Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 36:2 (2021) ► pp.336–361

‘Fact type’ complementizer in Guadeloupean Creole

 | University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy
This paper aims to give account of the distribution in Guadeloupean Creole of the form of the complementizer kè. It claims that it has a specific distribution, as it seems to appear in opposition to the zero form. Besides a sociolinguistic component, the presence of kè is associable with the fact type semantics of the completive event (Dixon 2006), and so do other grammatical functions and markers that are featured in the completive clauses when kè is present, such as independent TAM markers on the verb and the obligatory featuring of a subject form in case of subject coreference.
Keywords: Guadeloupean Creole, complementizers, completive clause, fact type, potential type
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical and methodological framework
    • 2.1Fact type, activity type and potential type complements
    • 2.2The complement-taking predicates
    • 2.3The collection of data
  • 3.The syntax of the fact-type and potential-type completive clause in gc
    • 3.1The distribution of the forms of complementizers
    • 3.2Values and percentage of the distribution of kè
    • 3.3Complementizers and other elements in the languages of the Balkan League
    • 3.4The distribution of TAM markers on the main and completive verbs
    • 3.5Subject coreference
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Bibliographic references
Published online: 14 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00078.tra
References (46)
Bibliographic references
Aboh, Enoch. 2002. Morphosyntax of the left periphery in Saramaccan and Gbe. Paper presented at the Conference of the Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics. SPCL, San Francisco.
. 2006. Complementiation in Saramaccan and Gungbe: the case of C-type modal particles. Natural language and linguistic Theory 24 (1), 1–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Philip. 1972. Kreol. A Description of a Mauritian Creole. London: Hurst & Company.Google Scholar
Banfi, Emanuele. 1985. Linguistica balcanica. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Bernabé, Jean. 1983. Fondal-Natal. Grammaire basilectale approchée des créoles guadeloupéen et martiniquais (1–3), Paris: Harmattan.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1981. Roots of Language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper. 2010. Reference and clausal perception-verb complements. Linguistics 48(2), 391–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Petar Kehayov (eds.). 2016. Complementizer semantics in European languages. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Francis. 1987. Grammatical Relations in a Radical Creole. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1986. On Conditionals. In Comrie, Bernard, Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, Ter Meulen, Alice, Snitzer Reilly, Judy, Ferguson, Charles A. Conditionals: a typology, 77–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damoiseau, Robert. 1999. Éléments de grammaire comparée français-créole martiniquais. Paris: Ibis Rouge.Google Scholar
Damonte, Federico. 2002. The complementizer layer in Saramaccan. In Leonetti, M., Fernandez, Soriano O., Escandell Vidal, V. (eds.), Current issues in Generative Grammar: 10th Colloquium on Generative Grammar, Selected Papers, 31–50. Universidad de Alcalà, Alcalà de Henares.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon Cornelis & Kees Hengeveld. 1991. The hierarchical structure of the clause and the typology of perception-verb complements. Linguistics 291, 231–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dionne, Claude. 2007. La complémentation en créole martiniquaise. MA Thesis. Montreal: Université du Québec.
Dixon, Robert Malcolm Ward. 2006. Complement clauses and complementation strategies in typological perspective. In Dixon, Robert Malcolm Ward & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), Complementation. A cross-linguistic typology, 1–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor & Brian Joseph. 2017. The Balkan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2005. The CP and split CP cross–linguistically. Word 551, 369–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.. [1981] 2001. Syntax, An Introduction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom. 2008. Quotative Indexes in African Languages : A synchronic and diachronic survey. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 341. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania, Kuteva. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 2015. [URL], Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Iatridou, Sabine. 2000. The Grammatical Ingredients of Countefactuality. Language Inquiry 31 (2), 231–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Bert, Koopman, Hilda, Muysken, Pieter. 1978. Serial verbs in the Creole languages. Amsterdam Creole Studies, 125–159.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian. 2016. The semantics and syntax of complementation markers as an areal phenomenon in the Balkans, with special attention to Albanian. In Boye, Kasper & Petar Kehayov. (eds.), Complementizer semantics in European Languages, 265–292. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In Bierwisch, Manfred & Heidolph, Karl Erich (eds.), Progress in Linguistics, 143–173. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Hilda. 1986. The genesis of Haitian: Implications of a comparison of some features of the syntax of Haitian, French and West African languages. In Muysken, Pieter et al. (ed.), Universals versus substrata in Creole genesis, 231–259. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Hilda & Claire, Lefebvre. 1982. Pu marqueur de mode, préposition et complémenteur. In Lefebvre, Claire & Magloire-Holly, Hélène, Piou, Nanie (eds.), Syntaxe de l’haïtien, 64–91. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire & Virginie, Loranger. 2006. On the properties of Saramaccan fu; synchronic and diachronic perspective. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 21 (2), 275–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne. 2016. Complex sentences in pidgin and creole languages. Conference paper (03/05/2016) Paris: Labex.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne Maria, & Philippe, Maurer, Martin, Haspelmath, Magnus Huber. 2013. Apics Online ([URL]).
Mufwene, Salikoko & Dijkhoff, Martha. 1989. On the so called ‘infinitive’ in Atlantic Creoles, Lingua 771, 319–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 1985. Complementation. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language Typology and syntactic description, 21, 42–141. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank. 2001. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 1993. Sentential complements in Sranan: on the formation of an English-based Creole language. Niemeyer: Tübingen.Google Scholar
. 1995. The emergence of taki as a complementizer in Sranan: on substrate influence, universals and gradual creolization. In Arends, J. (ed.). The early stages of creolization, 113–148. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rochette, Anne. 1988. Semantic and syntactic aspects of romance sentential complementation. PhD Thesis, Cambridge MA: MIT.
Sampanis, Kostantinos. 2013. Summary of “A diachronic and typological approach to the Modern Greek subjunctive complementation”, Journal of Greek Linguistics 131, 165–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandfeld, Kristian. 1930. Linguistique balkanique. Problèmes et résultats. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Schüle, Susanne. 2000. Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language, PhD thesis, University of Tübingen.
Siegel, Jeff. 2000. Substrate influence in Hawai’i Creole English. Language in Society 291, 197–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simone, Raffaele. 2002. Dual complementizers in a language without infinitive. In Jansen, Henrike (ed.), Infinito e oltre, 439–462. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Sterlin, Marie Denise. 1989. Les caractéristiques de pou: un modal en position de complémenteur. Revue québécoise de linguistique 181, 21, 131–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veenstra, Tonjes. 1996. Serial verbs in Saramaccan. Predication and Creole Genesis, HIL dissertations, The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca/NewYork, Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald. 1985. The syntax of fi complements in Caribbean English Creoles. Language 611, 588–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald & Bettina, Migge. 2013. Fact-type complements in Gbe and Surinamese Creole, Lingua 1291, 9–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar