Cover not available
Review published In:
Substrate Influence in Creole Formation
Edited by Bettina Migge and Norval Smith
[Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 22:1] 2007
► pp. 170–176
Book review

John McWhorter. Defining creole. John McWhorter. Oxford University Press, 2005. 351 pp. Hardback. $49.00

Reviewed by
 | Universiteit van Amsterdam
Published online: 6 April 2007
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.22.1.16ans
References (17)
References
Ansaldo, U. (2004). The evolution of Singapore English. Finding the matrix. In L. Lim (Ed.). Singapore English. A grammatical description (pp. 127–149). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(in preparation). A social and structural typology of contact languages. Cambridge University Press.
Ansaldo, U. and Matthews, S. J. (2001). Typical creoles and simple languages. The case of Simitic. Linguistic Typology, 5.2/3, 311–326.Google Scholar
(eds.) (forthcoming). Deconstructing creole: Studies in language companion series. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Arends, J. (2001). Social stratification and network relations in the formation of Sranan. In N. Smith and T. Veenstra (Eds.). Creolization and contact (pp. 291–307). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Dahl, O. (2004). The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, M. (2005). Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of creole exceptionalism. Language in Society, 341, 533–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gil, D. (2001). Creoles, complexity and Riau Indonesian. Linguistic Typology, 5.2/3, 125–156.Google Scholar
Givon, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. (1998). Identifying the creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class. Language, 741, 788–818. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). The world’s simplest grammars are Creole grammars. Linguistic Typology, 5.2/3, 125–156.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. (2001). The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P. (1990). Are creoles a special type of language? In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey Vol. II. Linguistic theory: extensions and implications (pp. 285–301). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2005). What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis? Commentary on Wunderlich. Studies in Language, 28.3, 641–644.Google Scholar
Winkler, E. G. (2005). Review of J. H. McWhorter 2005. Defining Creole. Oxford University Press. Linguist List, 161.1853.Google Scholar