Cover not available
Article published In:
Nonbinary pronouns as a site of advocacy in research and teaching
Edited by Lex Konnelly, Bronwyn M. Bjorkman and Lee Airton
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 11:2] 2022
► pp. 165–189

Language ideologies and legitimacy among nonbinary YouTubers

| University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

This paper explores how ten nonbinary North American YouTubers appeal to legitimizing discourses (van Leeuwen & Wodak 1999) as rationalizations for their choices regarding identity labels and pronouns. Given the local cultural salience of the implications of their language choices, the YouTubers rationalize their terminological choices through legitimizing discourses that prioritize historical facts, lexical definitions, and personal feelings. I examine how these discourses presuppose particular language ideologies, or implicit assumptions about what language users view as “appropriate” language practices. In the case of the nonbinary YouTubers, I illustrate that the vloggers’ legitimizing discourses appeal to and juxtapose a referentialist ideology (Hill 2008, Silverstein 1979), according to which words should describe the world truthfully, and an ideology of self-identification (Zimman 2019), which prioritizes individual agency. Crucially, deploying these legitimizing discourses is an important strategy that nonbinary YouTubers draw on as part of their advocacy and education projects.

Keywords: nonbinary, transgender, language ideology, legitimization, YouTube, discourse analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Linguistic activism and gender
  • 3.Language and legitimacy
  • 4.Language ideologies and semiotic ideologies
  • 5.Nonbinary communities and YouTube
  • 6.Methods
  • 7.Legitimizing discourses
    • 7.1Discourse of historical fact
    • 7.2Discourse of lexical definition
    • 7.3Discourse of personal feeling
    • 7.4Feelings about definitions
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 August 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20021.cro
References
Baron, Dennis
2020 What’s Your Pronoun? Beyond He and She. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan
1984 Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2): 145–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borba, Rodrigo
2019 The interactional making of a “true transsexual”: Language and (dis)identification in trans-specific healthcare. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2561: 21–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
1991 [1982] Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira
2005 Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chun, Elaine W.
2016 The meaning of Ching-Chong: Language, racism, and response in new media. In Raciolinguistics: How Language Shapes Our Ideas about Race, H. Samy Alim, John R. Rickford & Arnetha F. Ball (eds), 81–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chun, Elaine & Walters, Keith
2011 Orienting to Arab orientalisms: Language, race, and humor in a YouTube video. In Crispin Thurlow & Kristine Mroczek (eds), Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media, 251–273. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowley, Archie & Chun, Elaine
2021 Online research and new media. In Research Methods in Linguistic Anthropology, Sabina M. Perrino & Sonya E. Pritzker (eds), 297–329. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Dame, Avery
2013 “I’m your hero? Like me?”: The role of ‘expert’ in the trans male vlog. Journal of Language and Sexuality 2(1): 40–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, Susan & King, Ruth
1992 Gender-based language reform and the social construction of meaning. Discourse & Society 3(2): 151–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Feminist meanings and the (de)politicization of the lexicon. Language in Society 23(1): 59–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrison, Spencer
2018 On the limits of “trans enough”: Authenticating trans identity narratives. Gender & Society 32(5): 613–637. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane H.
1998 Language, race, and white public space. American Anthropologist 100(3): 680–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 The Everyday Language of White Racism. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith
1989 When talk isn’t cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist 16(2): 248–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra
2008 Discourses of endangerment: Contexts and consequences of essentializing discourses. In Discourses of Endangerment: Ideology and Interest in the Defence of Languages, Alexandre Duchêne & Monica Heller (eds), 57–75. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Johnson, Austin H.
2015 Normative accountability: How the medical model influences transgender identities and experiences. Sociology Compass 9(9): 803–813. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Lucy
2019 Discourses of transnormativity in vloggers’ identity construction. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2019(256): 85–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keane, Webb
2018 On semiotic ideology. Signs and Society 6(1): 64–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Konnelly, Lex
2018 “I’m just making an update video”: Monologic inter-subjectivity and the stylistic use of creaky voice in non-binary transition vlogs. (Paper presented at the 25th Lavender Languages and Linguistics Conference, Providence RI)
Kroskrity, Paul
2004 Language ideologies. In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, Alessandro Duranti (ed), 496–517. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lovelock, Michael
2019 ‘My coming out story’: Lesbian, gay and bisexual youth identities on YouTube. International Journal of Cultural Studies 22(1): 70–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mallinson, Christine
2017 Language and its everyday revolutionary potential. In The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Women’s Social Movement Activism (Vol. 11), Holly J. McCammon, Verta Taylor, Jo Reger & Rachel L. Einwohner (eds), 419–439. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally
2003 What’s in a name? Social labeling and gender practices. In The Handbook of Language and Gender, Miriam Meyerhoff & Janet Holmes (eds), 69–97. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLemore, Kevin A.
2015 Experiences with misgendering: Identity misclassification of transgender spectrum individuals. Self and Identity 14(1): 51–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jordan Forrest
2017 “I Wanna Know Where the Rule Book Is”: YouTube as a Site of Counternarratives to Transnormativity. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.Google Scholar
Milroy, James
2001 Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(4): 530–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley
1999 Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Nicolazzo, Z.
2016 ‘It’s a hard line to walk’: Black non-binary trans* collegians’ perspectives on passing, realness, and trans*-normativity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 29(9): 1173–1188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, Anne
2003 Linguistic sexism and feminist linguistic activism. In The Handbook of Language and Gender, Miriam Meyerhoff & Janet Holmes (eds), 550–570. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raun, Tobias
2016 Out Online: Trans Self-Representation and Community Building on YouTube. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reyes, Antonio
2011 Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & Society 22(6): 781–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rumsey, Alan
1990 Wording, meaning, and linguistic ideology. American Anthropologist 92(2): 346–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1979 Language structure and linguistic ideology. In The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, Paul Clyne, William F. Hanks & Carol L. Hofbauer (eds), 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
2007 Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication 1(1): 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo & Wodak, Ruth
1999 Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies 1(1): 83–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vipond, Evan
2015 Resisting transnormativity: Challenging the medicalization and regulation of trans bodies. Theory in Action 8(2): 21–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn. A.
1985 Language variation and cultural hegemony: Toward an integration of sociolinguistic and social theory. American Ethnologist 12(4): 738–748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn. A. & Schieffelin, Bambi B.
1994 Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology 231: 55–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimman, Lal
2012 Voices in Transition: Testosterone, Transmasculinity, and the Gendered Voice among Female-to-Male Transgender People. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado.Google Scholar
2017a Trans people’s linguistic self-determination and the dialogic nature of identity. In Representing Trans: Linguistic, Legal and Everyday Perspectives, Evan Hazenberg & Miriam Meyerhoff (eds), 226–248. Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
2017b Transgender language reform: Some challenges and strategies for promoting trans-affirming, gender-inclusive language. Journal of Language and Discrimination 1(1): 83–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Trans self-identification and the language of neoliberal selfhood: Agency, power, and the limits of monologic discourse. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2561: 147–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M.
2007 Why are we so Illuded? [URL] (April 11, 2022).
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Bruns, Hanna
2023. “That’s all it takes to be trans”: counter-strategies to hetero- and transnormative discourse on YouTube. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2023:283 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Jones, Lucy
2023. Language, gender and sexuality in 2022. Gender and Language 17:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Çalışkan, Dilara
2023. Trans theoretical approaches to memory and relatedness: Potentials and suggestions at the intersections of transgender studies and queer studies. Memory Studies 16:6 ► pp. 1484 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.