Article published In:
Nonbinary pronouns as a site of advocacy in research and teaching
Edited by Lex Konnelly, Bronwyn M. Bjorkman and Lee Airton
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 11:2] 2022
► pp. 141164
Ackerman, Lauren
2019Syntactic and cognitive issues in investigating gendered coreference. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1): 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bjorkman, Bronwyn M.
2017Singular they and the syntactic representation of gender in English. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2 (1): 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyer, C. Reyn & Galupo, M. Paz
2018Transgender friendship profiles: Patterns across gender identity and LGBT affiliation. Gender Issues 35(3): 236–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith
1990Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1993Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Conrod, Kirby
2017Names Before Pronouns: Variation in Pronominal Reference and Gender (Paper presented at Northwest Linguistics Conference, University of British Columbia; May 6, 2017).
2018Pronouns and Misgendering (Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation, New York University; October 18–22, 2018).
2019Pronouns Raising and Emerging. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
Curzan, Anne
2003Gender Shifts in the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
1996Vowels and nail polish: The emergence of linguistic style in the preadolescent heterosexual marketplace. In Gender and Belief Systems, Natasha Warner, Jocelyn Ahlers, Leela Bilmes, Monica Oliver, Suzanne Wertheim & Melinda Chen (eds), 183–190. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
2014The problem with binaries: Coding for gender and sexuality. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(11): 529–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foertsch, Julie & Gernsbacher, Morton Ann
1997In search of gender neutrality: Is singular they a cognitively efficient substitute for generic he? Psychological Science 8(2): 106–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herman, Jody L., Flores, Andrew R., Brown, Taylor N. T., Wilson, Bianca D. M. & Conron, Kerith J.
2017How Many Adults Identify as Transgender in the United States? Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute.Google Scholar
Hutton, Christopher
2017Legal sex, self-classification and gender self-determination. Law and Humanities 11(1): 64–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, Sandy E., Herman, Jody L., Rankin, Susan, Kiesling, Mara, Mottet, Lisa & Anafi, Ma’ayan
2016The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality.Google Scholar
Konnelly, Lex & Cowper, Elizabeth
2020Gender diversity and morphosyntax: An account of singular they . Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally
2013Gender and its relation to sex: The myth of ‘natural’ gender. In The Expression of Gender, Greville Corbett (ed), 3–38. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter
2008Functional Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoff
2003Postcard from Vegas, 2: Syntactic data collection on the strip. Language Log (blog). [URL] (January 31 2022)
2017A letter saying they won. Language Log (blog). [URL] (January 31 2022)
Sanford, Anthony J. & Filik, Rurth
2007“They” as a gender-unspecified singular pronoun: Eye tracking reveals a processing cost. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60(2): 171–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sprouse, Jon, Schütze, Carson & Almeida, Diogo
2013Assessing the reliability of journal data in syntax: Linguistic inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua 1341: 219–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin
1968Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar