Cover not available
Article published In:
Discourse and Socio-Political Transformations in Contemporary China
Edited by Paul Chilton, Hailong Tian and Ruth Wodak
[Journal of Language and Politics 9:4] 2010
► pp. 489–507

Reflections on discourse and critique in China and the West

| Lancaster University and Tianjin University of Commerce
The term “critical”, as used by scholars writing under the banner of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), is in need of review in a new global intellectual environment in which diverse philosophical and political traditions are increasingly in contact with one another. This essay is particularly concerned with the question of how a shared understanding of the concept of the critical can be developed among Western and Chinese scholars. To this end the paper gives an overview of notions of critique in the historical traditions of China and the West, addressing issues of conceptualisation, discourse practice and translation. This leads us to consider, from a “critical” point of view, what the appearance of the “critical” approach may mean in the Chinese context. The need for continued dialogue oriented to a deepened understanding of existing ideas and approaches is highlighted.
Keywords: discourse, CDA, critique, China, reflections, West
Published online: 7 January 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.4.02chi
References (68)
References
Baker, Paul, et al. 2008. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 19/3, 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy A. 1989. Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 2003. Critical discourse analysis and the rhetoric of critique. In: Gilbert Weiss and Ruth Wodak (eds). Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. London: Palgrave, 35–46.Google Scholar
2008. The language of critical discourse analysis: The case of nominalisation. Discourse and Society, 19(6), 783–800. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 1982. Nukespeak: Nuclear language, culture and propaganda. In: Crispin Aubrey (ed.). Nukespeak: The Media and the Bomb. London: Comedia Publishing Group, 94–112.Google Scholar
1983. Newspeak. In: Crispin Aubrey and Paul Chilton (eds). Nineteen eighty-four in 1984: Autonomy, Control and Communication. London: Comedia Publishing Group, 33–44.Google Scholar
1985. Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1988. Orwellian Language and the Media. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
1996. Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common European Home. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Critical discourse analysis. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences. Cambridage: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie and Fairclough, Norman. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Confucius. 1979. Analects, translated by D. C. Lau, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Editorial Board. 2006. Grand Chinese Dictionary. Shanghai: Century Publisher.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2001a (1989). Language and Power (2nd Edition). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2001b. The discourse of new Labour: Critical discourse analysis. In: Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon Yates (eds). Discourse as Data. London: Sage in association with The Open University, 229–266.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman and Wodak, Ruth. 1997. Critical discourse analysis. In: Teun A. van Dijk (ed). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, 258–84.Google Scholar
Gernet, Jacques. 1999. A History of Chinese Civilization (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1968. Science and technology as ideology. In: Barry Barnes (ed.). Sociology of Science. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 74–85Google Scholar
. 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests, translated by Jeremy Shapiro, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
. 1979. Communicaiton and the Evolution of Society, translated by Thomas McCarthy, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
. 1984/1987. The Theory of Communicative Action, 21 vols. Translated by Thomas McCarthy, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
. 1996 (2nd edition). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Heer, Hannes, Manoschek, Walter, Pollak, Alexander, and Wodak, Ruth. (eds). 2008. The Discursive Construction of History. Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Iedema, Rick. 1997. The language of administration: Organizing human activity in formal institutions. In: Frances Christie and James Martin (eds). Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London and Washington: Cassell, 73–100.Google Scholar
