Selectional factors in pronominal system formation
Evidence from Fiji’s two pidgins
Creolists have long debated the role of sociocultural ecologies and superstrate/substrate typology in the formation of new contact languages. The present study broadens this discussion by examining the pronominal systems of two pidgins that formed in Fiji – Pidgin Hindustani and Pidgin Fijian. Both pidgins have smaller pronoun paradigms than do their lexifiers, but differ in the kind and degree of restructuring they exhibit. This study conducts a systematic typological comparison of the languages present in the feature pools of both pidgins, in search of selectional factors that shaped their systems of person reference. I argue that within this grammatical subdomain, Pidgin Hindustani and Pidgin Fijian each lend support to different models of pidgin formation, suggesting that pidginization is not a single deterministic process with a prototypical typological outcome.
Article outline
- 1.Background: Pidgins and theories of contact language formation
- 2.Feature pools for Fiji’s pidgins
- 2.1A linguistic history of Fiji
- 2.2General assumptions in modelling feature pools
- 2.3Feature pools
- 3.Four Fijian language varieties and their pronoun systems
- 3.1Fijian personal pronouns
- 3.2Pidgin Fijian personal pronouns
- 3.3Fiji Hindi personal pronouns
- 3.4Pidgin Hindustani personal pronouns
- 4.Discussion
- 4.1Comparing the pronominal systems of Pidgin Fijian and Pidgin Hindustani
- 4.2A typology of theories of contact language formation
- 4.3Proposing six models
- 4.4Evaluating the six models
- 4.5Two proposals on selectional factors
- 5.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References