Abstract
This article is concerned with the relationship between a witness' narrative style and judgments of jurors based on that style. It takes as its starting point the Duke University Law and Language Project results that a witness using a narrative style is judged more credible than a witness using a fragmented style. The main argument of this article is that it is not the use of narrative per se, but rather a particular narrative style that is valued in the courtroom. Data from a day of testimony in a murder trial is used to demonstrate two opposing narrative styles in testimony: that of the law enforcement officer and that of some nonexpert witnesses. It is shown first that the style of the law enforcement officers differs from ordinary conversation in its extreme explicitness. It is hypothesized that jurors will associate this style of delivery with credibility. It is further hypothe-sized that witnesses will lose credibility to the extent that they deviate from this style. After demonstrating the differences in the styles, the article draws on experimental work of other researchers to suggest that trial outcomes can be affected by the narrative style of the witness. (Linguistics)
(1980) Stories, background knowledge and themes: Problems in the analysis of life history narrative. American Ethnologist, 71, 223–239.
Applegate, J. L., & Delia, J. G.
(1980) Person-centered speech, psychological development, and the contexts of language use. In R. N. St. Clair & H. Giles (Eds.) The social and psychological contexts of language (pp. 245–282). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Barry, A.
(1991, January) Constructing a courtroom narrative: A lawyer-witness duet. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting. Chicago.
Bennet, W. L., & Feldman, M. S.
(1981) Reconstructing reality in the courtroom. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Bernstein, B.
(1970) Social class, language and socialization. In P. Giglioli (Ed.) Language and social context (pp. 157–178). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
Gumperz, J.
(1982) Fact and inference in courtroom testimony. In J. Gumperz (Ed.) Language and social identity (pp. 163–194). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Michaels, S.
(1981) Sharing time: Children's narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in Society, 101, 423–442.
Michaels, S., & Collins, J.
(1984) Oral discourse styles: Classroom interaction and the acquisition of literacy. In D. Tannen (Ed.) Advances in Discourse Processes, 12. Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 219–244). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
O'Barr, W.
(1982) Linguistic evidence: Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic.
Penman, R.
(1987) Discourse in courts: Cooperation, coercion, and coherence. Discourse Processes, 101, 201–218.
Riessman, C.
(1987) When gender is not enough: Women interviewing women. Gender & Society, 11, 172–207.
Cited by
Cited by 11 other publications
Allison, Meredith, C. A. Elizabeth Brimacombe, Michael A. Hunter & Helena Kadlec
2006. Young and Older Adult Eyewitnesses' Use of Narrative Features in Testimony. Discourse Processes 41:3 ► pp. 289 ff.
Bliss, Lynn S. & Allyssa McCabe
2008. Personal Narratives. Topics in Language Disorders 28:2 ► pp. 162 ff.
Boccaccini, Marcus T.
2002. What do we really know about witness preparation?. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 20:1-2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Ehrlich, Susan
2002. (Re)contextualizing complainants' accounts of sexual assault. Forensic Linguistics 9:2 ► pp. 193 ff.
Ehrlich, Susan
2006. Trial Discourse and Judicial Decision-Making: Constraining the Boundaries of Gendered Identities. In Speaking Out, ► pp. 139 ff.
Ehrlich, Susan
2007. Legal discourse and the cultural intelligiblity of gendered meanings1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11:4 ► pp. 452 ff.
HARRIS, SANDRA
2001. Fragmented Narratives and Multiple Tellers: Witness and Defendant Accounts in Trials. Discourse Studies 3:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Hydén, Margareta & Imelda Colgan McCarthy
1994. Woman Battering and Father-Daughter Incest Disclosure: Discourses of Denial and Acknowledgement. Discourse & Society 5:4 ► pp. 543 ff.
Smalls, Krystal A.
2018. Fighting Words: Antiblackness and Discursive Violence in an American High School. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 28:3 ► pp. 356 ff.
Zhang, Fangfang, Yan Wang, Allyssa McCabe & Huihui Fan
2021. On referential abilities in personal narratives of Mandarin-speaking children aged three to six years. Lingua 260 ► pp. 103108 ff.
Ziemke, Mitchell H. & Stanley L. Brodsky
2015. Unloading the hired gun: Inoculation effects in expert witness testimony. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 42-43 ► pp. 91 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.