Ji, Fengyuan. 2004. Linguistic Engineering: Language and Politics in Mao’s China. Honolulu: University of Hawai Press.Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika and Wodak, Ruth. 2008. Introduction: Shifting boundaries and emergent public spheres. In: Ruth Wodak and Veronika Koller (eds). Communication in the Public Sphere. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1–21.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 1996. Representational resources and the production of subjectivity: Questions for the theoretical development of critical discourse analysis in a multicultural society. In: Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard (eds). Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Routledge, 15–31.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał and Wodak, Ruth. 2008. The Politics of Exclusion. Debating Migration in Austria. New Orleans: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mautner, Gerlinde. 2008. Analyzing newspapers, magazines and other print media. In: Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski (eds). Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 30–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds). Methods of CDA. London: Sage (2nd revised edition), 122–141.Google Scholar
Orwell, George. 1949. Nineteen Eighty-Four. London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar
Plato.1996. Plato: Cratylus. Parmenides. Greater Hippias. Lesser Hippias. Translated by Harold N. Fowler (Loeb Classical Library No. 167) St Edmunds, Suffolk, UK: St Edmundsbury Press.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin 2009. The discourse-historical Approach. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds). Methods of CDA. London: Sage (2nd revised edition), 87–121.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1997. Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society 81, 165–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi-xu. 2005. A Cultural Approach to Discourse. New York: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2007. Discourse as Cultural Struggle. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
2009. Reconstructing eastern paradigms of discourse studies. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 4 (1), 29–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1997. Whorf’s children: critical comments on CDA. in Ryan, A. & Wray, A. (eds.) Evolving Models of Language. Milton Keynes: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Tian, Hailong. 2008. Critical perspectives on discourse studies. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 40(5), 339–344.Google Scholar
2009. Discourse Studies: Categories, Perspectives and Methodologies. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse & Society 6(2), 243–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. Opinions and ideologies in the press. In A. Bell & P. Garrett (eds.). Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell, 21–63.Google Scholar
1999. Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schäffner & A. Wenden (eds.). Language and Peace. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 17–33.Google Scholar
2001. Critical discourse analysis. In: Deborah Schiffrin et al.. (eds). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, 352–371.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo and Wodak, Ruth. 1999. Legitimizing immigration control: A Discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies 1(1), 83–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, Henry. 2004. Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophische Untersuchungen./Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. (ed.). 1989. Language, Ideology, and Power: Studies in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2000a. From conflict to consensus? The co-construction of a policy paper. In: Peter Muntigl, Gilbert Weiss, and Ruth Wodak (eds). European Union Discourses on Unemployment. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 73–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000b. Recontextualization and the transformation of meaning: A critical discourse analysis of decision making in EU-meetings about employment policies. In: Srikant Sarangi and Malcolm Coulthard (eds). Discourse and Social Life. Harlow: Pearson Education, 185–206.Google Scholar
2001. The discourse-historical approach. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds). Methods of CDA. London: Sage, 63–94.Google Scholar
2003. Populist discourses. The rhetoric of exclusion in written genres. Document Design 4:2, 133–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Dilemmas of discourse (analysis). Language in Society 351, 595–611.Google Scholar
2007. Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis. A cross-disciplinary analysis. Pragmatics and Cognition 15:1, 203–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Introduction: discourse studies — Important concepts and terms. In: Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski (eds). Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and van Dijk, Teun A. (eds). 2000. Racism at the Top. Klagenfurt: Drava.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Chilton, Paul. (eds). 2007. A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Koller, Veronika. (eds) 2008. Communication in the Public Sphere. (Handbook of Applied Linguistics, Vol. IV) Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Fairclough, Norman. 2010. Recontextualising the Bologna process in Austria and Romania, Critical Discourse Studies (in press).Google Scholar
Wright, Scott. 2005. Design matters: The political efficacy of government-run online discussion forums. In: Sarah Oates, Diana Owen, and Rachel K. Gibson (eds). The Internet and Politics: Citizens, voters, and activists. London: Routledge, 80–99.Google Scholar
