Article published in:
Journal of Language and Sexuality
Vol. 8:2 (2019) ► pp. 221–241

Communicating trans identity

Toward an understanding of the selection and significance of gender identity-based terminology

| Nazarbayev University, Kazakhstan
This paper will analyze a series of qualitative interviews to better understand the selection and significance of gender identity-based terminology used by trans persons in the United Kingdom. An analysis of factors such as the perceived understanding of terminology available at a given historical moment (i.e. transgender, transman, trans, etc.), identity of interactors (i.e. trans or cis identified), and purpose of interaction (i.e. legal, medical) will be considered to better understand the terminology chosen by individuals to construct and communicate their gender identity in a way that has meaning both to themselves as well as to those with whom they are communicating. Analysis will help to develop a deeper understanding of the importance of terminology in how trans persons understand and communicate their gender identity.
Keywords: gender expression, gender identity, sociolinguistics, transgender identity, transgender studies, transsexual
Published online: 20 August 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.19001.rya
References

References

Bono, Chaz & Fitzpatrick, Billie
2011 Transition: The Story of How I Became a Man. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Bouman, Walter Pierre, Schwend, Amets Suess, Motmans, Joz, Smiley, Adam, Safer, Joshua D., Deutsch, Madeline B., Adams, Noah J. & Winter, Sam
2017 Language and trans health. International Journal of Transgenderism 18(1): 1–6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brontsema, Robin
2004 A queer revolution: Reconceptualizing the debate over linguistic reclamation. Colorado Research in Linguistics 17(1): 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary
2004 Language, gender, and sexuality. In Language in the USA: Themes for the Twenty-First Century, Edward Finegan & John R. Rickford (eds), 410–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, John W.
1998 Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Davis, Erin Calhoun
2009 Situating “fluidity”: (Trans) Gender identification and the regulation of gender diversity. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 15(1): 97–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 240 ]
Edelman, Elijah Adiv & Zimman, Lal
2014 Boycunts and bonus holes: Trans men’s bodies, neoliberalism, and the sexual productivity of genitals. Journal of Homosexuality 61(5): 673–690. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, Joshua L.
2006 The nomenclature of the community: An activist’s perspective. In The Handbook of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Public Health: A Practitioner’s Guide to Service, Michael D. Shankle (ed), 3–10. Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
Gagne, Patricia, Tewksbury, Richard & McGaughey, Deanna
1997 Coming out and crossing over: Identity formation and proclamation in a transgender community. Gender & Society 11(4): 478–508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Barney & Strauss, Anselm
1967 The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Green, James & Sharp, Nancy
1997 Transgender dialogue. FTM Newsletter (36): 1–4.Google Scholar
Green, Jamison
2004 Becoming a Visible Man. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Jack, Grant, Jaime & Herman, Jody L.
2012 A gender not listed here: Genderqueers, gender rebels, and otherwise in the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. LGBTQ Policy Journal at Harvard Kennedy School 2: 13–24.Google Scholar
Hazenberg, Evan
2016 Walking the straight and narrow: Linguistic choice and gendered presentation. Gender and Language 10(2): 270–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Amanda, Rutherford, Michael W., Fellbaum, Christiane & Bian, Jiang
2016 An analysis of WordNet’s coverage of gender identity using Twitter and the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. Proceedings of the Global WordNet Conference (GWC) 8: 122–129.Google Scholar
Jones, Lucy
2019 Discourses of transnormativity in vloggers’ identity construction. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 256: 85–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kulick, Don
1999 Transgender and language: A review of the literature and suggestions for the future. GLQ: A Journal of Gay and Lesbian Studies 5(4): 605–622. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, Laura E., Nussbaum, Robin & Mustanski, Brian
2012 Exploring the diversity of gender and sexual orientation identities in an online sample of transgender individuals. Journal of Sex Research 49(2–3): 244–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laing, Alison
1995 A label by any other name might stick. Transgender Tapestry 74: 48.Google Scholar
Leap, William L.
(ed) 1995 Beyond the Lavender Lexicon: Authenticity, Imagination, and Appropriation in Lesbian and Gay Languages. Luxembourg: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
1996 Word’s Out: Gay Men’s English. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
2004 Language, belonging and (homo)sexual citizenship in Cape Town, South Africa. In Speaking in Queer Tongues: Globalization and Gay Language, Tom Boellstorff & William L. Leap (eds), 134–162. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Levitt, Heidi M. & Ippolito, Maria R.
2014 Being transgender: The experience of transgender identity development. Journal of Homosexuality 61(12): 1727–1758. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally
2002 “Queering” semantics: Definitional struggles. In Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 137–160. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
[ p. 241 ]
Miller, Kristen & Ryan, J. Michael
2014 Evaluation of a sexual identity question. In Cognitive Interviewing Methodology, Valerie Chepp, Kristen Miller, Jose L. Padilla & Stephanie Willson (eds), 85–106. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Miller, Kristen, Willson, Stephanie, Chepp, Valerie & Ryan, J. Michael
2014 Analysis. In Cognitive Interviewing Methodology, Valerie Chepp, Kristen Miller, Jose L. Padilla & Stephanie Willson (eds), 35–50. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Plummer, Kenneth
1981 Homosexual categories: Some research problems in the labeling perspective of homosexuality. In The Making of the Modern Homosexual, Kenneth Plummer (ed), 53–75. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.Google Scholar
Roen, Katrina
2002 “Either/or” and “both/neither”: Discursive tensions in transgender politics. Signs 27(2): 501–522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, J. Michael
2013 Improving Survey Measurement Questions for Sexual Minorities and the Trans Population: Toward an Understanding of the Socially Constructed Nature of the Trans Life Course. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
2019 Expressing identity: Toward an understanding of how trans individuals navigate the barriers and opportunities of official identity. Journal of Gender Studies 28: in print. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schilt, Kristen & Lagos, Danya
2017 The development of transgender studies in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology (42): 425–443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Anselm & Corgin, Juliet
1990 Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Stryker, Susan
2008 Transgender History. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.Google Scholar
Valentine, David
2007 Imagining Transgender: An Ethnography of a Category. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilchins, Riki Anne
1995 What’s in a name: The politics of gender speak. Transgender Tapestry 74: 46–47.Google Scholar
Zimman, Lal
2014 The discursive construction of sex: Remaking and reclaiming the gendered body in talk about genitals among trans men. In Queer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender, and Sexuality, Jenny L. Davis, Joshua Raclaw & Lal Zimman (eds), 13–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Transgender language reform: Some challenges and strategies for promoting trans-affirming, gender-inclusive language. Journal of Language and Discrimination 1(1): 84–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Konnelly, Lex
2021. Nuance and normativity in trans linguistic research. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10:1 ► pp. 71 ff. Crossref logo
Ryan, J. Michael
2019. The Problematics of Assessing Trans Identity in Survey Research: A Modest Proposal for Improving Question Design. Societies 9:4 ► pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.