions of the ‘other religion’ in French and Austrian discourse on Turkey’s accession to the European Union

| Institute of Conflict Research, Vienna
This article presents results from a qualitative analysis of religious and gender-specific ‘othering’ in Austrian and French media discourse on Turkey’s accession to the EU (2004–2006). A typology of arguments justifying inclusion and exclusion of Turkey from Europe or the EU is presented, and gender-specific othering is placed in the context of differing national discourses about Europe and diverging visions of secularisation and citizenship. Secondly, various topoi of orientalism are reconstructed which play a crucial role in both national corpora, and it is shown how various historically shaped discourses of alterity intersect and produce gendered images of cultural and religious otherness.
Keywords: European Union, Turkey, enlargement, print media, discourse analysis, identity, orientalism, Austria, France
Published online: 01 November 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.3.02bis
References
Altheide, David L.
1996 Qualitative Media Analysis (= Qualitative Research Methods Series, vol. 38), London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Martin and Aarts, Bas.
2000 Corpus construction: a principle for qualitative data collection. In: Martin Bauer and George Gaskell (eds.). Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. London: Sage, 19–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bottici, Chiara.
2008 Disentangling the myths of Europe. Paper presented at the workshop Myths and Maps of Europe. Florence.Google Scholar
Braun, Christina von and Mathes, Bettina
2007 Verschleierte Wirklichkeit. Die Frau, der Islam und der Westen, Berlin: Aufbau.Google Scholar
Braun, Christina von
2001 Versuch über den Schwindel. Religion, Schrift, Bild, Geschlecht, Zürich/München: Pendo.Google Scholar
Dietz, Thomas.
2005 Constructing the self and changing others: reconsidering ‘Normative Power Europe’. Millennium 33 (3): 613–636. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman and Wodak, Ruth.
1997 Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Teun van Dijk (ed.). Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 258–284.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Joel S. and Soper, J. Christopher
2005 Muslims and the State in Britain, France, and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert.
2002 The meanings of Europe in French national discourse: a French Europe or an Europeanized France? In: Mikael af Malmborg and Bo Strath (eds.). The Meaning of Europe. Variety and Contention With and Among Nations. Oxford: Berg, 311–326.Google Scholar
Giannakopoulos, Angelos and Maras, Konstadinos
2005 Der europäische Türkei-Diskurs: Eine Vergleichsanalyse. In: Angelos Giannakopoulos and Konstadinos Maras (eds.): Die Türkei-Debatte in Europa. Ein Vergleich. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag, 213–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilman, Sander L.
1994 Freud, Identität und Geschlecht, Frankfurt/M: Fischer.Google Scholar
Göckede, Regina and Karentzos, Alexandra
2006 Einleitung. In: Regine Göckede and Alexandra Karentzos (eds.): Der Orient, die Fremde — Positionen zeitgenössischer Kunst und Literatur. Bielefeld: transcript. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Göle, Nilüfer
2002 Islam in public: New visibilities and new imaginaries. Public Culture 14(1), 173–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guénif-Souilamas, Naicra
2006 The other French exception. Virtuous racism and the war of sexes in postcolonial France. French Politics, Culture and Society 24(3), 23–41.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen
2001 Glauben und Wissen. Frankfurt / Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart.
1992 The West and the rest: discourse and power. In: Stuart Hall and Bram Gieben (eds.). Formations of Modernity. Cambridge: Open University/Polity Press, 275–320Google Scholar
Hörner, Karin
2001 Verborgene Körper — verbotene Schätze. Haremsfrauen im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert, in: Gernig, Kerstin (Hg.): Fremde Körper. Zur Konstruktion des Anderen in europäischen Diskursen, Berlin: Achims Verlag Achim Freudenstein, S. 177–207.Google Scholar
Huth-Hildebrandt, Christine
2002 Das Bild von der Migrantin. Auf den Spuren eines Konstrukts, Frankfurt/M: Brandes&Apsel.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian.
2009 Veil: Mirror of Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kalmar, Ivan Davidson and Penslar, Derek
2005 Orientalism and the Jews: an introduction. In: Ivan Davidson Kalmar and Derek J. Penslar (eds.). Orientalism and the Jews. Waltham/Mass: Brandeis University Press, XIII–XL.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred.