Xia, Zhengnong (editor-in-chief). 1999. Cihai. Shanghai: Shanghai Dictionary Publisher.Google Scholar
Cited by (30)

Cited by 30 other publications

Guliashvili, Nino
2023. National identity revisited. Journal of Language and Politics 22:6 ► pp. 779 ff. DOI logo
Li, Songqing & Hongli Yang
2023. ‘Open’, ‘connected’, ‘distinctive’, ‘pioneering’, and ‘committed’: semioscaping Shanghai as a global city. International Journal of Multilingualism 20:2 ► pp. 250 ff. DOI logo
Negro, Gianluigi
2023. China’s Perspective on Internet Governance: a more Integrated Role in the Global Discussion?. Journal of Chinese Political Science 28:1 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Jiayu & Guangyu Jin
2023. Critical discourse studies eleven years on in China (from 2011 to 2021): A critical review. Discourse Studies 25:3 ► pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Li, Tao & Kaibao Hu
2021. Corpus-Based Translation Studies and Political Discourse Analysis. In Reappraising Self and Others [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 6], ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Li, Tao & Feng Pan
2021. Reshaping China’s image: a corpus-based analysis of the English translation of Chinese political discourse. Perspectives 29:3 ► pp. 354 ff. DOI logo
Li, Tao
2020. Representing China in Translations of Two Korean News Outlets: A Corpus-based Discourse Analysis Approach. In Corpus-based Translation and Interpreting Studies in Chinese Contexts, ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Sen Zhang
2019. Alignment, ‘politeness’ and implicitness in Chinese political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 18:5 ► pp. 698 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Zhining, Dandan Liu & Shaohan Cai
2019. Self-reflection and employee creativity. Chinese Management Studies 13:4 ► pp. 895 ff. DOI logo
Singh, Michael & Jinghe Han
2017. Pedagogies of Intellectual Equality. In Pedagogies for Internationalising Research Education, ► pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Singh, Michael & Jinghe Han
2017. The Socio-Historical Basis of Xíngzhī Research. In Pedagogies for Internationalising Research Education, ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Capstick, Tony
2016. Introduction. In Multilingual Literacies, Identities and Ideologies, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Sibo
2016. Language and ecology: A content analysis of ecolinguistics as an emerging research field. Ampersand 3 ► pp. 108 ff. DOI logo
Tian, Hailong
2015. Discourse and the Development of Public Sphere in China. In Contemporary Chinese Discourse and Social Practice in China [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 4], ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Mei
2015. Liberty in Harmony: An Integration of Confucian Harmony and Liberalism in Contemporary China. Vienna Journal of East Asian Studies 7:1 ► pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Mei
2016. Rethinking critique as ethics in higher education institutions. Critical Arts 30:2 ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Tian, Hailong & Paul Chilton
2014. Chapter 8. Issues in discourse approach to social transformations in China. In Discourse, Politics and Media in Contemporary China [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 54], ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Unger, Johann Wolfgang
2013. Rebranding the Scottish Executive. Journal of Language and Politics 12:1 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Chilton, Paul
2012. “Critical” in Critical Discourse Analysis. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, DOI logo
Clarke, Ian, Winston Kwon & Ruth Wodak
2012. A Context‐sensitive Approach to Analysing Talk in Strategy Meetings. British Journal of Management 23:4 ► pp. 455 ff. DOI logo
Wodak, Ruth
2011. Complex texts: Analysing, understanding, explaining and interpreting meanings. Discourse Studies 13:5 ► pp. 623 ff. DOI logo
Wodak, Ruth
2013. Multilingualism in Eu Institutions. In Multilingualism and Multimodality, ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Wodak, Ruth
2016. Dialogue matters: transcending dichotomies. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 11:4 ► pp. 367 ff. DOI logo
Wodak, Ruth
2018. Diskursanalyse. In Handbuch Organisationssoziologie [Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wodak, Ruth
2019. Diskursanalyse. In Handbuch Organisationssoziologie [Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wodak, Ruth
2020. Diskursanalyse. In Handbuch Methoden der Politikwissenschaft, ► pp. 881 ff. DOI logo
Wodak, Ruth
2022. Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 426 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Hongyan, Paul Chilton, Yadan He & Wen Jing
2011. Critique across cultures: some questions for CDA. Critical Discourse Studies 8:2 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Language Policy in Business [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 89], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Politics, Ethnicity and the Postcolonial Nation [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 93], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.