Abstract
It has often been suggested that memory for life experiences is primarily orga-nized around the self. To test this hypothesis, students who had participated in a semester-long seminar were asked to recall various events (e.g., discussions in which they had participated, reports that they or others had presented, class demonstrations, interruptions, etc.). It was not the case that these cued recalls were primarily organized around the self. The self played only a small part in the recall of some types of events, and the students remembered others' contribu-tions to class discussions just as well as their own. The self was remembered differently from others in one major respect: Although subjects often recalled their own thoughts and feelings, they rarely made such "cognitive attributions" to others. Differences in the availability of various kinds of information may be chiefly responsible for whatever special status the self has in memory. (Psychol-ogy)
(1956) The individual psychology of Alfred Adler. New York: Basic Books.
Barclay, C. R., & Smith, T. S.
in press). Autobiographical remembering and self-composing. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology.
Bobrow, S. A., & Bower, G. H.
(1969) Comprehension and recall of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 801, 455–461.
Brewer, W. F.
(1988) Memory for randomly-selected autobiographical events. In U. Neisser & E. Winograd (Eds.) Remembering reconsidered: Ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory (pp. 21–90). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cartwright, D. S.
(1956) Self-consistency as a factor affecting immediate recall. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 521, 212–218.
Fivush, R.
in press). The social construction of personal narratives. Merrill Palmer Quarterly.
Greenwald, A. G.
(1980) The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 351, 603–618.
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M.
(1989) The self as a memory system: Powerful, but ordinary. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 571, 41–54.
Hyman, I. E., Jr.
(1990) Remembering as discourse: How memories are shaped by the social context of retrieval. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Emory University, Atlanta.
Kihlstrom, J. F., Cantor, N., Albright, J. S., Chew, B. R., Klein, S. B., & Niedenthal, P. M.
(1988) Information processing and the study of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Eds.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 211, pp. 145–177). New York: Academic.
Klein, S. B., & Kihlstrom, J. F.
(1986) Elaboration, organization, and the self-reference effect in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1151, 26–38.
Kuiper, N. A., & Rogers, T. D.
(1979) Encoding of personal information: Self-other differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 371, 499–514.
Neisser, U.
(1988) Five kinds of self-knowledge. Philosophical Psychology, 11, 35–59.
Neisser, U.
(1991) Two perceptually-given aspects of the self and their development. Developmental Review, 111, 197–209.
(1977) Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 351, 677–688.
Ross, M., & Sicoly, F.
(1979) Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 371, 322–336.
Singer, S.
(1969) Factors related to participants' memory of a conversation. Journal of Personality, 371, 93–110.
Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P.
(1978) The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 41, 592–604.
Thompson, C. P.
(1985) Memory for unique personal events: Some implications of the self-schema. Human Learning, 41, 267–280.
Voss, J. F., Vesonder, G. T., Post, T. A., & Ney, L. G.
(1987) Was the item recalled and if so by whom?Journal of Memory and Language, 261, 466–479.
Wagner, W.
(1984) Recognition of own and other's utterances in an natural conversation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 101, 596–604.
Cited by
Cited by 40 other publications
Algom, Daniel
1996. Correspondence conception of memory: A good match is hard to find. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 188 ff.
Alterman, Richard
1996. Everyday memory and activity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 189 ff.
Anderson, Norman H.
1996. Functional memory requires a quite different value metaphor. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 190 ff.
Bahrick, Harry P.
1996. The relation between reproductive and reconstructive processing of memory content. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Begg, Ian Maynard
1996. On correspondence, accuracy, and truth. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Ben-Ze'ev, Aaron
1996. The alternative to the storehouse metaphor. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 192 ff.
Bjork, Robert A. & Thomas D. Wickens
1996. Memory, metamemory, and conditional statistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 193 ff.
Bruce, Darryl
1996. The correspondence metaphor: Prescriptive or descriptive?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 194 ff.
Conway, Martin A.
