Article published in:
Corpus Linguistics in Language and Sexuality Studies: Developments and Prospects
Edited by Heiko Motschenbacher
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 7:2] 2018
► pp. 175204
References

References

Bachmann, Ingo
2011Civil partnership – “gay marriage in all but name”: A corpus-driven analysis of discourses of same-sex relationships in the UK parliament. Corpora 6(1): 77–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul
2004“Unnatural acts”: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debates on gay male law reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(1): 88–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Rusty
2002Is queer theory important for sociolinguistic theory? In Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 25–43. Stanford: CSLI Press.Google Scholar
BBC
2017Heterosexual couple lose civil partnership challenge. BBC News. http://​www​.bbc​.co​.uk​/news​/uk​-39039146 (July 13, 2017)
Butler, Judith
1990Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
[ p. 202 ]
1993Bodies that Matter. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Findlay, Jamie
2017Unnatural acts lead to unconsummated marriages: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords revisited. Journal of Language and Sexuality 6(1): 30–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jäkel, Olaf
2014Denotational boundary disputes in political discourse: Defining the definition of marriage. Journal of Language and Politics 13(2): 336–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Rychlý, Pavel, Smrž, Pavel & Tugwell, David
2004The Sketch Engine. Information Technology. http://​www​.sketchengine​.co​.uk (May 13, 2017)
Koller, Veronika
2009Analysing collective identity in discourse: Social actors and contexts. In Critical Discourse Analysis I: Notions of Context and Social Actors, Adele Petitclerc & Philippe Schepens (eds), 69–95. Besançon–Cedex: Presses Universitaire de Franche–Comté.Google Scholar
Leap, William
2013Queering language and normativity. Discourse & Society 24(5): 643–648.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Love, Robbie & Baker, Paul
2015The hate that dare not speak its name? Journal of Language, Aggression and Conflict 3(1): 57–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko & Stegu, Martin
2013Queer Linguistic approaches to discourse. Discourse & Society 24(5): 519–535.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
OED
1989Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rayson, Paul
2009Wmatrix: A web-based corpus processing environment. Computing Department, Lancaster University. http://​ucrel​.lancs​.ac​.uk​/wmatrix/ (April 8, 2017)
Scott, Mike
2012WordSmith Tools version 6. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis SoftwareGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff
2004Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Turner, Georgina, Mills, Sara, van der Bom, Isabelle, Coffey-Glover, Laura, Paterson, Laura L. & Jones, Lucy
2018Opposition as victimhood in media debates about same-sex marriage. Discourse & Society 29(2): 180–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Bom, Isabelle, Coffey-Glover, Laura, Jones, Lucy, Mills, Sara & Paterson, Laura L.
2015Implicit homophobic argument structure: Equal marriage discourse in The Moral Maze. Journal of Language and Sexuality 4(1): 102–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
1996The representation of social actors. In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard (eds), 32–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2008Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Jones, Lucy
2021. Queer linguistics and identity. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10:1  pp. 13 ff. Crossref logo
Kania, Ursula
2020. Marriage for all (‘Ehe fuer alle’)?! A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of the marriage equality debate in Germany. Critical Discourse Studies 17:2  pp. 138 ff. Crossref logo
Zheng, Yue & Lik Sam Chan
2020. Framing same-sex marriage in U.S. liberal and conservative newspapers from 2004 to 2016: Changes in issue attributes, organizing themes, and story tones. The Social Science Journal  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.