Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Sexuality
Vol. 11:1 (2022) ► pp.31–56

Online discourses of ‘homosexuality’ and religion

The discussion relating to Islam in Finland

 | University of Jyväskylä, Finland
 | University of Jyväskylä, Finland
This article examines Finnish online forum discussions where religion and discourses of ‘homosexuality’ are connected in various ways. Previous research (e.g. Jantunen 2018a) shows that in Finnish online discussions where sexual minorities are the topic, religion stands out as a significant feature – particularly in discourses on ‘homosexuality’. Via corpus-assisted discourse analysis (CADS), the present study adds to previous knowledge on this subject by qualitatively analyzing the occurrences of certain keywords in the Finnish societal context – one in which immigration and the visibility of both Islam and sexual minorities are perceived to have increased. The analysis found four interrelated key discourses in these online discussions: (1) Islamization as an alleged threat to gay people (in the data: ‘homosexuals’); (2) the alleged indifference/ignorance of people to Islam’s stance against sexual minorities; (3) relativist discourse(s) claiming all fundamentalists to be similar; and (4) othering – including for instance, the verbal stylization of Muslims as being particularly hypersexual.
Keywords: homosexuality, religion, Islam, web forums, online discourses, corpus-assisted discourse analysis, keyword analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.‘Homosexuality’ vis-à-vis religion
  • 3.Methodology and data
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Keywords and corpus-assisted discourse analysis
    • 3.3Ethical issues
  • 4.Discourse prosodies and keywords related to religion
    • 4.1Overview of discourse prosodies
    • 4.2Keywords related to religion
  • 5.Islam and ‘homosexuality’ as discussed on Suomi24
    • 5.1Discourse 1: Islamization threatens ‘homosexuals’
      • Data Example (6): ‘Islamization’
      • Data Example (7): ‘Gays are always having to watch out for Muslim gangs’
    • 5.2Discourse 2: Tolerant liberals ignore the fact that Muslims disapprove of sexual minorities
      • Data Example (8): ‘But Islam wants to kill gays who would usually support the Greens’
      • Data Example (9): ‘But in Muslim countries the President stays quiet…’
    • 5.3Discourse 3: Christian or Muslim – tolerance is better than fundamentalism
      • Data Example (10): ‘It’s little different from your [evangelical] fundy doctrine’
      • Data Example (11): ‘Most of the world’s Muslims accept gays’
    • 5.4Discourse 4: Hypersexualization and stylization
      • Data Example (12): ‘Preferably big-dicked black Muslim warriors’
      • Data Example (13): ‘allah great he love anal sex’
      • Data Example (14): ‘Yuck. Islam judge homo to lowest hell’
  • 6.Discussion and suggestions for further research
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 11 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20011.jan
References (69)
References
Anthony, Laurence. 2015. AntConc. Version 3.4.4. Computer Software. Tokyo: Waseda University. <[URL]> (December 7, 2017)
Bachmann, Ingo. 2011. Civil partnership – “gay marriage in all but name”: A corpus-driven analysis of discourses of same-sex relationships in the UK parliament. Corpora 6(1): 77–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2004. ‘Unnatural Acts’: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debates on gay male law reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(1): 88–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Language, sexuality and corpus linguistics: Concerns and future directions. Journal of Language and Sexuality 7(2): 263–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Elof Axel. 2013. The 7 Sexes: Biology of Sex Determination. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Charpentier, Sari. 2000. Gender, body and the sacred: Heterosexual hegemony as a sacred order. Queen: Journal of Rhetorics and Power 1(1). <[URL]> (May 6, 2020)
. 2001. Pyhä, sukupuoli ja heteronormatiivisuus. Sukupuolten pyhä järjestys lesbo- ja homoliittokeskustelussa. [The sacred, gender and normative heterosexuality. Gender system as a sacred order in the discussion of legalising homosexual relationships.] Naistutkimus – Kvinnoforskning 14(1): 4–15.Google Scholar
