Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 33:2 (2018) ► pp.307–361

Lingua Franca between pidginization and koineization

| University of California, Los Angeles
Published literature on Lingua Franca contains divergent views regarding its place in the taxonomy of contact language types. While this language is traditionally regarded as a pidgin, some scholars consider it more accurate to view it as a koine. This paper shows that Lingua Franca exhibits features that are consistent with both pidginization and koineization, and proposes to view it as located on the pidgin/koine continuum.
Keywords: language contact, contact languages, pidgin, koine, Fremdarbeiteritalienisch, simplified Italian of Ethiopia, Spanish, Italian, Mediterranean, Maghreb
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Historical background
    • 2.1Periodization of LF and sources of the data
    • 2.2Demographic information
  • 3.Evidence of pidginization in LF
    • 3.1Refunctionalization of the Romance infinitive in LF
      • 3.1.1Data
      • 3.1.2Discussion
    • 3.2Refunctionalization of the Romance past participle in LF
      • 3.2.1Data
      • 3.2.2Discussion
    • 3.3Loss of lexifiers’ functional elements and categories in LF
    • 3.4Typological discontinuities between LF and its lexifiers
  • 4.Evidence of koineization in LF
    • 4.1LF lexicon and word formation
      • 4.1.1Affixation
      • 4.1.2Compounding
      • 4.1.3Other multi-word lexemes
    • 4.2LF verb classes
      • 4.2.1Data
      • 4.2.2Discussion
    • 4.3LF copula (e)star
      • 4.3.1Data
      • 4.3.2Discussion
    • 4.4LF personal pronouns
      • 4.4.1Data
      • 4.4.2Discussion
    • 4.5Differential object marking in LF
      • 4.5.1Data
      • 4.5.2Discussion
    • 4.6Typological continuity between LF and its lexifiers
  • 5.LF between pidginization and koineization
    • 5.1Formative processes
    • 5.2The feature pool
    • 5.3LF on the pidgin/koine continuum
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00018.ope
References (127)
References
Anonymous. 1830a. Dictionnaire de la langue franque ou petit mauresque, suivi de quelques dialogues familiers et d’un vocabulaire de mots arabes les plus usuels, a l’usage des français en Afrique. Marseille: Typographie de Feissat ainé et Demonchy.Google Scholar
. 1830b. Alger. Topographie, population, forces militaires de terre et de mer, acclimatement et resources que le pays peut offrir à l’armée d’expédition, precede d’un résumé historique; suivi d’un précis sur le service des troupes pendant un siège et orné d’un plan très exact de la ville et de ses environs. Par un Français qui a résidé à Alger. Marseille: Typographie de Feissat ainé et Demonchy.Google Scholar
. 1852. La lanque sabir. L’Algérien, 11 May 1852.Google Scholar
Arends, Jacques. 1997. The Lingua Franca hypothesis: A review of the evidence. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics, London, June 1997.
. 1998. A bibliography of Lingua Franca. The Carrier Pidgin 261. 4–5, 33–35.Google Scholar
. 2005. Lingua Franca. In Philipp Strazny (ed.), Encyclopedia of linguistics, Vol. 11, 625–626. New York: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar
Aslanov, Cyril. 2006. Le français au Levant, jadis et naguère: À la recherche d’une langue perdue. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
. 2010. Débat sur l’ouvrage de Jocelyne Dakhlia, Lingua franca: Histoire d’une langue métisse en Méditerranée. Langage et Société 1341. 103–113.Google Scholar
. 2014. Lingua Franca in the Western Mediterranean: Between myth and reality. In Juliane Besters-Dilger, Cynthia Dermarkar, Stefan Pfänder, & Achim Rabus (eds.), Congruence in contact-induced language change: Language families, typological resemblance, and perceived similarity, 122–136. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernini, Giuliano. 1987. Le preposizioni nell’italiano lingua seconda. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica e Letterature Comparate 31. 129–152.Google Scholar
. 1989. Strategie di costruzione dei paradigmi verbali in lingua seconda. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica e Letterature Comparate 51. 195–208.Google Scholar
. 2010. Italiano come pidgin. In Raffaele Simone (ed.), Enciclopedia dell’italiano, vol. 11. Rome: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana. [URL] (13 February, 2017.)
