The "Labovian Model" Revisited With Special Consideration of Literary Narrative
References (27)
REFERENCES
Adam, J. (1982). The macro-structure of the conventional narrative. Poetics Today, 31, 135–68.
Chatman, S. (1990). What can we learn from contextualist narratology?. Poetics Today, 111, 309–328.
Fleischman, S. (1985). Discourse functions of tense-aspect oppositions in narrative: Toward a theory of grounding. Linguistics, 231, 851–882.
Fleischman, S. (1986a). Evaluation in narrative: The present tense in medieval “performed stories. ” Yale French studies, 701, 199–251.
Fleischman, S. (1986b). “Overlay” structures in the Song of Roland: A discourse-pragmatic strategy of oral narrative. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 41, 108–123.
Fleischman, S. (1990). Tense and narrativity. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Fleischman, S. (1991). Toward a theory of tense-aspect in narrative discourse. In J. Gvozdanovic & T. Janssen (Ed.), in co-operation with O. Dahl The function of tense in texts (pp. 75–97). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Fludernik, M. (1996). Towards a “natural” narratology. London: Routledge.
Genette, G. (1980). Narrative discourse: An essay in method (J. E. Lewin, Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press (Translation of “Discours du récit,” a portion of Figures III, Paris: Seuil, 1972).
Herring, S. C. (1991). Functions of the verb in Tamil narration. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Hopper, P. J. (1979a). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: 12. Discourse and syntax (pp. 213–241). New York: Academic.
Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In Language in the inner city (pp. 354–396). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (this issue). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press. (Original work published 1967)
Longacre, R. E. (1981). A spectrum and profile approach to discourse analysis. Text, 41, 337–359.
Ochs, E. (1979). Planned and unplanned discourse. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: 12. Discourse and syntax (pp. 51–80). New York: Academic.
Polanyi, L. (1978). False starts can be true. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 41, 628–639.
Pratt, M. L. (1977). Toward a speech-act theory of literary discourse. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Ryan, M. (1988). Review of Katharine Galloway Young, Taleworlds and storyrealms Dordrecht, The Netherlands: M. Nijhoff). Style, 221, 143–146.
Sternberg, M. (1978). Expositional modes and temporal ordering in fiction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sternberg, M. (1990). Telling in time (1): Chronology and narrative theory. Poetics today, 111, 901–948.
Traugott, E., & Pratt., M. L. (1980). Linguistics for students of literature. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
van Dijk, T. A. (1975). Action, action description, and narrative. New literary history, 61, 273–294.
Vetters, C. (1991). Foreground and background: Weinrich against Labov. In M. Kiefer & J. van den Auwera (Eds.), Meaning and grammar: Cross-linguistic perspectives (pp. 367–381). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Watts, R. J. (1984). Narration as role-complementary interaction: An ethnomethodological approach to the study of literary narratives. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 171, 157–164.
Weinrich, H. (1973). Le temps (M. Lacoste, Trans.). Paris: Seuil. (Originally published in German, 1964 as Tempus, Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer)
Wolfson, N. (1978). A feature of performed narrative: The conversational historical present. Language in society, 71, 215–237.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Morini, Massimiliano
2010.
The poetics of disengagement: Jane Austen and echoic irony.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 19:4
► pp. 339 ff.
POVEDA, DAVID
2002.
Quicos story: An ethnopoetic analysis of a Gypsy boys narratives at school.
Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 22:2
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.