Cover not available
Article published In:
Discourse and Socio-Political Transformations in Contemporary China
Edited by Paul Chilton, Hailong Tian and Ruth Wodak
[Journal of Language and Politics 9:4] 2010
► pp. 546–573

A cultural political economy of transnational knowledge brands

Porterian “competitiveness” discourse and its recontextualization in Hong Kong/Pearl River Delta

| Lancaster University
This paper adopts a “cultural political economy” (CPE) approach to examine the production of hegemony and related hegemonic struggles during the socio-spatial changes occurring in the Pearl River Delta. Drawing from the case of Hong Kong/Pearl River Delta, economic restructuring has given rise to the “hollowing out” debate. In face of this debate, two knowledge brands, the Harvard-Porter’s “competitive advantage” (1985) and MIT-Berger-Lester’s “industrial performance” models, have been stabilized as competing modes of developmentality (development governmentality) and have operated as paper-based economic panopticons to order/manage, at a distance, the organization of Hong Kong’s/Pearl River Delta’s space, policy, and, ultimately, the conduct of its population. These modes of developmentalities have met resistance from other forces in other spaces and with other interests, including from below. Nonetheless the two main power blocs are engaging in inter-bloc negotiations in the light of such resistance and are creating a hybrid strategy under the dominance of the service bloc.
Keywords: knowledge brand, cultural political economy, competitiveness, recontextualization, Hongkong/Pearl River Delta
Published online: 7 January 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.4.05sum
References (51)
References
Arvidsson, Adam. 2005. Brands: Meaning and Value in Media Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barnett, C. 2005. The consolidations of “neoliberalism”, Geoforum 36 (1): 7–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berger, Suzanne and Lester, Richard. 1997. Made by Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Basil. 1990. The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse: Class, Codes and Control. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ketel, Christian and Memedovic, Olga. 2008. From clusters to cluster-based economic development. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development 1 (3):375–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Andrea Tyson, Laura. 1988. Competitiveness: An analysis of the problem and a perspective of future policy. In: Martin Kenneth Starr (ed.). Global Competitiveness, Getting the U.S. Back on Track. New York: W.W. Norton, 95–120.Google Scholar
Dosi, Giovanni, and Soete, L. 1988. Technical change and international trade. In: Giovanni Dosi (ed.). Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter, 401–431.Google Scholar
Ekers, M., and Loftus, A. 2008. The power of water: Developing dialogues between Foucault and Gramsci. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 261: 698–718. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enright, Michael, Scott, Edith and Dodwell, David. 1997. The Hong Kong Advantage. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Enright, Michael, Scott, Edith and Chang, Kamun. 2005. Regional Powerhouse: The Greater Pearl River Delta and the Rise of China. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Fagerberg, Jan. 1996. Technology and Competitiveness. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 12 (3): 39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2006. Language and Globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frauley, Jon. 2007. The expulsion of Foucault from governmentality studies: Towards an archaeological-realist retrieval. In: Jon Frauley and Frank Pearce (eds). Critical Realism and the Social Sciences. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 258–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1998. Technologies of the self. In: L. Martin, H. Gutman and P. Hutton (eds). Technologies of the Self. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 14–49.Google Scholar
Freeman, Chris. 1982. Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Gereffi, Gary and Korzeniewicz, Miguel. 1994. Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Greater Pearl River Delta Business Council. 2006. Second Annual Report 2005–6. [URL], last accessed on 14.6.07.Google Scholar
Hong Kong Arts Development Council. 2000. Introduction to Creative Industries: The Case of the United Kingdom and Implementation Strategies in Hong Kong. [URL], last accessed 12.12.2006Google Scholar
Hong Kong Democratic Foundation ([URL])
Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors ( [URL]), last accessed on 14.9.06.
Hong Kong Trade Development Council. 2002. Creative Industries in Hong Kong. [URL], last accessed 12.12.2006.Google Scholar
Hong Kong University Centre For Cultural Policy Research. 2003. Baseline Study on Hong Kong’s Creative Industries. [URL], last accessed 14.9.06.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 2004. Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy. Critical Discourse Studies 1 (2): 159–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jessop, Bob and Sum, Ngai-Ling. 2006. Beyond the Regulation Approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1994. Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession. Foreign Policy March 73: 342–65. People’s Panel on West Kowloon (Source: [URL]), last accessed on 14th September 2006.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Marsden, Richard. 1999. The Nature of Capital: Foucault After Marx. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James. 1988. Gramsci’s Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction. Houndmills: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Martin, Ron and Sunley, Peter. 2003. Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography 31: 5–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miettinen, Reijo. 2002. National Innovation System: Scientific Concept or Political Rhetoric. Helsinki: Edita.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. 2003. Spatial metaphors as spatial techniques in the Work of Michel Foucault. In: Lorraina Pinnell (ed.). Interruptions: Essays in the Poetics/Politics of Space. Gazimagusa: Eastern Mediterranean University Press, 47–55.Google Scholar
Morera, Esteve. 1990. Gramsci’s Historicism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mumford, Lewis. 1938. Culture of cities. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
OECD. 1962. Minutes of the 4th Session, Committee for Scientific Research, SR/M (62), Paris: OECD, p. 2.Google Scholar
. 1991. Technology and Productivity: The Challenges for Economic Policy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Perry, Martin. 2004. Business cluster promotion in New Zealand and the limits of exemplar clusters. Policy & Society 23 (4): 82–103.Google Scholar
Porter, Michael. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
1990. Competitive Advantage of Nations. Basingstoke: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posner, M. 1961. International trade and technical change. Oxford Economic Papers 13 (1): 323–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sum, Ngai-Ling. (1999) Rethinking globalization: Rearticulating the spatial scales and temporal horizons of trans-border space. In: K. Olds et al.. (eds.). Globalization in the Asia Pacific. London: Routledge, 129–146.Google Scholar
. 2004. Towards a cultural political economy: Discourses, material power and (counter-)hegemony’. EU Framework 6 DEMOLOGOS project, [URL], last accessed on 15th June 2007.Google Scholar
. 2006. Hong Kong/Pearl River Delta as a trans-border region: Structures, strategies and discourses. EU Framework 6 DEMOLOGOS project, [URL], last accessed on 15th June 2007.Google Scholar
. 2008. Struggles against wal-martization and neo-liberal competitiveness in (southern) China: Is post-neoliberalism an alternative?. Development Dialogue 51: 67–81.Google Scholar
Sum, Ngai-Ling. and Jessop, Bob. 2010. Towards a Cultural Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
The 2022 Foundation. 2003. Hong Kong and the Pearl River Delta: The Economic Interaction. [URL], last accessed 11.06.07.Google Scholar
Vernon, Raymond. 1966. International trade and international investment in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (2): 190–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webb, D. West Kowloon. [URL], last accessed on 11.6.07.
Yan, Yunxiang. 1996. The flow of gifts: Reciprocity and social networks in a Chinese village. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Mayfair Mei-hui. 1994. Gift, Favours and Banquets: The Arts of Social Relationships in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Sidhu, Ravinder K., Ho Kong Chong & Brenda S. A. Yeoh
2020. Assembling East Asian Knowledge Spaces. In Student Mobilities and International Education in Asia, ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Riep, Curtis B.
2019. Fixing contradictions of education commercialisation: Pearson plc and the construction of its efficacy brand. Critical Studies in Education 60:4 ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Seung-Ook
2017. Free trade agreements and “economic territory” as a geoeconomic imaginary in South Korea. Critical Asian Studies 49:4 ► pp. 569 ff. DOI logo
Jessop, Bob
2016. Putting higher education in its place in (East Asian) political economy. Comparative Education 52:1 ► pp. 8 ff. DOI logo
Julier, Guy
2016. Spatial Planning and Design Citizenship. In Human Smart Cities, ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Mulvad, Andreas
2015. Competing Hegemonic Projects within China's Variegated Capitalism: ‘Liberal’ Guangdong vs. ‘Statist’ Chongqing. New Political Economy 20:2 ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.