Berretta, Monica. 1986. Per uno studio dell’apprendimento dell’italiano in contesto naturale: Il caso dei pronomi personali atoni. In Anna Giacalone Ramat (ed.), L’apprendimento spontaneo di una seconda lingua, 329–353. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Che sia ben chiaro ciò di cui parli”: Riprese anaforiche tra chiarificazione e semplificazione. Annali della Facoltà di Lettere dell’Universita di Cagliari n.s. 81. 367–389.Google Scholar
. 1990. Sull’accusativo preposizionale in italiano. In Monica Berretta, Piera Molinelli, & Ada Valentini (eds.), Parallela 4. Morfología / Morphologie, 179–189. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
. 1991. Note sulla sintassi dell’accusativo preposizionale in italiano. Linguistica 311. 211–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. Marcatezza in morfologia e apprendimento di lingue seconde. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica e Letterature Comparate 81. 129–156.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano. 1983. L’italiano popolare e la semplificazione linguistica. Vox Romanica 421. 38–79.Google Scholar
. 1991. Fremdarbeiteritalienisch: Fenomeni di pidginizzazione dell’italiano nella Svizzera tedesca. Rivista di Linguistica 31. 333–367.Google Scholar
. 1993. Italiano in Europa oggi: Foreigner talk nella Svizzera tedesca. In Omaggio a Gianfranco Folena, 2275–2290. Padova: Programma.Google Scholar
. 2012. Sociolinguistica dell’italiano contemporaneo. 2nd ed. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano, Bruno Moretti, & Stephan Schmid. 1990. Interlingue italiane nella Svizzera tedesca. Osservazioni generali e note sul sistema dell’articolo. In Emanuele Banfi & Patrizia Cordin (eds.), Storia dell’italiano e forme dell’italianizzazione, 203–228. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Bilous, Rostyslav. 2011. Transitivité et marquage d’objet différentiel. Toronto: The University of Toronto dissertation.Google Scholar
Bossong, Georg. 1991. Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In Dieter Wanner & Douglas A. Kibbee (eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics, 143–170. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broughton, Mrs. 1840. Six years residence in Algiers. 2nd ed. London: Saunders and Otley.Google Scholar
Butt, John & Carmen Benjamin. 2004. A new reference grammar of Modern Spanish. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Camamis, George. 1977. Estudios sobre el cautiverio en el Siglo de Oro. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Castellanos, Carles. 2007. La lingua franca, una revolució lingüística mediterrània amb empremta catalana. Paper presented at the XII International Colloquium of the North American Catalan Society, Halifax, Canada, May 2007. [URL] (14 February, 2017.)
Chitoran, Ioana. 2002. The phonology of Romanian: A constraint-based approach. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cifoletti, Guido. 1978. Lingua franca e sabir: Considerazioni storiche et terminologiche. Incontri Linguistici 41. 205–212.Google Scholar
. 1989. La lingua franca mediterranea. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
. 2000. La lingua franca a Venezia nel settecento. In Vincenzo Orioles (ed.), Documenti letterari del plurilinguismo, 9–18. Rome: Il Calamo.Google Scholar
. 2004. La lingua franca barbaresca. Rome: Il Calamo.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1996. Genitivo e genitivi pronominali nel DP italiano. In Baola Benincà, Guglielmo Cinque, Tullio de Mauro, & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Italiano e dialetti nel tempo: Saggi di gramática per Giulio C. Lepschy, 67–84. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Clements, J. Clancy. 2003. The tense-aspect system in pidgins and naturalistically learned L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 251. 245–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. The linguistic legacy of Spanish and Portuguese: Colonial expansion and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The Spanish-based creoles. In José Ignacio Hualde, Antxón Olarréa, & Erin O’Rouke (eds.), Handbook of Hispanic linguistics, 27–46. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Form selection in contact languages: Evidence from some Portuguese- and Spanish-lexified contact varieties. In Patricia Amaral & Ana Maria Carvalho (eds.), Portuguese-Spanish interfaces: Diachrony, synchrony, and contact, 377–401. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Clissold, Stephen. 1977. The Barbary slaves. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Coates, William A. 1971. The Lingua Franca. In Frances Ingemann (ed.), Papers from the Fifth Annual Kansas Linguistics Conference, 25–34. Lawrence, Kansas: The Linguistics Department, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, Ralf. 1992. Zur Lingua Franca des Mittelmeers. In Gabriele Birken-Silverman & Gerda Rössler (eds.), Beiträge zur sprachlichen, literarischen und kulturellen Vielfalt in der Philologien, 217–228. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Coutelle, Louis. 1977. Grec, greghesco, lingua franca. In Hans-Georg Beck, Manoussos Manoussacas, & Agostino Pertusi (eds.), Venezia: Centro di mediazione tra Oriente e Occidente (secoli XV-XVI). Aspetti e problemi, Vol. 21, 537–544. Florence: Leo S. Olschki.Google Scholar
Couto, Hildo Honório do. 2002. A língua franca mediterrânea: Histórico, textos e interpretação. Brasilia: Editora Plano.Google Scholar
