Cover not available
Article published In:
Corpus Linguistics in Language and Sexuality Studies: Developments and Prospects
Edited by Heiko Motschenbacher
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 7:2] 2018
► pp. 205–236

“I wanna be a toy”

Self-sexualisation in gender-variant Twitter users’ biographies

| Lancaster University | Manchester Metropolitan University, United Kingdom

The paradigmatic transgender woman is often negatively oversexualised, pornographised and fetishised in mainstream conceptualisations and discourses. However, self-sexualisation by transgender individuals is often portrayed as a (sex-)positive social phenomenon. Little research has been conducted that analyses the self-sexualisation strategies of the multiple instantiations of gender-variant identity, including transmasculine and non-binary social actors. This paper uses a corpus-informed socio-cognitive approach to critical discourse studies to identify differences between the self-sexualisation strategies and underpinning cognitive models of different gender-variant user-groups on Twitter. 2,565 users are coded into five categories: (1) transfeminine; (2) transmasculine; (3) transsexual; (4) transvestite; (5) non-binary. Findings show that transvestite- and transsexual-identifying users most closely fit the pornographised and fetishised conceptualisation, whilst non-binary users are the least self-sexualising user-group.

Keywords: transgender, gender-variant, sexualisation, Twitter, socio-cognitive, corpus linguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Sexualisation strategies – A brief overview
  • 3.Data contextualisation and analytical framework
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Transfeminine users
      • 4.1.1Keywords
      • 4.1.2Collocates
    • 4.2Transmasculine users
      • 4.2.1Keywords
      • 4.2.2Collocates
    • 4.3Transsexual users
      • 4.3.1Keywords
      • 4.3.2Collocates
    • 4.4Transvestite users
      • 4.4.1Keywords
      • 4.4.2Collocates
    • 4.5Non-binary users
      • 4.5.1Keywords
      • 4.5.2Collocates
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.17016.web
References

