Book review
John McWhorter. Defining creole. John McWhorter. Oxford University Press, 2005. 351 pp. Hardback. $49.00
References (17)
References
Ansaldo, U. (in preparation). A social and structural typology of contact languages. Cambridge University Press.
Ansaldo, U. and Matthews, S. J. (2001). Typical creoles and simple languages. The case of Simitic. Linguistic Typology, 5.2/3, 311–326.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeGraff, M. (2005). Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of creole exceptionalism. Language in Society, 341, 533–591. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gil, D. (2001). Creoles, complexity and Riau Indonesian. Linguistic Typology, 5.2/3, 125–156.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givon, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McWhorter, J. (1998). Identifying the creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class. Language, 741, 788–818. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McWhorter, J. (2001). The world’s simplest grammars are Creole grammars. Linguistic Typology, 5.2/3, 125–156.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mufwene, S. (2001). The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Muysken, P. (1990). Are creoles a special type of language? In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey Vol. II. Linguistic theory: extensions and implications (pp. 285–301). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, M. (2005). What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis? Commentary on Wunderlich. Studies in Language, 28.3, 641–644.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winkler, E. G. (2005). Review of J. H. McWhorter 2005. Defining Creole. Oxford University Press. Linguist List, 161.1853.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)