Cremona, Joseph. 1996. L’italiano in Tunisi. La lingua di alcuni testi del tardo 500 e del 600. In Baola Benincà, Guglielmo Cinque, Tullio de Mauro, & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Italiano e dialetti nel tempo: Saggi di gramática per Giulio C. Lepschy, 85–97. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
. 2002. Italian-based Lingua Francas around the Mediterranean. In Anna Laura Lepschy & Arturo Tosi (eds.), Multilingualism in Italy: Past and present, 24–30. Oxford: Legenda.Google Scholar
Da Tos, Martina. 2012. The intramorphological meanings of thematic vowels in Italian verbs. Padua: The University of Padua dissertation.Google Scholar
Davis, Robert C. 2003. Christian slaves, Muslim masters: White slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500–1800. Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Epalza, Míkel de & Abdel-Hakim Slama-Gafsi. 2010. El español hablado en Túnez por los moriscos o andalusíes y sus descendientes (siglos XVII-XVIII). Material léxico y onomástico documentado, siglos XVII-XXI. Valencia: Universitat de València, Granada: Universidad de Granada, & Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Fagard, Benjamin & Alexandru Mardale. 2014. Non, mais tu l’as vu à lui? Analyse(s) du marquage différentiel de l’objet en français. Verbum 261. 145–170. [URL] (14 February, 2017.)
Ferguson, Charles A. 1971. Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity: A study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk, and pidgins. In Dell Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages, 141–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. & Charles E. DeBose. 1977. Simplified registers, broken language, and pidginization. In Albert Valdman (ed.), Pidgin and creole linguistics, 99–125. Bloomington/ London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorentino, Giuliana. 2010. Accusativo preposizionale. In Raffaele Simone (ed.), Enciclopedia dell’italiano, vol. 11. Rome: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana. [URL] (10 February, 2017.)
Foltys, Christian. 1984–1985. Die Belege der Lingua Franca. Neue Romania 11. 1–37, 21. 133–134.Google Scholar
. 1987. Das ‘Dictionnaire de la langue franque’ von 1830 und die Frage der sprachlichen Expansion in der Lingua Franca. Neue Romania 51. 60–84.Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco. 2016. Allogenous exaptation. In Muriel Norde & Freek Van De Velde (eds.), Exaptation and language change, 227–260. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, Kimberly L. & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes. 2008. Variation in contemporary Spanish: Linguistic predictors of estar in four cases of language contact. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 111. 365–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grion, Giusto. 1890–1892. Farmacopea e lingua franca del dugento. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 121. 181–186.Google Scholar
Habte-Mariam, Marcos. 1976. Italian. In M. L. Bender, J. D. Bowen, R. L. Cooper, & C. A. Ferguson (eds.), Language in Ethiopia, 170–180. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haedo, Fray Diego de. 1612. Topographia e historia general de Argel. Valladolid.Google Scholar
Harris-Northall, Ray. 1996. The Old Spanish participle in -udo: Its origin, use, and loss. Hispanic Review 641. 31–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 2002. Jewish and Muslim dialects of Moroccan Arabic. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 2012. Mood meets mood: Turkic versus Indo-European. In Martine Vanhove, Thomas Stolz, Aina Urdze, & Hitomi Otsuka (eds.), Morphologies in contact, 195–203. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Kabatek, Johannes & Claus D. Pusch. 2011. The Romance languages. In Bernd Kortmann & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe: A comprehensive guide, 69–96. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahane, Henry & Renée Kahane. 1985. A case of glossism: Greghesco and Lingua Franca in Venetian literature. In M. Deanovíc et al. (eds.), Mélanges de linguistique dédiés à la mémoire de Petar Skok (1881–1956), 223–228. Zagreb: Djela Jugoslavenske Akademije Znanosti i Umjetnosti.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 2010. Contact and new varieties. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 230–251. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul & Peter Trudgill. 2005. The birth of new dialects. In Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens, & Paul Kerswill (eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages, 196–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang & Clive Perdue. 1997. The Basic Variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?) Second Language Research 131. 301–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korletjanu, Nikolai Grigorievich. 1974. Issledovanie narodnoj latyni i ee otnoshenij s romanskimi jazykami [A study of Vulgar Latin and its relationship with Romance languages]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 831. 344–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lapesa, Rafael. 1980. Historia de la lengua española. 8th ed. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Lipski, John M. 2002. ‘Partial Spanish’: Strategies of pidginization and simplification (from Lingua Franca to ‘Gringo Lingo’). In Caroline R. Wiltshire & Joaquim Campts (eds.), Romance phonology and variation: Selected papers from the 30th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Gainesville, Florida, February 2000, 117–143. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
n.d. On the source of the infinitive in Romance-derived pidgins and creoles. [URL] (11 February, 2017.)
