Cover not available
Article published In:
Nonbinary pronouns as a site of advocacy in research and teaching
Edited by Lex Konnelly, Bronwyn M. Bjorkman and Lee Airton
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 11:2] 2022
► pp. 141–164

Variation in English gendered pronouns

Analysis and recommendations for ethics in linguistics

| Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, USA

This paper describes an ongoing shift in the pronominal system of English that is primarily related to transgender and non-binary identities. Apparent time evidence suggests that this is an ongoing change, and metalinguistic comments support the indexical link between the change and the increased visibility of transgender and non-binary English speakers. Sociopragmatic variation enabled by this change shows that the pronoun system of English functions much less like a grammatical gender (noun class) system, and much more like a system of honorifics. The second half of the paper puts forward a position for social justice around pronoun use and gender autonomy, including advice for professional linguists who work in related fields.

Keywords: gender, pronouns, transgender, non-binary
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 1.Variation and change in the pronoun system
    • 1.1Production of singular they in sociolinguistic interviews
    • 1.2Online acceptability judgment study
    • 1.3Pragmatics of pronominal choice
  • 2.What should we do about it?
    • 2.1How to start noticing
    • 2.2How to talk about it
    • 2.3How to teach it
  • 3.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 August 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20026.con
References
Ackerman, Lauren
2019 Syntactic and cognitive issues in investigating gendered coreference. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1): 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bjorkman, Bronwyn M.
2017 Singular they and the syntactic representation of gender in English. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2 (1): 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyer, C. Reyn & Galupo, M. Paz
2018 Transgender friendship profiles: Patterns across gender identity and LGBT affiliation. Gender Issues 35(3): 236–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith
1990 Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1993 Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Conrod, Kirby
2017 Names Before Pronouns: Variation in Pronominal Reference and Gender (Paper presented at Northwest Linguistics Conference, University of British Columbia; May 6, 2017).
2018 Pronouns and Misgendering (Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation, New York University; October 18–22, 2018).
2019 Pronouns Raising and Emerging. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
Curzan, Anne
2003 Gender Shifts in the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
1996 Vowels and nail polish: The emergence of linguistic style in the preadolescent heterosexual marketplace. In Gender and Belief Systems, Natasha Warner, Jocelyn Ahlers, Leela Bilmes, Monica Oliver, Suzanne Wertheim & Melinda Chen (eds), 183–190. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
2014 The problem with binaries: Coding for gender and sexuality. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(11): 529–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foertsch, Julie & Gernsbacher, Morton Ann
1997 In search of gender neutrality: Is singular they a cognitively efficient substitute for generic he? Psychological Science 8(2): 106–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herman, Jody L., Flores, Andrew R., Brown, Taylor N. T., Wilson, Bianca D. M. & Conron, Kerith J.
2017 How Many Adults Identify as Transgender in the United States? Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute.Google Scholar
Hutton, Christopher
2017 Legal sex, self-classification and gender self-determination. Law and Humanities 11(1): 64–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, Sandy E., Herman, Jody L., Rankin, Susan, Kiesling, Mara, Mottet, Lisa & Anafi, Ma’ayan
2016 The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality.Google Scholar
Konnelly, Lex & Cowper, Elizabeth
2020 Gender diversity and morphosyntax: An account of singular they . Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally
2013 Gender and its relation to sex: The myth of ‘natural’ gender. In The Expression of Gender, Greville Corbett (ed), 3–38. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter
2008 Functional Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoff
2003 Postcard from Vegas, 2: Syntactic data collection on the strip. Language Log (blog). [URL] (January 31 2022)
2017 A letter saying they won. Language Log (blog). [URL] (January 31 2022)
Sanford, Anthony J. & Filik, Rurth
2007 “They” as a gender-unspecified singular pronoun: Eye tracking reveals a processing cost. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60(2): 171–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sprouse, Jon, Schütze, Carson & Almeida, Diogo
2013 Assessing the reliability of journal data in syntax: Linguistic inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua 1341: 219–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin
1968 Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Jones, Lucy
2023. Language, gender and sexuality in 2022. Gender and Language 17:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Knisely, Kris Aric
2023. Gender‐justice beyond inclusion: How trans knowledges and linguistic practices can and should be re‐shaping language education. The Modern Language Journal 107:2 ► pp. 607 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.