Article published In:
Corpus Linguistics in Language and Sexuality Studies: Developments and ProspectsEdited by Heiko Motschenbacher
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 7:2] 2018
► pp. 175–204
Edited by Heiko Motschenbacher
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 7:2] 2018
► pp. 175–204
Discourses of marriage in same-sex marriage debates in the UK press 2011–2014
This paper interrogates media representations of same-sex marriage debates in the UK using a combination of corpus linguistics tools and close reading, and drawing on Queer Linguistics. Following related work by Bachmann (2011), Baker (2004), and Love and Baker (2015), we analyse a 1.3 million-word corpus of UK national newspaper texts compiled for the Discourses of Marriage Research Group. Our corpus stretches from September 2011 and the announcement of a government consultation on same-sex marriage, to April 2014 when the first same-sex marriages took place. Using a top-down approach we investigate the discourses drawn upon in same-sex marriage debates (as indexed by keywords and key semantic fields) and uncover the binary social categories used to normalise social structures and hold the same-sex marriage debate in place. We also consider which social actors are (not) given a voice and/or agency and discuss how (same-sex) marriage is constituted.
Keywords: same-sex marriage, queer theory, discourse, corpus linguistics, social actors, semantic domains
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Queer Theory, corpus linguistics, and same-sex marriage debates
- 3.Building the corpus
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1The terms of debate
- 4.2The semantics of same-sex marriage
- 4.3Defining marriage
- 4.4Social actors and agency
- 5.Discussion and conclusions
- Notes
-
References
References
Bachmann, Ingo
2011 Civil partnership – “gay marriage in all but name”: A corpus-driven analysis of discourses of same-sex relationships in the UK parliament. Corpora 6(1): 77–105. 
Baker, Paul
2004 “Unnatural acts”: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debates on gay male law reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(1): 88–106.
Barrett, Rusty
2002 Is queer theory important for sociolinguistic theory? In Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 25–43. Stanford: CSLI Press.
BBC
Butler, Judith
1990 Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
1993 Bodies that Matter. New York: Routledge.
Findlay, Jamie
2017 Unnatural acts lead to unconsummated marriages: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords revisited. Journal of Language and Sexuality 6(1): 30–60.
Jäkel, Olaf
2014 Denotational boundary disputes in political discourse: Defining the definition of marriage. Journal of Language and Politics 13(2): 336–363.
Kilgarriff, Adam, Rychlý, Pavel, Smrž, Pavel & Tugwell, David
Koller, Veronika
2009 Analysing collective identity in discourse: Social actors and contexts. In Critical Discourse Analysis I: Notions of Context and Social Actors, Adele Petitclerc & Philippe Schepens (eds), 69–95. Besançon–Cedex: Presses Universitaire de Franche–Comté.
Leap, William
2013 Queering language and normativity. Discourse & Society 24(5): 643–648.
Love, Robbie & Baker, Paul
2015 The hate that dare not speak its name? Journal of Language, Aggression and Conflict 3(1): 57–86.
Motschenbacher, Heiko & Stegu, Martin
2013 Queer Linguistic approaches to discourse. Discourse & Society 24(5): 519–535.
OED
1989 Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rayson, Paul
2009 Wmatrix: A web-based corpus processing environment. Computing Department, Lancaster University. [URL] (April 8, 2017)
Scott, Mike
2012 WordSmith Tools version 61. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software
Thompson, Geoff
2004 Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Education.
Turner, Georgina, Mills, Sara, van der Bom, Isabelle, Coffey-Glover, Laura, Paterson, Laura L. & Jones, Lucy
2018 Opposition as victimhood in media debates about same-sex marriage. Discourse & Society 29(2): 180–197.
van der Bom, Isabelle, Coffey-Glover, Laura, Jones, Lucy, Mills, Sara & Paterson, Laura L.
2015 Implicit homophobic argument structure: Equal marriage discourse in The Moral Maze. Journal of Language and Sexuality 4(1): 102–137.
van Leeuwen, Theo
1996 The representation of social actors. In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard (eds), 32–70. London: Routledge.
2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 6 other publications
Hill, G. & C. Bulley
2023. Help me to come out gracefully! Working with lesbian, gay, and bisexual, people affected by cancer to develop a national practitioner guide supporting inclusive care. Radiography 29 ► pp. S81 ff. 
Jantunen, Jarmo Harri & Samu Kytölä
2022. Online discourses of ‘homosexuality’ and religion. Journal of Language and Sexuality 11:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Jones, Lucy
Kania, Ursula
2020. Marriage for all (‘Ehe fuer alle’)?! A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of the marriage equality debate in Germany. Critical Discourse Studies 17:2 ► pp. 138 ff.
Wilkinson, Mark
2022. Radical contingency, radical historicity and the spread of ‘homosexualism’: A diachronic corpus-based critical discourse analysis of queer representation in The Times between 1957–1967 and 1979–1990. Discourse, Context & Media 48 ► pp. 100623 ff.
Zheng, Yue & Lik Sam Chan
2022. Framing same-sex marriage in U.S. liberal and conservative newspapers from 2004 to 2016: Changes in issue attributes, organizing themes, and story tones. The Social Science Journal 59:1 ► pp. 34 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.