Cruz, Angela Gracia B., Seo, Yuri & Rex, Mathew. 2018. Trolling in online communities: A practice-based theoretical perspective. The Information Society 34(1): 15–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Jessie. 1997. White Lies: Race, Class, Gender, and Sexuality in White Supremacist Discourse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eidhamar, Levi Geir. 2014. Is gayness a test from Allah? Typologies in Muslim stances on homosexuality. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 25(2): 245–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Sonja J. & Kitzinger, Celia. 2002. Denying equality: An analysis of arguments against lowering the age of consent for sex between men. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 12(3): 167–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanon, Frantz. 2008 [1952]. Black Skin, White Masks. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
FIAM 2018: Finnish Internet Audience Measurement. <[URL]> (April 12, 2020)
García, Dalia I., Gray-Stanley, Jennifer & Ramirez-Valles, Jesus. 2008. “The priest obviously doesn’t know that I’m gay”: The religious and spiritual journeys of Latino gay men. Journal of Homosexuality 55(3): 411–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giffney, Noreen. 2009. Introduction: the ‘q’ word. In Ashgate Research Companion to Queer Theory, Noreen Giffney & Michael O’Rourke (eds), 1–13. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Marc, Claes, Ellen, Harell, Allison, Quintelier, Ellen & Dejaeghere, Yves. 2010. Anti-gay sentiment among adolescents in Belgium and Canada: A comparative investigation into the role of gender and religion. Journal of Homosexuality 57(3): 384–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hughey, Matthew W. & Daniels, Jessie. 2013. Racist comments at online news sites: A methodological dilemma for discourse analysis. Media, Culture & Society 35(3): 332–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ioannides, George. 2014. Queer travels: Intersections for the study of Islam, sexuality, and Queer Theory. In Queering Religion, Religious Queers, Yvette Taylor & Ria Snowdon (eds), 117–136. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Islamia queeristi. n.d. <[URL]> (May 10, 2020)
Jäckle, Sebastian & Wenzelburger, Georg. 2015. Religion, religiosity, and the attitudes toward homosexuality – A multilevel analysis of 79 countries. Journal of Homosexuality 62(2): 207–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jantunen, Jarmo H. 2018a. Homot ja heterot Suomi24:ssä: analyysi digitaalisista diskursseista [The gay and the straight in Suomi24: Analysis of digital discourses]. Puhe ja kieli 38(1): 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018b. Korpusavusteinen diskurssintutkimus (CADS): analyysiesimerkki homouden ja heterouden digitaalisista diskursseista. [Corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS): Example analysis of digital discourses of homosexuality and heterosexuality.] AFinLA-e 111: 20–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jantunen, Jarmo H. & Juvonen, Tuula. 2021. Lesbonormatiivisuuksien ristipaineessa: Määrällistä ja laadullista analyysiä Suomi24-verkkokeskusteluista. [In the pressure conflict of lesbian normativities: Quantitative and qualitative analysis on online discussions in Suomi24.] SQS – Suomen Queer-Tutkimuksen Seuran Lehti 15(1–2), 17–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaspal, Rusi. 2014. Sexuality, migration and identity among gay Iranian migrants to the UK. In Queering Religion, Religious Queers, Yvette Taylor & Ria Snowdon (eds), 44–60. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
King, Brian W. 2015. Investigating digital sex talk practices: A reflection on corpus-assisted discourse analysis. In Discourse and Digital Practices: Doing Discourse Analysis in the Digital Age, Rodney H. Jones, Alice Chik & Christoph A. Hafner (eds), 130–143. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kligerman, Nicole. 2007. Homosexuality in Islam: A difficult paradox. Macalester Islam Journal 2(3): Article 8. <[URL]> (June 22, 2020)
Körkkö, Hilla. 2020. Muslimi-seksuaalivähemmistöt organisoituvat Suomessakin – Lontoossa järjestetään jo muslimipride. [London already hosts a Muslim Pride – now Muslim sexual minorities in Finland are getting themselves organized]. Helsingin Sanomat, March 6, 2020. <[URL]> (June 16, 2020)
Kytölä, Samu. 2017. Researching sexual minorities in men’s football (discourse): Methodological challenges of multi-sited and multisemiotic ethnographies. (Paper presented at Language in the Media Conference 2017, University of the Western Cape, October 19, 2017)
. 2018. Sexual diversities in male football cultures from the perspectives of visibility: Insights from football events and digital media. (Paper presented at the International Conference on Sociolinguistics (ICS2), in the panel “Regimenting the public sphere: the politics of visibility”, ELTE, Budapest, September 8, 2018)
Kytölä, Samu & Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2012. Ethnographic perspectives on multilingual computer-mediated discourse: Insights from Finnish football forums on the Web. In Multilingualism, Discourse and Ethnography, Sheena Gardner & Marilyn Martin-Jones (eds), 179–196. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lähdesmäki, Tuuli & Saresma, Tuija. 2014. The intersections of sexuality and religion in the anti-interculturalist rhetoric in Finnish internet discussion on Muslim homosexuals in Amsterdam. In Building Barriers and Bridges: Interculturalism in the 21st Century, Jonathan Gourlay & Gabriele Strohschen (eds), 35–48. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leap, William. 2012. Queer linguistics, sexuality and discourse analysis. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, James Paul Gee & Michael Handford (eds), 558–571. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lehman, Peter. 2006. A “strange quirk in his lineage”: Walter Mosely, Donald Goines, and the racial representation of the penis. Men and Masculinities 9(2): 226–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehtonen, Heini. 2016. Troping on prejudice: Stylised “bad Finnish” performances among adolescents in Eastern Helsinki. In Reflexivity in Late Modernity: Accounts from Linguistic Ethnographies of Youth, Miguel Pérez-Milans (ed), 15–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leppänen, Sirpa, Kytölä, Samu, Westinen, Elina & Peuronen, Saija. 2017. Introduction: Social media discourse, (dis)identifications and diversities. In Social Media Discourse, (Dis)identifications and Diversities, Sirpa Leppänen, Elina Westinen & Samu Kytölä (eds), 1–35. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez. 2015. Conflicted selves: language, religion, and same-sex desire in Israel. In Language, Sexuality, and Power: Studies in Intersectional Sociolinguistics, Erez Levon & Ronald Beline Mendes (eds), 215–240. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mapril, José, Martikainen, Tuomas & Khan, Adil Hussain. 2019. Introduction. In Muslims at the Margins of Europe: Finland, Greece, Ireland and Portugal, Tuomas Martikainen, José Mapril & Adil Hussain Khan (eds), 1–24. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mautner, Gerlinde. 2009. Corpora and critical discourse analysis. In Contemporary Corpus Linguistics, Paul Baker (ed), 32–46. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Meta-Share. 2016. The Suomi24 Corpus. <[URL]> (June 17, 2020)
Milani, Tommaso M. & Levon, Erez. 2016. Sexing diversity: Linguistic landscapes of homonationalism. Language & Communication 511: 69–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2018. Corpus linguistics in language and sexuality studies: Taking stock and looking ahead. Journal of Language and Sexuality 7(2): 145–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Language and sexuality studies today: Why “homosexual” is a bad word and why “queer linguist” is not an identity. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10(1): 25–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogland, Curtis P. & Verona, Ana Paula. 2014. Religion and the rainbow struggle: Does religion factor into attitudes toward homosexuality and same-sex civil unions in Brazil? Journal of Homosexuality 61(9): 1334–1349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OSF (Official Statistics of Finland). 2015. Population structure [e-publication]. ISSN=1797–5395. Annual review 2015, Appendix table 6. Population by religious community in 2000 to 2015. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. <[URL]> (April 21, 2020).