1992 Alltagslogik: Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Koenig, Matthias.
2004 Öffentliche Konflikte um die Inkorporation muslimischer Minderheiten in Westeuropa — analytische und komparative Perspektiven. Journal für Konflikt- und Gewaltforschung 21, 85–100.Google Scholar
Kittner, Alma Elisa
2006 „Nahe Ferne“ — „ferne Nähe” Anmerkungen zu einem orientalischen Topos in der zeitgenössischen Kunst, in: Regina Göckede/Alexandra Karentzos (Hg.): Der Orient, die Fremde. Positionen zeitgenössischer Kunst und Literatur, Bielefeld, 139–158.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud and Erbe, Jessica
2004 Towards a European public sphere? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 17 (2), 97–118.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud and Stratham, Paul.
1999 Political claims analysis: integrating protest events and political discourse approaches. Mobilization 4 (2), 203–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart.
1985 [1979] Futures past, translated by K. Tribe. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał and Oberhuber, Florian
2007 (Un)Doing Europe: Discourses and Practices of Negotiating the EU Constitution. Brussels et al.: P.I.E.-Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2008 Analyzing focus group discussions. In: Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski (eds.). Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 162–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loster-Schneider, Gudrun
(Hg.) (2003): Geschlecht — Literatur — Geschichte II. Nation und Geschlecht, St. Ingbert: Röhrig.Google Scholar
Madeker, Ellen.
2006 Turkey — a part of Europe? The Construction of European Identity in the German Enlargement Debate. ECPR-Paper, 3rd Pan-European Conference on EU-Politics, Bilgi University Istanbul.Google Scholar
Mautner, Gerlinde.
2008 Analyzing newspapers, magazines and other print media. In: Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski (eds.). Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 30–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mejri, Mouna.
2004 La candidature turque à l’Union Euruopéenne à travers la presse française. Paris : L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Moisi, Dominique.
1999 Dreaming of Europe. Foreign Policy 1151, 44–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Münkler, Herfried
1991 Europa als politische Idee. Ideengeschichtliche Facetten des Europabegriffs und deren aktuelle Bedeutung. Leviathan 191, 521–541.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas.
2006 Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 21(1), 22–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth.
2001 Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin
2008 Analyzing political rhetoric. In: Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski (eds.). Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 96–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rommelspacher, Birgit.
1995 Dominanzkultur. Texte zu Fremdheit und Macht, Berlin: Orlanda.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Markus
2006 Orientalismus, Gender und die binäre Matrix kultureller Repräsentationen. In: Regina Göckede and Alexandra Karentzos (eds.). Der Orient, die Fremde — Positionen zeitgenössischer Kunst und Literatur. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 39–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa.
1995 Am Busen der Natur. Erkenntnis und Geschlecht in den Anfängen der Wissenschaft, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W.
2007 The Politics of the Veil, Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steeg, Marianne van de
2006 Does a public sphere exist in the EU? An analysis of the contentof the debate on the Haider case? European Journal for Political Research 45(4), 609–634 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Anselm and Corbin, Juliet M.
1998 Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Trenz, Hans-Jörg
2006 Europäische Öffentlichkeit und die verspätete Politisierung der EU. Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft 1/2006, 117–133.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
1984 Prejudice in Discourse. Amsterdam/Phil.: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
1996 The representation of social actors. In: Carmen-Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard (eds). Texts and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 32–70.Google Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert.
2002a Searching for Europe: The problem of legitimisation and representation in recent political speeches on Europe. Journal of Language and Politics 1(1): 59–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002b AEIOU — Austria Europe Imago, Onus, Unio? In: Mikael af Malmborg and Bo Strath (eds). The Meaning of Europe. Variety and Contention With and Among Nations. Oxford: Berg, 263–284.Google Scholar
Wimmel, Andreas.
2005 Transnationale Diskurse in der europäischen Medienöffentlichkeit: Die Debatte zum EU-Beitritt der Türkei. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 46(3), 459–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wimmel, Andreas
2006 Transnationale Diskurse in Europa. Der Streit um den Türkei-Beitritt in Deutschland, Frankreich und Großbritannien, Frankfurt / Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Weiss, Gilbert.
2005 Analyzing European Union discourses: theories and applications. In: Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton (eds). A New Research Agenda in Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam/Phil.: Benjamins, 121–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth.
2000 Recontextualisation and transformation of meanings: a critical discourse analysis of decision-making in EU meetings about employment policies. In: Srikant Sarangi and Malcolm Coulthard (eds.). Discourse and Social Life, London: Longman, 185–207.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2001 The discourse-historical approach. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 63–94.Google Scholar
Yegenoglu, Meyda.
1998 Colonial Fantasies. Towards a Feminist Reading of Orientalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira
1997 Gender and Nation, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Ajanovic, Edma, Stefanie Mayer & Birgit Sauer
2018. Constructing ‘the people’. Journal of Language and Politics 17:5 ► pp. 636 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.