Maiden, Martin. 2011. Morphological persistence. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages, vol. 11, Structures, 155–214. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2016. Inflectional morphology. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 497–512. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minervini, Laura. 1996. La lingua franca mediterranea: Plurilinguismo, mistilinguismo, pidginizzazione sulle coste del mediterraneo tra tardo medioevo e prima età moderna. Medioevo Romanzo 201. 231–301.Google Scholar
Morsly, Dalila. 1996. Alger plurilingue. Plurilinguismes 121. 47–80.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1997. Jargons, pidgins, creoles and koines: What are they? In Arthur K. Spears & Donald Winford (eds.), The structure and status of pidgins and creoles, 35–70. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo & Irene Vogel. 1990. The conjugations of Italian. Italica 671. 479–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neuburger, Kathrin A. & Elisabeth Stark. 2014. Differential object marking in Corsican. Regularities and triggering factors. Linguistics 521. 365–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obediente y Sosa, Enrique. 1997. Biografía de una lengua: Nacimiento, desarrollo y expansión del español. Merida-Venezuela: Universidad de los Andes, Consejo de Publicaciones CDCHT.Google Scholar
Oltra Massuet, Maria Isabel. 1999. On the notion of theme vowel: A new approach to Catalan verbal morphology. Boston, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology thesis.Google Scholar
Operstein, Natalie. 1998. Was Lingua Franca ever creolized? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 131. 377–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. On the status and transmission of Lingua Franca. In Wolfgang Hock & Michael Meier-Brügger (eds.), Darъ slovesьny: Festschrift für Christoph Koch zum 65. Geburtstag, 235–249. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
. 2017a. The Spanish component in Lingua Franca. Language Ecology 11. 105–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. Syntactic structures of Lingua Franca in the Dictionnaire de la langue franque . Italian Journal of Linguistics 29(2). 87–130.Google Scholar
. 2018a. Inflection in Lingua Franca: From Haedo’s Topographia to the Dictionnaire de la langue franque . Morphology. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2018b. Toward a typological profile of Lingua Franca: A view from the lexicon and word formation. Language Sciences 661. 60–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orozco, Rafael 2010a. A sociolinguistic study of Colombian Spanish in Colombia and New York City. New York, NY: The New York University dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2010b. Variation in the expression of nominal possession in Costeño Spanish. Spanish in Context 71. 194–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael & Peter Bakker. 2013. Pidgins. In Peter Bakker & Yaron Matras (eds.), Contact languages: A comprehensive guide, 15–64. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penny, Ralph. 2002. A history of the Spanish language. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pineda, Anna. 2012. Double object constructions and dative/accusative alternations in Spanish and Catalan: A unified account. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 21. 57–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2008a. Creoles as interlanguages: Inflectional morphology. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 231. 109–130.Google Scholar
. 2008b. Creoles as interlanguages: Syntactic structures. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 231. 307–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009a. Creoles as interlanguages: Phonology. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 241. 119–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. Creoles as interlanguages: Word-formation. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 241. 339–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pountain, Christopher. 1982. *ESSERE/STARE as a Romance phenomenon. In Nigel Vincent & Martin Harris (eds.), Studies in the Romance verb. Essays offered to Joe Cremona on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 139–160. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz. 2016a. Spanish. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen, & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe, Vol. 41, 2620–2640. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016b. Italian. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen, & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe, Vol. 41, 2712–2731. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Sarah J. & Joan Bresnan. 2008. Retained inflectional morphology in pidgins: A typological study. Linguistic Typology 121. 269–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1968. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti: Morfologia. Turin: Giulio Einaudi.Google Scholar