Partington, Alan, Duguid, Alison & Taylor, Charlotte. 2013. Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paterson, Laura L. & Coffey-Glover, Laura. 2018. Discourses of marriage in same-sex marriage debates in the UK press 2011–2014. Journal of Language and Sexuality 7(2): 175–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perry, Barbara & Sutton, Michael. 2006. Seeing red over black and white: Popular and media representations of inter-racial relationships as precursors to racial violence. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 48(6): 887–904. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peumans, Wim. 2017. Queer Muslims in Europe: Sexuality, Religion and Migration in Belgium. London: IB Tauris.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2017. Europe’s growing Muslim population. Published Nov 29, 2017. <[URL]> (April 21, 2020).
Provencher, Denis M. 2011. Coming out à l’Oriental: Maghrebi-French performances of gender, sexuality, and religion. Journal of Homosexuality 58(6–7): 812–833. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puar, Jasbir. 2007. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rich, Timothy S. 2017. Religion and public perceptions of gays and lesbians in South Korea. Journal of Homosexuality 64(5): 606–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohleder, Poul. 2014. Othering. In Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology, Thomas Teo (ed), n.p. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruckenstein, Minna. 2017. Suomi24-käyttäjäkyselyn tuloksia [Results of the Suomi24 user survey]. <[URL]> (June 29, 2020)
Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Sakki, Inari & Pettersson, Katarina. 2016. Discursive constructions of Otherness in populist radical right political blogs. European Journal of Social Psychology 46(2): 156–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saresma, Tuija. 2020. Vihan sfäärit: Valkoisten heteromiesten affektiivinen mobilisaatio sosiaalisessa mediassa. [The spheres of hate: The affective mobilization of white heterosexual men in social media]. In Affektit ja tunteet kulttuurien tutkimuksessa. Ethnos-toimite 22, Jenni Rinne, Anna Kajander & Riina Haanpää (eds), 196–243. Helsinki: Ethnos ry.Google Scholar
Schulte, Lisa J. & Battle, Juan. 2004. The relative importance of ethnicity and religion in predicting attitudes towards gays and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality 47(2): 127–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva, Derek M. D. 2017. The othering of Muslims: Discourses of radicalization in the New York Times , 1969–2014. Sociological Forum 32(1): 138–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siraj, Asifa. 2014. Islam, homosexuality and gay Muslims: Bridging the gap between faith and sexuality. In Queering Religion, Religious Queers, Yvette Taylor & Ria Snowdon (eds), 194–210. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 2001. Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thompson, Katrina D. 2019. Becoming Muslims with a “Queer voice”: Indexical disjuncture in the talk of LGBT members of the progressive Muslim community. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 30(1): 123–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, Marianne, Bos, David J., Derks, Marco, Ganzevoort, R. Ruard, Jovanovič, Miloš, Korte, Anne-Marie & Sremac, Srdjan. 2014. Religion, homosexuality, and contested social orders in the Netherlands, the Western Balkans, and Sweden. In Religion in Times of Crisis, Gladys Ganiel, Heidemarie Winkel & Christophe Monnot (eds), 116–134. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Vitikainen, Sami. 2019. Gay Muslim refugees in Finland: Intersections of experience. Unpublished MA dissertation, University of Helsinki. <[URL]> (June 22, 2020).
Whitehead, Andrew L. 2018. Homosexuality, religion, and the family: The effects of religion on Americans’ appraisals of the parenting abilities of same-sex couples. Journal of Homosexuality 65(1): 42–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Melissa M. 2006. Outlaws or in-laws? Journal of Homosexuality 52(1–2): 73–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xie, Ying & Peng, Minggang. 2018. Attitudes toward homosexuality in China: Exploring the effects of religion, modernizing factors, and traditional culture. Journal of Homosexuality 65(13): 1758–1787. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Unlu, Ali & Tommi Kotonen
2024. Online polarization and identity politics: An analysis of Facebook discourse on Muslim and LGBTQ+ communities in Finland. Scandinavian Political Studies 47:2 ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Unlu, Ali, Sophie Truong & Tommi Kotonen
2024. Mapping the terrain of hate: identifying and analyzing online communities and political parties engaged in hate speech against Muslims and LGBTQ+ communities. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.