Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Sexuality
Vol. 12:1 (2023) ► pp.46–72

Provocative euphemism in pornographic film titles

A critical analysis

| Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha , Spain
Following a critical discourse-analytic approach, this study explores the role of euphemistic language in a corpus of titles of pornographic films designed for heterosexual male consumption that were nominated and awarded in the different categories of the AVN (Adult Video News) Awards, also known as “Oscars of Porn”, from 2015 to 2020. The analysis demonstrates that provocative euphemism contributes to the discursive representation of gender and sexual stereotypes that fall under a dominant heteronormative discourse in which female characters are represented both as victims of male dominance and as perverted, sex-crazed animals. This study also reveals that in the context of male supremacy that straight pornography seems to exalt, the sexist and misogynistic connotations that euphemistic references carry are used with a strategic purpose intended to attract the interest of pornography consumers, stimulate their curiosity, and ultimately make them buy, rent or stream the film.
Keywords: pornography, sexual taboo, euphemism, gender, heteronormativity, critical discourse studies, metaphor
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical and analytical framework
  • 3.Delimiting euphemism
  • 4.Corpus and methodology
  • 5.Results and discussion
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 February 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.21001.cre
References (68)
References
Allan, Keith. 2016. Pragmatics in language change and creativity. SpringerPlus 5(342). <[URL]> (January 22, 2020)
. 2019. Taboo words and language: An overview. In The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, Keith Allan (ed), 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allan, Keith & Burridge, Kate. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attwood, Feona. 2002. Reading porn: The paradigm shift in pornography research. Sexualities 5(1): 91–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Pornography and objectification: Re-reading “the picture that divided Britain”. Feminist Media Studies 4(1): 7–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attwood, Feona & Smith, Clarissa. 2014. Porn studies: An introduction. Porn Studies 11: 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attwood, Feona, Maina, Giovanna & Smith, Clarissa. 2018. Conceptualizing, researching and writing about pornography. Porn Studies 5(1): 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barcelona, Antonio. 2003. Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds), 207–277. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bivona, Jenny & Critelli, Joseph. 2009. The nature of women’s rape fantasies: An analysis of prevalence, frequency, and contents. Journal of Sex Research 46(1): 33–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Peter & Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brunskell-Evans, Heather. 2016. Introduction. In The Sexualized Body and the Medical Authority of Pornography: Performing Sexual Liberation, Heather Brunskell-Evans (ed), 1–17. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Burridge, Kate. 2012. Euphemism and language change: The sixth and seventh ages. Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology 71: 65–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don. 2006. Heteronorms. In The Language and Sexuality Reader, Deborah Cameron & Don Kulick (eds), 165–168. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casas Gómez, Miguel. 2012. The expressive creativity of euphemism and dysphemism. Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology 71: 43–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cawston, Amanda. 2019. The feminist case against pornography: A review and re-evaluation. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 621: 624–658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Jodie. 2012. Language, Sex and Social Structure: Analysing Discourses of Sexuality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 2007. ‘Everyone was convinced that we were closet fags’: The role of heterosexuality in the construction of hegemonic masculinity. In Language, Sexualities and Desires: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, Helen Sauntson & Sakis Kyratzis (eds), 41–67. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. The discursive production of everyday heterosexualities. Discourse & Society 24(5): 536–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connell, Raewyn W. & Messerschmidt, James W. 2005. Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society 19(6): 829–859. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connell, Raewyn & Pearse, Rebecca. 2014. Gender in World Perspective. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Corcoran, Hannah & Smith, Kevin. 2016. Hate Crime, England and Wales, 2015/16. Home Office Statistical Bulletin 11(16), 13 October 2016.Google Scholar
Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer. 2015. Sex in Language: Euphemistic and Dysphemistic Metaphors in Internet Forums. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
. 2018. The axiological and communicative potential of homosexual-related metaphors. In Linguistic Taboo Revisited: Novel Insights from Cognitive Perspectives, Andrea Pizarro Pedraza (ed), 35–53. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Taboos in speaking of sex and sexuality. In The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, Keith Allan (ed), 41–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Donald Alexander. 1989. The New Politics of Pornography. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Andrea. 1985. Against the male flood: Censorship, pornography and equality. Harvard Women’s Law Journal 81: 69–98.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2001. Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds), 121–138. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fernández Smith, Gerard & Casas Gómez, Miguel. 2018. From lexicon to discourse in the linguistic expression of taboo: Configuring new social realities. In Taboo in Discourse: Studies on Attenuation and Offence in Communication, Eliecer Crespo-Fernández (ed), 25–52. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, Karen. 2017. The subject of porn research: Inquiring bodies and lines of resistance. In Bodies in Resistance: Gender and Sexual Politics in the Age of Neoliberalism, Wendy Harcourt (ed), 307–323. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genette, Gérard. 1988. Structure and functions of the title in literature. Critical Inquiry 14(4): 692–720. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hearn, Jeff & Hall, Matthew. 2019. “This is my cheating ex”: Gender and sexuality in revenge porn. Sexualities 22(5–6): 860–882. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hines, Caitlin. 1999. Foxy chicks and playboy bunnies: A case study in metaphorical lexicalization. In Cultural, Psychological and Typological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics, Masako K. Hiraga, Chris Sinha & Sherman Wilcox (eds), 9–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Robert & Dines, Gail. 1998. The content of mass-marketed pornography. In Pornography: The Production and Consumption of Inequality, Gail Dines, Robert Jensen & Ann Ruso (eds), 65–100. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika. 2015a. The subversive potential of queer pornography: A systemic-functional analysis of a written online text. Journal of Language and Sexuality 4(2): 254–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015b. No ordinary boy: Language, masculinities and queer pornographies. In Language and Masculinities: Performances, Intersections, Dislocations, Tommaso M. Milani (ed), 156–173. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2019. Critical discourse studies of language and sexuality. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, Kira Hall & Rusty Barrett (eds), <[URL]> (September 11, 2020) DOI logo
Kövecses, Zoltán. 1988. The Language of Love: The Semantics of Passion in Conversational English. London: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michal & Forchtner, Bernhard. 2016. Theories and concepts in Critical Discourse Studies: Facing challenges, moving beyond foundations. Discourse and Society 7(3): 253–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought, Andrew Ortony (ed), 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leap, William L. & Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2012. Launching a new phase in language and sexuality studies. Journal of Language and Sexuality 1(1): 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LeFranc, Ghislaine. 2017. Lust in Language: The Reading, Writing and Translation of Erotic Literature. (Unpublished) PhD Dissertation, Concordia University.
Lisková, Katerina. 2007. Pornography as language: From discourse of domination to heretical subversion. In Sexual Politics of Desire and Belonging, Nick Rumens & Alejandro Cervantes-Carson (eds), 41–56. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1987. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marko, Georg. 2008. Penetrating Language: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Pornography. Tübingen: Gunther Narr.Google Scholar
Martin, Karin A. 2009. Normalizing heterosexuality. American Sociological Review 741: 190–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. & White, Peter R. R. 2005. Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKee, Alan, Byron, Paul, Litsou, Katerina & Ingham, Roger. 2019. An interdisciplinary definition of pornography: Results from a Global Delphi panel. Archives of Sexual Behaviour 491: 1–7.Google Scholar
McNamara, Tim. 2019. Language and Subjectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara. 2008. Language and Sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2014. Focusing on normativity in language and sexuality studies: Insights from conversations on objectophilia. Critical Discourse Studies 11(1): 49–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mullholland, Monique. 2013. Young People and Pornography: Negotiating Pornification. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Peter F. 2001. Studs, Tools, and the Family Jewels: Metaphors Men Live By. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Nissim, Mayer. 2018. Transvestite, transsexual, transgender: Here’s what you should actually call trans people. <[URL]> (September 17, 2020)
Paasonen, Susana. 2006. Email from Nancy Nutsucker: Representation and gendered address in online pornography. European Journal of Cultural Studies 9(4): 403–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penley, Constance. 2006. Crackers and whackers: The white trashing of porn. In Pornography: Film and Culture, Peter Lehman (ed), 99–117. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Queen, Robin. 2014. Language and sexual identities. In The Handbook of Language, Gender and Sexuality, Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff & Janet Holmes (eds), 209–219. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. 2000. The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads, Antonio Barcelona (ed), 109–132. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. & Galera Masegosa, Alicia. 2014. Cognitive Modeling: A Linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sloan, Jennifer. 2017. Sex doesn’t matter? The problematic status of sex, misogyny and hate. Journal of Language Discrimination 1(1): 61–83.Google Scholar
Smolak, Linda & Striegel-Moore, Ruth. 2002. Body image concerns. In Encyclopedia of Women and Gender, Edith Worrel (ed), 201–210. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard. 2011. The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9(1): 26–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1997. The study of discourse. In Discourse as Structure and Process: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Teun A. van Dijk (ed), 1–34. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. Critical discourse analysis: A sociocognitive approach. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds), 62–86. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Linda. 1999. Hard Core: Power, Pleasure, and the “Frenzy of the Visible.” Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Proliferating pornographies on/scene: An introduction. In Porn Studies, Linda Williams (ed), 1–23. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth & Meyer, Michael. 2016. Critical discourse studies: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds), 1–22. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Suñer, Ferran & Barbara De Cock
2024. The role of reticence in the comprehension of metaphorical taboo expressions in the foreign language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 746 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.