. 1971. Autour de l’accusatif prépositionnel dans les langues romanes. Revue de Linguistique Romane 351. 312–334.Google Scholar
Sayahi, Lotfi. 2014. Diglossia and language contact: Language variation and change in North Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schepens, Job, Frans van der Slik, & Roeland van Hout. 2013. The effect of linguistic distance across Indo-European mother tongues on learing Dutch as a second language. In Lars Borin & Anju Saxena (eds.), Approaches to measuring linguistic differences, 199–229. Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Stephan. 1992. Le interlingue di ispanofoni nella Svizzera tedesca: Un tipo di italiano popolare? In Bruno Moretti, Dario Petrini, & Sandro Bianconi (eds.), Linee di tendenza dell’italiano contemporaneo, 285–301. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
. 1994. L’italiano degli spagnoli. Interlingue di immigrati nella Svizzera tedesca. Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1909. Die Lingua franca. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 331. 441–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarze, Christoph. 1999. Inflectional classes in lexical functional morphology: Latin -sk- and its evolution. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG 99 Conference, The University of Manchester. CSLI Publications. [URL] (14 February, 2017.)
Schwegler, Armin. 1990. Analyticity and syntheticity: A diachronic perspective with special reference to Romance languages. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. 2014. Two kinds of differential object marking in Portuguese and Spanish. In Patricia Amaral & Ana Maria Carvalho (eds.), Portuguese-Spanish interfaces: Diachrony, synchrony, and contact, 237–260. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 1985. Koines and koineization. Language in Society 141. 357–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Mixing, leveling, and pidgin/creole development. In Arthur K. Spears & Donald Winford (eds.), The structure and status of pidgins and creoles, 111–149. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Koine formation and creole genesis. In Norval Smith & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Creolization and contact, 175–197. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1986. Bilingualism and language change: The extension of estar in Los Angeles Spanish. Language 621. 587–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stovicek, Thomas William. 2010. A developmental history of the Hispano-Romance verb conjugations. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University dissertation.Google Scholar
Tagliavini, Carlo. 1932. Divagazioni semantiche rumene e balcaniche. Archivum Romanicum 161. 333–383.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Roger. 1991. Copula deletion in Spanish foreigner-talk: Using questionnaires as a research tool. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 61. 89–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New-dialect formation: The inevitability of colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Valentini, Ada. 1994. Un caso di comunicazione esolingue: Il foreigner talk . Quaderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica e Letterature Comparate 101. 397–411.Google Scholar
Vanelli, Laura. 1997. Personal pronouns and demonstratives. In Martin Maiden & Mair Parry (eds.), The dialects of Italy, 106–115. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Varela, Soledad. 2011. Derivation and compounding. In José Ignacio Hualde, Antxon Olarrea, & Erin O’Rourke (eds.), Handbook of Spanish linguistics, 207–226. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vedovelli, Massimo. 1989. Gli immigrati stranieri in Italia: Note sociolinguistiche. Studi Emigrazione 931. 68–94.Google Scholar
. 1991a. Apprendimento linguistico nel contesto dell’immigrazione. Scuola Democratica 3–41. 119–130.Google Scholar
. 1991b. L’immigrazione straniera in Italia: Note tra sociolinguistica e educazione linguistica. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica ed Applicata 201. 411–435.Google Scholar
Vincent, Bernard. 2004. La langue espagnole en Afrique du Nord: XVIe-XVIIIe siècles. In Jocelyne Dakhlia (ed.), Trames de langues: Usages et métissages linguistiques dans l’histoire du Maghreb, 105–111. Paris: Maisonneuve & Larose. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Operstein, Natalie
2020. Lexical diversity and the issue of the basilect/acrolect distinction in Lingua Franca. Language Ecology 4:2 ► pp. 202 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.