References

American Psychological Association (APA)
2007 Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. [URL] (March 11, 2018).
Archer, Margaret
1998 Introduction: Realism in the social sciences. In Critical Realism: Essential Readings, Margaret Archer, Roy Bhaskar, Andrew Collier, Tony Lawson & Alan Norrie (eds), 189–205. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Attwood, Feona
2006 Sexed up: Theorizing the sexualization of culture. Sexualities 9(1): 77–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul
2005 Public Discourses of Gay Men. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
2014 Using Corpora to Analyze Gender. London: BloomsburyGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Gabrielatos, Costas, KhosraviNik, Majid, Krzyżanowski, Michał, McEnery, Tony & Wodak, Ruth
2008 A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 19(3): 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul & Levon, Erez
2015 Picking the right cherries? A comparison of corpus-based and qualitative analyses of news articles about masculinity. Discourse & Communication 9(2): 221–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beek, Titia F., Cohen-Kettenis, Peggy T., Bouman, Walter P., de Vries, Annelou L. C., Steensma, Thomas D., Witcomb, Gemma L., Arcelus, Jon, Richards, Christina, de Cuypere, Griet & Kreukels, Baudewijntje P. C.
2017 Gender incongruence of childhood: Clinical utility and stakeholder agreement with the World Health Organization’s proposed ICD-11 criteria. PLoS ONE 12(1): 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Tiffany K. & Chung, Y. Barry
2015 Transgender microaggressions: Complexity of heterogeneity of transgender identities. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling 9(3): 217–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coy, Maddy
2009 Milkshakes, lady lumps and growing up to want boobies: How the sexualisation of popular culture limits girls’ horizons. Child Abuse Review 18(6): 372–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coy, Maddy & Garner, Maria
2010 Glamour modelling and the marketing of self-sexualization: Critical reflections. International Journal of Cultural Studies 13(6): 657–675. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Definitions, discourses and dilemmas: Policy and academic engagement with the sexualisation of popular culture. Gender and Education 24(3): 285–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dangerfield, Derek T., Smith, Laramie R., Williams, Jeffery, Unger, Jennifer & Bluthenthal, Ricky
2017 Sexual positioning among men who have sex with men: A narrative review. Archives of Sexual Behaviour 46(4): 869–884. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DePalma, Renée & Atkinson, Elizabeth
2006 The sound of silence: Talking about sexual orientation and schooling. Sex Education 6(4): 333–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ding, Ying & Jiang, Jing
2014 Extracting interest tags from Twitter user biographies. In Information Retrieval Technology: Proceedings from the 10th Annual Information Retrieval Societies Conference, Azizah Jaafar, Nazlena Mohamad Ali, Shahrul Azman Mohd Noah, Alan F. Smeaton, Peter Bruza, Zainab Abu Bakar, Nursuriati Jamil & Tengku Mohd Tengku Sembok (eds), 268–279. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Elijah A. & Zimman, Lal
2014 Boycunts and bonus holes: Trans men’s bodies, neoliberalism, and the sexual productivity of genitals. Journal of Homosexuality 61(5): 673–690. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espineira, Karine
2016 Transgender and transsexual people’s sexuality in the media. Parallax 22(3): 323–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas & Baker, Paul
2008 Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996–2005. Journal of English Linguistics 36(1): 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gill, Rosalind
2007 Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies 10(2): 147–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 The sexualisation of culture? Social and Personality Psychology Compass 6/71: 483–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gill, Rosalind & Donaghue, Ngaire
2013 As if postfeminism had come true: The turn to agency in cultural studies of ‘sexualisation’. In Gender, Agency, and Coercion. Thinking Gender in Transnational Times, Sumi Madhok, Anne Phillips & Kalpana Wilson (eds), 240–258. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
GLAAD
2017 GLAAD Media Reference Guide – Transgender. [URL] (November 14, 2017)
Glynn, Tiffany R. & van den Berg, Jacob J.
2017 A systematic review of interventions to reduce problematic substance use among transgender individuals: A call to action. Transgender Health 2(1): 45–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graff, Kaitlin A., Murnen, Sarah K. & Krause, Anna K.
2013 Low-cut shirts and high-heeled shoes: Increased sexualisation across time in magazine depictions of girls. Sex Roles 69(11/12): 571–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Fiona & Aitchison, Cara
2008 Tourism and the sexualisation of the gaze: Solo female tourists’ experiences of gendered power, surveillance and embodiment. Leisure Studies 27(3): 329–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kehily, Mary Jane
2012 Contextualising the sexualisation of girls debate: Innocence, experience and young female sexuality. Gender and Education 24(3): 355–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Liz
2007 A conducive context: Trafficking of persons in Central Asia. In Human Trafficking, Maggy Lee (ed), 73–91. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Khamis, Susie, Ang, Lawrence & Welling, Raymond
2016 Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Studies 8(2): 191–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Christopher E. M. & Finn, Mark D.
2017 Authenticity, validation and sexualisation on Grindr: An analysis of trans women’s accounts. Psychology & Sexuality 8(1–2): 158–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNair, Brian
2002 Striptease Culture: Sex, Media, and the Democratization of Desire. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meier, Stacey Colton & Labuski, Christine M.
2013 The demographics of the transgender population. In International Handbook on the Demography of Sexuality, Amanda K. Baumle (ed), 289–327. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, Linda
2010 Sexualisation of Young People: Review. Home Office. [URL] (August 15, 2017)
Raddon, Arwen
2002 Mothers in the Academy: Positioned and positioning within discourses of the ‘successful academic’ and the ‘good mother’. Studies in Higher Education 27(4): 387–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riggs, Damien W. & Bartholomaeus, Clare
2017 Transgender young people’s narratives of intimacy and sexual health: implications for sexuality education. Sex Education. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salama, Amir H. Y.
2011 Ideological collocation and the recontextualization of Wahhabi-Saudi Islam post-9/11: A synergy of corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 22(3): 315–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scandurra, Cristiano, Amodeo, Anna Lisa, Bochicchio, Vincenzo, Valerio, Paolo & Frost, David M.
2017 Psychometric characteristics of the Transgender Identity Survey in an Italian sample: A measure to assess positive and negative feelings towards transgender identity. International Journal of Transgenderism 18(1): 53–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sears, James T.
1999 Teaching queerly: Some elementary propositions. In Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue about Sexualities and Schooling, William J. Letts & James T. Sears (eds), 3–14. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Smith, Angela
2018 Bulging biceps and tender kisses: The sexualisation of fatherhood. Social Semiotics 28(3): 315–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Jenny
2013 Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laura & Donaghue, Ngaire
2014 The confidence trick: Competing constructions of confidence and self-esteem in young Australian women’s discussions of the sexualisation of culture. Women’s Studies International Forum 47(A): 23–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, John C.
[1982] 2010 Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, Henri Tajfel (ed), 15–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
1977 Semantic macro-structures and knowledge frames in discourse comprehension. In Cognitive Processes in Comprehension, Marcel A. Just & Patricia A. Carpenter (eds), 3–32. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
1995 Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In Language & Peace, Christina Schäffner & Anita L. Wenden (eds), 17–33. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company Ltd.Google Scholar
2009 Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds), 62–86. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2015 Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds), 62–85. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2017 Socio-cognitive discourse studies. In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, John Flowerdew (ed), 26–43. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
1995 Representing social action. Discourse & Society 6(1): 81–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 The representation of social actors. In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard (eds), 32–70. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Volkova, Svitlana, Backrach, Yoram, Armstrong, Michael & Sharma, Vijay
2015 Inferring latent user properties from texts published in social media. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2015), 4296–4297. [URL] (March 11, 2018).
Walton, S. Courtney & Rice, Ronald E.
2013 Mediated disclosure on Twitter: The roles of gender and identity in boundary impermeability, valence, disclosure, and stage. Computers in Human Behaviour 29(3): 1465–1474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webster, Lexi
forthcoming. ‘I am I’: Self-constructed transgender identities in internet-mediated forum communication. International Journal of Sociology of Language.
Zimman, Lal
2009 ‘The other kind of coming out’: Transgender people and the coming out narrative genre. Gender & Language 3(1): 53–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 The discursive construction of sex: Remaking and reclaiming the gendered body in talk about genitals among trans men. In Queer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender, and Sexuality, Lal Zimman, Jenny Davis & Joshua Raclaw (eds), 13–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Jones, Lucy
2021. Queer linguistics and identity. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10:1 ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Konnelly, Lex
2021. Nuance and normativity in trans linguistic research. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10:1 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Lawson, Robert & Laura Coffey-Glover
2023. Introducing mediated discrimination: Intersections of gender, sexuality and media discourse. Discourse, Context & Media 56 ► pp. 100739 ff. DOI logo
Mattfeldt, Anna
2020. Marginalisierung in der Marginalität?. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 2020:73 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Motschenbacher, Heiko
2021. Language and sexuality studies today. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10:1 ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Webster, Lexi
2022. “Erase/rewind”: How transgender Twitter discourses challenge and (re)politicize lesbian identities. Journal of Lesbian Studies 26:2 ► pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Webster, Lexi
2022. ‘Scary Monsters (and Super Creeps?)’: Critiquing representations of women throughout the 1980s in Fangoria magazine. Horror Studies 13:2 ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Webster, Lexi
2023. ‘Sorry, You're Not A Winner’: considering critical relativism, competing interests and lateral power struggle in ethical critique. Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.