Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 34:2 (2019) ► pp.287–345

Plurality and definiteness in Mauritian and Haitian creoles

| ISC, CNRS | Rutgers University, USA
In addition to plurality, creole plural morphemes impart an additional meaning of definiteness or specificity to the nominal expressions they mark. As of yet, there is no precise characterization either empirical or theoretical of the semantic/pragmatic dimensions they convey. Furthermore, the question of whether this added meaning is largely fixed across distinct creoles and plural morphemes, or subject to variations has never been examined. With the goal of bringing new insights intothese questions, this paper reports the results of a comparativestudy of the properties of two creole plural morphemes in two distinct French-lexifier creoles, Haitian Creole (HC) and Mauritian Creole (MC).
Besides relying on native speaker intuitions, a detailed comparative qualitative and quantitative study of the uses of these plural morphemes was conducted in a textual corpus in two adaptations of the story of the Little Prince by Antoine De St Exupery, in Haitian Creole and in Mauritian Creole respectively. The results of this comparative investigation clearly demonstrate that the use of plural morphemes in the two creoles, though similarin a number of respects, also differ quite systematically. We observe that the distinctions noted closely mirror the uses of the singular definite marker ‘la’ bv’ also argued to subtly diverge in these two creoles (Wespel 2008, Déprez 2016, in preparation). The paper analyzes this mirroring effect as a consequence of the positions that the plural morphemes come to occupy in the nominal structure and of the way the structure building operations are constrained in the different creoles. Concretely it is argued that the plural morphemes come to derivationally occupy the position of definite articles in each of the languages, and that this derivational process is obligatory in Haitian Creole due to the pronominal nature of its plural morpheme, but remains optional in Mauritian.
Keywords: Plural inclusive, Plural exclusive, Definite Plural, Plural Maximality, Definiteness strong, Definiteness weak, Semantic Definiteness, Pragmatic Definiteness, Specificity, Bare Nouns, Nominal structure, Plural syntax, Definiteness and movement
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Descriptive and theoretical preliminaries
    • 2.1The morpho-syntactic distribution of the plurals bann and yo
    • 2.2Semantic properties of the creole plurals
      • 2.2.1Definitess and specificity: Questions of definitions
    • 2.3The Mauritian plural marker bann
    • 2.4The Haitian plural yo
  • 3.Quality and Quantity data
    • 3.1Methodology and classification
    • 3.2Qualitative data
    • 3.3Quantitative data on the use of plural marking in Mauritian and Haitian Creole
      • 3.3.1Mauritian plural marking
      • 3.3.2Haitian plural marking
  • 4.Sketching an analysis
    • 4.1Analysis of the Mauritian plural
    • 4.2Analysis of the Haitian plural
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00041.dep
References (66)
References
Aboh, Enoch Oleadé. 2004a. The morphosyntax of complement-head sequences : Clause structure and word order patterns in Kwa, New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004b. Topic and focus within DP. Linguistics in the Netherlands 2004 211: 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aboh, Enoch Oleadé, & Michel DeGraff. 2014. Some notes on bare noun phrases in Haitian and Gungbe : a transatlantic Sprachbund perspective. In The Socio-linguistics of Grammar. Tor. A. Afarli, Brit Maelhum eds. John Benjamins, 203–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alleesaib, Muhsina. 2005. Le morphème de pluriel BANN en créole mauricien : syntaxe et interprétation. Saint-Denis: Université de Paris-8. Masters (DEA) thesis.Google Scholar
. 2012. Le groupe nominal en Créole Mauricien : études syntaxiques, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Paris VIII St-Denis-Vincennes.Google Scholar
Arkoh, Ruby & Lisa, Matthewson. 2013. A familiar definite article in Akan. Lingua 2131:1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baptista, Marlyse & Jacqueline Guéron eds. 2007. Noun Phrases in Creole Languages: A multifaceted approach. Creole Languages Library. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Judy B. 1997. Demonstratives and Reinforcers in Romance and Germanic Languages. Lingua 1021, 87–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biswas, Priyanka. 2012. Reanalyzing Definiteness in Bangla. BLS 38, 2012. DOI logo (published by the Berkeley Linguistics Society and the Linguistic Society of America)Google Scholar
Bobyleva, Ekaterina. 2013. The development of the nominal domain in creole languages. A comparative typological approach, Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Bollée, Annegret. 1977. Le créole français des Seychelles: esquisse d’une grammaire, textes, vocabulaire. Tübingen Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. La restructuration du pluriel nominal dans les créoles de l’Océan Indien, Études créoles, vol. XXIII1, 25–39.Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Fabiola Henri. 2012. Predicting article agglutination in Mauritian FACS III, University of Lisbon. Portugal.Google Scholar
Brisson, Christine. 1997. On definite plurals NPs and the meaning of All. Proceding. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1998. On the Deficient/Strong Opposition in Possessive 1995 Systems. In Alexiadou, A. & Wilder, C. (eds.), Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase: 17–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, G. N., and F. J. Pelletier (eds.). 1995. The Generic Book. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Champolion, Lucas. 2014. Algrebraic Semantics and Mereology. Lecture Notes, August 2014, NYU.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 61: 339–405. Springer.Google Scholar
Damoiseau, Robert. 1999. Éléments de grammaire comparée français-créole martiniquais. Ibis Rouge. Collection: Chimen Lékol – ISBN: 2844500633Google Scholar
D’Ans, André-Marcel. 1968. Le Créole français d’Haïti: étude des unités d’articulation, d’expansion et de communication. Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Probal. 1983. The Bangla classifier /Ta/, its penumbra and definiteness. Indian Linguistics 441. 11–26.Google Scholar
Déprez, Viviane. 2002. On the nature of bare nouns in Haitian Creole. dans Current Issues in Romance Languages: Selected papers from the 29th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Ann Arbor, 8–11 April 1999, Edited by Teresa Satterfield, Christina Tortora and Diana Cresti. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 220] (pp. 47–64) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Determiner Architecture and Phrasal Movement in French Lexifier Creoles. dans Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2001: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’, Amsterdam, 6–8 December 2001, Edited by Josep Quer, Jan Schroten, Mauro Scorretti, Petra Sleeman and Els Verheugd. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 245] (pp. 49–74) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Morphological Number, Semantic Number and bare Nouns.” Lingua. Volume 115, Issue 6: 857–883.Google Scholar
. 2006. “On the Conceptual Role of Number”. In New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics, Nishida, Chiyo and Jean-Pierre Y. Montreuil (eds.), 67–83. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007a. Nominal constituents in French lexifier creoles: Probing the structuring role of grammaticalization. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 22:2, (pp. 263–307) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007b. Implicit determination and plural. in Noun Phrases in Creole Languages: A multi-faceted approach, Edited by Marlyse Baptista and Jacqueline Guéron. [Creole Language Library, 31] (pp. 301–336) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. (Un)-interpretable features and grammaticalization. dans Historical Linguistics 2007: Selected papers from the 18th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Montreal, 6–11 August 2007, Edited by Monique Dufresne, Fernande Dupuis and Etleva Vocaj. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 308] (pp. 83–98) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Dimensions of Definiteness in French Based Creoles. V. Déprez LSRL 43 City University of New York, April 17–19 [URL]
. 2016. Refining Cross-linguistic Dimensions of Definiteness: Variations on the French Lexifier Creole ‘la’. Worshop on the semantic contribution of Det and Num: (In)definiteness, Genericity and Referentiality in Barcelona Spain, in May 27–28.
. in preparation. Dimensions of Definiteness in French Based Creoles. ms. Rutgers University.
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Enç, Murvet. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 221:1–25.Google Scholar
Fattier, Dominique. 1998. Atlas Linguistique et ethnographique d’Haiti, available at [URL]
. 2003. Grammaticalisation en créole haïtien : morceaux choisis, Creolica. [URL]
Frege, Gottlob. 1892.: Über Sinn und Bedeutung, in: Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, (NF 100), 25–50 [reprinted in: Frege (1994), 40–65; in English as “On Sense and Reference” in: A. P. Martinich ed. (1996): The Philosophy of Language, New York: Oxford University Press, 186–198 (3rd edition)].Google Scholar
Glaude, Herby. 2013. Aspects de la Syntaxe de l’Haiitien Thèse de doctorat. Paris VIII.Google Scholar
Govain, Renauld. 2017. Analyse comparative du déterminant en créoles haïtien et jamaïcain
 Ms. LangSÉ: FLA – UEHGoogle Scholar
Guillemin, Diana. 2009. The Mauritian Creole Noun Phrase: its form and function. PhD dissertation: University of Queensland.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1978. Definiteness and indefiniteness: a study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London; Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Croom Helm; Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 1997. Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase. Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Articles. In Haspelmath, M., König, E., Oesterreicher, W. (eds.), Language Typology and Language universals, 831–841. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H. & Wexler, K. 2003. “Specificity as a grammatical notion: Evidence from L2-English article use”. dans G. Garding and M. Tsujimura (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 245–258). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, Frantz. 1989. La détermination nominale en créole haïtien. Thèse de doctorat. Paris: Université Paris VII.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaeshil. 2008. The Parameterization of Plural Markings in Classifier Languages. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 301 (2008), p. 159.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Semantics and contextual expression, eds. Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem and Peter van Emde Boas, 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire. 1982. L’expansion d’une catégorie grammaticale: le déterminant la , in: C. Lefebvre, H. Magloire-Holly & N. Piou (eds.): Syntaxe de l’haïtien, Ann Arbor: Karoma, 21–63.Google Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian. 1985. Definites, in: Journal of Semantics (4), 279–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magri, Giorgio. 2014. An account for the homogeneity effects triggered by plural definites and conjunction based on double strengthening. In Salvatore Pistoia Reda (ed.), Pragmatics, semantics and the case of scalar implicatures Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition, 99–145. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mathieu, Eric. 2014. Many a plural. In Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn & Joost Zwarts (Eds.), Weak referentiality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 157–181.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary. 1979. Existential sentences in English. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter. 2007. “Jamaican Patwa (Creole English).” dans John A. Holm and Peter L. Patrick, eds., Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars. London: Battlebridge Press, 127–152.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1905. On Denoting, in: Mind (14), 479–493 [reprinted in G. Ostertag ed. 1998: Definite Descriptions − A Reader, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 35–49].Google Scholar
Schwarz, Florian. 2009. Two Types of Definites in Natural Language, PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Schang, E. 2013. Extended Projections in a Guadeloupean TAG Grammar. HMGE 13, Proceedings of ESSLLI 2013. Düsseldorf, August 2013.
Schwarz, Florian. 2013. Different Types of Definites Crosslinguistically. Language and Linguistics Compass Volume 7, Issue 10, pages 534–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Andrew, Hooi Ling Soh & Hiroki Nomoto. 2011. Bare Classifiers and Definiteness. In Studies in Language 35:1, 168–193. John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. 1950. On referring. Mind 591, 320–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Syea, Anand. 2007. ‘The development of the Noun Phrase in Mauritian Creole and the mechanisms of language development’ dans The making of Mauritian Creole ed. by P. Baker & G. Fon Sing. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Sylvain, Suzanne. 1936. Le créole Haïtien: Morphologie et Syntaxe. (Wetteren, Belgium: Imprimerie de Meester, 1936. Pp. 180).Google Scholar
Wiesinger, Evelyn. 2017. Le syntagme nominal en créole guyanais. Une étude synchronique et diachronique du marqueur LA, Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Wespel, Johannes. 2008. Descriptions and their domains: the patterns of definiteness marking in French-related creoles. Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne & Herby Glaude. 2007. Bare NPs and deficient DPs in Haitian Creole and French: from morphosyntax to referent construal’. in Noun phrases in Creole languages, M. Baptista & J. Guéron eds., 265–98. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zucchi, Alessandro. 1995. The ingredients of definiteness and the definiteness effect. Natural Language Semantics 31:33–S78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Albers, Ulrike
2024. A three-way distinction in definiteness: sortal, individual, and functional concepts in Réyoné. Linguistics 0:0 DOI logo
Peltier, Joy P. G.
2024. Noun phrases in Kwéyòl Donmnik. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.