1996. What do memories correspond to?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 195 ff.
Drivdahl, Sarah B. & Ira E. Hyman
2014. Fluidity in autobiographical memories: Relationship memories sampled on two occasions. Memory 22:8 ► pp. 1070 ff.
Eichenbaum, Howard
1996. The real-life/laboratory controversy as viewed from the cognitive neurobiology of animal learning and memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 196 ff.
Ely, Richard & Elizabeth Ryan
2008. Remembering talk: Individual and gender differences in reported speech. Memory 16:4 ► pp. 395 ff.
Fisher, Ronald P.
1996. Implications of output-bound measures for laboratory and field research in memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Hyman, Ira E. & F. James Billings
1998. Individual Differences and the Creation of False Childhood Memories. Memory 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Hyman, Ira E., Rebecca F. Roundhill, Kiernan M. Werner & Calvin A. Rabiroff
2014. Collaboration inflation: Egocentric source monitoring errors following collaborative remembering.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 3:4 ► pp. 293 ff.
Jalbert, Madeline C., Alia N. Wulff & Ira E. Hyman
2021. Stealing and sharing memories: Source monitoring biases following collaborative remembering. Cognition 211 ► pp. 104656 ff.
Karn, Keith S. & Gregory J. Zelinsky
1996. Driving and dish-washing: Failure of the correspondence metaphor for memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 198 ff.
Koriat, Asher & Morris Goldsmith
1996. Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Koriat, Asher & Morris Goldsmith
1996. The correspondence metaphor of memory: Right, wrong, or useful?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 211 ff.
Kruglanski, Arie W.
1996. The storehouse/correspondence partition in memory research: Promises and perils. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 198 ff.
Kvavilashvili, Lia & Judi Ellis
1996. Let's forget the everyday/laboratory controversy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Larsen, Steen F.
1996. Correspondence to the past: The essence of the archaeology metaphor. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 200 ff.
Mayes, Andrew R., Rob van Eijk & Patricia L. Gooding
1996. Accuracy and quantity are poor measures of recall and recognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
Mazzoni, Giuliana
1996. The phenomenal object of memory and control processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 202 ff.
McNamara, Timothy P.
1996. False dichotomies and dead metaphors. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
Neisser, Ulric
1996. Remembering as doing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
Neisser, Ulric
1996. Remembering the Earthquake: Direct Experience vs. Hearing the News. Memory 4:4 ► pp. 337 ff.
Nelson, Thomas O.
1996. Metacognition, metaphors, and the measurement of human memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 204 ff.
Newby, Ian R. & Michael Ross
1996. Beyond the correspondence metaphor: When accuracy cannot be assessed. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
Oakes, Mark A. & Ira E. Hyman
2001. The Role of the Self in False Memory Creation. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 4:2 ► pp. 87 ff.
Palmer, David C.
1996. Operationaling “correspondence”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 206 ff.
Pasupathi, Monisha, Trisha Weeks & Cora Rice
2006. Reflecting on Life. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 25:3 ► pp. 244 ff.
Schwartz, Bennett L.
1996. Amnesia and metamemory demonstrate the importance of both metaphors. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 207 ff.
Shi, Liangzi, Norman R. Brown & P. J. Charles Reimer
2024. Exploring the metamnemonic and phenomenal differences between transitional and mundane events. Memory & Cognition
Small, Jocelyn Penny
1996. Classical antecedents for modern metaphors for memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 208 ff.
Sotgiu, Igor
2022. Ulric Neisser's contribution to the study of autobiographical memory accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology 36:6 ► pp. 1365 ff.
Wang, Qi & Martin A. Conway
2004. The Stories We Keep: Autobiographical Memory in American and Chinese Middle‐Aged Adults. Journal of Personality 72:5 ► pp. 911 ff.
White, K. Geoffrey
1996. Direct remembering and the correspondence metaphor. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 208 ff.
Winograd, Eugene
1996. Contexts and functions of retrieval. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
Wright, Daniel B.
1996. Hypothesis testing in experimental and naturalistic memory research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2 ► pp. 210 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.