Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 9:3 (2010) ► pp.409–432

Between Orient and Occident

Tradition, politics and the limits of criticism in the Scholem-Arendt exchange

| University of Derby

This paper revisits the fabled yet substantially neglected public exchange between Hannah Arendt and Gershom Scholem in the wake of Arendt’s publication of the book Eichmann in Jerusalem. Analyzing the central concept of the correspondence, Ahabath Israel, the paper investigates what may be considered two diametrically opposed constructions of Jewish identity and politics. Scholem’s particularistic “politics of continuity” is analyzed in terms achieving continuity or even unity between past and present, the sacred and the secular. This construction is supported by his ultimate dividing line being between the Jewish and non-Jewish, where his correspondent’s place is constructed outside the boundaries of the group. In turn, Arendt introduces the rigidly universalist constitutive categories of post-Enlightenment liberal democracies, where the firm demarcation is drawn exactly between the sacred and secular, the religious and the politics. Consequently, the intrusion of a religious tradition is understood by her as an attempt by Scholem to render otherwise earthly objects beyond the limits of criticism, manifesting not only a racist but a downright totalitarian tendency. Having presented these radical positions — Occidentalism and Orientalism, respectively —, the paper will conclude with pondering the possibility of their reconciliation.

Keywords: Jewish identity, Holocaust, criticism, tradition, secularism, Hannah Arendt, discourse analysis, Gershom Scholem
Published online: 1 November 2010
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.3.04kap
References
Antaki, Charles, Billig, Michael, Edwards, Derek and Potter, Jonathan
2003 Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analytic shortcomings. Discourse Analysis Online 1(1) [[URL]].Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah.
1978 “Eichmann in Jerusalem” — An Exchange of Letters between Gershom Scholem and Hannah Arendt. In Hannah Arendt. The Jew as Pariah. Ron Feldman (ed). New York: The Grove Press, 240–251.Google Scholar
1991 The Origins of Totalitarianism. London: Harcourt, Inc.Google Scholar
1993 Truth and Politics. In Hannah Arendt. Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. London: Penguin Books, 227–264.Google Scholar
1994a Eichmann in Jerusalem. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
1994b Religion and Politics. In Hannah Arendt Essays in Understanding. Jerome Kohn (ed). New York: Shocken Books, 368–390.Google Scholar
1998 The Human Condition. London: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aschheim, Steven E.
2001 Scholem, Arendt, Klemperer: Intimate Chronicles in Turbulent Times. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
2004 The Metaphysical Psychologist: On the Life and Letters of Gershom Scholem. The Journal of Modern History. 761, 903–933. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avnery, Ury.
1968 Israel without Zionists: A Pleas for Peace in the Middle East. New York: Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
Benda, Julien.
1928 The Treason of the Intellectuals. New York: William Morrow and Company.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla
2000 Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem. In Dana Villa (ed). The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 65–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J.
1996 Hannah Arendt and the Jewish Question. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997 Did Hannah Arendt Change Her Mind? From Radical Evil to the Banality of Evil. In Larry May and Jerome Kohn (eds). Hannah Arendt — Twenty Years Later. London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Biale, David.
1979 Gershom Scholem: Kabbalah and Counter-History. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael.
1996 Arguing and Thinking. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bilsky, Leora.
2004 Transformative Justice: Israeli Identity on Trial. The University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braham, Randolph L.
1969 The Eichmann Case: A Source Book. New York: World Federation of Hungarian Jews.Google Scholar
Buruma, Ian and Margalit, Avishai.
2004 Occidentalism: The West in the Eyes of Its Enemies. London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith.
2004 The Charge of Anti-Semitism: Jews, Israel and The Risks of Public Critique. In Judith Butler. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso, 101–127.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret.
1992 Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Politics as Culture: Hannah Arendt and the Public Realm. In Lewis P. Hinchman and Sandra K. Hinchman (eds). Hannah Arendt: Critical Essays. New York: State University of New York Press, 179–205.Google Scholar
Cohen, Richard I.
1993 Breaking the Code: Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem and the Public Polemic: Myth, Memory and Historical Imagination. In Dina Porat and Shlomo Simonsohn (eds). Michael: On the History of the Jews in the Diaspora, Vol. XIII1. Tel Aviv: The Diaspora Research Institute, 46–60.Google Scholar
Dan, Joseph.
1987 Gershom Scholem and the Mystical Dimension of Jewish History. London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
1999 Gershom Scholem: Between History and Historiography. In Joseph Dan. Jewish Mysticism: Volume 4: General Characteristics and Comparative Studies. Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
Diner, Dan.
1997 Hannah Arendt Reconsidered: On the Banal and the Evil in Her Holocaust Narrative. New German Critique 711, 177–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Derek.
2000 Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral. Research on Language and Social Interaction. 33(4), 347–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Derek and Potter, Jonathan.
1992 Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Elon, Amos.
1997 The Case of Hannah Arendt. New York Review of Books. 44(17), 25–29.Google Scholar
2003 Wise Survivors. New York Review of Books. 50(6), 76–79.Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana.
2001 Theatres of Justice: Arendt in Jerusalem, the Eichmann Trial, and the Redefinition of Legal Meaning in the Wake of the Holocaust. Critical Inquiry. 27(2), 201–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fine, Robert.
2000 Crimes Against Humanity — Hannah Arendt and the Nuremberg Debates. European Journal of Social Theory. 3(3), 293–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finlay, Michael.
2005 Pathologizing dissent: Identity politics, Zionism and the “self-hating Jew”. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(2), 201–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley.
1989 Doing What Comes Naturally. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen
1994 Hannah Arendt’s Communications Concept of Power. In Lewis P. Hinchman and Sandra K. Hinchman (eds). Hannah Arendt: Critical Essays. New York: State University of New York Press, 211–229.Google Scholar
Hertzberg, Arthur.
1985 Gershom Scholem as Zionist and Believer. Modern Judaism. 5(1), 3–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herzog, Annabel
2002 Reporting and storytelling: Eichmann in Jerusalem as political testimony. Thesis Eleven. Number 691, 83–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howe, Irving.
1983 A Margin of Hope: An Intellectual Autobiography. London: Martin Secker and Warburg Limited.Google Scholar
Kaposi, David.
2008a The Clash of Discourses: Politics and Morality in the Exchange of Letters between Hannah Arendt and Gershom Scholem. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Loughborough University.Google Scholar
2008b To Judge or Not To Judge: The Clash of Perspectives in the Scholem-Arendt Exchange. Holocaust Studies: A Journal of Culture and History 14(1): 95–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimmerling, Baruch
2001 The Invention and Decline of Israeliness: State, Society, and The Military. London: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia.
2001 Hannah Arendt. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laqueur, Walter.
2001 The Arendt Cult: Hannah Arendt as Political Commentator. . In Steven E. Aschheim (ed). Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem. London: University of California Press, 47–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipstadt, Deborah E.
1996 America and the Memory of the Holocaust, 1950–1965. Modern Judaism, 16(2): 195–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marrus, Michael R.
2001 Eichmann in Jerusalem: Justice and History. In Steven E. Aschheim (ed). Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem. London: University of California Press, 205–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart
2008 On Liberty and Other Essays. John Gray (ed). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Hans.
1991 Hannah Arendt and the Eichmann Trial. In Hans Mommsen. From Weimar to Auschwitz: Essays in German History. Cambridge: Polity Press, 254–278.Google Scholar
Niranjana, Tejaswini
1992 Representing Texts and Cultures: Translation Studies and Ethnography. In Tejaswini Niranjana. Siting Translation. History, Post-Structuralism and the Colonial Context. Berkeley: University of California Press, 47–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parvikko, Tuija.
2003 Hannah Arendt and the Arrogance of Judgment. Alternatives 281, 199–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1986 Extreme case formulations: a way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 9(2): 219–229.Google Scholar
Rabinbach, Anson.
2004 Eichmann in New York: The New York Intellectuals and the Hannah Arendt Controversy. October 1081, 97–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravitzky, Aviezer
(1996) Messianism, Zionism and Jewish Religious Radicalism. London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Raz-Krakotzkin, Amnon
2001 Binationalism and Jewish identity: Hannah Arendt and the Question of Palestine. In Steven E. Aschheim (ed). Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem. London: University of California Press, 165–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard.
1999 Religion as a conversation-stopper. In Richard Rorty. Philosophy and Social Hope. Penguin Books, 168–174.Google Scholar
Said, Edward.
1978 Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Scholem, Gershom.
1964 Brief an Hannah Arendt. In Friedrich A. Krummacher (ed). Die Kontroverse. Hannah Arendt, Eichmann und die Juden. München: Nymphenburger Verlagshandlung, 206–210.Google Scholar
1965 On the Kabbalah and Its Symbolism. New York: Shocken Books.Google Scholar
1974 Zionism — Dialect of Continuity and Rebellion. In Ehud Ben Ezer (ed). Unease in Zion. New York: Quadrangle/The New York Times Book Co., 263–298.Google Scholar
Scholem, Gershom
1975 Sabbatai Sevi — The Mystical Messiah. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scholem, Gershom.
1976 On Jews and Judaism in Crisis. New York: Shocken Books.Google Scholar
1983 From Berlin to Jerusalem: Memories of My Youth. New York. Shocken Books.Google Scholar
1994 Briefe, Vol. I: 1914–1947. Itta Shedletzky (ed). Munich: CH Beck.Google Scholar
Scholem, Gershom
1997 On the Possibility of Jewish Mysticism in Our Time. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar
Scholem, Gershom.
2002 A Life in Letters, 1914–1982. A.D. Skinner (ed). London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2003 Walter Benjamin: The Story of a Friendship. New York Review Books.Google Scholar
Shapira, Anita
2005 The Eichmann Trial: Changing Perspectives. In David Cesarani (ed). After Eichmann: Collective memory and the Holocaust since 1961. London: Routledge, 18–39.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven B.
1997 Spinoza, Liberalism and the Question of Jewish Identity. London: Yale Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael.
2007 Liberalism and the Art of Separation. In Michael Walzer Thinking Politically. London: Yale University Press, 53–67.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Lorberbaum, Menachem, Zohar, Noam J. and Lorberbaum, Y.
(eds) 2000 The Jewish Political Tradition. Volume I: Authority. London: Yale University Press, 486–523.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
1999 Critical Discourse Analysis at the End of the 20th Century. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(1–2), 185–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolin, Richard.
1996 The Ambivalences of German-Jewish Identity: Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem. History and Memory. 8(2), 9–35.Google Scholar
2001 Heidegger’s Children — Hannah Arendt, Karl Löwith, Hans Jonas and Herbert Marcuse. Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth
2004 Hannah Arendt: For the Love of the World. 2nd edition. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Zertal, Idith.
2005 Israel’s Holocaust and the Politics of Nationhood. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zertal, Idith and Eldar, Akiva.
2007 Lords of the Land: The War for Israel’s Settlements in the Occupied Territories, 1967–2007. London: Nation Books.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Houwink ten Cate, Lotte
2019. “Die Amerikanerin Scolds!”. New German Critique 46:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kaposi, David
2013. The crooked timber of identity: Integrating discursive, critical, and psychosocial analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology 52:2 ► pp. 310 ff. DOI logo
Manoff, Itamar
2024. Arendt’s conception of love and anti-fascist education. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.