Article published in:
Journal of Language and Sexuality
Vol. 4:1 (2015) ► pp. 30–76

Sounding gay and sounding straight

The performance of male sexual identity in Italian

| University of California, Davis, USA
This paper presents a performance-based approach to the study of the phonetic encoding of sexual identity in Italian. Six male speakers were recruited after being controlled for familiarity, interaction, and comfort with members of both hetero- and homosexual communities. They were recorded reading introductory, scientific, and narrative paragraphs with the goals of conveying straight and gay identities, respectively, as well as in an unmarked style. Analysis focused on segmental (vowels, /s/, liquids), suprasegmental, and pragmatic components of performances, the results of which suggest that speakers use a combination of phonetic features to instantiate socially salient identities.
Keywords: Italian, performance, gay male, phonetics, straight male
Published online: 30 March 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.4.1.02rus
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Daniele, Maddalena, Fabio Fasoli, Raquel Antonio, Simone Sulpizio & Anne Maass
2020. Gay Voice: Stable Marker of Sexual Orientation or Flexible Communication Device?. Archives of Sexual Behavior 49:7 ► pp. 2585 ff. Crossref logo
Jones, Lucy
2021. Queer linguistics and identity. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10:1 Crossref logo
Russell, Eric Louis
2017. Style shifting and the phonetic performance of gay vs. straight. Journal of Language and Sexuality 6:1 ► pp. 128 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Agha, Asif
2007 Language and Social Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Rusty
1998 Markedness and style shifting in performances by African American drag queens. In Codes and Consequences: Choosing Linguistic Variables, Carol Myers-Scotton (ed), 139–161. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan
1984 Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2): 145–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 Back in style: Reworking audience design. In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, Penelope Eckert & John Rickford (eds), 139–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don
2003 Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas
2001 Language, situation, and the relational self: Theorizing dialect-style in sociolinguistics. In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, Penelope Eckert & John R. Rickford (eds), 185–210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007 Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crisafulli, Edoardo
1995 Linguagia e identità omosessuale. La Rivista della Lingue 4(18): 9–10.Google Scholar
Crist, Sean
1997 Duration of onset consonants in gay male stereotyped speech. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(3): 53–70.Google Scholar
Dardano, Maurizio & Trifone, Pietro
1995 Grammatica Italiana, con Nozione di Linguistica (3rd edition). Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
2008 Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 453–476. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Podesva, Robert J.
2011 Sociophonetics and sexuality: Toward a symbiosis of sociolinguistics and laboratory phonology. American Speech 86(1): 6–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul & Docherty, Gerard
2006 The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34: 409–438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul
2010 Exploring social-indexical knowledge: A long past but a short history. Journal of Laboratory Phonology 1: 5–39.Google Scholar
Gaudio, Rudolf P.
1994 Sounding gay: Pitch properties in the speech of gay and straight men. American Speech 69(1): 30–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guzik, Karita M.
2006 Acoustic analysis of phonetic parameters of less masculine sounding German speech. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und digitale Sprachverarbeitung Universität Kiel 36: 15–29.Google Scholar
Hayes, Joseph J.
1981 Gayspeak. In Gayspeak: Gay Male and Lesbian Communication, James W. Chesebro (ed), 45–57. New York: Pilgrim Press.Google Scholar
Krämer, Martin
2009 The Phonology of Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kulick, Don
2000 Gay and lesbian language. Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 243–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levon, Erez
2006 Hearing “gay”: Prosody, interpretation, and the affective judgments of men’s speech. American Speech 81(1): 56–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Bjorn
1990 Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Speech Production and Speech Modelling, William J. Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds), 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linville, Sue Ellen
1998 Acoustic correlates of perceived versus actual sexual orientation in men’s speech. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 50: 35–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mack, Sara
2010 A sociophonetic analysis of perception of sexual orientation in Puerto Rican Spanish. Laboratory Phonology 1(1): 41–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mack, Sara & Munson, Benjamin
2012 The influence of /s/ quality on ratings of men’s sexual orientation: Explicit and implicit measures of the ‘gay lisp’ stereotype. Journal of Phonetics 40: 198–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally
2011 Gender, Sexuality, and Meaning: Language Practice and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Munson, Benjamin & Babel, Molly
2007 Loose lips and silver tongues, or, projecting sexual orientation through speech. Languages and Linguistics Compass 1(5): 416–449. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munson, Benjamin, Jefferson, Sarah V. & McDonald, Elizabeth C.
2006a The influence of perceived sexual orientation on fricative identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(4): 2427–2437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munson, Benjamin, McDonald, Elizabeth C., DeBoe, Nancy L. & White, Aubrey R.
2006b The acoustic and perceptual bases of judgments of women and men’s sexual orientation from read speech. Journal of Phonetics 34: 202–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F.
1979 The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 5: 461–476. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai, Maegaard, Marie, Spindler Møller, Janus & Kristiansen, Tore
2014 Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society 43: 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B., Bent, Tessa, Munson, Benjamin, Bradlow, Ann R. & Bailey, J. Michael
2004 The influence of sexual orientation on vowel production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(4): 1905–1908. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J.
2011a The California vowel shift and gay identity. American Speech 86(1): 32–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011b Salience and the social meaning of declarative contours: Three case studies of gay professionals. Journal of English Linguistics 39: 233–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ranzato, Irene
2012 Gayspeak and gay subjects in audiovisual translation: Strategies in Italian dubbing. Meta 57(2): 369–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie
1998 Investigating “self-conscious” speech: The performance register in Ocracoke English. Language in Society 27: 53–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sisson, Carol
2003 Phonetic cues in the evaluation of gay male speech in Canadian English and Québec French (Unpublished manuscript).
Smyth, Ron, Jacobs, Greg & Rogers, Henry
2003 Male voices and perceived sexual orientation: An experimental and theoretical approach. Language in Society 32(3): 329–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M.
1997 Two lavender issues for linguists. In Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality, Anna Livia & Kira Hall (eds), 21–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar