Transparency and language contact
The case of Haitian Creole, French, and Fongbe
When communicating speakers map meaning onto form. It would thus seem obvious for languages to show a one-to-one
correspondence between meaning and form, but this is often not the case. This perfect mapping, i.e. transparency, is indeed continuously
violated in natural languages, giving rise to zero-to-one, one-to-many, and many-to-one opaque correspondences between meaning and form.
However, transparency is a mutating feature, which can be influenced by language contact. In this scenario languages tend to evolve and lose
some of their opaque features, becoming more transparent. This study investigates transparency in a very specific contact situation, namely
that of a creole, Haitian Creole, and its sub- and superstrate languages, Fongbe and French, within the Functional Discourse Grammar
framework. We predict Haitian Creole to be more transparent than French and Fongbe and investigate twenty opacity features, divided into
four categories, namely Redundancy (one-to-many), Fusion (many-to-one), Discontinuity (one meaning is split in two or more forms,) and
Form-based Form (forms with no semantic counterpart: zero-to-one). The results indeed prove our prediction to be borne out: Haitian Creole
only presents five opacity features out of twenty, while French presents nineteen and Fongbe nine. Furthermore, the opacity features of
Haitian Creole are also present in the other two languages.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Transparency
- 2.1Functional Discourse Grammar
- 2.2Transparency in FDG
- 2.3Transparency and creoles
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Redundancy
- 3.1.1Clausal Agreement and Cross-Reference
- 3.1.2Phrasal agreement
- 3.1.3Concord
- 3.1.4Tense copying
- 3.2Discontinuity
- 3.2.1Extraposition and/or Extraction
- 3.2.2Raising
- 3.2.3Circumfixes and circumpositions
- 3.2.4Infixes
- 3.2.5Non-parallel alignment
- 3.3Fusion
- 3.3.1Cumulation of TAME and case
- 3.3.2Morphologically conditioned stem alternation: Suppletion
- 3.3.3Morphologically conditioned stem alternation: Irregular stem formation
- 3.4Form-based form
- 3.4.1Grammatical gender
- 3.4.2Syntactic alignment
- 3.4.3Nominal expletives
- 3.4.4Influence of complexity in word order or heavy shift
- 3.4.5Predominantly head marking
- 3.4.6Morphophonologically conditioned stem alternation
- 3.4.7Morpho(phono)logically conditioned affix alternation or conjugation and declension
- 3.5Summary of all transparency features
- 4.Results
- 4.1Redundancy
- 4.2Discontinuity
- 4.3Fusion
- 4.4Form-based form
- 4.5Summary
- 5.Discussion and conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2012 Languages of the Amazon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A. & Dan I. Slobin
1985 Acquisition of Turkish. In
Dan I. Slobin (ed),
The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 1. The data, 839–878. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Arends, Jacques, Pieter Muysken, & Norval Smith
1995 Pidgins and Creoles: An Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Audring, Jenny
2009 Gender assignment and gender agreement.
Morphology 181: 93–116.
Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall & Ingo Plag
Bauer, Laurie
2003 Introducing linguistic morphology (Second Edition). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Bickel, Balthasar
2011 Grammatical relations typology. In
Song, Jae J. (ed.),
The Oxford Handbook Of Linguistic Typology, 399–444. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blasi, D. E., Michaelis, S. M., & Haspelmath, M.
2017 Grammars are robustly transmitted even during the emergence of creole languages.
Nature Human Behaviour 1(10). 723–729.
Blom, Elma, Daniela Polišenská, & Fred Weerman
2008 Articles, adjectives and age of onset: The acquisition of Dutch grammatical gender.
Second Language Research 241. 297–331.
Bonenfant, Jacques L.
2011 History of Haitian Creole: from Pidgin to Lingua Franca and English Influence on the Language.
Review of Higher Education and Self-Learning 4(11). 27–34.
Corbett, Greville G.
2006 Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davis, William D. & Stanley Dubinsky
2004 The Grammar of Raising and Control: A Course in Syntactic Argumentation. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
DeGraff, Michel
2001 Kreyòl Ayisien. In
John Holm &
Peter L. Patrick (eds.),
Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars. London: Battlebridge Pubblications.
Dereau, Léon
1995 Cours de Kikongo. Namur: Wesmael-Charlier.
Dik, Simon C.
1978 Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Downing, Laura J. & Barbara Stiebels
2012 Iconicity*. In
Jochen Trommer (ed.),
The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence, 379–426. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Durie, Mark
1985 A grammar of Acehnese: On the basis of a dialect of North Aceh. Dordrecht-Holland/Cinnaminson-USA: Foris Publications.
Gess, Randall, Chantal Lyche & Trudel Meisenburg
Glaude, Herby
2012 Aspects de la syntaxe de l’Haïtien. Paris: Anibwé.
Hall, Robert A.
1966 Pidgin and Creoles Languages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hengeveld, Kees
2007 Parts-of-speech systems and morphological types,
ACLC Working Papers 2(1). 31–48.
Hengeveld, Kees
2011a Transparency in Functional Discourse Grammar.
Linguistics in Amsterdam 41. 1–22.
Hengeveld, Kees
2011b Epilogue: Degrees of transparency.
Linguistics in Amsterdam 4(2). 110–114.
Hengeveld, Kees & Lachlan J. Mackenzie
2008 Functional Discourse Grammar: a Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jespersen, Otto
1917 Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst.
Kusters, Wouter
2003 Linguistic complexity: The influence of social change on verbal inflection. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Langacker, Ronald
1977 Syntactic reanalysis. In
Charles Li (ed.),
Mechanisms of syntactic change, 56–139. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Lass, Roger
1997 Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lefebvre, Claire, Hélène Magliore-Holly, & Nanie Piou
1982 Syntaxe de l’Haïtien. USA: Karoma Publishers INC.
Lefebvre, Claire & Anne-Marie Brousseau
2002 A Grammar of Fongbe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Leufkens, Sterre
2015 Transparency in Language: A Typological Study. Utrecht: LOT.
Lightfoot, David W.
1979 Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lupyan, Gary & Rick Dale
2010 Language structure is partly determined by social structure,
PLoS ONE 5 (1). 1–10.
McWorther, John H.
1998 Identifying the creole prototype: vindicating a typological class.
Language 74, No. 4. 788–818.
McWhorter, John
2001 The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars.
Linguistic Typology 51. 125–166.
McWhorter, John H.
2011 Linguistic Simplicity and Complexity. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Miestamo, Matti
2006 On the feasibility of complexity metrics, In
Kerge Krista &
Maria Maren Sepper (eds.),
FinEst Linguistics: Conference Proceeding of The Annual Finnish and Estonian Conference of Linguistics May 6–7 2004, Eesti Filoloogia Osakonna Toimtited 81, 11–26. Tallinn: TLÜ
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
2015 Pidgin and Creole Languages.
International Encyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (Second Edition). 133–145. Oxford: Elsevier.
Omar, Margaret
1973 The acquisition of Egyptian Arabic as a native language. The Hague: Mouton.
Peterson, John
2011 A grammar of Kharia. A South Munda language. Leiden: Brill.
Seuren, Pieter & Herman Wekker
Siegel, Jeff
2008 The emergence of pidgin and creole languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slobin, Dan I.
1977 Language change in childhood and history. In
John Macnamara (ed.),
Language Learning and Language Thought. New York: Academic Press. 185–214.
Trudgill, Peter
2011 Sociolinguistic typology: social determinants of linguistics complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Valdman, Albert
2015 Haitian Creole: Structure, Variation, Status, Origin. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
Velde, Freek van de
2012 PP extraction and extraposition in Functional Discourse Grammar,
Language Sciences 341. 433–454.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.